Cited by 6Digitalization, Law, and RegulationMedical and Health Sciences ResearchDigital Transformation in Law

Patients v. Myriad or the GDPR Access Right v. the EU Database Right

Open access
Bovenberg, Jasper A., Almeida, Mara·2019·European Journal of Human Genetics

Abstract

In 2016, four US cancer patients legally challenged Myriad by claiming full access to all genomic information produced in the course of Myriad's testing of their risks for a variety of cancers. Asserting that Myriad's refusal to provide them with this information violated the HIPAA Privacy Rule, the patients sought a determination of a right to access all their genetic information from testing laboratories. Such access would not only serve their own care, but also enable them to share their genetic data with the scientific community which they alleged Myriad failed to do. A similar case may be brought in Europe under the novel EU GDPR. Specifically, it would put the GDPR right of access to personal data against Myriad's database right under the EU Database Right Directive. The outcome of this case could impact the fate of personalized medicine, which depends on the one hand on patients' having control over their genetic data, and on the other hand on incentives for genetic testing companies to generate these data. We first address the issue of whether the GDPR applies to medical records. We then analyse how GDPR rights could play out in the context of clinical genetic testing and conclude that the GDPR access right stops short of granting unconditional access to all data generated in the process of testing, to the extent that its exercise would result in the violation of medical-professional norms, expose the testing company to potential liability, or compromise normal exploitation of the database of which the personal data form part.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41431-018-0258-4

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Unstructured data mostly requires NLP technique to be applied to make it structured and processable by computers.

    “On the other hand unstructured data mostly requires NLP (for hand written prescriptions) technique to be applied to make it structured (detail is provided in Section III) and processable by computers [90], [91].”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bovenberg, J. A., & Almeida, M.
Affiliations
  • Office of the Attorney General (US)
  • University of Lisbon (PT)
Corresponding author
  • Bovenberg, Jasper A.
  • Almeida, Mara
Venue
European Journal of Human Genetics
Published
2018-09-27
Volume
27
Issue
2
Pages
211-215
ISSN
  • 1018-4813 (ISSN-L)
  • 1476-5438
OpenAlex
W2893074747
Cited by
6
References
7
Citations by year
2024: 2 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1
FWCI
4.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Human Genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
EC | Horizon 2020 (643439)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Law › Digitalization, Law, and Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Medical and Health Sciences Research
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › General Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Digital Transformation in Law
Keywords
access rights, GDPR, EU Database Directive, database right, genetic data, clinical genetic testing, HIPAA Privacy Rule, personalized medicine, medical records, data protection law, patient data control
MeSH terms
Europe, Genetic Testing, Humans, Neoplasms, Computer Security, Access to Information, Patient Rights, Databases, Genetic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review