Cited by 14Genomics and Phylogenetic StudiesMicrobial metabolism and enzyme functionMicrobial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Borg extrachromosomal elements of methane-oxidizing archaea have conserved and expressed genetic repertoires

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Borgs are huge extrachromosomal elements (ECE) of anaerobic methane-consuming “ Candidatus Methanoperedens” archaea. Here, we used nanopore sequencing to validate published complete genomes curated from short reads and to reconstruct new genomes. 13 complete and four near-complete linear genomes share 40 genes that define a largely syntenous genome backbone. We use these conserved genes to identify new Borgs from peatland soil and to delineate Borg phylogeny, revealing two major clades. Remarkably, Borg genes encoding nanowire-like electron-transferring cytochromes and cell surface proteins are more highly expressed than those of host Methanoperedens , indicating that Borgs augment the Methanoperedens activity in situ. We reconstructed the first complete 4.00 Mbp genome for a Methanoperedens that is inferred to be a Borg host and predicted its methylation motifs, which differ from pervasive TC and CC methylation motifs of the Borgs. Thus, methylation may enable Methanoperedens to distinguish their genomes from those of Borgs. Very high Borg to Methanoperedens ratios and structural predictions suggest that Borgs may be capable of encapsulation. The findings clearly define Borgs as a distinct class of ECE with shared genomic signatures, establish their diversification from a common ancestor with genetic inheritance, and raise the possibility of periodic existence outside of host cells.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-49548-8

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 67

  1. Al-Shayeb, B. et al. Borgs are giant genetic elements with potential to expand metabolic capacity. Nature 610, 731–736 (2022). · DOI
  2. Chen, L.-X., Anantharaman, K., Shaiber, A., Eren, A. M. & Banfield, J. F. Accurate and complete genomes from metagenomes. Genome Res. 30, 315–333 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  3. Haroon, M. F. et al. Anaerobic oxidation of methane coupled to nitrate reduction in a novel archaeal lineage. Nature 500, 567–570 (2013). · DOI
  4. Arshad, A. et al. A metagenomics-based metabolic model of nitrate-dependent anaerobic oxidation of methane by methanoperedens-like archaea. Front. Microbiol. 6, 1423 (2015). · DOI
  5. McIlroy, S. J. et al. Anaerobic methanotroph “Candidatus Methanoperedens nitroreducens” has a pleomorphic life cycle. Nat. Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41564-022-01292-9. (2023). · DOI
  6. Schoelmerich, M. C., Sachdeva, R., West-Roberts, J., Waldburger, L. & Banfield, J. F. Tandem repeats in giant archaeal Borg elements undergo rapid evolution and create new intrinsically disordered regions in proteins. PLoS Biol. 21, e3001980 (2023). · DOI
  7. van der Lee, R. et al. Classification of intrinsically disordered regions and proteins. Chem. Rev. 114, 6589–6631 (2014). · DOI
  8. Jankevicius, G., Ariza, A., Ahel, M. & Ahel, I. The toxin-antitoxin system DarTG catalyzes reversible ADP-ribosylation of DNA. Mol. Cell 64, 1109–1116 (2016). · DOI
  9. Weller, S. K. & Coen, D. M. Herpes simplex viruses: mechanisms of DNA replication. Cold Spring Harb. Perspect. Biol. 4, a013011 (2012). · DOI
  10. Burroughs, A. M., Zhang, D., Schäffer, D. E., Iyer, L. M. & Aravind, L. Comparative genomic analyses reveal a vast, novel network of nucleotide-centric systems in biological conflicts, immunity and signaling. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, 10633–10654 (2015). · DOI
  11. Amitsur, M., Levitz, R. & Kaufmann, G. Bacteriophage T4 anticodon nuclease, polynucleotide kinase and RNA ligase reprocess the host lysine tRNA. EMBO J. 6, 2499–2503 (1987). · DOI
  12. Griffith, E. C. et al. Ureadepsipeptides as ClpP activators. ACS Infect. Dis. 5, 1915–1925 (2019). · DOI
  13. Boccitto, M. & Wolin, S. L. Ro60 and Y RNAs: structure, functions, and roles in autoimmunity. Crit. Rev. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 54, 133–152 (2019). · DOI
