Cited by 20Ion channel regulation and functionIon Transport and Channel RegulationErythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Structural insights into the mechanism of phosphate recognition and transport by XPR1

Open access

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract XPR1 is the only known protein responsible for transporting inorganic phosphate (Pi) out of cells, a function conserved from yeast to mammals. Human XPR1 variants lead to cerebral calcium-phosphate deposition, which are associated with a hereditary neurodegenerative disorder known as primary familial brain calcification (PFBC). Here, we present the cryo-EM structure of human XPR1 in both its Pi-unbound form and various Pi-bound states. XPR1 features 10 transmembrane α-helices that form an ion channel-like architecture. Multiple Pi recognition sites are arranged along the channel, facilitating Pi ion transport. Two arginine residues, subject to pathogenic mutation in PFBC families, line the translocation channel and serve to bind Pi ion. Clinically linked mutations in these arginines impair XPR1’s Pi transport activity. To gain dynamic insights into the channel-like transport mechanism, we conducted molecular dynamics simulations. The simulations reveal that Pi ion undergoes a stepwise transition through the sequential recognition sites during the transport process. Together with functional analyses, our results suggest that the sequential arrangement of Pi recognition sites likely enable XPR1 to use a “relay” process to facilitate Pi ion passage through the channel, and they establish a framework for the interpretation of disease-related mutations and for the development of future therapeutics. One Sentence Summary Combined cryo-EM, molecular dynamics simulations and functional studies demonstrate that human XPR1 employs a channel-like transport mechanism to export inorganic phosphate out of cells

