Cited by 102Fungal Infections and StudiesAntifungal resistance and susceptibilityFungal and yeast genetics research

5-fluorocytosine resistance is associated with hypermutation and alterations in capsule biosynthesis in Cryptococcus

Open access
Billmyre, R. Blake, Applen Clancey, Shelly, Li, Lucy X., Doering, Tamara L., Heitman, Joseph·2020·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Patients infected with the fungal pathogen Cryptococcus are most effectively treated with a combination of 5-fluorocytosine (5FC) and amphotericin B. 5FC acts as a prodrug, which is converted into toxic 5-fluorouracil (5FU) upon uptake into fungal cells. However, the pathogen frequently develops resistance through unclear mechanisms. Here we show that resistance to 5FC in Cryptococcus deuterogattii is acquired more frequently in isolates with defects in DNA mismatch repair that confer an elevated mutation rate. We use whole genome sequencing of 16 independent isolates to identify mutations associated with 5FC resistance in vitro. We find mutations in known resistance genes (FUR1 and FCY2 ) and in a gene UXS1 , previously shown to encode an enzyme that converts UDP-glucuronic acid to UDP-xylose for capsule biosynthesis, but not known to play a role in 5FC metabolism. Mutations in UXS1 lead to accumulation of UDP-glucuronic acid and alterations in nucleotide metabolism, which appear to suppress toxicity of both 5FC and its toxic derivative 5FU.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-019-13890-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • A subset of Cryptococcus isolates have been identified as hypermutator strains, which contain mutations in core genes in the DNA mismatch repair pathway, most notably MSH2.

    “a subset of Cryptococcus isolates have been identified as hypermutator strains30,31, which contain mutations in core genes in the DNA mismatch repair pathway, most notably MSH2 (refs30,32,33)”
  • Hypermutator strains have a 15% higher rate of resistance to flucytosine in C. gattii when compared with isolates that do not possess a hypermutator mutation.

    “hypermutator strains have a 15% higher rate of resistance to this prodrug (the active drug is fluorouracil) when compared with isolates that do not possess a hypermutator mutation.”
  • Hypermutator isolates derived from both the clinic and the laboratory lead to the rapid emergence of resistance to drugs such as rapamycin, FK506, flucytosine, fluconazole and even amphotericin B.

    “hypermutator isolates derived from both the clinic and the laboratory lead to the rapid emergence of resistance to drugs such as rapamycin, FK506 (ref.33), flucytosine32, fluconazole and even amphotericin B30.”
  • The enhanced flucytosine resistance in hypermutator strains was caused by loss-of-function mutations in Fcy2 and Fur1, and a mutation in Uxs1.

    “This enhanced resistance was caused by loss-of-function mutations in the genes encoding the purine-cytosine permease Fcy2 and the uracil phosphoribosyltransferase Fur1, which import and process the prodrug, respectively, as well as a mutation in the gene encoding Uxs1, which produces UDP-xylose, a precursor in capsule biosynthesis32.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 52 · Cited by 102

Authors
Billmyre, R. B., Applen Clancey, S., Li, L. X., Doering, T. L., & Heitman, J.
Affiliations
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • Washington University in St. Louis (US)
  • Duke University (US)
Corresponding author
Heitman, Joseph
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-01-08
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
127-127
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3000052441
Cited by
102
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 14 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 10 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Digital Commons@Becker (Washington University School of Medicine) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (AI120339, AI109623, AI39115-21, AI50113-15, AI112595-04, AI104533-05)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Fungal Infections and Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Antifungal resistance and susceptibility
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Fungal and yeast genetics research
Keywords
5-fluorocytosine resistance, Cryptococcus deuterogattii, DNA mismatch repair, hypermutation, capsule biosynthesis, UXS1, UDP-glucuronic acid, UDP-xylose, 5-fluorouracil toxicity, nucleotide metabolism, antifungal resistance, fungal pathogens
MeSH terms
Amphotericin B, Antifungal Agents, Cryptococcus, Flucytosine, Fungal Proteins, Humans, Microbial Sensitivity Tests, Mutation, Polysaccharides, Drug Resistance, Fungal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review