Author Correction: Discrepancy in scientific authority and media visibility of climate change scientists and contrarians
Open accessAbstract
An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via a link at the top of the paper.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Vested interests have taken advantage of new communication technology to spread misinformation, which partially explains why climate contrarians are overrepresented in nontraditional, digital media.
“Vested interests have taken advantage of new communication technology to spread misinformation, which partially explains why climate contrarians are overrepresented in nontraditional, digital media”
From Stewardship of global collective behavior (2021) · cites this paper as [88]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stewardship of global collective behavior
Bak-Coleman, J. B., Alfano, M., Barfuss, W., Bergstrom, C. T., Centeno, M. A., Couzin, I. D., Donges, J. F., Galesic, M., Gersick, A. S., Jacquet, J., et al. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2025764118 · Cited by 289 · see citing works
Bogert, J. M., Buczny, J., Harvey, J. A., & Ellers, J. (2023) · Environmental Communication · doi:10.1080/17524032.2023.2280749 · Cited by 54 · see citing works
“…and politics about this issue is to a large part due to the fact that mainstream media still do not give fully accurate representations of ACC and its serious consequences, the most e ff ective solutions, and the scienti fi c consensus (Feldman et al., 2017; Moser, 2016; Petersen et al., 2019).”
BackgroundTen Measures to Make Climate Governance Fit for Purpose
Ponthieu, E. (2020) · SpringerBriefs in climate studies · doi:10.1007/978-3-030-58127-5_4 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Ganderton, P. (2022) · Oxford University Press eBooks · doi:10.1093/obo/9780199830060-0238 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Bogert, J. M. (2024) · doi:10.5463/thesis.997 · Cited by 1 · see citing works
Come for a swim in our new pool of Education materials
Wilkinson, L. J. (2020) · Journal of Metadata Perfection · doi:10.5555/487hjd
- Authors
- Petersen, A. M., Vincent, E. M., & Westerling, A. L.
- Affiliations
- University of California, Merced (US)
- Corresponding author
- Petersen, Alexander Michael
- Vincent, Emmanuel M.
- Westerling, Anthony LeRoy
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2019-08-29
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3966-3966
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC6715640
- OpenAlex
- W2971224302
- Cited by
- 6
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- eScholarship (California Digital Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Climate Change Communication and Perception
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › scientometrics and bibliometrics research
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Information Systems and Management › Academic Publishing and Open Access
- Keywords
- scientific authority, media visibility, scientific credibility
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
