Cited by 99Body Composition Measurement TechniquesElectrical and Bioimpedance TomographyHemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy

Lack of agreement of in vivo raw bioimpedance measurements obtained from two single and multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance devices

Open access
Silva, Analiza M., Matias, Catarina N., Nunes, Catarina L., Santos, Diana A., Marini, Elisabetta, Lukaski, Henry C., Sardinha, Luís B.·2019·European Journal of Clinical Nutrition

Abstract

Background It is important for highly active individuals to accurately assess their hydration level. Bioelectrical impedance (BIA) can potentially meet these needs but its validity in active individuals is not well established.Methods We compared whole-body bioimpedance measurements obtained from multi-frequency bioelectrical impedance spectroscopy (BIS, Xitron 4200) at a 50 kHz frequency with those determined by a phase-sensitive single-frequency device (SF-BIA, BIA-101, RJL/Akern Systems) in two populations: active adults and elite athletes.Results One hundred twenty-six participants, including active males involved in recreational sports (N = 25, 20-39 yr) and elite athletes (females: N = 26, 18-35 yr; males: N = 75, 18-38 yr) participated in this study. Reactance (Xc), Resistance (R), Impedance (Z), and phase angle (PhA) were obtained by BIS and SF-BIA. Small but significant differences (R: -9.91 ± 15.09 Ω; Xc: -0.97 ± 2.56 Ω; Z: -9.96 ± 15.18 Ω; PhA: 0.12 ± 0.2°) were observed between the bioimpedance equipment in all measured variables (p < 0.05) though differences were within the devices' technical error of measurements. Device-specific values were highly (p < 0.0001) correlated [R 2 ranged from 0.881 (Xc) to 0.833 (R)], but slopes and intercepts were different (p < 0.0001) from 1 and 0, respectively. Relatively large limits of agreement were observed for R (-40 to 21 Ω), Xc (-6 to 4 Ω), PhA (-0.4 to 0.5°), and impedance (-40 to 20 Ω).Conclusion Bioimpedance measurements from the current single- and multi-frequency devices should not be used interchangeably. The of lack of agreement between devices was observed in determining individual values of R, Xc, Z and PhA of highly active populations possibly due to methodological and biological factors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41430-018-0355-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There is a lack of agreement between bioelectrical values obtained at different frequencies.

    “considering the lack of agreement between bioelectrical values obtained at different frequencies [21, 107]”

    From High-standard predictive equations for estimating body composition using bioelectrical impedance analysis: a systematic review (2024) · cites this paper as [107]

    The Discussion (p. 11) reports a lack of agreement between two devices in a highly active population, but specifies that their values were compared at the same frequency, 50 kHz. The paper does not establish a lack of agreement between values obtained at different frequencies. (LLM, conf=0.89)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 36 · Cited by 99

Research works printed but not linked: 6

  1. [3]3. pre-school children. Clin Nutr. 2012;31(1):144-8. 353
  2. [28]28. Ward LC, Byrne NM, Rutter K, Hennoste L, Hills AP, Cornish BH, et al. Reliability 397 - of multiple frequency bioelectrical impedance analysis: An intermachine comparison. 398 - American journal of human biology : the official journal of the Human Biology Council. 399 - 1997;9(1):63-72. 400
  3. [2]2. error in bioimpedance spectroscopy. Physiological measurement. 1998;19(2):235-45. 402
  4. [9]9. by bioelectrical impedance? International Journal Of Obesity. 1997;21:1085. 409
  5. [12]12. players. International journal of sports physiology and performance. 2014;9(3):532-9. 412
  6. [35]35. Nescolarde L, Lukaski H, De Lorenzo A, de-Mateo-Silleras B, Redondo-Del-Rio MP, 419 - Camina-Martin MA. Different displacement of bioimpedance vector due to Ag/AgCl 420 - electrode effect. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2016;70(12):1401-7. 421 422 423 424

Authors
Silva, A. M., Matias, C. N., Nunes, C. L., Santos, D. A., Marini, E., Lukaski, H. C., & Sardinha, L. B.
Affiliations
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
  • University of Cagliari (IT)
  • University of North Dakota (US)
Corresponding author
Silva, Analiza M.
Venue
European Journal of Clinical Nutrition
Published
2018-10-22
Volume
73
Issue
7
Pages
1077-1083
ISSN
  • 0954-3007 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5640
OpenAlex
W2897420011
Cited by
99
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 11 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 15 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 12 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 1
FWCI
7.54
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Clinical Nutrition (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • UNICA IRIS Institutional Research Information System (University of Cagliari) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Ministry of Education and Science | Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (PTDC/DES/69495/2006, PTDC/DES/098963/2008, SFRH/BPD/92462/2013)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Body Composition Measurement Techniques
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Electrical and Bioimpedance Tomography
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Hemodynamic Monitoring and Therapy
Keywords
bioimpedance, bioimpedance spectroscopy, hydration status, device agreement, elite athletes, physically active adults, body resistance, reactance, phase angle, measurement error
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Dehydration, Equipment Design, Female, Humans, Male, Reproducibility of Results, Electric Impedance, Young Adult, Athletes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review