The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Defect production in collision cascades in elemental semiconductors and fcc metals
Abstract
A comparative molecular dynamics simulation study of collision cascades in two elemental semiconductors and five fcc metals is performed to elucidate how different material characteristics affect primary defect production during ion irradiation. By using simulations of full 400 eV-10 keV collision cascades and contrasting the results on different materials with each other, we probe the effect of the mass, melting temperature, material strength, and crystal structure on the modification of the material due to the cascade. The results show that the crystal structure has a strong effect on many aspects of damage production, while other material characteristics are of lesser overall importance. In all materials studied, isolated point defects produced by the cascade are predominantly interstitials. In semiconductors, amorphous clusters are produced in the cascade core, whereas in metals most of the crystal regenerates, leaving only small vacancy-rich clusters. Large interstitial clusters found in a few events in the heavy metals were observed to form by the isolation of a high-density liquid zone during the recrystallization phase of a cascade.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Computer Simulation of Liquids
Allen, M. P., & Tildesley, D. J. (2017) · doi:10.1093/oso/9780198803195.001.0001 · Cited by 20,945
Interatomic Potentials from First-Principles Calculations: The Force-Matching Method
Ercolessi, F., & Adams, J. B. (1994) · Europhysics Letters (EPL) · doi:10.1209/0295-5075/26/8/005 · Cited by 1,455
Melting line of aluminum from simulations of coexisting phases
Morris, J. R., Wang, C. Z., Ho, K. M., & Chan, C. T. (1994) · Physical Review B · doi:10.1103/physrevb.49.3109 · Cited by 558
Cited by
Improving atomic displacement and replacement calculations with physically realistic damage models
Nordlund, K., Zinkle, S. J., Sand, A. E., Granberg, F., Averback, R. S., Stoller, R., Suzudo, T., Malerba, L., Banhart, F., Weber, W. J., et al. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03415-5 · Cited by 409
Self-citationIn situ probing of the evolution of irradiation-induced defects in copper
Li, N., Hattar, K., & Misra, A. (2013) · Journal of Nuclear Materials · doi:10.1016/j.jnucmat.2013.04.013 · Cited by 40
Metadata
- Authors
- Nordlund, K., Ghaly, M., Averback, R. S., Caturla, M., Diaz de la Rubia, T., & Tarus, J.
- Venue
- Physical Review B
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 1998-04-01
- Volume
- 57
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 7556-7570
- ISSN
- 0163-1829 (ISSN-L)
- 1095-3795
- OpenAlex
- W2027260909
- Cited by
- 924
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 13.93
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Defect production in collision cascades in elemental semiconductors and fcc metals. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1103/physrevb.57.7556
- The paper
- Nordlund, K., Ghaly, M., Averback, R. S., Caturla, M., Diaz de la Rubia, T., & Tarus, J. (1998). Defect production in collision cascades in elemental semiconductors and fcc metals. Physical Review B. https://doi.org/10.1103/physrevb.57.7556
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.