The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Structural insights into the mechanism of phosphate recognition and transport by XPR1
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract XPR1 is the only known protein responsible for transporting inorganic phosphate (Pi) out of cells, a function conserved from yeast to mammals. Human XPR1 variants lead to cerebral calcium-phosphate deposition, which are associated with a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder known as primary familial brain calcification (PFBC). Here, we present the cryo-EM structure of human XPR1 in both its Pi-unbound form and various Pi-bound states. XPR1 features 10 transmembrane α-helices that form an ion channel-like architecture. Multiple Pi recognition sites are arranged along the channel, facilitating Pi ion transport. Two arginine residues, subject to pathogenic mutation in PFBC families, line the translocation channel and serve to bind Pi ion. Clinically linked mutations in these arginines impair XPR1’s Pi transport activity. To gain dynamic insights into the channel-like transport mechanism, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations reveal that Pi ion undergoes a stepwise transition through the sequential recognition sites during the transport process. Together with functional analyses, our results suggest that the sequential arrangement of Pi recognition sites likely enable XPR1 to use a “relay” process to facilitate Pi ion passage through the channel, and they establish a framework for the interpretation of disease-related mutations and for the development of future therapeutics. One Sentence Summary Combined cryo-EM, molecular dynamics simulations and functional studies demonstrate that human XPR1 employs a channel-like transport mechanism to export inorganic phosphate out of cells
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 68
- Kavanaugh, M. P. et al. Cell-surface receptors for gibbon ape leukemia-virus and amphotropic murine retrovirus are inducible sodium-dependent phosphate symporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7071–7075 (1994). · DOI
- Olah, Z., Lehel, C., Anderson, W. B., Eiden, M. V. & Wilson, C. A. The cellular receptor for gibbon ape leukemia-virus is a novel high-affinity sodium-dependent phosphate transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25426–25431 (1994). · DOI
- Hilfiker, H. et al. Characterization of a murine type II sodium-phosphate cotransporter expressed in mammalian small intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14564–14569 (1998). · DOI
- Murer, H., Hernando, N., Forster, I. & Biber, J. Proximal tubular phosphate reabsorption: molecular mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 80, 1373–1409 (2000). · DOI
- Forster, I. C., Hernando, N., Biber, J. & Murer, H. Phosphate transporters of the SLC20 and SLC34 families. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 386–395 (2013). · DOI
- Chande, S. & Bergwitz, C. Role of phosphate sensing in bone and mineral metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 637–655 (2018). · DOI
- Prie, D. & Friedlander, G. Genetic disorders of renal phosphate transport. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2399–2409 (2010). · DOI
- Manghat, P., Sodi, R. & Swaminathan, R. Phosphate homeostasis and disorders. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 51, 631–656 (2014). · DOI
- Giovannini, D., Touhami, J., Charnet, P., Sitbon, M. & Battini, J. L. Inorganic phosphate export by the retrovirus receptor XPR1 in metazoans. Cell Rep. 3, 1866–1873 (2013). · DOI
- Tailor, C. S., Nouri, A., Lee, C. G., Kozak, C. & Kabat, D. Cloning and characterization of a cell surface receptor for xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 927–932 (1999). · DOI
- Pedersen, B. P. et al. Crystal structure of a eukaryotic phosphate transporter. Nature 496, 533–536 (2013). · DOI
- Tsai, J. Y. et al. Structure of the sodium-dependent phosphate transporter reveals insights into human solute carrier SLC20. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4024 (2020). · DOI
- Liu, Y. et al. Key computational findings reveal proton transfer as driving the functional cycle in the phosphate transporter PiPT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101932118 (2021). · DOI
- Lopez-Sanchez, U. et al. Interplay between primary familial brain calcification-associated SLC20A2 and XPR1 phosphate transporters requires inositol polyphosphates for control of cellular phosphate homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 9366–9378 (2020). · DOI
- Ma, B. et al. A plasma membrane transporter coordinates phosphate reallocation and grain filling in cereals. Nat. Genet. 53, 906–915 (2021). · DOI
- Jennings, M. L. Role of transporters in regulating mammalian intracellular inorganic phosphate. Front. Pharmacol. 14, 1163442 (2023). · DOI
- Legati, A. et al. Mutations in XPR1 cause primary familial brain calcification associated with altered phosphate export. Nat. Genet. 47, 579–581 (2015). · DOI
- Balck, A. et al. Genotype-phenotype relations in primary familial brain calcification: systematic MDSGene review. Mov. Disord. 36, 2468–2480 (2021). · DOI
- Yao, X. P. et al. Analysis of gene expression and functional characterization of XPR1: a pathogenic gene for primary familial brain calcification. Cell Tissue Res. 370, 267–273 (2017). · DOI
- Anheim, M. et al. XPR1 mutations are a rare cause of primary familial brain calcification. J. Neurol. 263, 1559–1564 (2016). · DOI
- Sobrido, M. J., Coppola, G., Oliveira, J., Hopfer, S. & Geschwind, D. H. Primary familial brain calcification. GeneReviews http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1421/ (2014).
