Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 462

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 88 of the 88 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement

Open access
Chen, Z. Jeffrey, Sreedasyam, Avinash, Ando, Atsumi, Song, Qingxin, De Santiago, Luis M., Hulse-Kemp, Amanda M., Ding, Mingquan, Ye, Wenxue, Kirkbride, Ryan C., Jenkins, Jerry, Plott, Christopher, Lovell, John, Lin, Yu-Ming, Vaughn, Robert, Liu, Bo, Simpson, Sheron, Scheffler, Brian E., Wen, Li, Saski, Christopher A., Grover, Corrinne E., Hu, Guanjing, Conover, Justin L., Carlson, Joseph W., Shu, Shengqiang, Boston, Lori B., Williams, Melissa, Peterson, Daniel G., McGee, Keith, Jones, Don C., Wendel, Jonathan F., Stelly, David M., Grimwood, Jane, Schmutz, Jeremy·2020·Nature Genetics

Abstract

Polyploidy is an evolutionary innovation for many animals and all flowering plants, but its impact on selection and domestication remains elusive. Here we analyze genome evolution and diversification for all five allopolyploid cotton species, including economically important Upland and Pima cottons. Although these polyploid genomes are conserved in gene content and synteny, they have diversified by subgenomic transposon exchanges that equilibrate genome size, evolutionary rate heterogeneities and positive selection between homoeologs within and among lineages. These differential evolutionary trajectories are accompanied by gene-family diversification and homoeolog expression divergence among polyploid lineages. Selection and domestication drive parallel gene expression similarities in fibers of two cultivated cottons, involving coexpression networks and N6-methyladenosine RNA modifications. Furthermore, polyploidy induces recombination suppression, which correlates with altered epigenetic landscapes and can be overcome by wild introgression. These genomic insights will empower efforts to manipulate genetic recombination and modify epigenetic landscapes and target genes for crop improvement.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41588-020-0614-5

Cites

88 of 88 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 88 references

Cited by

See all 462

Metadata

Authors
Chen, Z. J., Sreedasyam, A., Ando, A., Song, Q., De Santiago, L. M., Hulse-Kemp, A. M., Ding, M., Ye, W., Kirkbride, R. C., Jenkins, J., Plott, C., Lovell, J., Lin, Y.-M., Vaughn, R., Liu, B., Simpson, S., Scheffler, B. E., Wen, L., Saski, C. A., Grover, C. E., Hu, G., Conover, J. L., Carlson, J. W., Shu, S., Boston, L. B., Williams, M., Peterson, D. G., McGee, K., Jones, D. C., Wendel, J. F., Stelly, D. M., Grimwood, J., & Schmutz, J.
Venue
Nature Genetics
Published
2020-04-20
Volume
52
Issue
5
Pages
525-533
ISSN
  • 1061-4036 (ISSN-L)
  • 1546-1718
OpenAlex
W3016732089
Cited by
462
References
88
FWCI
37.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41588-020-0614-5
The paper
Chen, Z. J., Sreedasyam, A., Ando, A., Song, Q., De Santiago, L. M., Hulse-Kemp, A. M., Ding, M., Ye, W., Kirkbride, R. C., Jenkins, J., Plott, C., Lovell, J., Lin, Y.-M., Vaughn, R., Liu, B., Simpson, S., Scheffler, B. E., Wen, L., Saski, C. A., . . . Schmutz, J. (2020). Genomic diversifications of five Gossypium allopolyploid species and their impact on cotton improvement. Nature Genetics. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-020-0614-5

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.