The DOI matches its Crossref record; 65 of the 65 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Improving accuracies of genomic predictions for drought tolerance in maize by joint modeling of additive and dominance effects in multi-environment trials
Open accessAbstract
Breeding for drought tolerance is a challenging task that requires costly, extensive, and precise phenotyping. Genomic selection (GS) can be used to maximize selection efficiency and the genetic gains in maize (Zea mays L.) breeding programs for drought tolerance. Here, we evaluated the accuracy of genomic selection (GS) using additive (A) and additive + dominance (AD) models to predict the performance of untested maize single-cross hybrids for drought tolerance in multi-environment trials. Phenotypic data of five drought tolerance traits were measured in 308 hybrids along eight trials under water-stressed (WS) and well-watered (WW) conditions over two years and two locations in Brazil. Hybrids' genotypes were inferred based on their parents' genotypes (inbred lines) using single-nucleotide polymorphism markers obtained via genotyping-by-sequencing. GS analyses were performed using genomic best linear unbiased prediction by fitting a factor analytic (FA) multiplicative mixed model. Two cross-validation (CV) schemes were tested: CV1 and CV2. The FA framework allowed for investigating the stability of additive and dominance effects across environments, as well as the additive-by-environment and the dominance-by-environment interactions, with interesting applications for parental and hybrid selection. Results showed differences in the predictive accuracy between A and AD models, using both CV1 and CV2, for the five traits in both water conditions. For grain yield (GY) under WS and using CV1, the AD model doubled the predictive accuracy in comparison to the A model. Through CV2, GS models benefit from borrowing information of correlated trials, resulting in an increase of 40% and 9% in the predictive accuracy of GY under WS for A and AD models, respectively. These results highlight the importance of multi-environment trial analyses using GS models that incorporate additive and dominance effects for genomic predictions of GY under drought in maize single-cross hybrids.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“As reported in other studies in plants, the inclusion of dominance effects in traditional WGP–MET resulted in increased predictive accuracy in models based on GBLUP compared with other methods.”
From Nonlinear kernels, dominance, and envirotyping data increase the accuracy of genome-based prediction in multi-environment trials (2021) · cites this paper as Dias et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measuredThe source backs part of the claim, not all of it — or backs it for a different population, condition or comparison.
In the citing paper
“Dias et al. (2018) demonstrated that GBLUP models containing A+D effects doubled the predictive capacity for grain yield in maize under diverse environmental conditions, such as environments with limited water availability (i.e., drought-stress screening trials).”
From Nonlinear kernels, dominance, and envirotyping data increase the accuracy of genome-based prediction in multi-environment trials (2021) · cites this paper as Dias et al. (2018)
Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
A new look at the statistical model identification
Akaike, H. (1974) · IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control · doi:10.1109/tac.1974.1100705 · Cited by 51,879
Prediction of Total Genetic Value Using Genome-Wide Dense Marker Maps
Meuwissen, T. H. E., Hayes, B. J., & Goddard, M. E. (2001) · Genetics · doi:10.1093/genetics/157.4.1819 · Cited by 7,917
A Robust, Simple Genotyping-by-Sequencing (GBS) Approach for High Diversity Species
Elshire, R. J., Glaubitz, J. C., Sun, Q., Poland, J., Kawamoto, K., Buckler, E. S., & Mitchell, S. E. (2011) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0019379 · Cited by 6,461
Efficient Methods to Compute Genomic Predictions
VanRaden, P. M. (2008) · Journal of Dairy Science · doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980 · Cited by 6,050
Maroof, M. A. S., Soliman, K. M., Jorgensen, R. A., & Allard, R. W. (1984) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.81.24.8014 · Cited by 5,132
Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height
Yang, J., Benyamin, B., McEvoy, B. P., Gordon, S., Henders, A. K., Nyholt, D. R., Madden, P. A., Heath, A. C., Martin, N. G., Montgomery, G. W., et al. (2010) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng.608 · Cited by 4,446
TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline
Glaubitz, J. C., Casstevens, T. M., Lü, F., Harriman, J., Elshire, R. J., Sun, Q., & Buckler, E. S. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0090346 · Cited by 1,686
Data and Theory Point to Mainly Additive Genetic Variance for Complex Traits
Hill, W. G., Goddard, M. E., & Visscher, P. M. (2008) · PLoS Genetics · doi:10.1371/journal.pgen.1000008 · Cited by 1,039
Gilmour, A. R., Thompson, R., & Cullis, B. R. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533274 · Cited by 915
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 101–122 of 122
