Cited by 3TGF-β signaling in diseasesProtease and Inhibitor MechanismsLiver physiology and pathology

Latent-TGF-β has a domain swapped architecture

Open access
Jin, Mingliang, Seed, Robert I., Shing, Tiffany, Wang, Li, Li, Junrui, Cheng, Yifan, Nishimura, Stephen L.·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

The multifunctional cytokine TGF-β is a dimeric protein produced within a latent complex (L-TGF-β). Latency is maintained by disulfide linked homodimeric prodomains forming a ring encircling the non-covalently bound mature TGF-β homodimer. This configuration sterically inhibits mature TGF-β from binding to its receptors. For TGF-β to be activated and bind to its receptors it must either be released, or if not released, overcome steric hinderance within the latent complex. Integrin binding to L-TGF-β results in activation with or without release of TGF-β by deforming the ring through different yet incompletely understood mechanisms. The domain architecture of L-TGF-β, which is not clearly defined, is a gap in mechanistic understanding of L-TGF-β activation. Here we fill this critical gap-in-knowledge by definitive experimental evidence demonstrating a domain-swapped architecture of L-TGF-β.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-65465-w

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Jin, M., Seed, R. I., Shing, T., Wang, L., Li, J., Cheng, Y., & Nishimura, S. L.
Affiliations
  • University of California, San Francisco (US)
  • Howard Hughes Medical Institute (US)
Corresponding author
  • Cheng, Yifan
  • Nishimura, Stephen L.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-11-25
Volume
16
Issue
1
Pages
10469-10469
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4416631640
Cited by
3
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 3
FWCI
0.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (R01 HL165175, R01 HL134183)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › TGF-β signaling in diseases
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cancer Research › Protease and Inhibitor Mechanisms
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Hepatology › Liver physiology and pathology
Keywords
latent TGF-beta, TGF-beta activation, domain swapping, integrin binding, steric inhibition, protein dimerization, disulfide-linked homodimer

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review