Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 409

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 32 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models

Open access
Nordlund, Kai, Zinkle, Steven J., Sand, Andrea E., Granberg, Fredric, Averback, Robert S., Stoller, Roger, Suzudo, Tomoaki, Malerba, Lorenzo, Banhart, Florian, Weber, William J., Willaime, Francois, Dudarev, Sergei L., Simeone, David·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Atomic collision processes are fundamental to numerous advanced materials technologies such as electron microscopy, semiconductor processing and nuclear power generation. Extensive experimental and computer simulation studies over the past several decades provide the physical basis for understanding the atomic-scale processes occurring during primary displacement events. The current international standard for quantifying this energetic particle damage, the Norgett−Robinson−Torrens displacements per atom (NRT-dpa) model, has nowadays several well-known limitations. In particular, the number of radiation defects produced in energetic cascades in metals is only ~1/3 the NRT-dpa prediction, while the number of atoms involved in atomic mixing is about a factor of 30 larger than the dpa value. Here we propose two new complementary displacement production estimators (athermal recombination corrected dpa, arc-dpa) and atomic mixing (replacements per atom, rpa) functions that extend the NRT-dpa by providing more physically realistic descriptions of primary defect creation in materials and may become additional standard measures for radiation damage quantification.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5

Cites

32 of 32 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 32 references

Cited by

See all 409

Metadata

Authors
Nordlund, K., Zinkle, S. J., Sand, A. E., Granberg, F., Averback, R. S., Stoller, R., Suzudo, T., Malerba, L., Banhart, F., Weber, W. J., Willaime, F., Dudarev, S. L., & Simeone, D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-03-14
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1084-1084
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2789518521
Cited by
409
References
32
FWCI
14.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5
The paper
Nordlund, K., Zinkle, S. J., Sand, A. E., Granberg, F., Averback, R. S., Stoller, R., Suzudo, T., Malerba, L., Banhart, F., Weber, W. J., Willaime, F., Dudarev, S. L., & Simeone, D. (2018). Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.