Cited by 18Telomeres, Telomerase, and SenescenceSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsGenetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms

Single-cell RNA sequencing reveals a quiescence-senescence continuum and distinct senotypes following chemotherapy

Open access
Fernandez, Brianna, Passanisi, Victor J., Ashraf, Humza M., Spencer, Sabrina L.·2025·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Quiescence (reversible cell-cycle arrest) and senescence (irreversible arrest) are challenging to distinguish due to a lack of specific biomarkers, yet both arise simultaneously after chemotherapy. While senescence suppresses tumors by limiting proliferation and recruiting the immune system, quiescent cancer cells evade future therapies and may resume proliferation. Here, we pair time-lapse imaging of cell-cycle dynamics with single-cell RNA-sequencing after etoposide treatment to differentiate these states, linking heterogeneous cell-cycle phenotypes to the transcriptomic landscape. We identify diverse senescent types (senotypes) and link them to two arrest pathways – a gradual path arising after a standard mitosis-to-G0 transition, and a rarer but direct path driven by a mitotic slip. Using pseudotime trajectory analysis, we find that senescent phenotypes begin to manifest early and gradually along the first trajectory, even in shallow quiescent cells. These data support a model wherein, following chemotherapy, quiescence and senescence exist on a continuum of cell-cycle withdrawal at a transcriptome-wide level.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-025-66836-z

