Cited by 636SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Researchvaccines and immunoinformatics approachesAnimal Virus Infections Studies

Increased resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variant P.1 to antibody neutralization

Open access
Wang, Pengfei, Casner, Ryan G., Nair, Manoj S., Wang, Maple, Yu, Jian, Cerutti, Gabriele, Liu, Lihong, Kwong, Peter D. +3 more·2021·Cell Host & Microbe

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The emergence of SARS-CoV-2 variants has raised concerns about altered sensitivity to antibody-mediated immunity. The relative resistance of SARS-CoV-2 variants B.1.1.7 and B.1.351 to antibody neutralization has been recently investigated. We report that another emergent variant from Brazil, P.1, is not only refractory to multiple neutralizing monoclonal antibodies but also more resistant to neutralization by convalescent plasma and vaccinee sera. The magnitude of resistance is greater for monoclonal antibodies than vaccinee sera and evident with both pseudovirus and authentic P.1 virus. The cryoelectron microscopy structure of a soluble prefusion-stabilized spike reveals that the P.1 trimer adopts exclusively a conformation in which one of the receptor-binding domains is in the "up" position, which is known to facilitate binding to entry receptor ACE2. The functional impact of P.1 mutations thus appears to arise from local changes instead of global conformational alterations. The P.1 variant threatens current antibody therapies but less so protective vaccine efficacy.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chom.2021.04.007

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Neutralizing activity of mRNA vaccines against B.1.351 was lower by a factor of 8.6 for mRNA-1273 and 6.5 for BNT-162b2 than against D614G, with no difference against B.1.1.7-like mutant.

    “Neutralizing activity of the two mRNA vaccines against the B.1.351 variant has also been observed to be lower, by a factor of 8.6 (mRNA-1273 vaccine [Moderna]) or 6.5 (BNT-162b2 vaccine [Pfizer]) on pseudovirus neutralization assay, than activity against the D614G virus, whereas no difference was evident against the N510Y.V1 (B.1.1.7)–like mutant.19,28,29”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wang, P., Casner, R. G., Nair, M. S., Wang, M., Yu, J., Cerutti, G., Liu, L., Kwong, P. D., Huang, Y., Shapiro, L., & Ho, D. D.
Affiliations
  • Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center (US)
  • Columbia University (US)
  • National Institutes of Health (US)
Corresponding author
  • Wang, Pengfei
  • Shapiro, Lawrence
  • Ho, David D.
Venue
Cell Host & Microbe
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2021-05
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
747-751.e4
ISSN
1931-3128 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W3156291144
Cited by
636
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 23 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 77 · 2022: 239 · 2021: 246
FWCI
48.06
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Cell Host & Microbe (publishedVersion)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • JPB Foundation
  • Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation
  • NIH
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › SARS-CoV-2 and COVID-19 Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › vaccines and immunoinformatics approaches
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Animal Virus Infections Studies
Keywords
SARS-CoV-2, P.1 variant, Alpha variant, Beta variant, neutralizing monoclonal antibodies, convalescent plasma, spike protein, receptor binding domain, ACE2 binding, pseudovirus, vaccine efficacy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review