- Xu, X. et al. The pathology of primary familial brain calcification: implications for treatment. Neurosci. Bull. 39, 659–674 (2023). · DOI
- Ramos, E. M. et al. Primary brain calcification: an international study reporting novel variants and associated phenotypes. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 26, 1462–1477 (2018). · DOI
- Mailer, R. K. et al. Xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 regulates procoagulant platelet polyphosphate. Blood 137, 1392–1405 (2021). · DOI
- Bondeson, D. P. et al. Phosphate dysregulation via the XPR1-KIDINS220 protein complex is a therapeutic vulnerability in ovarian cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 681–695 (2022). · DOI
- Quintans, B., Oliveira, J. & Sobrido, M.-J. Primary familial brain calcifications. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 147, 307–317 (2018). · DOI
- Akasu-Nagayoshi, Y. et al. PHOSPHATE exporter XPR1/SLC53A1 is required for the tumorigenicity of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 113, 2034–2043 (2022). · DOI
- Li, X. Y. et al. Control of XPR1-dependent cellular phosphate efflux by InsP(8) is an exemplar for functionally-exclusive inositol pyrophosphate signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3568–3574 (2020). · DOI
- Moritoh, Y. et al. The enzymatic activity of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase controls circulating phosphate in mammals. Nat. Commun. 12, 4847 (2021). · DOI
- Li, X. Y. et al. Homeostatic coordination of cellular phosphate uptake and efflux requires an organelle-based receptor for the inositol pyrophosphate IP8. Cell Rep. 43, 114316 (2024). · DOI
- Wild, R. et al. Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domains. Science 352, 986–990 (2016). · DOI
- Guan, Z. et al. The cytoplasmic synthesis and coupled membrane translocation of eukaryotic polyphosphate by signal-activated VTC complex. Nat. Commun. 14, 718 (2023). · DOI
- Guan, Z. Y. et al. Mechanistic insights into the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis by the rice SPX2-PHR2 complex. Nat. Commun. 13, 1581 (2022). · DOI
- Zhou, J. et al. Mechanism of phosphate sensing and signaling revealed by rice SPX1-PHR2 complex structure. Nat. Commun. 12, 7040 (2021). · DOI
- Wege, S. et al. The EXS domain of PHO1 participates in the response of shoots to phosphate deficiency via a root-to-shoot signal. Plant Physiol. 170, 385–400 (2016). · DOI
- Wang, Y., Ribot, C., Rezzonico, E. & Poirier, Y. Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 135, 400–411 (2004). · DOI
- Holm, L. & Sander, C. Protein-structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123–138 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
- Chovancova, E. et al. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. Plos Comput. Biol. 8, e1002708 (2012). · DOI
- Sun, L. F. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature 490, 361–366 (2012). · DOI
- Popova, Y., Thayumanavan, P., Lonati, E., Agrochao, M. & Thevelein, J. M. Transport and signaling through the phosphate-binding site of the yeast Pho84 phosphate transceptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2890–2895 (2010). · DOI
- Lopez-Sanchez, U. et al. Characterization of XPR1/SLC53A1 variants located outside of the SPX domain in patients with primary familial brain calcification. Sci. Rep. 9, 6776 (2019). · DOI
- Guo, X. X. et al. Spectrum of SLC20A2, PDGFRB, PDGFB, and XPR1 mutations in a large cohort of patients with primary familial brain calcification. Hum. Mutat. 40, 392–403 (2019). · DOI
- Orimo, K. et al. A Japanese family with idiopathic basal ganglia calcification carrying a novel XPR1 variant. J. Neurol. Sci. 451, 120732 (2023). · DOI
- Hurlimann, B. C., Stadler-Waibel, M., Werner, T. P. & Freimoser, F. M. Pho91 is a vacuolar phosphate phosphate and polyphosphate Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4438–4445 (2007). · DOI
