Cited by 367

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Screening for autosomal recessive and X-linked conditions during pregnancy and preconception: a practice resource of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG)

Gregg, Anthony R., Aarabi, Mahmoud, Klugman, Susan, Leach, Natalia T., Bashford, Michael T., Goldwaser, Tamar, Chen, Emily, Sparks, Teresa N., Reddi, Honey V., Rajkovic, Aleksandar, Dungan, Jeffrey S.·2021·Genetics in Medicine

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41436-021-01203-z

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 15

  1. 2017, National Tay-Sachs and Allied Diseases
  2. Kaback, 1993, Tay–Sachs disease—carrier screening, prenatal diagnosis, and the molecular era. An international perspective, 1970 to 1993. The International TSD Data Collection Network, JAMA, 270, 2307, 10.1001/jama.1993.03510190063028 · DOI
  3. 2020, National Human Genome Research Institute. The cost of sequencing a human genome
  4. Rehder, 2021, Next generation sequencing for constitutional variants in the clinical laboratory, 2021 revision: a technical standard of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), Genet. Med., 10.1038/s41436-021-01139-4 · DOI
  5. Burke, 2014, Genetic tests: clinical validity and clinical utility, Curr. Protoc. Hum. Genet., 81, 9.15.1
  6. ClinVar. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/clinvar/ (2021).
  7. 2021, BlueCross BlueShield Assocation
  8. 2000, Census, race and science, Nat. Genet., 24, 97, 10.1038/72884 · DOI
  9. Risch, 2002, Categorization of humans in biomedical research: genes, race and disease, Genome Biol, 3, 10.1186/gb-2002-3-7-comment2007 · DOI
  10. Brothers, 2021, Taking an antiracist posture in scientific publications in human genetics and genomics, Genet. Med., 23, 1004, 10.1038/s41436-021-01109-w · DOI
  11. Gross, 2008, Carrier screening in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish descent, Genet. Med., 10, 54, 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31815f247c · DOI
  12. Miller, 2021, ACMG SF v3.0 list for reporting of secondary findings in clinical exome and genome sequencing: a policy statement of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), Genet. Med.
  13. Murray, 2021, DNA-based screening and population health: a points to consider document for programs and sponsoring organizations from the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), Genet Med, 10.1038/s41436-020-01082-w · DOI
  14. OMIM. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/omim (2021).
  15. Witkop, 1990, Hermansky-Pudlak syndrome (HPS). An epidemiologic study, Ophthalmic Paediatr. Genet., 11, 245, 10.3109/13816819009020986 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Gregg, A. R., Aarabi, M., Klugman, S., Leach, N. T., Bashford, M. T., Goldwaser, T., Chen, E., Sparks, T. N., Reddi, H. V., Rajkovic, A., & Dungan, J. S.
Venue
Genetics in Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-10
Volume
23
Issue
10
Pages
1793-1806
ISSN
1098-3600
Cited by
367
References
4
Language
en
Update notices
erratum (2021-10-01)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review