Periodic reanalysis of whole-genome sequencing data enhances the diagnostic advantage over standard clinical genetic testing
Open accessAbstract
Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) as a first-tier diagnostic test could transform medical genetic assessments, but there are limited data regarding its clinical use. We previously showed that WGS could feasibly be deployed as a single molecular test capable of a higher diagnostic rate than current practices, in a prospectively recruited cohort of 100 children meeting criteria for chromosomal microarray analysis. In this study, we report on the added diagnostic yield with re-annotation and reanalysis of these WGS data ~2 years later. Explanatory variants have been discovered in seven (10.9%) of 64 previously undiagnosed cases, in emerging disease genes like HMGA2. No new genetic diagnoses were made by any other method in the interval period as part of ongoing clinical care. The results increase the cumulative diagnostic yield of WGS in the study cohort to 41%. This represents a greater than 5-fold increase over the chromosomal microarrays, and a greater than 3-fold increase over all the clinical genetic testing ordered in practice. These findings highlight periodic reanalysis as yet another advantage of genomic sequencing in heterogeneous disorders. We recommend reanalysis of an individual's genome-wide sequencing data every 1-2 years until diagnosis, or sooner if their phenotype evolves.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
This is consistent with multiple recent studies that have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24-36 months.
“This is consistent with multiple recent studies that have shown increases of up to 10% in diagnostic yield with reanalysis within 24–36 months.10”
From Genome sequencing in persistently unsolved white matter disorders (2020) · cites this paper as [10]
Cites
Richards, S., Aziz, N., Bale, S., Bick, D., Das, S., Gastier-Foster, J., Grody, W. W., Hegde, M., Lyon, E., Spector, E., et al. (2015) · Genetics in Medicine · doi:10.1038/gim.2015.30 · Cited by 32,594 · see citing works
Genome sequencing identifies major causes of severe intellectual disability
Gilissen, C., Hehir-Kwa, J. Y., Thung, D. T., van de Vorst, M., van Bon, B. W. M., Willemsen, M. H., Kwint, M., Janssen, I. M., Hoischen, A., Schenck, A., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13394 · Cited by 1,125 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Clark, M. M., Hildreth, A., Batalov, S., Ding, Y., Chowdhury, S., Watkins, K., Ellsworth, K., Camp, B., Kint, C. I., Yacoubian, C., et al. (2019) · Science Translational Medicine · doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.aat6177 · Cited by 300 · see citing works
A large data resource of genomic copy number variation across neurodevelopmental disorders
Zarrei, M., Burton, C. L., Engchuan, W., Young, E. J., Higginbotham, E. J., MacDonald, J. R., Trost, B., Chan, A. J. S., Walker, S., Lamoureux, S., et al. (2019) · npj Genomic Medicine · doi:10.1038/s41525-019-0098-3 · Cited by 187 · see citing works
Self-citationGenome sequencing in persistently unsolved white matter disorders
Helman, G., Lajoie, B. R., Crawford, J., Takanohashi, A., Walkiewicz, M., Dolzhenko, E., Gross, A. M., Gainullin, V. G., Bent, S. J., Jenkinson, E. M., et al. (2020) · Annals of Clinical and Translational Neurology · doi:10.1002/acn3.50957 · Cited by 39 · see citing works
- Authors
- Costain, G., Jobling, R., Walker, S., Reuter, M. S., Snell, M., Bowdin, S., Cohn, R. D., Dupuis, L., Hewson, S., Mercimek-Andrews, S., Shuman, C., Sondheimer, N., Weksberg, R., Yoon, G., Meyn, M. S., Stavropoulos, D. J., Scherer, S. W., Mendoza-Londono, R., & Marshall, C. R.
- Affiliations
- Hospital for Sick Children (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Marshall, Christian R.
- ORCID
- Venue
- European Journal of Human Genetics
- Published
- 2018-02-16
- Volume
- 26
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 740-744
- ISSN
- 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
- 1476-5438
- PMC
- PMC5945683
- OpenAlex
- W2794029549
- Cited by
- 138
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 17 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 19 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 18 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 18 · 2018: 7
- FWCI
- 9.33
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- GlaxoSmithKline
- Genome Canada
- University of Toronto
- Hospital for Sick Children
- Canadian Institutes of Health Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomics and Rare Diseases
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genomic variations and chromosomal abnormalities
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health › Prenatal Screening and Diagnostics
- Keywords
- whole genome sequencing, re-annotation, diagnostic yield, children, HMGA2, undiagnosed cases, clinical genetic testing
- MeSH terms
- Whole Genome Sequencing, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Genetic Testing, Humans, Male, Genome, Human, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Genetic Predisposition to Disease, Genetic Diseases, Inborn, Microarray Analysis, Pathology, Molecular
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review