Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 396

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 23 of the 23 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Machine learning enabled autonomous microstructural characterization in 3D samples

Open access
Chan, Henry, Cherukara, Mathew, Loeffler, Troy D., Narayanan, Badri, Sankaranarayanan, Subramanian K. R. S.·2020·npj Computational Materials

Abstract

We introduce an unsupervised machine learning (ML) based technique for the identification and characterization of microstructures in three-dimensional (3D) samples obtained from molecular dynamics simulations, particle tracking data, or experiments. Our technique combines topology classification, image processing, and clustering algorithms, and can handle a wide range of microstructure types including grains in polycrystalline materials, voids in porous systems, and structures from self/directed assembly in soft-matter complex solutions. Our technique does not require a priori microstructure description of the target system and is insensitive to disorder such as extended defects in polycrystals arising from line and plane defects. We demonstrate quantitively that our technique provides unbiased microstructural information such as precise quantification of grains and their size distributions in 3D polycrystalline samples, characterizes features such as voids and porosity in 3D polymeric samples and micellar size distribution in 3D complex fluids. To demonstrate the efficacy of our ML approach, we benchmark it against a diverse set of synthetic data samples representing nanocrystalline metals, polymers and complex fluids as well as experimentally published characterization data. Our technique is computationally efficient and provides a way to quickly identify, track, and quantify complex microstructural features that impact the observed material behavior.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41524-019-0267-z

Cites

23 of 23 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 23 references

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Ludwig, W. et al. Three-dimensional grain mapping by x-ray diffraction contrast tomography and the use of Friedel pairs in diffraction data analysis. Rev. Sci. Instrum. 80, 033905 (2009). · doi:10.1063/1.3100200
  2. Holm, E. A. & Foiles, S. M. How grain growth stops: a mechanism for grain-growth stagnation in pure materials. Science 328, 1138–1141 (2010). · doi:10.1126/science.1187833
  3. McFadden, S. X., Mishra, R. S., Valiev, R. Z., Zhilyaev, A. P. & Mukherjee, A. K. Low-temperature superplasticity in nanostructured nickel and metal alloys. Nature 398, 684–686 (1999). · doi:10.1038/19486
  4. Engqvist, H. & Uhrenius, B. Determination of the average grain size of cemented carbides. Int. J. Refractory Met. Hard Mater. 21, 31–35 (2003). · doi:10.1016/s0263-4368(03)00005-2
  5. Groeber, M. A., Haley, B. K., Uchic, M. D., Dimiduk, D. M. & Ghosh, S. 3D reconstruction and characterization of polycrystalline microstructures using a FIB–SEM system. Mater. Charact. 57, 259–273 (2006). · doi:10.1016/j.matchar.2006.01.019
  6. Peregrina-Barreto, H. et al. Automatic grain size determination in microstructures using image processing. Measurement 46, 249–258 (2013). · doi:10.1016/j.measurement.2012.06.012
  7. Roebuck, B. Measuring WC grain size distribution. Met. Powder Rep. 54, 20–24 (1999). · doi:10.1016/s0026-0657(99)80421-4
  8. Mingard, K. P. et al. Comparison of EBSD and conventional methods of grain size measurement of hardmetals. Int. J. Refractory Met. Hard Mater. 27, 213–223 (2009). · doi:10.1016/j.ijrmhm.2008.06.009
  9. Kofu, M. et al. Heterogeneous slow dynamics of imidazolium-based ionic liquids studied by neutron spin echo. J. Phys. Chem. B 117, 2773–2781 (2013). · doi:10.1021/jp312608r
  10. Burankova, T., Hempelmann, R., Wildes, A. & Embs, J. P. Collective ion diffusion and localized single particle dynamics in pyridinium-based ionic liquids. J. Phys. Chem. B 118, 14452–14460 (2014). · doi:10.1021/jp5092416
  11. Prévost, S., Gradzielski, M. & Zemb, T. Self-assembly, phase behaviour and structural behaviour as observed by scattering for classical and non-classical microemulsions. Adv. Colloid Interface Sci. 247, 374–396 (2017). · doi:10.1016/j.cis.2017.07.022

Cited by

See all 396

Metadata

Authors
Chan, H., Cherukara, M., Loeffler, T. D., Narayanan, B., & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. R. S.
Venue
npj Computational Materials
Published
2020-01-06
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2057-3960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2997959813
Cited by
396
References
23
FWCI
26.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
gold
Licence
Funders
DOE | SC | Basic Energy Sciences (DE-AC02-06CH11357, DE-AC02-05CH11231)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Machine learning enabled autonomous microstructural characterization in 3D samples. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41524-019-0267-z
The paper
Chan, H., Cherukara, M., Loeffler, T. D., Narayanan, B., & Sankaranarayanan, S. K. R. S. (2020). Machine learning enabled autonomous microstructural characterization in 3D samples. npj Computational Materials. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41524-019-0267-z

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.