The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
CryoPROS: Correcting misalignment caused by preferred orientation using AI-generated auxiliary particles
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Abstract The preferred orientation phenomenon is a common issue in cryo-EM, posing a persistent challenge to conventional reconstruction methods. In this study, we introduce CryoPROS, a computational framework designed to correct misalignment caused by preferred orientation through co-refining the raw and auxiliary particles. These auxiliary particles, generated using a self-supervised deep generative model, enhance the alignment accuracy of particles in datasets affected by preferred orientation. CryoPROS achieved near-atomic resolution with the untilted HA-trimer dataset and successfully resolved high-resolution structures from three experimental datasets, including P001-Y, Na\textsubscript{\textsl{X}}, and hormone-sensitive lipase dimer, all affected by preferred orientation issues. Extensive experiments validate the robustness of cryoPROS and its minimal risk of introducing model bias. These findings suggest that in many cases thought to suffer from preferred orientation, addressing misalignment issues can lead to significant improvements in the density map.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764
Generating Sentences from a Continuous Space
Bowman, S. R., Vilnis, L., Vinyals, O., Dai, A., Jozefowicz, R., & Bengio, S. (2016) · Proceedings of The 20th SIGNLL Conference on Computational Natural Language Learning · doi:10.18653/v1/k16-1002 · Cited by 2,061
Automated model building and protein identification in cryo-EM maps
Jamali, K., Käll, L., Zhang, R., Brown, A., Kimanius, D., & Scheres, S. H. W. (2023) · doi:10.1101/2023.05.16.541002 · Cited by 686
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 44
- Cheng, Y. Single-particle cryo-EM—How did it get here and where will it go. Science 361, 876–880 (2018). · DOI
- Lyumkis, D. Challenges and opportunities in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 5181–5197 (2019). · DOI
- Glaeser, R. M. & Han, B.-G. Opinion: hazards faced by macromolecules when confined to thin aqueous films. Biophys. Rep. 3, 1–7 (2017). · DOI
- Tan, Y. Z. et al. Addressing preferred specimen orientation in single-particle cryo-EM through tilting. Nat. Methods 14, 793–796 (2017). · DOI
- Glaeser, R. M. How good can cryo-EM become? Nat. Methods 13, 28–32 (2016). · DOI
- Boisset, N. et al. Overabundant single-particle electron microscope views induce a three-dimensional reconstruction artifact. Ultramicroscopy 74, 201–207 (1998). · DOI
- Barth, M., Bryan, R. K. & Hegerl, R. Approximation of missing-cone data in 3D electron microscopy. Ultramicroscopy 31, 365–378 (1989). · DOI
- Drulyte, I. et al. Approaches to altering particle distributions in cryo-electron microscopy sample preparation. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 74, 560–571 (2018). · DOI
- Noble, A. J. et al. Routine single particle CryoEM sample and grid characterization by tomography. eLife 7, e34257 (2018). · DOI
- Baldwin, P. R. & Lyumkis, D. Tools for visualizing and analyzing Fourier space sampling in Cryo-EM. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 160, 53–65 (2021). · DOI
- Baldwin, P. & Lyumkis, D. Non-uniformity of projection distributions attenuates resolution in Cryo-EM. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 150, 160–183 (2020). · DOI
- Hauer, F. et al. GraDeR: Membrane Protein Complex Preparation for Single-Particle Cryo-EM. Structure 23, 1769–1775 (2015). · DOI
- Chen, J. et al. Eliminating effects of particle adsorption to the air/water interface in single-particle cryo-electron microscopy: Bacterial RNA polymerase and CHAPSO. J. Struct. Biol. X. 1, 100005 (2019).
- Li, B. et al. Effect of charge on protein preferred orientation at the air–water interface in cryo-electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107783 (2021). · DOI
- Frotscher, E. et al. A fluorinated detergent for membrane-protein applications. Angew. Chem. 54, 5069–5073 (2015). · DOI
- Neselu, K. et al. Measuring the effects of ice thickness on resolution in single particle cryo-EM. J. Struct. Biol. X, 100085 (2023).
- Noble, A. J. et al. Reducing effects of particle adsorption to the air–water interface in cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 15, 793–795 (2018). · DOI
- Bromberg, R. et al. The His-tag as a decoy modulating preferred orientation in cryoEM. Front. Mol. Biosci.9, 912072 (2022). · DOI
- Wu, K. et al. Application of monolayer graphene and its derivative in Cryo-EM sample preparation. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2021. 22, https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms22168940. · DOI
- Xu, J. et al. Structural engineering of graphene for high‐resolution cryo‐electron microscopy. SmartMat 2, 202–212 (2021). · DOI
- Zivanov, J. et al. New tools for automated high-resolution cryo-EM structure determination in RELION-3. eLife. 7, e42166 (2018). · DOI
- Aiyer, S. et al. Overcoming resolution attenuation during tilted cryo-EM data collection. Nat. Commun. 15, 389 (2024). · DOI
- Rosenthal, P. B. & Henderson, R. Optimal determination of particle orientation, absolute hand, and contrast loss in single-particle electron cryomicroscopy. J. Mol. Biol. 333, 721–745 (2003) · DOI · Paper page
- Zheng, D. et al. Learn from unpaired data for image restoration: A variational bayes approach. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 45, 5889–5903 (2022).
