Cited by 14Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationPlanarian Biology and ElectrostimulationRetinal Development and Disorders

A genetically tractable non-vertebrate system to study complete camera-type eye regeneration

Open access
Accorsi, Alice, Pardo, Brenda, Ross, Eric, Corbin, Timothy J., McClain, Melainia, Weaver, Kyle, Delventhal, Kym, Gattamraju, Asmita +4 more·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

ABSTRACT Camera-type eyes are complex sensory organs susceptible to irreversible damage. Their repair is difficult to study due to the paucity of camera-type eye regeneration models. Identifying a genetically tractable organism with the ability to fully regenerate complete camera-type eyes would help overcome this difficulty. Here, we introduce the apple snail Pomacea canaliculata , capable of full regeneration of camera-type eyes even after complete resection. We defined anatomical components of P. canaliculata eyes and genes expressed during crucial steps of their regeneration. By exploiting the unique features of this organism, we successfully established the first stable mutant lines in apple snails. Our studies revealed that, akin to humans, pax6 is indispensable for eye development in apple snails, establishing this as a research organism to unravel the mechanisms of camera-type eye regeneration. This work expands our understanding of complex sensory organ regeneration and offers new ways to explore this process.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-61681-6

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Accorsi, A., Pardo, B., Ross, E., Corbin, T. J., McClain, M., Weaver, K., Delventhal, K., Gattamraju, A., Morrison, J. A., McKinney, M. C., McKinney, S. A., & Sánchez Alvarado, A.
Affiliations
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research (US)
  • University of California, Davis (US)
Corresponding author
Accorsi, Alice
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-08-06
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
6698-6698
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4413025412
Cited by
14
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 6 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 3
FWCI
3.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute
  • Stowers Institute for Medical Research
  • Society for Developmental Biology
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Planarian Biology and Electrostimulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
Keywords
Pomacea canaliculata, apple snail, eye development, Pax6, mutant strain, genetic model organisms, eye anatomy
MeSH terms
PAX6 Transcription Factor, Animals, Eye, Regeneration, Snails

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review