  14. Liang, Q. et al. Structure and activity of a bacterial defense-associated 3’−5’ exonuclease. Protein Sci. 31, e4374 (2022). · DOI
  15. Fromme, J. C. & Verdine, G. L. Structure of a trapped endonuclease III-DNA covalent intermediate. EMBO J. 22, 3461–3471 (2003). · DOI
  16. Wang, P., Selvadurai, K. & Huang, R. H. Reconstitution and structure of a bacterial Pnkp1-Rnl-Hen1 RNA repair complex. Nat. Commun. 6, 6876 (2015). · DOI
  17. Bailly, V., Sung, P., Prakash, L. & Prakash, S. DNA.RNA helicase activity of RAD3 protein of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88, 9712–9716 (1991). · DOI
  18. Fülöp, A., Béres, R., Tengölics, R., Rákhely, G. & Kovács, K. L. Relationship between PHA and hydrogen metabolism in the purple sulfur phototrophic bacterium Thiocapsa roseopersicina BBS. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 37, 4915–4924 (2012). · DOI
  19. Bamford, D. H. et al. Constituents of SH1, a novel lipid-containing virus infecting the halophilic euryarchaeon Haloarcula hispanica. J. Virol. 79, 9097–9107 (2005). · DOI
  20. Santos-Pérez, I. et al. Structural basis for assembly of vertical single β-barrel viruses. Nat. Commun. 10, 1184 (2019). · DOI
  21. Nayfach, S. et al. CheckV assesses the quality and completeness of metagenome-assembled viral genomes. Nat. Biotechnol. 39, 578–585 (2021). · DOI
  22. Camargo, A. P. et al. You can move, but you can’t hide: identification of mobile genetic elements with geNomad. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2023.03.05.531206. (2023). · DOI
  23. Vellani, T. S. & Myers, R. S. Bacteriophage SPP1 Chu is an alkaline exonuclease in the SynExo family of viral two-component recombinases. J. Bacteriol. 185, 2465–2474 (2003). · DOI
  24. Weidner-Glunde, M., Mariggiò, G. & Schulz, T. F. Kaposi’s sarcoma-associated herpesvirus latency-associated nuclear antigen: replicating and shielding viral DNA during viral persistence. J. Virol. 91, e01083-16 (2017). · DOI
  25. Grady, L. M. et al. The exonuclease activity of herpes simplex virus 1 UL12 is required for production of viral DNA that can be packaged to produce infectious virus. J. Virol. 91, e01380-17 (2017). · DOI
  26. Okura, T., Taneno, A. & Oishi, E. Cell-to-cell transmission of turkey herpesvirus in chicken embryo cells via tunneling nanotubes. Avian Dis. 65, 335–339 (2021). · DOI
  27. Schoelmerich, M. C. et al. A widespread group of large plasmids in methanotrophic Methanoperedens archaea. Nat. Commun. 13, 1–11 (2022). · DOI · Paper page
  28. Xiang, X. et al. Sulfolobus tengchongensis spindle-shaped virus STSV1: virus-host interactions and genomic features. J. Virol. 79, 8677–8686 (2005). · DOI
  29. Hoelzer, K., Shackelton, L. A. & Parrish, C. R. Presence and role of cytosine methylation in DNA viruses of animals. Nucleic Acids Res. 36, 2825–2837 (2008). · DOI
  30. Gu, Y. et al. Structure of Geobacter cytochrome OmcZ identifies mechanism of nanowire assembly and conductivity. Nat. Microbiol. 8, 284–298 (2023). · DOI
  31. Yalcin, S. E. et al. Electric field stimulates production of highly conductive microbial OmcZ nanowires. Nat. Chem. Biol. 16, 1136–1142 (2020). · DOI
  32. Wegener, G., Krukenberg, V., Riedel, D., Tegetmeyer, H. E. & Boetius, A. Intercellular wiring enables electron transfer between methanotrophic archaea and bacteria. Nature 526, 587–590 (2015). · DOI
  33. Baquero, D. P. et al. Extracellular cytochrome nanowires appear to be ubiquitous in prokaryotes. Cell 186, 2853–2864.e8 (2023). · DOI
  34. Ouboter, H. T. et al. Mechanisms of extracellular electron transfer in anaerobic methanotrophic archaea. Nat. Commun. 15, 1477 (2024). · DOI
  35. Wilson, R. M. et al. Soil metabolome response to whole-ecosystem warming at the spruce and peatland responses under changing environments experiment. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 118, e2004192118 (2021). · DOI
  36. Bushnell, B. BBMap: a fast, accurate, splice-aware aligner. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1241166-bbmap-fast-accurate-splice-aware-aligner (2014).
