CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 106

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A domestication history of dynamic adaptation and genomic deterioration in Sorghum

Smith, Oliver, Nicholson, William V., Kistler, Logan, Mace, Emma, Clapham, Alan, Rose, Pamela, Stevens, Chris, Ware, Roselyn, Samavedam, Siva, Barker, Guy, Jordan, David, Fuller, Dorian Q., Allaby, Robin G.·2019·Nature Plants
DOI 10.1038/s41477-019-0397-9

Published version of a preprint

Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41477-019-0397-9

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Figures

Image 1
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 2
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 3
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 4
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 5
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Table S6 p values for reduction in heterozygosity in windows containing domestication loci observed in archaeological accessions relative to S. verticilliflorum .
Table S6 p values for reduction in heterozygosity in windows containing domestication loci observed in archaeological accessions relative to S. verticilliflorum .CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 7
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 8
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 9
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 10
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 11
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 12
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 13
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 14
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Figure S9
Figure S9 CC-BY-ND · From the PDF
Image 16
CC-BY-ND · From the PDF

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 56

  1. Larson, G. et al. Current perspectives and the future of domestication studies. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6139–6146 (2014). · DOI
  2. Purugganan, M. D. & Fuller, D. Q. The nature of selection during plant domestication. Nature 457, 843–848 (2009). · DOI
  3. Fuller, D. Q. et al. Convergent evolution and parallelism in plant domestication revealed by an expanding archaeological record. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 6147–6152 (2014). · DOI
  4. Allaby, R. G., Stevens, S., Lucas, L., Maeda, O. & Fuller, D. Q. Geographic mosaics and changing rates of cereal domestication. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B 372, 20160429 (2017). · DOI
  5. Poets, A. M., Fang, Z., Clegg, M. T. & Morell, P. L. Barley landraces are characterized by geographically heterogeneous genomic origins. Genome Biol. 16, 173 (2015). · DOI
  6. Hardigan, M. A. et al. Genome diversity of tuber-bearing solanum uncovers complex evolutionary history and targets of domestication in the cultivated potato. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 114, E9999–E10008 (2017). · DOI
  7. Hufford, M. et al. The genomic signature of crop-wild introgression in maize. PLoS Genet. 9, e1003477 (2013). · DOI
  8. Winchell, F., Stevens, C. J., Murphy, C., Champion, L. & Fuller, D. Q. Evidence for sorghum domestication in fourth millennium BC eastern Sudan: spikelet morphology from ceramic impressions of the Butana group. Curr. Anthropol. 58, 673–683 (2017). · DOI
  9. Brown, P. J., Myles, S. & Kresowich, S. Genetic support for a phenotype-based racial classification in sorghum. Crop Sci. 51, 224–230 (2011). · DOI
  10. Morris, G. et al. Population genomic and genome-wide association studies of agroclimatic traits in sorghum. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 110, 453–458 (2013). · DOI
  11. Fuller, D. Q. & Stevens, C. J. in Plants and People in Africa’s Past: Progress in African Archaeobotany (eds Mercuri, A. M. et al.) 427–452 (Springer, 2017). · DOI
