Cited by 206AI in cancer detectionRadiomics and Machine Learning in Medical ImagingCell Image Analysis Techniques

Deep learning-based cross-classifications reveal conserved spatial behaviors within tumor histological images

Open access
Noorbakhsh, Javad, Farahmand, Saman, Foroughi pour, Ali, Namburi, Sandeep, Caruana, Dennis, Rimm, David, Soltanieh-ha, Mohammad, Zarringhalam, Kourosh +1 more·2020·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Histopathological images are a rich but incompletely explored data type for studying cancer. Manual inspection is time consuming, making it challenging to use for image data mining. Here we show that convolutional neural networks (CNNs) can be systematically applied across cancer types, enabling comparisons to reveal shared spatial behaviors. We develop CNN architectures to analyze 27,815 hematoxylin and eosin scanned images from The Cancer Genome Atlas for tumor/normal, cancer subtype, and mutation classification. Our CNNs are able to classify TCGA pathologist-annotated tumor/normal status of whole slide images (WSIs) in 19 cancer types with consistently high AUCs (0.995 ± 0.008), as well as subtypes with lower but significant accuracy (AUC 0.87 ± 0.1). Remarkably, tumor/normal CNNs trained on one tissue are effective in others (AUC 0.88 ± 0.11), with classifier relationships also recapitulating known adenocarcinoma, carcinoma, and developmental biology. Moreover, classifier comparisons reveal intra-slide spatial similarities, with an average tile-level correlation of 0.45 ± 0.16 between classifier pairs. Breast cancers, bladder cancers, and uterine cancers have spatial patterns that are particularly easy to detect, suggesting these cancers can be canonical types for image analysis. Patterns for TP53 mutations can also be detected, with WSI self- and cross-tissue AUCs ranging from 0.65-0.80. Finally, we comparatively evaluate CNNs on 170 breast and colon cancer images with pathologist-annotated nuclei, finding that both cellular and intercellular regions contribute to CNN accuracy. These results demonstrate the power of CNNs not only for histopathological classification, but also for cross-comparisons to reveal conserved spatial behaviors across tumors.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-020-20030-5

Cites

64 of 64 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many morphological features are observed across cancers from different topographies.

    “Indeed, it has been shown that training a model on multiple tissues or cancer variants can improve detection performance for each cancer53, as many morphological features are observed across cancers from different topographies54.”
  • Increased diversity helps to learn robust and rare features.

    “although we posit that increased diversity helps to learn robust and rare features. Indeed, it has been shown that training a model on multiple tissues or cancer variants can improve detection performance for each cancer53, as many morphological features are observed across cancers from different topographies54.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. [13]Schaumberg, A. J., Rubin, M. A. & Fuchs, T. J. H&E-stained whole slide image deep learning predicts SPOP mutation state in prostate cancer. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/064279v9 (2018). · DOI
  2. [14]Simonyan, K. & Zisserman, A. in 3rd International Conference on Learning Representations (eds Bengio, Y. & LeCun, Y.) (ICLR, San Diego, CA, 2015).
  3. [21]Xu, H., Park, S., Lee, S. H. & Hwang, T. H. Using transfer learning on whole slide images to predict tumor mutational burden in bladder cancer patients. Preprint at https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/554527v1 (2019). · DOI
  4. [26]Zhu, Y. et al. in Proceedings of the 2011 AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Vol. 11. 1304–1309 (AAAI, 2011).
  5. [50]Raghu, M., Zhang, C., Kleinberg, J. & Bengio, S. in Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems. (eds Wallach, H. et al.) 3347–3357 (Curran Associates, Inc., 2019).
  6. [57]Diederik, P. K. & Jimmy, B. in 3rd international Conference on Learning Representations. (eds Yoshua, B. & Yann, L.) (ICLR 2015, San Diego, CA, 2015).
  7. [58]Abadi, M. et al. in 12th USENIX Symposium on Operating Systems Design and Implementation. 265–283 (USENIX Association, 2016).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Noorbakhsh, J., Farahmand, S., Foroughi pour, A., Namburi, S., Caruana, D., Rimm, D., Soltanieh-ha, M., Zarringhalam, K., & Chuang, J. H.
Affiliations
  • The Jackson Laboratory for Genomic Medicine (US)
  • University of Massachusetts Boston (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Boston University (US)
Corresponding author
Chuang, Jeffrey H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2020-12-11
Volume
11
Issue
1
Pages
6367-6367
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3113328935
Cited by
206
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 47 · 2022: 41 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1
FWCI
11.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (publishedVersion, other-oa)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • The Mouseion at the JAXlibrary (Jackson Laboratory) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OpenBU (Boston University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (R01CA230031)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Biophysics › Cell Image Analysis Techniques
Keywords
histopathology image analysis, whole slide images, convolutional neural networks, tumor subtypes, H&E staining, TCGA, breast cancer, colon cancer, nuclei segmentation
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Breast Neoplasms, Colonic Neoplasms, Female, Genotype, Humans, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Mutation, Neoplasms, Spatial Behavior, Genes, p53, Computational Biology, Area Under Curve

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review