USP1-Trapping Lesions as a Source of DNA Replication Stress and Genomic Instability
Open accessAbstract
The deubiquitinase USP1 is a critical regulator of genome integrity through the deubiquitylation of Fanconi Anemia proteins and the DNA replication processivity factor, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). Uniquely, following UV irradiation, USP1 self-inactivates through autocleavage, which enables its own degradation and in turn, upregulates PCNA monoubiquitylation. However, the functional role for this autocleavage event during physiological conditions remains elusive. Herein, we discover that cells harboring an autocleavage-defective USP1 mutant, while still able to robustly deubiquitylate PCNA, experience more replication fork-stalling and premature fork termination events. Using super-resolution microscopy and live-cell single-molecule tracking, we show that these defects are related to the inability of this USP1 mutant to be properly recycled from sites of active DNA synthesis, resulting in replication-associated lesions. Furthermore, we find that the removal of USP1 molecules from DNA is facilitated by the DNA-dependent metalloprotease Spartan to counteract the cytotoxicity caused by "USP1-trapping". We propose a utility of USP1 inhibitors in cancer therapy based on their ability to induce USP1-trapping lesions and consequent replication stress and genomic instability in cancer cells, similar to how non-covalent DNA-protein crosslinks cause cytotoxicity by imposing steric hindrances upon proteins involved in DNA transactions.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Stressed mice exhibited higher expression of SASP, CREB, NF-κB, and AP-1 genes.
“These stressed mice also exhibited a higher expression of SASP, CREB, NF-κB, and AP-1 genes.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
In male SCID mice subjected to 14 days of restraint stress, there was increased expression of aging markers p16INK4a and p21, alongside reduced DNA damage repair capabilities.
“In a study involving male SCID mice subjected to 14 days of restraint stress, researchers observed an increased expression of aging markers such as p16INK4a and p21, alongside reduced DNA damage repair capabilities.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
Chronic stress can significantly affect biological aging pathways, particularly within bone marrow leukocytes, potentially mediated by sympathetic beta-adrenergic receptor activation.
“The findings suggest that chronic stress can significantly affect biological aging pathways, particularly within bone marrow leukocytes, potentially mediated by sympathetic beta-adrenergic receptor activation.”
From Comprehensive review of chronic stress pathways and the efficacy of behavioral stress reduction programs (BSRPs) in managing diseases. (2024) · cites this paper as [54]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 70 · Cited by 50
Research works printed but not linked: 1
- [54]Mórocz, M. et al. DNA-dependent protease activity of human Spartan facilitates replication of DNA–protein crosslink-containing DNA. Nucleic Acids Res.10.1093/nar/gkw1315 (2017). PMC5389635 28053116 · DOI
- Authors
- Coleman, K. E., Yin, Y., Lui, S. K. L., Keegan, S., Fenyo, D., Smith, D. J., Rothenberg, E., & Huang, T. T.
- Affiliations
- New York University (US)
- Peking University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Huang, Tony T.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2022-04-01
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1740-1740
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC8975806
- OpenAlex
- W4221069222
- Cited by
- 50
- References
- 70
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 17 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 5
- FWCI
- 3.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (ES031658, ES025166, gm139610)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › DNA Repair Mechanisms
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- Keywords
- USP1, deubiquitinase, PCNA, replication stress, genomic instability, replication fork stalling, UV irradiation, USP1 inhibitor, cancer therapy, DNA-protein crosslinks
- MeSH terms
- DNA Damage, DNA Replication, Humans, Genomic Instability, Ubiquitination, Ubiquitin-Specific Proteases
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review