  12. de Wet, J. M. L., Harlan, J. R. & Price, E. G. in Origins of African Plant Domestication (eds Harlan, J. R. et al.) 453–463 (Mouton Press, 1976). · DOI
  13. Harlan, J. R. & Stemler, A. B. L. in Origins of African Plant Domestication (eds Harlan, J. R. et al.) 465–478 (Mouton Press, 1976). · DOI
  14. Ohadi, S., Hodnett, G., Rooney, W. & Bagavathiannan, M. Gene flow and its consequences in Sorghum spp. Crit. Rev. Plant Sci. 36, 367–385 (2017). · DOI
  15. Meyer, R. & Purugganan, M. Evolution of crop species: genetics of domestication and diversification. Nat. Rev. Genet. 14, 840–852 (2013). · DOI
  16. Wang, L. et al. The interplay of demography and selection during maize domestication and expansion. Genome Biol. 18, 215 (2017). · DOI
  17. Meyer, R. S. et al. Domestication history and geographical adaptation inferred from a SNP map of African rice. Nat. Genet. 48, 1083–1088 (2016). · DOI
  18. Mazet, O., Rodríguez, W., Grusea, S., Boitard, S. & Chikhi, L. On the importance of being structured: instantaneous coalescence rates and human evolution—lessons for ancestral population size inference. Heredity (Edinb.) 116, 362–371 (2016). · DOI
  19. Orozco-terWengel, P. The devil is in the details: the effect of population structure on demographic inference. Heredity (Edinb.) 116, 349–350 (2016). · DOI
  20. Renault, S. & Rieseberg, L. The accumulation of deleterious mutations as a consequence of domestication and improvement in sunflower and other Compositae crops. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 2273–2283 (2015). · DOI
  21. Liu, Q., Zhou, Y., Morrell, P. L. & Gaut, B. S. Deleterious variants in Asian rice and the potential cost of domestication. Mol. Biol. Evol. 34, 908–924 (2017). · DOI
  22. Cooper, G. M. et al. Distribution and intensity of constraint in mammalian genomic sequence. Genome Res. 15, 901–913 (2005). · DOI · Paper page
  23. Smith, O. et al. Genomic methylation patterns in archaeological barley show de-methylation as a time-dependent diagenetic process. Sci. Rep. 4, 5559 (2014). · DOI · Paper page
  24. Pavlidis, P., Živkovic, D., Stamatakis, A. & Alachiotis, N. SweeD: likelihood-based detection of selective sweeps in thousands of genomes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 30, 2224–2234 (2013). · DOI
  25. Hudson, M., Ringli, C., Boylan, M. T. & Quail, P. H. The FAR1 locus encodes a novel nuclear protein specific to phytochrome a signaling. Genes Dev. 13, 2017–2027 (1999). · DOI
  26. Zhu, Q. H., Ramm, K., Shivakkumar, R., Dennis, E. S. & Upadhyahya, N. M. The ANTHER INDEHISCENCE1 gene encoding a single MYB domain protein is involved in anther development in rice. Plant Physiol. 135, 1514–1525 (2004). · DOI
  27. Martin, S., Davey, J. & Jiggins, C. Evaluating the use of ABBA–BABA statistics to locate introgressed loci. Mol. Biol. Evol. 32, 244–257 (2014). · DOI
  28. Mace, E. S. et al. Whole genome sequencing reveals untapped genetic potential in Africa’s indigenous cereal crop sorghum. Nat. Commun. 4, 2320 (2013). · DOI
  29. Thurber, C. S., Ma, J. M., Higgins, R. H. & Brown, P. J. Retrospective genomic analysis of sorghum adaptation to temperate-zone grain production. Genome Biol. 14, R68 (2013). · DOI
  30. Alvarez, N. et al. Farmers’ practices, metapopulation dynamics, and conservation of agricultural biodiversity on-farm: a case study of sorghum among the Duupa in sub-sahelian Cameroon. Biol. Conserv. 121, 533–543 (2005). · DOI
  31. Westengen, O. T. et al. Ethnolinguistic structuring of sorghum genetic diversity in Africa and the role of local seed systems. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 111, 14100–14105 (2014). · DOI
  32. Allaby, R. G., Ware, R. & Kistler, L. A re-evaluation of the domestication bottleneck from archaeogenomic evidence. Evol. Appl. 12, 29–37 (2018). · DOI
  33. Kremling, K. A. et al. Dysregulation of expression correlates with rare-allele burden and fitness loss in maize. Nature 555, 520–523 (2018). · DOI