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-024-55471-9

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 68

  1. Kavanaugh, M. P. et al. Cell-surface receptors for gibbon ape leukemia-virus and amphotropic murine retrovirus are inducible sodium-dependent phosphate symporters. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 91, 7071–7075 (1994). · DOI
  2. Olah, Z., Lehel, C., Anderson, W. B., Eiden, M. V. & Wilson, C. A. The cellular receptor for gibbon ape leukemia-virus is a novel high-affinity sodium-dependent phosphate transporter. J. Biol. Chem. 269, 25426–25431 (1994). · DOI
  3. Hilfiker, H. et al. Characterization of a murine type II sodium-phosphate cotransporter expressed in mammalian small intestine. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 14564–14569 (1998). · DOI
  4. Murer, H., Hernando, N., Forster, I. & Biber, J. Proximal tubular phosphate reabsorption: molecular mechanisms. Physiol. Rev. 80, 1373–1409 (2000). · DOI
  5. Forster, I. C., Hernando, N., Biber, J. & Murer, H. Phosphate transporters of the SLC20 and SLC34 families. Mol. Asp. Med. 34, 386–395 (2013). · DOI
  6. Chande, S. & Bergwitz, C. Role of phosphate sensing in bone and mineral metabolism. Nat. Rev. Endocrinol. 14, 637–655 (2018). · DOI
  7. Prie, D. & Friedlander, G. Genetic disorders of renal phosphate transport. N. Engl. J. Med. 362, 2399–2409 (2010). · DOI
  8. Manghat, P., Sodi, R. & Swaminathan, R. Phosphate homeostasis and disorders. Ann. Clin. Biochem. 51, 631–656 (2014). · DOI
  9. Giovannini, D., Touhami, J., Charnet, P., Sitbon, M. & Battini, J. L. Inorganic phosphate export by the retrovirus receptor XPR1 in metazoans. Cell Rep. 3, 1866–1873 (2013). · DOI
  10. Tailor, C. S., Nouri, A., Lee, C. G., Kozak, C. & Kabat, D. Cloning and characterization of a cell surface receptor for xenotropic and polytropic murine leukemia viruses. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 927–932 (1999). · DOI
  11. Pedersen, B. P. et al. Crystal structure of a eukaryotic phosphate transporter. Nature 496, 533–536 (2013). · DOI
  12. Tsai, J. Y. et al. Structure of the sodium-dependent phosphate transporter reveals insights into human solute carrier SLC20. Sci. Adv. 6, eabb4024 (2020). · DOI
  13. Liu, Y. et al. Key computational findings reveal proton transfer as driving the functional cycle in the phosphate transporter PiPT. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 118, e2101932118 (2021). · DOI
  14. Lopez-Sanchez, U. et al. Interplay between primary familial brain calcification-associated SLC20A2 and XPR1 phosphate transporters requires inositol polyphosphates for control of cellular phosphate homeostasis. J. Biol. Chem. 295, 9366–9378 (2020). · DOI
  15. Ma, B. et al. A plasma membrane transporter coordinates phosphate reallocation and grain filling in cereals. Nat. Genet. 53, 906–915 (2021). · DOI
  16. Jennings, M. L. Role of transporters in regulating mammalian intracellular inorganic phosphate. Front. Pharmacol. 14, 1163442 (2023). · DOI
  17. Legati, A. et al. Mutations in XPR1 cause primary familial brain calcification associated with altered phosphate export. Nat. Genet. 47, 579–581 (2015). · DOI
  18. Balck, A. et al. Genotype-phenotype relations in primary familial brain calcification: systematic MDSGene review. Mov. Disord. 36, 2468–2480 (2021). · DOI
  19. Yao, X. P. et al. Analysis of gene expression and functional characterization of XPR1: a pathogenic gene for primary familial brain calcification. Cell Tissue Res. 370, 267–273 (2017). · DOI
  20. Anheim, M. et al. XPR1 mutations are a rare cause of primary familial brain calcification. J. Neurol. 263, 1559–1564 (2016). · DOI
  21. Sobrido, M. J., Coppola, G., Oliveira, J., Hopfer, S. & Geschwind, D. H. Primary familial brain calcification. GeneReviews http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK1421/ (2014).
  22. Xu, X. et al. The pathology of primary familial brain calcification: implications for treatment. Neurosci. Bull. 39, 659–674 (2023). · DOI
  23. Ramos, E. M. et al. Primary brain calcification: an international study reporting novel variants and associated phenotypes. Eur. J. Hum. Genet. 26, 1462–1477 (2018). · DOI
  24. Mailer, R. K. et al. Xenotropic and polytropic retrovirus receptor 1 regulates procoagulant platelet polyphosphate. Blood 137, 1392–1405 (2021). · DOI
  25. Bondeson, D. P. et al. Phosphate dysregulation via the XPR1-KIDINS220 protein complex is a therapeutic vulnerability in ovarian cancer. Nat. Cancer 3, 681–695 (2022). · DOI