- Poirier, Y., Thoma, S., Somerville, C. & Schiefelbein, J. A. Mutant of arabidopsis deficient in xylem loading of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 97, 1087–1093 (1991). · DOI
- Stefanovic, A. et al. Over-expression of PHO1 in Arabidopsis leaves reveals its role in mediating phosphate efflux. Plant J. 66, 689–699 (2011). · DOI
- Xu, C. et al. A phosphate-sensing organelle regulates phosphate and tissue homeostasis. Nature 617, 798–806 (2023). · DOI
- Quistgaard, E. M., Low, C., Guettou, F. & Nordlund, P. Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 123–132 (2016). · DOI
- Drew, D., North, R. A., Nagarathinam, K. & Tanabe, M. Structures and general transport mechanisms by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Chem. Rev. 121, 5289–5335 (2021). · DOI
- Shears, S. B. Inositol pyrophosphates: why so many phosphates? Adv. Biol. Regul. 57, 203–216 (2015). · DOI
- Nagpal, L., He, S., Rao, F. & Snyder, S. H. Inositol pyrophosphates as versatile metabolic messengers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 93, 317–338 (2024). · DOI
- Yan, R. et al. Human XPR1 structures reveal phosphate export mechanism. Nature 633, 960–967 (2024). · DOI
- Lu, Y. et al. Structural basis for inositol pyrophosphate gating of the phosphate channel XPR1. Science 386, eadp3252 (2024). · DOI
- Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
- Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). · DOI
- Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021). · DOI
- Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
- Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EMEM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). · DOI
- Brown, A. et al. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 71, 136–153 (2015). · DOI
- Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018). · DOI
- Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
- Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. Software news and updates—CHARNIM-GUI: a web-based grraphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
- Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017). · DOI
- Olsson, M. H. M., Sondergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011). · DOI
- Páll, S., Abraham, M. J., Kutzner, C., Hess, B. & Lindahl, E. Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS. 2nd International Conference on Exascale Applications and Software (EASC) 3–27 (2015). · DOI
- Bonomi, M. et al. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations. Nat. Methods 16, 670–673 (2019). · DOI
- Briones, R., Biau, C., Kutzner, C., de Groot, B. L. & Aponte-Santamaría, C. GROmaρs: a GROMACS-based toolset to analyze density maps derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 116, 4–11 (2019). · DOI
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Guan, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, M., Du, Z., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., Zuo, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Yin, P., Ma, L., & Liu, Z.
- Affiliations
- Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
- Zhejiang University (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Liu, Zhu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-01-02
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 18-18
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC11696373
- OpenAlex
- W4406002903
- Cited by
- 20
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 7
- FWCI
- 5.71
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Key Research and Development Program of China
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
- Keywords
- XPR1, inorganic phosphate transport, phosphate recognition, Fahr disease, transmembrane ion channels, arginine mutations, cryo-EM structure, molecular dynamics simulation
- MeSH terms
- Xenotropic and Polytropic Retrovirus Receptor, Binding Sites, Biological Transport, Humans, Mutation, Phosphates, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, HEK293 Cells
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review