The DOI matches its Crossref record; 51 of the 51 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial
Open accessAbstract
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a highly heterogeneous disease, and molecular subtyping may result in improved diagnostic precision and targeted therapies. Our previous study classified TNBCs into four subtypes with putative therapeutic targets. Here, we conducted the FUTURE trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03805399), a phase Ib/II subtyping-based and genomic biomarker-guided umbrella trial, to evaluate the efficacy of these targets. Patients with refractory metastatic TNBC were enrolled and stratified by TNBC subtypes and genomic biomarkers, and assigned to one of these seven arms: (A) pyrotinib with capecitabine, (B) androgen receptor inhibitor with CDK4/6 inhibitor, (C) anti PD-1 with nab-paclitaxel, (D) PARP inhibitor included, (E) and (F) anti-VEGFR included, or (G) mTOR inhibitor with nab-paclitaxel. The primary end point was the objective response rate (ORR). We enrolled 69 refractory metastatic TNBC patients with a median of three previous lines of therapy (range, 1–8). Objective response was achieved in 20 (29.0%, 95% confidence interval (CI): 18.7%–41.2%) of the 69 intention-to-treat (ITT) patients. Our results showed that immunotherapy (arm C), in particular, achieved the highest ORR (52.6%, 95% CI: 28.9%–75.6%) in the ITT population. Arm E demonstrated favorable ORR (26.1%, 95% CI: 10.2%–48.4% in the ITT population) but with more high grade (≥ 3) adverse events. Somatic mutations of TOP2A and CD8 immunohistochemical score may have the potential to predict immunotherapy response in the immunomodulatory subtype of TNBC. In conclusion, the phase Ib/II FUTURE trial suggested a new concept for TNBC treatment, demonstrating the clinical benefit of subtyping-based targeted therapy for refractory metastatic TNBC.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
PD-1 and PD-L1 Immune Checkpoint Blockade to Treat Breast Cancer
Hartkopf, A. D., Taran, F.-A., Wallwiener, M., Walter, C. B., Krämer, B., Grischke, E.-M., & Brucker, S. Y. (2016) · Breast Care · doi:10.1159/000453569 · Cited by 30,845
Comprehensive molecular portraits of human breast tumours
The Cancer Genome Atlas Network (2012) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature11412 · Cited by 12,129
Lehmann, B. D., Bauer, J. A., Chen, X., Sanders, M. E., Chakravarthy, A. B., Shyr, Y., & Pietenpol, J. A. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Investigation · doi:10.1172/jci45014 · Cited by 5,592
Breast Cancer Treatment: A Review
Waks, A. G., & Winer, E. P. (2019) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.2018.19323 · Cited by 4,804
Atezolizumab and nab-paclitaxel in advanced triple-negative breast cancer
Schmid, P., Adams, S., Rugo, H. S., Schneeweiss, A., Barrios, C. H., Iwata, H., Diéras, V., Hegg, R., Im, S.-A., Shaw Wright, G., et al. (2018) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmoa1809615 · Cited by 4,350
Zehir, A., Benayed, R., Shah, R. H., Syed, A., Middha, S., Kim, H. R., Srinivasan, P., Gao, J., Chakravarty, D., Devlin, S. M., et al. (2017) · Nature Medicine · doi:10.1038/nm.4333 · Cited by 3,380
Triple-negative breast cancer: challenges and opportunities of a heterogeneous disease
Bianchini, G., Balko, J. M., Mayer, I. A., Sanders, M. E., & Gianni, L. (2016) · Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1038/nrclinonc.2016.66 · Cited by 3,079
Harbeck, N., & Gnant, M. (2017) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(16)31891-8 · Cited by 2,280
Denkert, C., von Minckwitz, G., Darb-Esfahani, S., Lederer, B., Heppner, B. I., Weber, K. E., Budczies, J., Huober, J., Klauschen, F., Furlanetto, J., et al. (2018) · The Lancet Oncology · doi:10.1016/s1470-2045(17)30904-x · Cited by 2,157
Pembrolizumab in Patients With Advanced Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: Phase Ib KEYNOTE-012 Study
Nanda, R., Chow, L. Q. M., Dees, E. C., Berger, R., Gupta, S., Geva, R., Pusztai, L., Pathiraja, K., Aktan, G., Cheng, J. D., et al. (2016) · Journal of Clinical Oncology · doi:10.1200/jco.2015.64.8931 · Cited by 1,477
Cited by
Yang, F., Xiao, Y., Ding, J.-H., Jin, X., Ma, D., Li, D.-Q., Shi, J.-X., Huang, W., Wang, Y.-P., Jiang, Y.-Z., et al. (2023) · Cell Metabolism · doi:10.1016/j.cmet.2022.09.021 · Cited by 624
Self-citationRecent advances in targeted strategies for triple-negative breast cancer
Zhu, S., Wu, Y., Song, B., Yi, M., Yan, Y., Mei, Q., & Wu, K. (2023) · Journal of Hematology & Oncology · doi:10.1186/s13045-023-01497-3 · Cited by 331
Multi-omic integration via similarity network fusion to detect molecular subtypes of ageing
Yang, M., Matan-Lithwick, S., Wang, Y., De Jager, P. L., Bennett, D. A., & Felsky, D. (2023) · Brain Communications · doi:10.1093/braincomms/fcad110 · Cited by 35
Metadata
- Authors
- Jiang, Y.-Z., Liu, Y., Xiao, Y., Hu, X., Jiang, L., Zuo, W.-J., Ma, D., Ding, J., Zhu, X., Zou, J., Verschraegen, C., Stover, D. G., Kaklamani, V., Wang, Z.-H., & Shao, Z.-M.
- Venue
- Cell Research
- Published
- 2020-07-27
- Volume
- 31
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 178-186
- ISSN
- 1001-0602 (ISSN-L)
- 1748-7838
- OpenAlex
- W3044428842
- Cited by
- 298
- References
- 51
- FWCI
- 11.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41422-020-0375-9
- The paper
- Jiang, Y.-Z., Liu, Y., Xiao, Y., Hu, X., Jiang, L., Zuo, W.-J., Ma, D., Ding, J., Zhu, X., Zou, J., Verschraegen, C., Stover, D. G., Kaklamani, V., Wang, Z.-H., & Shao, Z.-M. (2021). Molecular subtyping and genomic profiling expand precision medicine in refractory metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: the FUTURE trial. Cell Research. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41422-020-0375-9
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