Cites

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 68 · Cited by 18

Research works printed but not linked: 53

  1. [1]Marescal, O. & Cheeseman, I. M. Cellular mechanisms and regulation of quiescence. Dev. Cell 55, 259–271 (2020). 33171109 PMC7665062 · DOI
  2. [2]He, S. & Sharpless, N. E. Senescence in health and disease. Cell 169, 1000–1011 (2017). 28575665 PMC5643029 · DOI · Paper page
  3. [4]Huang, W., Hickson, L. J., Eirin, A., Kirkland, J. L. & Lerman, L. O. Cellular senescence: the good, the bad and the unknown. Nat. Rev. Nephrol. 18, 611–627 (2022). 35922662 PMC9362342 · DOI · Paper page
  4. [8]Coppé, J.-P., Desprez, P.-Y., Krtolica, A. & Campisi, J. The senescence-associated secretory phenotype: the dark side of tumor suppression. Annu Rev. Pathol. 5, 99–118 (2010). 20078217 PMC4166495 · DOI · Paper page
  5. [9]Gewirtz, D. A., Holt, S. E. & Elmore, L. W. Accelerated senescence: an emerging role in tumor cell response to chemotherapy and radiation. Biochem. Pharmacol. 76, 947–957 (2008). 18657518 · DOI
  6. [10]Ewald, J. A., Desotelle, J. A., Wilding, G. & Jarrard, D. F. Therapy-induced senescence in cancer. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 102, 1536–1546 (2010). 20858887 PMC2957429 · DOI · Paper page
  7. [11]Wang, L., Lankhorst, L. & Bernards, R. Exploiting senescence for the treatment of cancer. Nat. Rev. Cancer 22, 340–355 (2022). 35241831 · DOI · Paper page
  8. [12]Romanov, S. R. et al. Normal human mammary epithelial cells spontaneously escape senescence and acquire genomic changes. Nature 409, 633–637 (2001). 11214324 · DOI · Paper page
  9. [13]Prasanna, P. G. et al. Therapy-Induced Senescence: Opportunities to Improve Anticancer Therapy. J. Natl Cancer Inst. 113, 1285–1298 (2021). 33792717 PMC8486333 · DOI
  10. [14]Schmitt, C. A. et al. A senescence program controlled by p53 and p16INK4a contributes to the outcome of cancer therapy. Cell 109, 335–346 (2002). 12015983 · DOI · Paper page
  11. [15]Sharpless, N. E. & Sherr, C. J. Forging a signature of in vivo senescence. Nat. Rev. Cancer 15, 397–408 (2015). 26105537 · DOI · Paper page
  12. [16]Ashraf, H. M., Fernandez, B. & Spencer, S. L. The intensities of canonical senescence biomarkers integrate the duration of cell-cycle withdrawal. Nat. Commun. 14, 4527 (2023). 37500655 PMC10374620 · DOI
  13. [18]Baldwin, E. L. & Osheroff, N. Etoposide, topoisomerase II and cancer. Curr. Med. Chem. Anticancer Agents 5, 363–372 (2005). 16101488 · DOI
  14. [19]Hatakeyama, M. & Weinberg, R. A. The role of RB in cell cycle control. In Progress in Cell Cycle Research.1, (eds. Meijer, L., Guidet, S. & Tung, H. Y. L.) 10.1007/978-1-4615-1809-9_2 (Springer US, Boston, MA, 1995). 9552350 · DOI
  15. [20]Spencer, S. L. et al. The proliferation-quiescence decision is controlled by a bifurcation in CDK2 activity at mitotic exit. Cell 155, 369–383 (2013). 24075009 PMC4001917 · DOI
  16. [21]McInnes, L., Healy, J., Saul, N. & Großberger, L. UMAP: uniform manifold approximation and projection. J. Open Source Softw. 3, 861 (2018). · DOI · Paper page
  17. [22]Hao, Y. et al. Integrated analysis of multimodal single-cell data. Cell 184, 3573–3587.e29 (2021). 34062119 PMC8238499 · DOI · Paper page
  18. [23]Butler, A., Hoffman, P., Smibert, P., Papalexi, E. & Satija, R. Integrating single-cell transcriptomic data across different conditions, technologies, and species. Nat. Biotechnol. 36, 411–420 (2018). 29608179 PMC6700744 · DOI · Paper page
  19. [24]Cornwell, J. A. et al. Loss of CDK4/6 activity in the S/G2 phase leads to cell cycle reversal. Nature 619, 363–370 (2023). 37407814 PMC10338338 · DOI
  20. [25]Johmura, Y. et al. Necessary and Sufficient Role for a Mitosis Skip in Senescence Induction. Mol. Cell 55, 73–84 (2014). 24910096 · DOI · Paper page
  21. [26]Wechter, N. et al. Single-cell transcriptomic analysis uncovers diverse and dynamic senescent cell populations. Aging 15, 2824–2851 (2023). 37086265 PMC10188353
  22. [28]Rossi, C. et al. PURPL and NEAT1 Long Non-Coding RNAs Are Modulated in Vascular Smooth Muscle Cell Replicative Senescence. Biomedicines 11, 3228 (2023). 38137449 PMC10740529 · DOI
  23. [29]Han, S. et al. PURPL represses autophagic cell death to promote cutaneous melanoma by modulating ULK1 phosphorylation. Cell Death Dis. 12, 1–13 (2021). 34759263 PMC8581000 · DOI
  24. [30]Li, X. L. et al. Long noncoding RNA PURPL suppresses basal p53 levels and promotes tumorigenicity in colorectal cancer. Cell Rep. 20, 2408–2423 (2017). 28877474 PMC5777516 · DOI
  25. [31]Hartford, C. C. R. et al. Context-dependent function of long noncoding RNA PURPL in transcriptome regulation during p53 activation. Mol. Cell Biol. 42, e0028922 (2022). 36342127 PMC9753727 · DOI
  26. [33]The Gene Ontology resource: enriching a GOld mine. Nucleic Acids Res. 49, D325–D334 (2020). PMC7779012 33290552
  27. [34]Aouad, P., Quinn, H. M., Berger, A. & Brisken, C. Tumor dormancy: EMT beyond invasion and metastasis. Genesis 62, e23552 (2024). 37776086 · DOI
  28. [35]Smith, B. N. & Bhowmick, N. A. Role of EMT in metastasis and therapy resistance. J. Clin. Med. 5, 17 (2016). 26828526 PMC4773773 · DOI
  29. [36]Brabletz, S., Schuhwerk, H., Brabletz, T. & Stemmler, M. P. Dynamic EMT: a multi-tool for tumor progression. EMBO J. 40, e108647 (2021). 34459003 PMC8441439 · DOI
  30. [37]Trapnell, C. et al. The dynamics and regulators of cell fate decisions are revealed by pseudotemporal ordering of single cells. Nat. Biotechnol. 32, 381–386 (2014). 24658644 PMC4122333 · DOI · Paper page
