Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 417

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Whole-genome resequencing reveals Brassica napus origin and genetic loci involved in its improvement

Open access
Lu, Kun, Wei, Lijuan, Li, Xiaolong, Wang, Yuntong, Wu, Jian, Liu, Miao, Zhang, Chao, Chen, Zhiyou, Xiao, Zhongchun, Jian, Hongju, Cheng, Feng, Zhang, Kai, Du, Hai, Cheng, Xinchao, Qu, Cunming, Qian, Wei, Liu, Liezhao, Wang, Rui, Zou, Qingyuan, Ying, Jiamin, Xu, Xingfu, Mei, Jiaqing, Liang, Ying, Chai, You-Rong, Tang, Zhanglin, Wan, Huafang, Ni, Yu, He, Yajun, Lin, Na, Fan, Yonghai, Sun, Wei, Li, Nan-Nan, Zhou, Gang, Zheng, Hongkun, Wang, Xiaowu, Paterson, Andrew H., Li, Jiana·2019·Nature Communications
DOI 10.1038/s41467-019-09134-9
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Brassica napus (2 n = 4 x = 38, AACC) is an important allopolyploid crop derived from interspecific crosses between Brassica rapa (2 n = 2 x = 20, AA) and Brassica oleracea (2 n = 2 x = 18, CC). However, no truly wild B. napus populations are known; its origin and improvement processes remain unclear. Here, we resequence 588 B. napus accessions. We uncover that the A subgenome may evolve from the ancestor of European turnip and the C subgenome may evolve from the common ancestor of kohlrabi, cauliflower, broccoli, and Chinese kale. Additionally, winter oilseed may be the original form of B. napus. Subgenome-specific selection of defense-response genes has contributed to environmental adaptation after formation of the species, whereas asymmetrical subgenomic selection has led to ecotype change. By integrating genome-wide association studies, selection signals, and transcriptome analyses, we identify genes associated with improved stress tolerance, oil content, seed quality, and ecotype improvement. They are candidates for further functional characterization and genetic improvement of B. napus.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-09134-9

Cites

53 of 53 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 53 references

Cited by

See all 417

Metadata

Authors
Lu, K., Wei, L., Li, X., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Liu, M., Zhang, C., Chen, Z., Xiao, Z., Jian, H., Cheng, F., Zhang, K., Du, H., Cheng, X., Qu, C., Qian, W., Liu, L., Wang, R., Zou, Q., Ying, J., Xu, X., Mei, J., Liang, Y., Chai, Y.-R., Tang, Z., Wan, H., Ni, Y., He, Y., Lin, N., Fan, Y., Sun, W., Li, N.-N., Zhou, G., Zheng, H., Wang, X., Paterson, A. H., & Li, J.
Venue
Nature Communications
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-03-11
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
1154-1154
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41467-019-09134-9
OpenAlex
W2922397686
Cited by
417
References
53
FWCI
29.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Whole-genome resequencing reveals Brassica napus origin and genetic loci involved in its improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-09134-9
The paper
Lu, K., Wei, L., Li, X., Wang, Y., Wu, J., Liu, M., Zhang, C., Chen, Z., Xiao, Z., Jian, H., Cheng, F., Zhang, K., Du, H., Cheng, X., Qu, C., Qian, W., Liu, L., Wang, R., Zou, Q., . . . Li, J. (2019). Whole-genome resequencing reveals Brassica napus origin and genetic loci involved in its improvement. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-09134-9

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.