Cited by 32

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Scale and information-processing thresholds in Holocene social evolution

Shin, Jaeweon, Price, Michael Holton, Wolpert, David H., Shimao, Hajime, Tracey, Brendan, Kohler, Timothy A.·2020·Nature Communications

Abstract

Throughout the Holocene, societies developed additional layers of administration and more information-rich instruments for managing and recording transactions and events as they grew in population and territory. Yet, while such increases seem inevitable, they are not. Here we use the Seshat database to investigate the development of hundreds of polities, from multiple continents, over thousands of years. We find that sociopolitical development is dominated first by growth in polity scale, then by improvements in information processing and economic systems, and then by further increases in scale. We thus define a Scale Threshold for societies, beyond which growth in information processing becomes paramount, and an Information Threshold, which once crossed facilitates additional growth in scale. Polities diverge in socio-political features below the Information Threshold, but reconverge beyond it. We suggest an explanation for the evolutionary divergence between Old and New World polities based on phased growth in scale and information processing. We also suggest a mechanism to help explain social collapses with no evident external causes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-16035-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 35

  1. Richerson, P. J., Boyd, R. & Bettinger, R. L. Was agriculture impossible during the Pleistocene but mandatory during the Holocene? A climate change hypothesis. Am. Antiquity 66, 387–411 (2001). · DOI
  2. Bettinger, R. L. In Macroevolution in Human Prehistory (eds. Prentiss, A., Kuijt, I. & Chatters, J. C.) 275–295 (Springer New York, New York, 2009). · DOI
  3. Kavanagh, P. H. et al. Hindcasting global population densities reveals forces enabling the origin of agriculture. Nat. Hum. Behav. 2, 478–484 (2018). · DOI
  4. Bocquet-Appel, J.-P. When the world’s population took off: the springboard of the Neolithic Demographic Transition. Science 333, 560–561 (2011). · DOI
  5. Kohler, T. A. & Reese, K. M. Long and spatially variable Neolithic Demographic Transition in the North American Southwest. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 10101–10106 (2014). · DOI
  6. Childe, V. G. The Urban revolution. Town Plan. Rev. 21, 3–17 (1950). · DOI
  7. Smith, M. E. V. Gordon Childe and the Urban Revolution: a historical perspective on a revolution in urban studies. Town Plan. Rev. 80, 3–29 (2009). · DOI
  8. Kohler, T. A. et al. Greater post-Neolithic wealth disparities in Eurasia than in North America and Mesoamerica. Nature 551, 619–622 (2017). · DOI
  9. Borgerhoff Mulder, M. et al. Intergenerational wealth transmission and the dynamics of inequality in small-scale societies. Science 326, 682–688 (2009). · DOI
  10. Mattison, S., Smith, E. A., Shenk, M. K. & Cochrane, E. E. The evolution of inequality. Evol. Anthropol. 25, 184–199 (2016). · DOI
  11. Sebastian, L. & Lipe, W. D. In Archaeology & Cultural Resource Management (eds. Sebastian, L. & Lipe, W. D.) 283–297 (School for Advanced Research Press, Santa Fe, 2009).
  12. Denaire, A. et al. The cultural project: Formal chronological modelling of the Early and Middle Neolithic sequence in Lower Alsace. J. Archaeol. Method Theory 24, 1072–1149 (2017). · DOI
  13. d’Alpoim Guedes, J. A., Crabtree, S. A., Bocinsky, R. K. & Kohler, T. A. Twenty-first century approaches to ancient problems: Climate and society. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 113, 14483–14491 (2016). · DOI
  14. Trigger, B. G. Understanding early civilizations: A comparative study (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003). · DOI
  15. Turchin, P. et al. Seshat: the global history databank. Cliodynamics 6, 77–107 (2015).
  16. Turchin, P. Fitting dynamic regression models to Seshat data. Cliodynamics 9, 25–58 (2018).
  17. Turchin, P. et al. Evolutionary pathways to statehood: old theories and new data. SocArXiv Prepr. https://doi.org/10.31235/osf.io/h7tr6 (2018). · DOI
  18. Whitehouse, H. et al. Complex societies precede moralizing gods throughout world history. Nature https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-019-1043-4 (2019). · DOI
  19. Turchin, P. et al. Quantitative historical analysis uncovers a single dimension of complexity that structures global variation in human social organization. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, E144–E151 (2018). · DOI
  20. Turchin, P. & Korotayev, A. V. Population dynamics and internal warfare: a reconsideration. Soc. Evol. Hist. 5, 112–147 (2006).
  21. McAllister, J. W. in The Future of the Sciences and Humanities (eds. Tindemans, P., Verrijn-Stuart, A. & Visser, R.) 19–54 (Amsterdam University Press, Amsterdam, 2002).
  22. Peregrine, P. N. in The Emergence of Premodern States: New Perspectives on the Development of Complex Societies (eds. Sabloff, J. A. & Sabloff, P. L. W.) 271–295 (SFI Press, Santa Fe, 2018). · DOI
  23. Peregrine, P. N. Outline of Archaeological Traditions. (HRAF Press, New Haven, 2001).
  24. McGhee, G. R. The Geometry of Evolution: Adaptive Landscapes and Theoretical Morphospaces. (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2006). · DOI
  25. Diamond, J. The World Until Yesterday: What can we learn from traditional societies? (Penguin, New York, 2012).
  26. Richerson, P. & Boyd, R. in Ethnic Conflict and Indoctrination: Altruism and Identity in Evolutionary Perspectives (eds. Eibl-Eibesfeldt, I. & Salter, F.) 71–95 (Berghahn, Oxford, 1998).
  27. Turchin, P., Currie, T. E., Turner, E. A. L. & Gavrilets, S. War, space, and the evolution of Old World complex societies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 16384–16389 (2013). · DOI
  28. Kohler, T. A. & Crabtree, S. A. in Peupler la Terre : De la Préhistoire à l’ère des métropoles (ed. Sanders, L.) 173–192 (Presses Universitaires François Rabelais, Paris, 2017). · DOI
  29. Feinman, G. M. in Cooperation and Collective Action: Archaeological Perspectives (ed. Carballo, D. M.) 35–56 (University Press of Colorado, Boulder, 2013).
  30. Johnson, G. A. in Theory and Explanation in Archaeology: the Southampton Conference (eds. Renfrew, C., Rowlands, M. J. & Segraves, B. A.) 389–421 (Academic Press, 1982).
  31. Kosse, K. Some regularities in human group formation and the evolution of societal complexity. Complexity 6, 60–64 (2000). · DOI
  32. Powers, S., van Schaik, C. & Lehmann, L. How institutions shaped the last major evolutionary transition to large-scale human societies. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B 371, 20150098 (2016). · DOI
  33. Anderson, D. G. in Political Structure and Change in the Prehistoric Southeastern United States, The Ripley P. Bullen Series, Florida Museum of Natural History (ed. Scarry, J.) 231–252 (University Press of Florida, Gainesville, 1996).
  34. Blitz, J. H. Mississippian chiefdoms and the fission-fusion process. Am. Antiquity 64, 577–592 (1999). · DOI
  35. Jolliffe, I. Principal Component Analysis, 2nd edn. (Springer, 2011). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Shin, J., Price, M. H., Wolpert, D. H., Shimao, H., Tracey, B., & Kohler, T. A.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-05-14
Volume
11
Issue
1
ISSN
2041-1723
Cited by
32
References
1
Language
en
Funders
National Science Foundation (SMA-1620462)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review