Dong, L., Xie, Y., Zhang, Y., Wang, R., & Sun, X. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.24934367
Integrating Genomic Selection and Machine Learning to Predict Maize Drought Yield
Wu, W. (2025) · Maize Genomics and Genetics · doi:10.5376/mgg.2025.16.0021
DoVale, J. C., Carvalho, H. F., Sabadin, F., & Fritsche‐Neto, R. (2021) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-1005929/v1
de Verdal, H., Bärtschi, C., Frouin, J., Quintero, C., Ospina, Y., Álvarez, M. F., Cao, T.-V., Bartholomé, J., & Grenier, C. (2024) · Figshare · doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.26620339
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.993
CAPÍTULO 13 - LEVANTAMENTO FLORÍSTICO DE FRUTÍFERAS NATIVAS NO CERRADO SUL MARANHENSE
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.998
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.990
CAPÍTULO 17 - AÇÃO DE FUNGOS ENTOMOPATOGÊNICOS INOCULADOS POR DIFERENTES VIAS EM PLANTAS
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.1002
CAPÍTULO 2 - SECAGEM E MICROENCAPSULAÇÃO COMO ALTERNATIVA PARA A UTILIZAÇÃO DE SUBPRODUTOS DE FRUTAS
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.987
Miranda, L. A., Verde, D. D. S. V., de Oliveira, N. C. R., de Lucena, W. B., & de Oliveira, C. R. S. (2025) · Wissen Editora eBooks · doi:10.52832/wed.170.986
Shrestha, M., Munroe, H., Sharifi, A. R., & Osatohanmwen, B. E. (2026) · Research Square · doi:10.21203/rs.3.rs-9022823/v1
Phenotypic characterization of elite maize genotypes under semi-arid conditions of Sergipe, Brazil
Bispo, P. C. F. B. F., SANTOS, B. N., Santos, J. F. S., Aragão, N. S. C., Feitosa, D. A. S., Ferreira, K. P. F., de Oliveira, T. R. A., Cordeiro, J. J. F., & de Oliveira, G. H. F. (2026) · Scientia Plena · doi:10.14808/sci.plena.2026.030201
da Júnior, A. C., Siqueira, M. J. S., Moura, W. D. M., Barbosa, I. D. P., Chagas, F. E. D. O., Cruz, C. D., & Nascimento, M. (2026) · Agronomy Science and Biotechnology · doi:10.33158/asb.r254.v12.2026
LIU, H. J., Huang, L., Li, J., He, Z., Zhao, X., Chen, Q., Wang, J., Zhou, G., & Zhang, J. (2026) · Plant Methods · doi:10.1186/s13007-026-01528-3
Santos, J. F. M., Edwards, J. W., Lee, E., Mikel, M. A., Fernandes, S. B., Hirsch, C. N., Berry, S. P., Lipka, A. E., & Bohn, M. (2026) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkag163
Anoni, C. D. O., Dias, K. O. D. G., Boer, M. P., Malosetti, M., Guimarães, L. J. M., Guimarães, P. E. D. O., Viana, M., Mudadu, M. A., BASTOS, E. A., Cardoso, M. J., et al. (2026) · G3 Genes Genomes Genetics · doi:10.1093/g3journal/jkag220
Self-citationGenomic prediction of silage traits in maize hybrids using additive, dominance, and epistatic models
Cömertpay, G., Çoban, N., Cerit, İ., Onaç, İ., Baloch, F. S., Hatipoğlu, R., & Adak, A. (2026) · Euphytica · doi:10.1007/s10681-026-03789-4
Brommonschenkel, T. D. C., Pastina, M. M., Resende, M. F. R., Guimarães, L. J. M., Peixoto, M. A., Borém, A., Guimarães, C. T., Trindade, R. D. S., Guimarães, P. E. O., Crossa, J. L., et al. (2026) · Crop Science · doi:10.1002/csc2.70369
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Dias, K. O. D. G., Gezan, S. A., Guimarães, C. T., Nazarian, A., da Costa e Silva, L., Parentoni, S. N., de Oliveira Guimarães, P. E., de Oliveira Anoni, C., Pádua, J. M. V., de Oliveira Pinto, M., Noda, R. W., Ribeiro, C. A. G., de Magalhães, J. V., Garcia, A. A. F., de Souza, J. C., Guimarães, L. J. M., & Pastina, M. M.
- Affiliations
- Universidade Federal de Lavras (BR)
- University of Florida (US)
- Embrapa Milho e Sorgo (BR)
- Universidade Federal de Viçosa (BR)
- ORCID
- Venue
- Heredity
- Published
- 2018-02-23
- Volume
- 121
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 24-37
- ISSN
- 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2540
- PMC
- PMC5997769
- OpenAlex
- W2792329433
- Cited by
- 115
- References
- 65
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 13 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 7.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- www.springer.com/tdm (tdm)
- Locations
- Heredity (publishedVersion)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (2016/12977‐7)
- Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior (23038, program PREMIO 2045/2014)
- Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de Minas Gerais
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic and phenotypic traits in livestock
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Genetics and Plant Breeding
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Genetic Mapping and Diversity in Plants and Animals
- Keywords
- genomic selection, drought tolerance, maize, additive and dominance effects, multi-environment trials, prediction accuracy, single-cross hybrids, cross-validation, gene-environment interaction, SNP markers, genotyping-by-sequencing
- MeSH terms
- Plant Breeding, Adaptation, Biological, Algorithms, Environment, Genetic Markers, Genotype, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Selection, Genetic, Stress, Physiological, Reproducibility of Results, Genome, Plant, Quantitative Trait, Heritable, Polymorphism, Single Nucleotide, Genomics, Droughts, Gene-Environment Interaction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
