Cited by 99Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

AlphaFold prediction of structural ensembles of disordered proteins

Open access
Brotzakis, Z. Faidon, Zhang, Shengyu, Murtada, Mhd Hussein, Vendruscolo, Michele·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Deep learning methods of predicting protein structures have reached an accuracy comparable to that of high-resolution experimental methods. It is thus possible to generate accurate models of the native states of hundreds of millions of proteins. An open question, however, concerns whether these advances can be translated to disordered proteins, which should be represented as structural ensembles because of their heterogeneous and dynamical nature. To address this problem, we introduce the AlphaFold-Metainference method to use AlphaFold-derived distances as structural restraints in molecular dynamics simulations to construct structural ensembles of ordered and disordered proteins. The results obtained using AlphaFold-Metainference illustrate the possibility of making predictions of the conformational properties of disordered proteins using deep learning methods trained on the large structural databases available for folded proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-56572-9

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Brotzakis, Z. F., Zhang, S., Murtada, M. H., & Vendruscolo, M.
Affiliations
University of Cambridge (GB)
Corresponding author
Vendruscolo, Michele
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-02-14
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
1632-1632
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4407565291
Cited by
99
References
14
Citations by year
2026: 58 · 2025: 41
FWCI
29.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • UK Research and Innovation (10061100, 10059436)
  • Bodossaki Foundation
  • HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, structural ensembles, AlphaFold, protein structure prediction, molecular dynamics simulation, structural restraints, conformational heterogeneity, protein dynamics
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Folding, Computational Biology, Databases, Protein, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review