Predicting mammalian hosts in which novel coronaviruses can be generated
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Novel pathogenic coronaviruses – such as SARS-CoV and probably SARS-CoV-2 – arise by homologous recombination between co-infecting viruses in a single cell. Identifying possible sources of novel coronaviruses therefore requires identifying hosts of multiple coronaviruses; however, most coronavirus-host interactions remain unknown. Here, by deploying a meta-ensemble of similarity learners from three complementary perspectives (viral, mammalian and network), we predict which mammals are hosts of multiple coronaviruses. We predict that there are 11.5-fold more coronavirus-host associations, over 30-fold more potential SARS-CoV-2 recombination hosts, and over 40-fold more host species with four or more different subgenera of coronaviruses than have been observed to date at >0.5 mean probability cut-off (2.4-, 4.25- and 9-fold, respectively, at >0.9821). Our results demonstrate the large underappreciation of the potential scale of novel coronavirus generation in wild and domesticated animals. We identify high-risk species for coronavirus surveillance.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The bat-to-intermediate-host-to-human pathway is plausible because many early known COVID-19 cases in Wuhan are linked to the Huanan Seafood Market, which sold animals such as raccoon dogs susceptible to SARS-related coronaviruses.
“The other natural pathway is transmission from bats to an intermediate host mammal and then to a human.61 This pathway is plausible because many of the earliest known cases of COVID-19 in humans in Wuhan are associated with the Huanan Seafood Market, and this market sold animals such as raccoon dogs that are known to be susceptible to SARS-related coronaviruses.62”
From The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic (2022) · cites this paper as [61]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Wardeh, M., Sharkey, K. J., & Baylis, M. (2020) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2019.2882 · Cited by 36 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The Lancet Commission on lessons for the future from the COVID-19 pandemic
Sachs, J. D., Karim, S. S. A., Aknin, L., Allen, J., Brosbøl, K., Colombo, F., Barron, G. C., Espinosa, M. F., Gaspar, V., Gaviria, A., et al. (2022) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(22)01585-9 · Cited by 842 · see citing works
- Authors
- Wardeh, M., Baylis, M., & Blagrove, M. S. C.
- Affiliations
- University of Liverpool (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Wardeh, Maya
- Blagrove, Marcus S. C.
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2021-02-16
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 780-780
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC7887240
- OpenAlex
- W3129779261
- Cited by
- 76
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 6 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 17 · 2021: 17 · 2020: 2
- FWCI
- 4.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
- Funders
- RCUK | Medical Research Council (MR/R024898/1)
- RCUK | Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (MR/R024898/1, BB/K003798/1)
- RCUK | Natural Environment Research Council (NE/G002827/1)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Zoonotic diseases and public health
- Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2, SARS-CoV, homologous recombination, co-infection, mammalian hosts
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Humans, Mammals, Models, Biological, Phylogeny, Recombination, Genetic, Reproducibility of Results, Coronavirus, Coronavirus Infections, Host-Pathogen Interactions
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review