The DOI matches its Crossref record; 77 of the 77 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software
Open accessAbstract
In recent years, many software packages for identifying structural variants (SVs) using whole-genome sequencing data have been released. When published, a new method is commonly compared with those already available, but this tends to be selective and incomplete. The lack of comprehensive benchmarking of methods presents challenges for users in selecting methods and for developers in understanding algorithm behaviours and limitations. Here we report the comprehensive evaluation of 10 SV callers, selected following a rigorous process and spanning the breadth of detection approaches, using high-quality reference cell lines, as well as simulations. Due to the nature of available truth sets, our focus is on general-purpose rather than somatic callers. We characterise the impact on performance of event size and type, sequencing characteristics, and genomic context, and analyse the efficacy of ensemble calling and calibration of variant quality scores. Finally, we provide recommendations for both users and methods developers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp324 · Cited by 58,607
A global reference for human genetic variation
The 1000 Genomes Project Consortium, authors, C., Auton, A., Abecasis, G. R., Steering committee, Altshuler, D. M., Durbin, R. M., Abecasis, G. R., Bentley, D. R., Chakravarti, A., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15393 · Cited by 18,247
Fast and accurate long-read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.
Li, H., & Durbin, R. (2010) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp698 · Cited by 12,063
Tandem repeats finder: a program to analyze DNA sequences
Benson, G. (1999) · Nucleic Acids Research · doi:10.1093/nar/27.2.573 · Cited by 9,374
DELLY: structural variant discovery by integrated paired-end and split-read analysis
Rausch, T., Zichner, T., Schlattl, A., Stütz, A. M., Benes, V., & Korbel, J. O. (2012) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/bts378 · Cited by 2,459
Massive genomic rearrangement acquired in a single catastrophic event during cancer development
Stephens, P. J., Greenman, C. D., Fu, B., Yang, F., Bignell, G. R., Mudie, L. J., Pleasance, E. D., Lau, K. W., Beare, D., Stebbings, L. A., et al. (2011) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2010.11.055 · Cited by 2,414
An integrated map of structural variation in 2,504 human genomes
Sudmant, P. H., Rausch, T., Gardner, E. J., Handsaker, R. E., Abyzov, A., Huddleston, J., Zhang, Y., Ye, K., Jun, G., Hsi-Yang Fritz, M., et al. (2015) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature15394 · Cited by 2,354
(2015) · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv710 · Cited by 2,234
Structural variation in the human genome
Feuk, L., Carson, A. R., & Scherer, S. W. (2006) · Nature Reviews Genetics · doi:10.1038/nrg1767 · Cited by 2,034
Ye, K., Schulz, M. H., Long, Q., Apweiler, R., & Ning, Z. (2009) · Bioinformatics · doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btp394 · Cited by 2,022
Metadata
- Authors
- Cameron, D. L., Di Stefano, L., & Papenfuss, A. T.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2019-07-19
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3240-3240
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2963186762
- Cited by
- 328
- References
- 77
- FWCI
- 21.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-11146-4
- The paper
- Cameron, D. L., Di Stefano, L., & Papenfuss, A. T. (2019). Comprehensive evaluation and characterisation of short read general-purpose structural variant calling software. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-11146-4
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
