Protein design of two-component tubular assemblies similar to cytoskeletons
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Recent advances in protein design have ushered in an era of constructing intricate higher-order structures. Nonetheless, orchestrating the assembly of diverse protein units into cohesive artificial structures akin to biological assembly systems, especially in tubular forms, remains elusive. To this end, we develop a methodology inspired by nature, which utilises two distinct protein units to create unique tubular structures under carefully designed conditions. These structures demonstrate dynamic flexibility similar to that of actin filaments, with cryo electron microscopy revealing diverse morphologies, like microtubules. By mimicking actin filaments, helical conformations are incorporated into tubular assemblies, thereby enriching their structural diversity. Notably, these assemblies can be reversibly disassembled and reassembled in response to environmental stimuli, including changes in salt concentration and temperature, mirroring the dynamic behaviour of natural systems. This methodology combines rational protein design with biophysical insights, leading to the creation of biomimetic, adaptable, and reversible higher-order assemblies. This approach deepens our understanding of protein assembly design and complex biological structures. Concurrently, it broadens the horizons of synthetic biology and material science, holding significant implications for unravelling life’s fundamental processes and enabling future applications.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Cites
Highly accurate protein structure prediction with AlphaFold
Jumper, J., Evans, R., Pritzel, A., Green, T., Figurnov, M., Ronneberger, O., Tunyasuvunakool, K., Bates, R., Žídek, A., Potapenko, A., et al. (2021) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-03819-2 · Cited by 43,764 · see citing works
Gnanapragasam, M. N., Scarsdale, J. N., Amaya, M. L., Webb, H. D., Desai, M. A., Walavalkar, N. M., Wang, S. Z., Zu Zhu, S., Ginder, G. D., & Williams, D. C. (2011) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1015341108 · Cited by 148 · see citing works
Microtubule curvatures under perpendicular electric forces reveal a low persistence length
Van den Heuvel, M. G. L., de Graaff, M. P., & Dekker, C. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0704169105 · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
- Authors
- Noji, M., Sugita, Y., Yamazaki, Y., Miyazaki, M., & Suzuki, Y.
- Affiliations
- Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JP)
- Kyoto University (JP)
- Corresponding author
- Suzuki, Yuta
- Venue
- Nature Communications
- Published
- 2025-07-22
- Volume
- 16
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 6738-6738
- ISSN
- 2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC12283931
- OpenAlex
- W4412572904
- Cited by
- 3
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3
- FWCI
- 0.90
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
- Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
- Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Funders
- MEXT | Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (19H02832, 19K22253, 21H05116, 21H05117, 20K22628, 21J00530)
- MEXT | JST | Precursory Research for Embryonic Science and Technology (JPMJPR22A7, JPMJPR20ED)
- Takeda Science Foundation, Chubei Itoh Foundation, The Hakubi Center for Advanced Research
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
- Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Supramolecular Self-Assembly in Materials
- Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Biochemical and Structural Characterization
- Keywords
- protein design, synthetic biology, protein higher-order structure
- MeSH terms
- Cytoskeleton, Actin Cytoskeleton, Microtubules, Models, Molecular, Protein Conformation, Proteins, Protein Engineering, Cryoelectron Microscopy
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review