  37. Peng, Y., Leung, H. C. M., Yiu, S. M. & Chin, F. Y. L. IDBA-UD: a de novo assembler for single-cell and metagenomic sequencing data with highly uneven depth. Bioinformatics 28, 1420–1428 (2012). · DOI
  38. Prjibelski, A., Antipov, D., Meleshko, D., Lapidus, A. & Korobeynikov, A. Using SPAdes de novo assembler. Curr. Protoc. Bioinforma. 70, e102 (2020). · DOI · Paper page
  39. Hyatt, D. et al. Prodigal: prokaryotic gene recognition and translation initiation site identification. BMC Bioinformatics 11, 119 (2010). · DOI
  40. Edgar, R. C. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics 26, 2460–2461 (2010). · DOI
  41. Wick, R. R., Judd, L. M., Gorrie, C. L. & Holt, K. E. Completing bacterial genome assemblies with multiplex MinION sequencing. Microb. Genom. 3, e000132 (2017).
  42. Li, H. Minimap2: pairwise alignment for nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 34, 3094–3100 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  43. Kolmogorov, M. et al. metaFlye: scalable long-read metagenome assembly using repeat graphs. Nat. Methods 17, 1103–1110 (2020). · DOI
  44. Aury, J.-M. & Istace, B. Hapo-G, haplotype-aware polishing of genome assemblies with accurate reads. NAR Genom. Bioinform. 3, lqab034 (2021). · DOI
  45. Liao, Y., Smyth, G. K. & Shi, W. featureCounts: an efficient general purpose program for assigning sequence reads to genomic features. Bioinformatics 30, 923–930 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  46. Brown, C. T., Olm, M. R., Thomas, B. C. & Banfield, J. F. Measurement of bacterial replication rates in microbial communities. Nat. Biotechnol. 34, 1256–1263 (2016). · DOI
  47. Mirdita, M., Ovchinnikov, S. & Steinegger, M. ColabFold - Making protein folding accessible to all. bioRxiv https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.15.456425. (2021). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Krissinel, E. & Henrick, K. Secondary-structure matching (SSM), a new tool for fast protein structure alignment in three dimensions. Acta Crystallogr. D. Biol. Crystallogr. 60, 2256–2268 (2004). · DOI
  49. Steinegger, M. & Söding, J. MMseqs2 enables sensitive protein sequence searching for the analysis of massive data sets. Nat. Biotechnol. 35, 1026–1028 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Remmert, M., Biegert, A., Hauser, A. & Söding, J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat. Methods 9, 173–175 (2011). · DOI · Paper page
  51. Söding, J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics 21, 951–960 (2005). · DOI
  52. Altschul, S. F., Gish, W., Miller, W., Myers, E. W. & Lipman, D. J. Basic local alignment search tool. J. Mol. Biol. 215, 403–410 (1990). · DOI · Paper page
  53. Shaffer, M. et al. DRAM for distilling microbial metabolism to automate the curation of microbiome function. Nucleic Acids Res. 48, 8883–8900 (2020). · DOI
  54. OpenAI. GPT-4 Technical Report. arXiv https://arxiv.org/abs/2303.08774 (2023). · arXiv
  55. Gilchrist, C. L. M. & Chooi, Y.-H. Clinker & clustermap.js: automatic generation of gene cluster comparison figures. Bioinformatics https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btab007. (2021). · DOI
  56. Finn, R. D. et al. Pfam: the protein families database. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D222–D230 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Quast, C. et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 41, D590–D596 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  58. Woodcroft et al. SingleM and Sandpiper: robust microbial taxonomic profiles from metagenomic data. bioRxiv https://www.biorxiv.org/content/10.1101/2024.01.30.578060v1 (2024). · DOI
  59. Katoh, K. & Standley, D. M. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 772–780 (2013). · DOI · Paper page
