Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 369

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 93 of the 93 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

B cells sustain inflammation and predict response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma

Open access
Griss, Johannes, Bauer, Wolfgang, Wagner, Christine, Simon, Martin, Chen, Minyi, Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, Katharina, Maurer-Granofszky, Margarita, Roka, Florian, Penz, Thomas, Bock, Christoph, Zhang, Gao, Herlyn, Meenhard, Glatz, Katharina, Läubli, Heinz, Mertz, Kirsten D., Petzelbauer, Peter, Wiesner, Thomas, Hartl, Markus, Pickl, Winfried F., Somasundaram, Rajasekharan, Steinberger, Peter, Wagner, Stephan N.·2019·Nature Communications

Abstract

Tumor associated inflammation predicts response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma. Current theories on regulation of inflammation center on anti-tumor T cell responses. Here we show that tumor associated B cells are vital to melanoma associated inflammation. Human B cells express pro- and anti-inflammatory factors and differentiate into plasmablast-like cells when exposed to autologous melanoma secretomes in vitro. This plasmablast-like phenotype can be reconciled in human melanomas where plasmablast-like cells also express T cell-recruiting chemokines CCL3, CCL4, CCL5. Depletion of B cells in melanoma patients by anti-CD20 immunotherapy decreases tumor associated inflammation and CD8 + T cell numbers. Plasmablast-like cells also increase PD-1 + T cell activation through anti-PD-1 blockade in vitro and their frequency in pretherapy melanomas predicts response and survival to immune checkpoint blockade. Tumor associated B cells therefore orchestrate and sustain melanoma inflammation and may represent a predictor for survival and response to immune checkpoint blockade therapy.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-12160-2

Cites

93 of 93 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 93 references

Cited by

See all 369

Metadata

Authors
Griss, J., Bauer, W., Wagner, C., Simon, M., Chen, M., Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K., Maurer-Granofszky, M., Roka, F., Penz, T., Bock, C., Zhang, G., Herlyn, M., Glatz, K., Läubli, H., Mertz, K. D., Petzelbauer, P., Wiesner, T., Hartl, M., Pickl, W. F., Somasundaram, R., Steinberger, P., & Wagner, S. N.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2019-09-13
Volume
10
Issue
1
Pages
4186-4186
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2973051889
Cited by
369
References
93
FWCI
15.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: B cells sustain inflammation and predict response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-019-12160-2
The paper
Griss, J., Bauer, W., Wagner, C., Simon, M., Chen, M., Grabmeier-Pfistershammer, K., Maurer-Granofszky, M., Roka, F., Penz, T., Bock, C., Zhang, G., Herlyn, M., Glatz, K., Läubli, H., Mertz, K. D., Petzelbauer, P., Wiesner, T., Hartl, M., Pickl, W. F., . . . Wagner, S. N. (2019). B cells sustain inflammation and predict response to immune checkpoint blockade in human melanoma. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12160-2

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.