Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 432

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 45 of the 45 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement

Open access
Duan, Naibin, Bai, Yang, Sun, Honghe, Wang, Nan, Ma, Yumin, Li, Mingjun, Wang, Xin, Jiao, Chen, Legall, Noah, Mao, Linyong, Wan, Sibao, Wang, Kun, He, Tianming, Feng, Shouqian, Zhang, Zongying, Mao, Zhiquan, Shen, Xiang, Chen, Xiaoliu, Jiang, Yuanmao, Wu, Shujing, Yin, Chengmiao, Ge, Shunfeng, Yang, Long, Jiang, Shenghui, Xu, Haifeng, Liu, Jingxuan, Wang, Deyun, Qu, Changzhi, Wang, Yicheng, Zuo, Weifang, Xiang, Li, Liu, Chang, Zhang, Daoyuan, Gao, Yuan, Xu, Yimin, Xu, Kenong, Chao, Thomas, Fazio, Gennaro, Shu, Huairui, Zhong, Gan-Yuan, Cheng, Lailiang, Fei, Zhangjun, Chen, Xuesen·2017·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Human selection has reshaped crop genomes. Here we report an apple genome variation map generated through genome sequencing of 117 diverse accessions. A comprehensive model of apple speciation and domestication along the Silk Road is proposed based on evidence from diverse genomic analyses. Cultivated apples likely originate from Malus sieversii in Kazakhstan, followed by intensive introgressions from M. sylvestris.M. sieversii in Xinjiang of China turns out to be an “ancient” isolated ecotype not directly contributing to apple domestication. We have identified selective sweeps underlying quantitative trait loci/genes of important fruit quality traits including fruit texture and flavor, and provide evidences supporting a model of apple fruit size evolution comprising two major events with one occurring prior to domestication and the other during domestication. This study outlines the genetic basis of apple domestication and evolution, and provides valuable information for facilitating marker-assisted breeding and apple improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 45 references

Cited by

See all 432

Metadata

Authors
Duan, N., Bai, Y., Sun, H., Wang, N., Ma, Y., Li, M., Wang, X., Jiao, C., Legall, N., Mao, L., Wan, S., Wang, K., He, T., Feng, S., Zhang, Z., Mao, Z., Shen, X., Chen, X., Jiang, Y., Wu, S., Yin, C., Ge, S., Yang, L., Jiang, S., Xu, H., Liu, J., Wang, D., Qu, C., Wang, Y., Zuo, W., Xiang, L., Liu, C., Zhang, D., Gao, Y., Xu, Y., Xu, K., Chao, T., Fazio, G., Shu, H., Zhong, G.-Y., Cheng, L., Fei, Z., & Chen, X.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2017-08-15
Volume
8
Issue
1
Pages
249-249
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7
OpenAlex
W2742463257
Cited by
432
References
45
FWCI
22.75
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7
The paper
Duan, N., Bai, Y., Sun, H., Wang, N., Ma, Y., Li, M., Wang, X., Jiao, C., Legall, N., Mao, L., Wan, S., Wang, K., He, T., Feng, S., Zhang, Z., Mao, Z., Shen, X., Chen, X., Jiang, Y., . . . Chen, X. (2017). Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.