Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 284

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 62 of the 62 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design

Open access
Porto, William F., Irazazabal, Luz, Alves, Eliane S. F., Ribeiro, Suzana M., Matos, Carolina O., Pires, Állan S., Fensterseifer, Isabel C. M., Miranda, Vivian J., Haney, Evan F., Humblot, Vincent, Torres, Marcelo D. T., Hancock, Robert E. W., Liao, Luciano M., Ladram, Ali, Lu, Timothy K., de la Fuente-Nunez, Cesar, Franco, Octavio L.·2018·Nature Communications

Abstract

Plants are extensively used in traditional medicine, and several plant antimicrobial peptides have been described as potential alternatives to conventional antibiotics. However, after more than four decades of research no plant antimicrobial peptide is currently used for treating bacterial infections, due to their length, post-translational modifications or high dose requirement for a therapeutic effect . Here we report the design of antimicrobial peptides derived from a guava glycine-rich peptide using a genetic algorithm. This approach yields guavanin peptides, arginine-rich α-helical peptides that possess an unusual hydrophobic counterpart mainly composed of tyrosine residues. Guavanin 2 is characterized as a prototype peptide in terms of structure and activity. Nuclear magnetic resonance analysis indicates that the peptide adopts an α-helical structure in hydrophobic environments. Guavanin 2 is bactericidal at low concentrations, causing membrane disruption and triggering hyperpolarization. This computational approach for the exploration of natural products could be used to design effective peptide antibiotics.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-018-03746-3

Cites

62 of 62 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 62 references

Cited by

See all 284

Metadata

Authors
Porto, W. F., Irazazabal, L., Alves, E. S. F., Ribeiro, S. M., Matos, C. O., Pires, Á. S., Fensterseifer, I. C. M., Miranda, V. J., Haney, E. F., Humblot, V., Torres, M. D. T., Hancock, R. E. W., Liao, L. M., Ladram, A., Lu, T. K., de la Fuente-Nunez, C., & Franco, O. L.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2018-04-16
Volume
9
Issue
1
Pages
1490-1490
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2796712624
Cited by
284
References
62
FWCI
16.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-018-03746-3
The paper
Porto, W. F., Irazazabal, L., Alves, E. S. F., Ribeiro, S. M., Matos, C. O., Pires, Á. S., Fensterseifer, I. C. M., Miranda, V. J., Haney, E. F., Humblot, V., Torres, M. D. T., Hancock, R. E. W., Liao, L. M., Ladram, A., Lu, T. K., de la Fuente-Nunez, C., & Franco, O. L. (2018). In silico optimization of a guava antimicrobial peptide enables combinatorial exploration for peptide design. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03746-3

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.