  34. Rogers & Slatkin Excess defects in a woolly mammoth on Wrangel Island. PLoS Genet. 13, e1006601 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  35. Shennan, S. et al. Regional population collapse followed initial agricultural booms in mid-Holocene Europe. Nat. Commun. 4, 2486 (2013). · DOI
  36. Allaby, R. G., Kitchen, J. L. & Fuller, D. Q. Surprisingly low limits of selection in plant domestication. Evol. Bioinform. Online 11, 41–51 (2016).
  37. Alexander, J. The Saharan divide in the Nile Valley: the evidence from Qasr Ibrim. Afr. Archaeol. Rev. 6, 73–90 (1988). · DOI
  38. Rose, P. in The Encyclopedia of Ancient History (eds Bagnall, R. S. et al.) 5695–5697 (Wiley, 2013).
  39. Palmer, S. A., Moore, J. D., Clapham, A. J., Rose, P. & Allaby, R. G. Archaeogenetic evidence of ancient Nubian barley evolution from six to two-row indicates local adaptation. PLoS ONE 4, e6301 (2009). · DOI
  40. Palmer, S. A. et al. Archaeogenomic evidence of punctuated genome evolution in Gossypium. Mol. Biol. Evol. 29, 2031–2038 (2012). · DOI
  41. O’Donoghue, K., Clapham, A., Evershed, R. P. & Brown, T. A. Remarkable preservation of biomolecules in ancient radish seeds. Proc. Biol. Sci. 263, 541–547 (1996). · DOI
  42. Alexander, J. & Driskell, B. Qasr Ibrim 1984. J. Egypt. Archaeol. 71, 12–26 (1985).
  43. Rowley-Conwy, P. Nubia AD 0-550 and the ‘Islamic’ agricultural revolution: preliminary botanical evidence from Qasr Ibrim, Egyptian Nubia. Archeol. du Nil Moyen 3, 131–138 (1989).
  44. Adams, W. Y. Ceramic Industries of Medieval Nubia (Univ. Kentucky Press, 1986).
  45. Hanghøj, K. et al. Fast, accurate and automatic ancient nucleosome and methylation maps with epiPALEOMIX. Mol. Biol. Evol. 33, 3248–3298 (2016). · DOI
  46. Paterson, A. H. et al. The Sorghum bicolor genome and the diversification of grasses. Nature 457, 551–556 (2009). · DOI
  47. Langmead, B. & Salzberg, S. L. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods 9, 357–359 (2012). · DOI · Paper page
  48. Li, H. et al. The sequence alignment/map (SAM) format and SAMtools. Bioinformatics 25, 2078–2079 (2009). · DOI · Paper page
  49. Bouyer, D. et al. DNA methylation dynamics during early plant life. Genome Biol. 18, 179 (2017). · DOI · Paper page
  50. Clark, R. M., Tavare, S. & Doebley, J. Estimating a nucleotide substitution rate for maize from polymorphism at a major domestication locus. Mol. Biol. Evol. 22, 2304–2312 (2005). · DOI
  51. da Fonseca, R. R. et al. The origin and evolution of maize in the southwestern United States. Nat. Plants 1, 14003 (2015). · DOI
  52. Koslov, A. M., Aberer, A. & Alexandros, S. ExaML version 3: a tool for phylogenomic analysis on supercomputers. Bioinformatics 31, 2577–2579 (2015). · DOI
  53. Felsenstein, J. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J. Mol. Evol. 17, 368–376 (1981). · DOI · Paper page
  54. Stamatakis, A. RAxML-VI-HPC: maximum likelihood-based phylogenetic analyses with thousands of taxa and mixed models. Bioinformatics 22, 2688–2690 (2006). · DOI · Paper page
  55. Pfeifer, B., Wittelsbürger, U., Ramos-Onsins, S. & Lercher, M. PopGenome: an efficient Swiss army knife for population genomic analyses in R. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 1929–1936 (2014). · DOI
  56. Wolfe, K. H., Sharpe, P. M. & Li, W. H. Rates of synonymous substitution in plant nuclear genes. J. Mol. Evol. 29, 208–211 (1989). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Smith, O., Nicholson, W. V., Kistler, L., Mace, E., Clapham, A., Rose, P., Stevens, C., Ware, R., Samavedam, S., Barker, G., Jordan, D., Fuller, D. Q., & Allaby, R. G.
ORCID
Venue
Nature Plants
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2019-04-08
Volume
5
Issue
4
Pages
369-379
ISSN
2055-0278
DOI
10.1038/s41477-019-0397-9
Cited by
106
References
3
Language
en
Licence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review