  31. [38]Cao, J. et al. The single-cell transcriptional landscape of mammalian organogenesis. Nature 566, 496–502 (2019). 30787437 PMC6434952 · DOI · Paper page
  32. [39]Kovalski, J. R., Kuzuoglu-Ozturk, D. & Ruggero, D. Protein synthesis control in cancer: selectivity and therapeutic targeting. EMBO J. 41, e109823 (2022). 35315941 PMC9016353 · DOI
  33. [40]White-Gilbertson, S., Kurtz, D. T. & Voelkel-Johnson, C. The role of protein synthesis in cell cycling and cancer. Mol. Oncol. 3, 402–408 (2009). 19546037 PMC2784195 · DOI
  34. [41]Rong, Y., Darnell, A. M., Sapp, K. M., Vander Heiden, M. G. & Spencer, S. L. Cells use multiple mechanisms for cell-cycle arrest upon withdrawal of individual amino acids. Cell Rep. 42, 113539 (2023). 38070134 PMC11238304 · DOI
  35. [42]Han, K. et al. Parallel measurement of dynamic changes in translation rates in single cells. Nat. Methods 11, 86–93 (2014). 24213167 PMC4039304 · DOI
  36. [43]Delfarah, A. et al. Inhibition of nucleotide synthesis promotes replicative senescence of human mammary epithelial cells. J. Biol. Chem. 294, 10564–10578 (2019). 31138644 PMC6615688 · DOI
  37. [45]Herranz, N., Gallage, S. & Gil, J. TORn about SASP regulation. Cell Cycle 14, 3771–3772 (2015). 26697828 PMC4825754 · DOI
  38. [50]Nangia, V. et al. MAPK and mTORC1 signaling converge to drive cyclin D1 protein production to enable cell cycle reentry in melanoma persister cells. Sci. Signal. 18, eadw3231 (2025). 40892895 PMC13198176 · DOI
  39. [51]Gillespie, M. et al. The Reactome Pathway Knowledgebase 2022. Nucleic Acids Res. 50, D687–D692 (2022). 34788843 PMC8689983 · DOI
  40. [52]Hsu, C.-H., Altschuler, S. J. & Wu, L. F. Patterns of early p21 dynamics determine proliferation-senescence cell fate after chemotherapy. Cell 178, 361–373.e12 (2019). 31204100 PMC6688629 · DOI · Paper page
  41. [54]Cohn, R. L., Gasek, N. S., Kuchel, G. A. & Xu, M. The heterogeneity of cellular senescence: insights at the single-cell level. Trends Cell Biol. 33, 9–17 (2022). 35599179 PMC9812642 · DOI · Paper page
  42. [56]Kirschner, K., Rattanavirotkul, N., Quince, M. F. & Chandra, T. Functional heterogeneity in senescence. Biochem Soc. Trans. 48, 765–773 (2020). 32369550 PMC7329341 · DOI
  43. [57]Stallaert, W. et al. The molecular architecture of cell cycle arrest. Mol. Syst. Biol. 18, e11087 (2022). 36161508 PMC9511499 · DOI
  44. [58]Sessions, G. A., Loops, M. V., Diekman, B. O. & Purvis, J. E. Multiplexed single-cell imaging reveals diverging subpopulations with distinct senescence phenotypes during long-term senescence induction. GeroScience 47, 3891–3905 (2025). 39849264 PMC12181536 · DOI
  45. [59]Paronetto, M. P., Miñana, B. & Valcárcel, J. The ewing sarcoma protein regulates DNA damage-induced alternative splicing. Mol. Cell 43, 353–368 (2011). 21816343 · DOI
  46. [60]Lü, X., de la Peña, L., Barker, C., Camphausen, K. & Tofilon, P. J. Radiation-induced changes in gene expression involve recruitment of existing messenger RNAs to and away from polysomes. Cancer Res. 66, 1052–1061 (2006). 16424041 · DOI
  47. [61]Halim, V. A. et al. Doxorubicin-induced DNA damage causes extensive ubiquitination of ribosomal proteins associated with a decrease in protein translation*. Mol. Cell Proteom. 17, 2297–2308 (2018). PMC6283304 29438997 · DOI
  48. [62]Payea, M. J., Anerillas, C., Tharakan, R. & Gorospe, M. Translational control during cellular senescence. Mol. Cell Biol. 41, e00512–e00520 (2021). 33077499 PMC8093494 · DOI
  49. [63]Weichhart, T. mTOR as regulator of lifespan, aging and cellular senescence. Gerontology 64, 127–134 (2018). 29190625 PMC6089343 · DOI · Paper page
  50. [64]Fujimaki, K. et al. Graded regulation of cellular quiescence depth between proliferation and senescence by a lysosomal dimmer switch. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 116, 22624–22634 (2019). 31636214 PMC6842626 · DOI
  51. [65]Gookin, S. et al. A map of protein dynamics during cell-cycle progression and cell-cycle exit. PLOS Biol. 15, e2003268 (2017). 28892491 PMC5608403 · DOI
  52. [66]Arora, M., Moser, J., Phadke, H., Basha, A. A. & Spencer, S. L. Endogenous replication stress in mother cells leads to quiescence of daughter cells. Cell Rep. 19, 1351–1364 (2017). 28514656 PMC5533606 · DOI
  53. [67]Yu, G., Wang, L.-G., Han, Y. & He, Q.-Y. clusterProfiler: an R package for comparing biological themes among gene clusters. OMICS 16, 284–287 (2012). 22455463 PMC3339379 · DOI · Paper page

Authors
Fernandez, B., Passanisi, V. J., Ashraf, H. M., & Spencer, S. L.
Affiliations
University of Colorado Boulder (US)
Corresponding author
Spencer, Sabrina L.
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2025-12-23
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
169-169
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7116914533
Cited by
18
References
68
Citations by year
2026: 17 · 2025: 1
FWCI
11.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | National Institutes of Health (1DP2CA238330-01, R01 R01AG082942)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Cancer Institute (F31 CA284877)
  • U.S. Department of Health & Human Services | NIH | National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM142607)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Telomeres, Telomerase, and Senescence
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Aging › Genetics, Aging, and Longevity in Model Organisms
Keywords
cellular senescence, quiescence, chemotherapy, etoposide, cell cycle withdrawal, G0 arrest, cancer cells, transcriptomic heterogeneity, pseudotime trajectory analysis, live-cell imaging

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review