The topological properties of the protein universe
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Deep learning methods have revolutionised our ability to predict protein structures, allowing us a glimpse into the entire protein universe. As a result, our understanding of how protein structure drives function is now lagging behind our ability to determine and predict protein structure. Here, we describe how topology, the branch of mathematics concerned with qualitative properties of spatial structures, provides a lens through which we can identify fundamental organising features across the known protein universe. We identify topological determinants that capture global features of the protein universe, such as domain architecture and binding sites. Additionally, our analysis identifies highly specific properties, so-called topological generators, that can be used to provide deeper insights into protein structure-function and evolutionary relationships. We present a practical methodology for mapping the topology of the known protein universe at scale. We then use our approach to determine structural, functional and disease consequences of mutations. Our approach reveals and helps to explain differences in properties of proteins in mesophiles and thermophiles, and the likely structural and functional consequences of polymorphisms in a protein. For eukaryotes we find striking differences between protein topologies in multi-cellular and single-celled organisms. Deep learning enables large-scale protein structure prediction, yet linking structure to function remains a challenge. Here, the authors use topology to reveal fundamental organising features of the protein universe, providing insights into domain architecture, binding sites, evolution, and disease.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Evolutionary-scale prediction of atomic level protein structure with a language model
Lin, Z., Akin, H., Rao, R., Hie, B., Zhu, Z., Lu, W., Smetanin, N., Verkuil, R., Kabeli, O., Shmueli, Y., et al. (2022) · doi:10.1101/2022.07.20.500902 · Cited by 5,523 · see citing works
Topological Persistence and Simplification
Edelsbrunner, Letscher, & Zomorodian (2002) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-002-2885-2 · Cited by 1,779 · see citing works
Zomorodian, A., & Carlsson, G. (2005) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-004-1146-y · Cited by 1,591 · see citing works
A Selected Core Microbiome Drives the Early Stages of Three Popular Italian Cheese Manufactures
De Filippis, F., La Storia, A., Stellato, G., Gatti, M., & Ercolini, D. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0089680 · Cited by 1,398 · see citing works
Stability of Persistence Diagrams
Cohen-Steiner, D., Edelsbrunner, H., & Harer, J. (2007) · Discrete & Computational Geometry · doi:10.1007/s00454-006-1276-5 · Cited by 1,280 · see citing works
Barcodes: the persistent topology of data
Ghrist, R. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0273-0979-07-01191-3 · Cited by 1,236 · cited 4× · see citing works
“Persistent homology 13,20 is a method in computational topology for analysing the shape of data via topological features.”
InfluentialTowards a new approach to reveal dynamical organization of the brain using topological data analysis
Saggar, M., Sporns, O., Gonzalez-Castillo, J., Bandettini, P. A., Carlsson, G., Glover, G., & Reiss, A. L. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03664-4 · Cited by 253 · see citing works
AlphaFold, Artificial Intelligence (AI), and Allostery
Nussinov, R., Zhang, M., Liu, Y., & Jang, H. (2022) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.2c04346 · Cited by 190 · see citing works
AlphaFold2 reveals commonalities and novelties in protein structure space for 21 model organisms
Bordin, N., Sillitoe, I., Nallapareddy, V., Rauer, C., Lam, S. D., Waman, V. P., Sen, N., Heinzinger, M., Littmann, M., Kim, S., et al. (2023) · Communications Biology · doi:10.1038/s42003-023-04488-9 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Madsen, C. D., Barbensi, A., Zhang, S. Y., Ham, L., David, A., Pires, D. E. V., & Stumpf, M. P. H.
- Affiliations
- The University of Melbourne (AU)
- Imperial College London (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Pires, Douglas E. V.
- Stumpf, Michael P. H.
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-08-13
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 7503-7503
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12350623
- OpenAlex
- W4413117324
- Cited by
- 7
- References
- 10
- Citations by year
- 2026: 5 · 2025: 2
- FWCI
- 2.10
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- University of Melbourne (DRM)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Machine Learning in Bioinformatics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Topological and Geometric Data Analysis
- Keywords
- protein topology, domain architecture, protein binding sites, protein structure-function relationship, protein evolution, polymorphism, pathogenic variants, protein structure prediction
- MeSH terms
- Protein Domains, Deep Learning, Binding Sites, Humans, Models, Molecular, Mutation, Protein Conformation, Proteins
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review