Validation and real-world clinical application of an artificial intelligence algorithm for breast cancer detection in biopsies
Open accessAbstract
Breast cancer is the most common malignant disease worldwide, with over 2.26 million new cases in 2020. Its diagnosis is determined by a histological review of breast biopsy specimens, which can be labor-intensive, subjective, and error-prone. Artificial Intelligence (AI)-based tools can support cancer detection and classification in breast biopsies ensuring rapid, accurate, and objective diagnosis. We present here the development, external clinical validation, and deployment in routine use of an AI-based quality control solution for breast biopsy review. The underlying AI algorithm is trained to identify 51 different types of clinical and morphological features, and it achieves very high accuracy in a large, multi-site validation study. Specifically, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUC) for the detection of invasive carcinoma and of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) are 0.99 (specificity and sensitivity of 93.57 and 95.51%, respectively) and 0.98 (specificity and sensitivity of 93.79 and 93.20% respectively), respectively. The AI algorithm differentiates well between subtypes of invasive and different grades of in situ carcinomas with an AUC of 0.97 for invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) vs. invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and AUC of 0.92 for DCIS high grade vs. low grade/atypical ductal hyperplasia, respectively, as well as accurately identifies stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) with an AUC of 0.965. Deployment of this AI solution as a real-time quality control solution in clinical routine leads to the identification of cancers initially missed by the reviewing pathologist, demonstrating both clinical utility and accuracy in real-world clinical application.
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Groups have reported deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides and for quantifying features such as mitotic cell counting.
“groups have reported on the use of deep learning for breast cancer diagnosis and subtyping from H&E slides (49)(50)(51), and quantifying other clinically relevant features such as mitotic cell counting (52,53).”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Sandbank and colleagues presented a deep learning model that classifies invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generates 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.
“Sandbank and colleagues (50) have recently presented a deep learning model for classifying invasive and noninvasive breast cancer subtypes and generating 51 predicted clinical and morphologic features.”
From Artificial Intelligence in Oncology: Current Landscape, Challenges, and Future Directions (2024) · cites this paper as [50]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 32 · Cited by 112
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- [5]Hicks, D.G. & Lester, S. C. Diagnostic Pathology: Breast 2nd edn (Elsevier, 2016).
- [23]Osareh, A. & Shadgar, B. 2010 5th International Symposium on Health Informatics and Bioinformatics (IEEE, 2010).
- Authors
- Sandbank, J., Bataillon, G., Nudelman, A., Krasnitsky, I., Mikulinsky, R., Bien, L., Thibault, L., Albrecht Shach, A., Sebag, G., Clark, D. P., Laifenfeld, D., Schnitt, S. J., Linhart, C., Vecsler, M., & Vincent-Salomon, A.
- Affiliations
- Maccabi Healthcare Services (IL)
- Université Paris Sciences et Lettres (FR)
- Brigham and Women's Hospital (US)
- ORCID
- Venue
- npj Breast Cancer
- Published
- 2022-12-06
- Volume
- 8
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 129-129
- ISSN
- 2374-4677 (ISSN-L)
- PMC
- PMC9723672
- OpenAlex
- W4311282448
- Cited by
- 112
- References
- 32
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 38 · 2023: 16
- FWCI
- 7.08
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- gold
- doi.org
- Locations
- npj Breast Cancer (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed Central (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- HAL (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › AI in cancer detection
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Pathology and Forensic Medicine › Breast Lesions and Carcinomas
- Keywords
- breast cancer, breast biopsy, artificial intelligence, computer-aided diagnosis, ductal carcinoma in situ, invasive ductal carcinoma, invasive lobular carcinoma, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, atypical ductal hyperplasia, external validation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review