Cited by 718Single-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGene expression and cancer classificationGenomics and Phylogenetic Studies

A general and flexible method for signal extraction from single-cell RNA-seq data

Open access
Risso, Davide, Perraudeau, Fanny, Gribkova, Svetlana, Dudoit, Sandrine, Vert, Jean-Philippe·2018·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Single-cell RNA-sequencing (scRNA-seq) is a powerful high-throughput technique that enables researchers to measure genome-wide transcription levels at the resolution of single cells. Because of the low amount of RNA present in a single cell, some genes may fail to be detected even though they are expressed; these genes are usually referred to as dropouts. Here, we present a general and flexible zero-inflated negative binomial model (ZINB-WaVE), which leads to low-dimensional representations of the data that account for zero inflation (dropouts), over-dispersion, and the count nature of the data. We demonstrate, with simulated and real data, that the model and its associated estimation procedure are able to give a more stable and accurate low-dimensional representation of the data than principal component analysis (PCA) and zero-inflated factor analysis (ZIFA), without the need for a preliminary normalization step.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-017-02554-5

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 60 · Cited by 718

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [22]Hicks, S. C., Teng, M. & Irizarry, R. A. On the widespread and critical impact of systematic bias and batch effects in single-cell RNA-Seq data. bioRxiv10.1101/025528 025528 (2015).

Authors
Risso, D., Perraudeau, F., Gribkova, S., Dudoit, S., & Vert, J.-P.
Affiliations
  • Weill Cornell Medicine (US)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modèles Aléatoires (FR)
  • Inserm (FR)
Corresponding author
  • Dudoit, Sandrine
  • Vert, Jean-Philippe
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-01-18
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
284-284
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2783644856
Cited by
718
References
60
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 73 · 2024: 96 · 2023: 102 · 2022: 100 · 2021: 89 · 2020: 99 · 2019: 72 · 2018: 38 · 2017: 10
FWCI
26.59
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • Padua Research Archive (University of Padova) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
Funders
  • Adolph C. and Mary Sprague Miller Institute for Basic Research in Science, University of California Berkeley
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR-11-BINF-0001)
  • National Institutes of Health (-0001)
  • National Institute of Mental Health (U01MH105979)
  • FP7 Ideas: European Research Council (280032)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Gene expression and cancer classification
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
Keywords
single-cell RNA sequencing, signal extraction, zero-inflated negative binomial regression, excess zeros, overdispersion, low-dimensional representation, principal component analysis, count data, gene expression normalization
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Line, Gene Expression Regulation, Humans, Male, Neurons, RNA, Visual Cortex, Computational Biology, Gene Expression Profiling, Principal Component Analysis, Mice, Single-Cell Analysis, High-Throughput Nucleotide Sequencing

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review