Cited by 15SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 ResearchMonoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approaches

Optimizing a human monoclonal antibody for better neutralization of SARS-CoV-2

Open access
Wang, Qian, Guo, Yicheng, Casner, Ryan G., Yu, Jian, Nair, Manoj S., Ho, Jerren, Reddem, Eswar R., Mellis, Ian A. +7 more·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

SARS-CoV-2 has largely evolved to resist antibody pressure, with each successive viral variant becoming more and more resistant to serum antibodies in the population. This evolution renders all previously authorized anti-spike therapeutic monoclonal antibodies inactive, and it threatens the remaining pipelines against COVID-19. We report herein the isolation of a human monoclonal antibody with a broad but incomplete SARS-CoV-2 neutralization profile, but structural analyses and mutational scanning lead to the engineering of variants that result in greater antibody flexibility while binding to the viral spike. Three such optimized monoclonal antibodies neutralize all SARS-CoV-2 strains tested with much improved potency and breadth, including against subvariants XEC and LP.8.1. The findings of this study not only present antibody candidates for clinical development against COVID-19, but also introduce an engineering approach to improve antibody activity via increasing conformational flexibility.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-61472-z

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Wang, Q., Guo, Y., Casner, R. G., Yu, J., Nair, M. S., Ho, J., Reddem, E. R., Mellis, I. A., Wu, M., Tzang, C.-C., Hong, H., Huang, Y., Shapiro, L., Liu, L., & Ho, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (US)
  • Mortimer B. Zuckerman Mind Brain Behavior Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Shapiro, Lawrence
  • Liu, Lihong
  • Ho, David D.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-07-04
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
6195-6195
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4412020829
Cited by
15
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 7
FWCI
11.44
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation (INV019355)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging › Monoclonal and Polyclonal Antibodies Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, human monoclonal antibodies, antibody engineering, neutralizing antibodies, spike protein, Omicron subvariants, COVID-19 treatment, mutation scanning
MeSH terms
COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2, Animals, Antibodies, Monoclonal, Antibodies, Viral, Humans, Mutation, Neutralization Tests, Antibodies, Neutralizing, Spike Glycoprotein, Coronavirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review