Cited by 4Machine Learning in Materials ScienceAdvanced Chemical Physics StudiesModel Reduction and Neural Networks

LAMBench: a benchmark for large atomistic models

Open access
Peng, Anyang, Cai, Chun, Guo, Mingyu, Zhang, Duo, Zhang, Chengqian, Jiang, Wanrun, Wang, Yinan, Loew, Antoine +4 more·2026·npj Computational Materials

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Abstract Large Atomistic Models (LAMs) have undergone remarkable progress recently, emerging as universal or fundamental representations of the potential energy surface defined by the first-principlescalculations of atomistic systems. However, our understanding of the extent to which these models achieve true universality, as well as their comparative performance across different models, remains limited. This gap is largely due to the lack of comprehensive benchmarks capable of evaluating the effectiveness of LAMs as approximations to the universal potential energy surface. In this study, we introduce LAMBench, a benchmarking system designed to evaluate LAMs in terms of their generalizability, adaptability, and applicability. These attributes are crucial for deploying LAMs as ready-to-use tools across a diverse array of scientific discovery contexts. We benchmark ten state-of-the-art LAMs released prior to August 1, 2025, using LAMBench. Our findings reveal asignificant gap between the current LAMs and the ideal universal potential energy surface. They also highlight the need for incorporating cross-domain training data, supporting multi-fidelity modeling, and ensuring the models’ conservativeness and differentiability. As a dynamic and extensible platform, LAMBench is intended to continuously evolve, thereby facilitating the development of robust and generalizable LAMs capable of significantly advancing scientific research. The LAMBench code is open-sourced at https://github.com/deepmodeling/lambench, and an interactive leaderboard is available at https://www.aissquare.com/openlam?tab=Benchmark.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41524-025-01929-3

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Peng, A., Cai, C., Guo, M., Zhang, D., Zhang, C., Jiang, W., Wang, Y., Loew, A., Wu, C., E, W., Zhang, L., & Wang, H.
Affiliations
  • Peking University (CN)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
  • National University of Defense Technology (CN)
Corresponding author
  • Peng, Anyang
  • Zhang, Linfeng
  • Wang, Han
Venue
npj Computational Materials
Published
2026-01-03
Volume
12
Issue
1
ISSN
2057-3960 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7118125901
Cited by
4
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 1
FWCI
4.11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Computational Materials (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • Research Square (acceptedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • EUSpecLab (101073486)
  • National Key Research and Development Program of China (2022YFA1004300)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Materials Science › Materials Chemistry › Machine Learning in Materials Science
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Model Reduction and Neural Networks
Keywords
potential energy surface, benchmarking, generalizability, multi-fidelity modeling, first-principles calculations, machine learning interatomic potentials

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review