  26. Quintans, B., Oliveira, J. & Sobrido, M.-J. Primary familial brain calcifications. Handb. Clin. Neurol. 147, 307–317 (2018). · DOI
  27. Akasu-Nagayoshi, Y. et al. PHOSPHATE exporter XPR1/SLC53A1 is required for the tumorigenicity of epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Sci. 113, 2034–2043 (2022). · DOI
  28. Li, X. Y. et al. Control of XPR1-dependent cellular phosphate efflux by InsP(8) is an exemplar for functionally-exclusive inositol pyrophosphate signaling. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 117, 3568–3574 (2020). · DOI
  29. Moritoh, Y. et al. The enzymatic activity of inositol hexakisphosphate kinase controls circulating phosphate in mammals. Nat. Commun. 12, 4847 (2021). · DOI
  30. Li, X. Y. et al. Homeostatic coordination of cellular phosphate uptake and efflux requires an organelle-based receptor for the inositol pyrophosphate IP8. Cell Rep. 43, 114316 (2024). · DOI
  31. Wild, R. et al. Control of eukaryotic phosphate homeostasis by inositol polyphosphate sensor domains. Science 352, 986–990 (2016). · DOI
  32. Guan, Z. et al. The cytoplasmic synthesis and coupled membrane translocation of eukaryotic polyphosphate by signal-activated VTC complex. Nat. Commun. 14, 718 (2023). · DOI
  33. Guan, Z. Y. et al. Mechanistic insights into the regulation of plant phosphate homeostasis by the rice SPX2-PHR2 complex. Nat. Commun. 13, 1581 (2022). · DOI
  34. Zhou, J. et al. Mechanism of phosphate sensing and signaling revealed by rice SPX1-PHR2 complex structure. Nat. Commun. 12, 7040 (2021). · DOI
  35. Wege, S. et al. The EXS domain of PHO1 participates in the response of shoots to phosphate deficiency via a root-to-shoot signal. Plant Physiol. 170, 385–400 (2016). · DOI
  36. Wang, Y., Ribot, C., Rezzonico, E. & Poirier, Y. Structure and expression profile of the Arabidopsis PHO1 gene family indicates a broad role in inorganic phosphate homeostasis. Plant Physiol. 135, 400–411 (2004). · DOI
  37. Holm, L. & Sander, C. Protein-structure comparison by alignment of distance matrices. J. Mol. Biol. 233, 123–138 (1993). · DOI · Paper page
  38. Chovancova, E. et al. CAVER 3.0: a tool for the analysis of transport pathways in dynamic protein structures. Plos Comput. Biol. 8, e1002708 (2012). · DOI
  39. Sun, L. F. et al. Crystal structure of a bacterial homologue of glucose transporters GLUT1-4. Nature 490, 361–366 (2012). · DOI
  40. Popova, Y., Thayumanavan, P., Lonati, E., Agrochao, M. & Thevelein, J. M. Transport and signaling through the phosphate-binding site of the yeast Pho84 phosphate transceptor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 107, 2890–2895 (2010). · DOI
  41. Lopez-Sanchez, U. et al. Characterization of XPR1/SLC53A1 variants located outside of the SPX domain in patients with primary familial brain calcification. Sci. Rep. 9, 6776 (2019). · DOI
  42. Guo, X. X. et al. Spectrum of SLC20A2, PDGFRB, PDGFB, and XPR1 mutations in a large cohort of patients with primary familial brain calcification. Hum. Mutat. 40, 392–403 (2019). · DOI
  43. Orimo, K. et al. A Japanese family with idiopathic basal ganglia calcification carrying a novel XPR1 variant. J. Neurol. Sci. 451, 120732 (2023). · DOI
  44. Hurlimann, B. C., Stadler-Waibel, M., Werner, T. P. & Freimoser, F. M. Pho91 is a vacuolar phosphate phosphate and polyphosphate Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol. Biol. Cell 18, 4438–4445 (2007). · DOI
  45. Poirier, Y., Thoma, S., Somerville, C. & Schiefelbein, J. A. Mutant of arabidopsis deficient in xylem loading of phosphate. Plant Physiol. 97, 1087–1093 (1991). · DOI
  46. Stefanovic, A. et al. Over-expression of PHO1 in Arabidopsis leaves reveals its role in mediating phosphate efflux. Plant J. 66, 689–699 (2011). · DOI
  47. Xu, C. et al. A phosphate-sensing organelle regulates phosphate and tissue homeostasis. Nature 617, 798–806 (2023). · DOI
  48. Quistgaard, E. M., Low, C., Guettou, F. & Nordlund, P. Understanding transport by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS): structures pave the way. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 17, 123–132 (2016). · DOI
  49. Drew, D., North, R. A., Nagarathinam, K. & Tanabe, M. Structures and general transport mechanisms by the major facilitator superfamily (MFS). Chem. Rev. 121, 5289–5335 (2021). · DOI
  50. Shears, S. B. Inositol pyrophosphates: why so many phosphates? Adv. Biol. Regul. 57, 203–216 (2015). · DOI
  51. Nagpal, L., He, S., Rao, F. & Snyder, S. H. Inositol pyrophosphates as versatile metabolic messengers. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 93, 317–338 (2024). · DOI
