Cited by 23Protein Structure and DynamicsEnzyme Structure and FunctionComputational Drug Discovery Methods

Atomic resolution ensembles of intrinsically disordered proteins with Alphafold

Open access
Schnapka, Vincent, Morozova, Tatiana I., Sen, Samiran, Bonomi, Massimiliano·2026·Nature Communications

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins are ubiquitous in biological systems and play essential roles in a wide range of biological processes and diseases. Despite recent advances in high-resolution structural biology techniques and breakthroughs in deep learning-based protein structure prediction, accurately determining structural ensembles of IDPs at atomic resolution remains a major challenge. Here, we introduce bAIes, a Bayesian framework that integrates AlphaFold2 predictions with physico-chemical molecular mechanics force fields to generate accurate atomic-resolution ensembles of IDPs. We show that bAIes produces structural ensembles that match a wide range of high- and low-resolution experimental data across diverse systems, achieving accuracy comparable to atomistic molecular dynamics simulations but at a fraction of their computational cost. Furthermore, bAIes outperforms state-of-the-art IDP models based on coarse-grained potentials as well as deep-learning approaches. Our findings pave the way for integrating structural information from modern deep-learning approaches with molecular simulations, advancing ensemble-based understanding of disordered proteins.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41467-026-69172-y

Cites

10 of 10 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Schnapka, V., Morozova, T. I., Sen, S., & Bonomi, M.
Affiliations
  • Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
  • École Normale Supérieure de Lyon (FR)
Corresponding author
Bonomi, Massimiliano
Venue
Nature Communications
Published
2026-02-05
Volume
17
Issue
1
Pages
2399
ISSN
2041-1723 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7127941162
Cited by
23
References
10
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 5
FWCI
37.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Communications (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
EC | Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (101086685 – bAIes)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Protein Structure and Dynamics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Enzyme Structure and Function
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computational Theory and Mathematics › Computational Drug Discovery Methods
Keywords
intrinsically disordered proteins, structural ensembles, AlphaFold2, molecular mechanics force field, bays, protein structure prediction, coarse-grained potentials
MeSH terms
Deep Learning, Bayes Theorem, Protein Conformation, Protein Folding, Molecular Dynamics Simulation, Intrinsically Disordered Proteins

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review