Cited by 257Machine Learning in Materials ScienceMetal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and ApplicationsComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Capturing chemical intuition in synthesis of metal-organic frameworks

Open access
Moosavi, Seyed Mohamad, Chidambaram, Arunraj, Talirz, Leopold, Haranczyk, Maciej, Stylianou, Kyriakos C., Smit, Berend·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

We report a methodology using machine learning to capture chemical intuition from a set of (partially) failed attempts to synthesize a metal-organic framework. We define chemical intuition as the collection of unwritten guidelines used by synthetic chemists to find the right synthesis conditions. As (partially) failed experiments usually remain unreported, we have reconstructed a typical track of failed experiments in a successful search for finding the optimal synthesis conditions that yields HKUST-1 with the highest surface area reported to date. We illustrate the importance of quantifying this chemical intuition for the synthesis of novel materials.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-08483-9

Cites

25 of 25 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In experimental data sets extracted from the literature, there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments, leading to challenges in classification tasks.

    “For example, in experimental data sets extracted from the literature (14,15,19), there can be positive bias for reporting only successful experiments (16, 107, 108), leading to challenges in classification tasks (17).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [20]Polinsky A., Feinstein R., Shi S., Kuki A. LiBrain. in Molecular Diversity and Combinatorial Chemistry: Libraries and Drug Discovery Vol. 996 (eds Chaiken I.M., Janda K.D. 219−232 (American Chemical Society, 1996).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Moosavi, S. M., Chidambaram, A., Talirz, L., Haranczyk, M., Stylianou, K. C., & Smit, B.
Affiliations
École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (CH)
Corresponding author
Smit, Berend
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-02-01
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
539-539
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2910636130
Cited by
257
References
25
Citations by year
2026: 27 · 2025: 42 · 2024: 24 · 2023: 38 · 2022: 37 · 2021: 42 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 15
FWCI
11.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation
  • European Commission (HORIZON2020, 666983)
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (SPP1570)
  • Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung (166888)
  • Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (RYC-2013-13949)
  • National Center of Competence in Research Materials’ Revolution: Computational Design and Discovery of Novel Materials
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Inorganic Chemistry › Metal-Organic Frameworks: Synthesis and Applications
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
metal-organic frameworks, HKUST-1, chemical intuition, machine learning, synthesis condition optimization, failed experiments, surface area, materials discovery

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review