Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 301

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Metal-organic framework membranes with single-atomic centers for photocatalytic CO2 and O2 reduction

Open access
Hao, Yu-Chen, Chen, Li-Wei, Li, Jiani, Guo, Yu, Su, Xin, Shu, Miao, Zhang, Qinghua, Gao, Wen-Yan, Li, Siwu, Yu, Zi-Long, Gu, Lin, Feng, Xiao, Yin, An-Xiang, Si, Rui, Zhang, Ya-Wen, Wang, Bo, Yan, Chun-Hua·2021·Nature Communications

Abstract

The demand for sustainable energy has motivated the development of artificial photosynthesis. Yet the catalyst and reaction interface designs for directly fixing permanent gases (e.g. CO 2 , O 2 , N 2 ) into liquid fuels are still challenged by slow mass transfer and sluggish catalytic kinetics at the gas-liquid-solid boundary. Here, we report that gas-permeable metal-organic framework (MOF) membranes can modify the electronic structures and catalytic properties of metal single-atoms (SAs) to promote the diffusion, activation, and reduction of gas molecules (e.g. CO 2, O 2 ) and produce liquid fuels under visible light and mild conditions. With Ir SAs as active centers, the defect-engineered MOF (e.g. activated NH 2 -UiO-66) particles can reduce CO 2 to HCOOH with an apparent quantum efficiency (AQE) of 2.51% at 420 nm on the gas-liquid-solid reaction interface. With promoted gas diffusion at the porous gas-solid interfaces, the gas-permeable SA/MOF membranes can directly convert humid CO 2 gas into HCOOH with a near-unity selectivity and a significantly increased AQE of 15.76% at 420 nm. A similar strategy can be applied to the photocatalytic O 2 -to-H 2 O 2 conversions, suggesting the wide applicability of our catalyst and reaction interface designs.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-021-22991-7

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 301

Metadata

Authors
Hao, Y.-C., Chen, L.-W., Li, J., Guo, Y., Su, X., Shu, M., Zhang, Q., Gao, W.-Y., Li, S., Yu, Z.-L., Gu, L., Feng, X., Yin, A.-X., Si, R., Zhang, Y.-W., Wang, B., & Yan, C.-H.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2021-05-11
Volume
12
Issue
1
Pages
2682-2682
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3189942403
Cited by
301
References
2
FWCI
9.46
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Metal-organic framework membranes with single-atomic centers for photocatalytic CO2 and O2 reduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-021-22991-7
The paper
Hao, Y.-C., Chen, L.-W., Li, J., Guo, Y., Su, X., Shu, M., Zhang, Q., Gao, W.-Y., Li, S., Yu, Z.-L., Gu, L., Feng, X., Yin, A.-X., Si, R., Zhang, Y.-W., Wang, B., & Yan, C.-H. (2021). Metal-organic framework membranes with single-atomic centers for photocatalytic CO2 and O2 reduction. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22991-7

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.