Cited by 5Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringNeurological disorders and treatmentsSilk-based biomaterials and applications

Silk-enabled conformal intraventricular interfaces for minimally invasive neural recordings

Open access
Liang, Jizhi, Wang, Xiner, Chen, Zhaohan, Wei, Xiaoling, Sun, Liuyang, Liu, Keyin, Shi, Zhifeng, Tao, Tiger H. +1 more·2025·Nature Communications

Abstract

Flexible neural interfaces capable of monitoring subcortical neuronal activity facilitate the study of deep brain neural circuits and their interactions with the cortex. However, there exists a paucity of translational tools for interfacing subcortical nuclei surfaces within the intraventricular cerebrospinal fluid. Here, we developed a flexible and conformal intraventricular interface (IVI) featuring a deformable microelectrode array paired with a silk scaffold. The IVI can be minimally invasively implanted into the lateral ventricles with the assistance of commonly used clinical catheters, self-unfolding in the cerebrospinal fluid environment to conformally attach to the surfaces of periventricular neural structures, and capturing high-quality signals by virtue of the microelectrode’s in-plane shielding. In parkinsonian ewes, the IVI detects deep brain abnormalities and achieves stable, biocompatible in vivo recordings for four weeks. This platform enables chronic monitoring and circuit analysis of healthy and diseased deep brain regions, facilitating studies of neural circuits between periventricular surface neurons and distant brain areas.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-64397-9

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Liang, J., Wang, X., Chen, Z., Wei, X., Sun, L., Liu, K., Shi, Z., Tao, T. H., & Zhou, Z.
Affiliations
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN)
  • Shanghai Medical College of Fudan University (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Tao, Tiger H.
  • Zhou, Zhitao
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-10-23
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
9366-9366
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4415464734
Cited by
5
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1
FWCI
1.95
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Chinese Academy of Sciences (Y2023070)
  • Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (22QA1410900)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Neurology › Neurological disorders and treatments
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Biomaterials › Silk-based biomaterials and applications
Keywords
silk scaffolds, flexible microelectrode arrays, lateral ventricle, Parkinson's disease, chronic neural recording, biocompatibility, cerebrospinal fluid
MeSH terms
Animals, Brain, Electrodes, Implanted, Female, Microelectrodes, Neurons, Parkinson Disease, Sheep, Lateral Ventricles, Silk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review