  60. Criscuolo, A. & Gribaldo, S. BMGE (Block Mapping and Gathering with Entropy): a new software for selection of phylogenetic informative regions from multiple sequence alignments. BMC Evol. Biol. 10, 210 (2010). · DOI
  61. Nguyen, L.-T., Schmidt, H. A., von Haeseler, A. & Minh, B. Q. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 268–274 (2015). · DOI · Paper page
  62. Hoang, D. T., Chernomor, O., von Haeseler, A., Minh, B. Q. & Vinh, L. S. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 518–522 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Letunic, I. & Bork, P. Interactive tree of life (iTOL) v3: an online tool for the display and annotation of phylogenetic and other trees. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W242–W245 (2016). · DOI
  64. Kumar, S., Stecher, G., Li, M., Knyaz, C. & Tamura, K. MEGA X: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Mol. Biol. Evol. 35, 1547–1549 (2018). · DOI
  65. Almagro Armenteros, J. J. et al. SignalP 5.0 improves signal peptide predictions using deep neural networks. Nat. Biotechnol. 37, 420–423 (2019). · DOI
  66. Sievers, F. et al. Fast, scalable generation of high-quality protein multiple sequence alignments using Clustal Omega. Mol. Syst. Biol. 7, 539 (2011). · DOI
  67. Ashkenazy, H. et al. ConSurf 2016: an improved methodology to estimate and visualize evolutionary conservation in macromolecules. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, W344–W350 (2016). · DOI · Paper page

Metadata

Authors
Schoelmerich, M. C., Ly, L., West-Roberts, J., Shi, L.-D., Shen, C., Malvankar, N. S., Taib, N., Gribaldo, S., Woodcroft, B. J., Schadt, C. W., Al-Shayeb, B., Dai, X., Mozsary, C., Hickey, S., He, C., Beaulaurier, J., Juul, S., Sachdeva, R., & Banfield, J. F.
Affiliations
  • ETH Zurich (CH)
  • University of California, Berkeley (US)
  • Innovative Genomics Institute (US)
  • Yale University (US)
  • Institut Pasteur (FR)
  • Translational Research Institute (AU)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (US)
Corresponding author
Banfield, Jillian F.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2024-06-26
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
5414-5414
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4400038578
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4
FWCI
1.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • OSTI OAI (U.S. Department of Energy Office of Scientific and Technical Information) (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • National Science Foundation (2210473, DEAC05- 00OR22725)
  • U.S. Department of Energy (AC05-00OR22725, DE--AC05--00OR22725, DE-AC05?, 00OR22725)
  • Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV-037174)
  • Battelle (DE-AC05- 00OR22725, DE-AC05)
  • Innovative Genomics Institute
  • Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (447383558, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
  • Agence Nationale de la Recherche
  • Australian Research Council (FT210100521)
  • Biological and Environmental Research (00OR22725, DE‐AC05–00OR22725)
  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory (AC05-00OR22725, DE-AC05-00OR22725)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Genomics and Phylogenetic Studies
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Microbial metabolism and enzyme function
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › Microbial Fuel Cells and Bioremediation
Keywords
Borg, extrachromosomal elements, syntenic genes, electron transfer, cell surface proteins, peat soils, host-parasite interactions
MeSH terms
Nanopore Sequencing, Archaea, Methane, Oxidation-Reduction, Phylogeny, Soil Microbiology, DNA Methylation, Genome, Archaeal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review