  52. Yan, R. et al. Human XPR1 structures reveal phosphate export mechanism. Nature 633, 960–967 (2024). · DOI
  53. Lu, Y. et al. Structural basis for inositol pyrophosphate gating of the phosphate channel XPR1. Science 386, eadp3252 (2024). · DOI
  54. Zheng, S. Q. et al. MotionCor2: anisotropic correction of beam-induced motion for improved cryo-electron microscopy. Nat. Methods 14, 331–332 (2017). · DOI
  55. Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. CTFFIND4: fast and accurate defocus estimation from electron micrographs. J. Struct. Biol. 192, 216–221 (2015). · DOI
  56. Punjani, A., Rubinstein, J. L., Fleet, D. J. & Brubaker, M. A. cryoSPARC: algorithms for rapid unsupervised cryo-EM structure determination. Nat. Methods 14, 290–296 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  57. Zhong, E. D., Bepler, T., Berger, B. & Davis, J. H. CryoDRGN: reconstruction of heterogeneous cryo-EM structures using neural networks. Nat. Methods 18, 176–185 (2021). · DOI
  58. Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. Elife 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
  59. Kucukelbir, A., Sigworth, F. J. & Tagare, H. D. Quantifying the local resolution of cryo-EMEM density maps. Nat. Methods 11, 63–65 (2014). · DOI
  60. Brown, A. et al. Tools for macromolecular model building and refinement into electron cryo-microscopy reconstructions. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 71, 136–153 (2015). · DOI
  61. Afonine, P. V. et al. Real-space refinement in PHENIX for cryo-EM and crystallography. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. Struct. Biol. 74, 531–544 (2018). · DOI
  62. Williams, C. J. et al. MolProbity: More and better reference data for improved all-atom structure validation. Protein Sci. 27, 293–315 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  63. Jo, S., Kim, T., Iyer, V. G. & Im, W. Software news and updates—CHARNIM-GUI: a web-based grraphical user interface for CHARMM. J. Comput. Chem. 29, 1859–1865 (2008). · DOI · Paper page
  64. Huang, J. et al. CHARMM36m: an improved force field for folded and intrinsically disordered proteins. Nat. Methods 14, 71–73 (2017). · DOI
  65. Olsson, M. H. M., Sondergaard, C. R., Rostkowski, M. & Jensen, J. H. PROPKA3: consistent treatment of internal and surface residues in empirical pKa predictions. J. Chem. Theory Comput. 7, 525–537 (2011). · DOI
  66. Páll, S., Abraham, M. J., Kutzner, C., Hess, B. & Lindahl, E. Tackling exascale software challenges in molecular dynamics simulations with GROMACS. 2nd International Conference on Exascale Applications and Software (EASC) 3–27 (2015). · DOI
  67. Bonomi, M. et al. Promoting transparency and reproducibility in enhanced molecular simulations. Nat. Methods 16, 670–673 (2019). · DOI
  68. Briones, R., Biau, C., Kutzner, C., de Groot, B. L. & Aponte-Santamaría, C. GROmaρs: a GROMACS-based toolset to analyze density maps derived from molecular dynamics simulations. Biophys. J. 116, 4–11 (2019). · DOI

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, W., Chen, Y., Guan, Z., Wang, Y., Tang, M., Du, Z., Zhang, J., Cheng, M., Zuo, J., Liu, Y., Wang, Q., Liu, Y., Zhang, D., Yin, P., Ma, L., & Liu, Z.
Affiliations
  • Huazhong Agricultural University (CN)
  • Zhejiang University (CN)
Corresponding author
Liu, Zhu
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-01-02
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
18-18
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4406002903
Cited by
20
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 7
FWCI
5.71
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
National Key Research and Development Program of China
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion channel regulation and function
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Ion Transport and Channel Regulation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology (medical) › Erythrocyte Function and Pathophysiology
Keywords
XPR1, inorganic phosphate transport, phosphate recognition, Fahr disease, transmembrane ion channels, arginine mutations, cryo-EM structure, molecular dynamics simulation
MeSH terms
Xenotropic and Polytropic Retrovirus Receptor, Binding Sites, Biological Transport, Humans, Mutation, Phosphates, Cryoelectron Microscopy, Receptors, G-Protein-Coupled, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, HEK293 Cells

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review