Cited by 138Genomics and Rare DiseasesGenomic variations and chromosomal abnormalitiesPrenatal Screening and Diagnostics

Periodic reanalysis of whole-genome sequencing data enhances the diagnostic advantage over standard clinical genetic testing

Open access
Costain, Gregory, Jobling, Rebekah, Walker, Susan, Reuter, Miriam S., Snell, Meaghan, Bowdin, Sarah, Cohn, Ronald D., Dupuis, Lucie +11 more·2018·European Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a first-tier diagnostic test could transform medical genetic assessments, but there are limited data regarding its clinical use. We previously showed that WGS could feasibly be deployed as a single molecular test capable of a higher diagnostic rate than current practices, in a prospectively recruited cohort of 100 children meeting criteria for chromosomal microarray analysis. In this study, we report on the added diagnostic yield with re-annotation and reanalysis of these WGS data ~2 years later. Explanatory variants have been discovered in seven (10.9%) of 64 previously undiagnosed cases, in emerging disease genes like HMGA2. No new genetic diagnoses were made by any other method in the interval period as part of ongoing clinical care. The results increase the cumulative diagnostic yield of WGS in the study cohort to 41%. This represents a greater than 5-fold increase over the chromosomal microarrays, and a greater than 3-fold increase over all the clinical genetic testing ordered in practice. These findings highlight periodic reanalysis as yet another advantage of genomic sequencing in heterogeneous disorders. We recommend reanalysis of an individual's genome-wide sequencing data every 1-2 years until diagnosis, or sooner if their phenotype evolves.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41431-018-0114-6

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • This is consistent with multiple recent studies that have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24-36 months.

    “This is consistent with multiple recent studies that have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24–36 months.10”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Costain, G., Jobling, R., Walker, S., Reuter, M. S., Snell, M., Bowdin, S., Cohn, R. D., Dupuis, L., Hewson, S., Mercimek-Andrews, S., Shuman, C., Sondheimer, N., Weksberg, R., Yoon, G., Meyn, M. S., Stavropoulos, D. J., Scherer, S. W., Mendoza-Londono, R., & Marshall, C. R.
Affiliations
  • Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Marshall, Christian R.
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2018-02-16
Volume
26
Issue
5
Pages
740-744
ISSN
  • 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5438
OpenAlex
W2794029549
Cited by
138
References
2
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7
FWCI
9.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • GlaxoSmithKline
  • Genome Canada
  • University of Toronto
  • Hospital for Sick Children
  • Canadian Institutes of Health Research
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
Keywords
whole genome sequencing, re-annotation, diagnostic yield, children, HMGA2, undiagnosed cases, clinical genetic testing
MeSH terms
Whole Genome Sequencing, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Microarray Analysis, Pathology, Molecular

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review