- Zheng, D. et al. SeNM-VAE: Semi-supervised noise modeling with hierarchical variational autoencoder. in 2024 IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR). 2024. · DOI
- Zivanov, J., Nakane, T. & Scheres, S. H. W. A Bayesian approach to beam-induced motion correction in cryo-EM single-particle analysis. IUCrJ 6, 5–17 (2019). · DOI
- Hu, M. et al. A particle-filter framework for robust cryo-EM 3D reconstruction. Nat. Methods 15, 1083–1089 (2018). · DOI
- Lin, W.-C. et al. Clustering-based undersampling in class-imbalanced data. Inf. Sci. 409-410, 17–26 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
- Batista, G. E. A. P. A., Prati, R. C. & Monard, M. C. A study of the behavior of several methods for balancing machine learning training data. SIGKDD Explor. Newsl. 6, 20–29 (2004). · DOI
- Sun, Z. et al. A novel ensemble method for classifying imbalanced data. Pattern Recognit. 48, 1623–1637 (2015). · DOI
- Sorzano, C. O. S. et al. A clustering approach to multireference alignment of single-particle projections in electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol. 171, 197–206 (2010). · DOI
- Sorzano, C. O. S. et al. Algorithmic robustness to preferred orientations in single particle analysis by CryoEM. J. Struct. Biol. 213, 107695 (2021). · DOI
- Sorzano, C. O. S. et al. On bias, variance, overfitting, gold standard and consensus in single-particle analysis by cryo-electron microscopy. Acta Crystallogr. Sect. D. 78, 410–423 (2022). · DOI
- Grant, T., Rohou, A. & Grigorieff, N. cisTEM, user-friendly software for single-particle image processing. eLife 7, e35383 (2018). · DOI
- He, J., Li, T. & Huang, S.-Y. Improvement of cryo-EM maps by simultaneous local and non-local deep learning. Nat. Commun. 14, 3217 (2023). · DOI
- Paulsen, C. E. et al. Structure of the TRPA1 ion channel suggests regulatory mechanisms. Nature 525, 552–552 (2015). · DOI
- Bepler, T. et al. Topaz-Denoise: general deep denoising models for cryoEM and cryoET. Nat. Commun. 11, 5208 (2020). · DOI
- Henderson, R. Avoiding the pitfalls of single particle cryo-electron microscopy: Einstein from noise. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. 110, 18037–18041 (2013). · DOI
- Punjani, A. & Fleet, D. J. 3DFlex: Determining structure and motion of flexible proteins from cryo-EM. Nat. Methods 20, 860–870 (2023). · DOI
- Child, R. Very Deep VAEs Generalize Autoregressive Models and Can Outperform Them on Images. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2011.10650 (2021). · DOI · Paper page
- Vahdat, A. & Kautz, J. NVAE: A Deep Hierarchical Variational Autoencoder. Preprint at https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2007.03898 (2021). · DOI
- Sønderby, C. K. et al., Ladder variational autoencoders, in Proceedings of the 30th International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2016, Curran Associates Inc.: Barcelona, Spain. p. 3745–3753.
- Zhang, Y. et al. Residual dense network for image super-resolution. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), 2472–2481 (2018). · DOI
- Kingma, D. P. & Ba, J. Adam: A method for stochastic optimization. Preprint at https://arxiv.org/abs/1412.6980. · arXiv
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, H., Zheng, D., Wu, Q., Yan, N., Peng, H., Hu, Q., Peng, Y., Yan, Z., Shi, Z., Bao, C., & Hu, M.
- Affiliations
- Tsinghua University (CN)
- University of California, San Francisco (US)
- Center for Life Sciences (CN)
- Westlake University (CN)
- Hunan University (CN)
- Beijing Institute of Mathematical Sciences and Applications (CN)
- State Key Laboratory of Membrane Biology (CN)
- Shenzhen Medical Academy of Research and Translation (CN)
- Corresponding author
- Bao, Chenglong
- Hu, Mingxu
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-05-16
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 4565-4565
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12084624
- OpenAlex
- W4410438894
- Cited by
- 12
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5
- FWCI
- 4.32
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (12271291, 12071244)
- National Key R&D Program of China
- Beijing Frontier Research Center for Biological Structure, Shenzhen Medical Academy of Research and Translation
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Structural Biology › Enzyme Structure and Function
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Keywords
- crystallographic texture, auxiliary particles, deep generative models, model bias
- MeSH terms
- Algorithms, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review