Simultaneous proteome localization and turnover analysis reveals spatiotemporal features of protein homeostasis disruptions
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
The spatial and temporal distributions of proteins are critical to protein function, but cannot be directly assessed by measuring protein bundance. Here we describe a mass spectrometry-based proteomics strategy, Simultaneous Proteome Localization and Turnover (SPLAT), to measure concurrently protein turnover rates and subcellular localization in the same experiment. Applying the method, we find that unfolded protein response (UPR) has different effects on protein turnover dependent on their subcellular location in human AC16 cells, with proteome-wide slowdown but acceleration among stress response proteins in the ER and Golgi. In parallel, UPR triggers broad differential localization of proteins including RNA-binding proteins and amino acid transporters. Moreover, we observe newly synthesized proteins including EGFR that show a differential localization under stress than the existing protein pools, reminiscent of protein trafficking disruptions. We next applied SPLAT to an induced pluripotent stem cell derived cardiomyocyte (iPSC-CM) model of cancer drug cardiotoxicity upon treatment with the proteasome inhibitor carfilzomib. Paradoxically, carfilzomib has little effect on global average protein half-life, but may instead selectively disrupt sarcomere protein homeostasis. This study provides a view into the interactions of protein spatial and temporal dynamics and demonstrates a method to examine protein homeostasis regulations in stress and drug response.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Global quantification of mammalian gene expression control
Schwanhäusser, B., Busse, D., Li, N., Dittmar, G., Schuchhardt, J., Wolf, J., Chen, W., & Selbach, M. (2011) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature10098 · Cited by 6,566 · see citing works
Chemically defined generation of human cardiomyocytes
Burridge, P. W., Matsa, E., Shukla, P., Lin, Z. C., Churko, J. M., Ebert, A. D., Lan, F., Diecke, S., Huber, B., Mordwinkin, N. M., et al. (2014) · Nature Methods · doi:10.1038/nmeth.2999 · Cited by 1,606 · see citing works
Endoplasmic reticulum stress and unfolded protein response in cardiovascular diseases
Ren, J., Bi, Y., Sowers, J. R., Hetz, C., & Zhang, Y. (2021) · Nature Reviews Cardiology · doi:10.1038/s41569-021-00511-w · Cited by 708 · cited 14× · see citing works
“2), marked by canonical peroxisome markers PEX14 and ACOX1 (Supplementary Data 2).”
InfluentialThe Proteasome in Modern Drug Discovery: Second Life of a Highly Valuable Drug Target
Cromm, P. M., & Crews, C. M. (2017) · ACS Central Science · doi:10.1021/acscentsci.7b00252 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Lakkaraju, A. K. K., Mary, C., Scherrer, A., Johnson, A. E., & Strub, K. (2008) · Cell · doi:10.1016/j.cell.2008.02.049 · Cited by 136 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Currie, J., Manda, V., Robinson, S. K., Lai, C., Agnihotri, V., Hidalgo, V., Ludwig, R. W., Zhang, K., Pavelka, J., Wang, Z. V., Rhee, J.-W., Lam, M. P. Y., & Lau, E.
- Affiliations
- University of Colorado Anschutz (US)
- Stanford Cardiovascular Institute (US)
- City Of Hope National Medical Center (US)
- Corresponding author
- Lau, Edward
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2024-03-11
- Volume
- 15
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 2207-2207
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC10928085
- OpenAlex
- W4392638185
- Cited by
- 29
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 13 · 2024: 4
- FWCI
- 3.61
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (R35-GM146815, R01-GM144456)
- U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (K08-HL148540, R01-HL141278)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Spectroscopy › Advanced Proteomics Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ubiquitin and proteasome pathways
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Endoplasmic Reticulum Stress and Disease
- Keywords
- protein turnover, protein localization, proteostasis, unfolded protein response, splats, protein half-life, endoplasmic reticulum stress, Golgi stress, RNA-binding proteins, amino acid transporters, protein trafficking, carfilzomib, cardiotoxicity, sarcomere proteins, iPSC-derived cardiomyocytes, AC16 cells
- MeSH terms
- Proteostasis, Golgi Apparatus, Humans, Mass Spectrometry, Proteome, Unfolded Protein Response
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review