Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 328

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 36 of the 36 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Extreme Li-Mg selectivity via precise ion size differentiation of polyamide membrane

Open access
Peng, Quan, Wang, Ruoyu, Zhao, Zilin, Lin, Shihong, Liu, Ying, Dong, Dianyu, Wang, Zheng, He, Yiman, Zhu, Yuzhang, Jin, Jian, Jiang, Lei·2024·Nature Communications

Abstract

Achieving high selectivity of Li + and Mg 2+ is of paramount importance for effective lithium extraction from brines, and nanofiltration (NF) membrane plays a critical role in this process. The key to achieving high selectivity lies in the on-demand design of NF membrane pores in accordance with the size difference between Li + and Mg 2+ ions, but this poses a huge challenge for traditional NF membranes and difficult to be realized. In this work, we report the fabrication of polyamide (PA) NF membranes with ultra-high Li + /Mg 2+ selectivity by modifying the interfacial polymerization (IP) process between piperazine (PIP) and trimesoyl chloride (TMC) with an oil-soluble surfactant that forms a monolayer at oil/water interface, referred to as OSARIP. The OSARIP benefits to regulate the membrane pores so that all of them are smaller than Mg 2+ ions. Under the solely size sieving effect, an exceptional Mg 2+ rejection rate of over 99.9% is achieved. This results in an exceptionally high Li + /Mg 2+ selectivity, which is one to two orders of magnitude higher than all the currently reported pressure-driven membranes, and even higher than the microporous framework materials, including COFs, MOFs, and POPs. The large enhancement of ion separation performance of NF membranes may innovate the current lithium extraction process and greatly improve the lithium extraction efficiency.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-46887-4

Cites

36 of 36 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Cited by

See all 328

Metadata

Authors
Peng, Q., Wang, R., Zhao, Z., Lin, S., Liu, Y., Dong, D., Wang, Z., He, Y., Zhu, Y., Jin, J., & Jiang, L.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-03-20
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
2505-2505
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392982661
Cited by
328
References
36
FWCI
36.65
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Extreme Li-Mg selectivity via precise ion size differentiation of polyamide membrane. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41467-024-46887-4
The paper
Peng, Q., Wang, R., Zhao, Z., Lin, S., Liu, Y., Dong, D., Wang, Z., He, Y., Zhu, Y., Jin, J., & Jiang, L. (2024). Extreme Li-Mg selectivity via precise ion size differentiation of polyamide membrane. Nature Communications. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-024-46887-4

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.