Cited by 70CO2 Sequestration and Geologic InteractionsCarbon Dioxide Capture TechnologiesCarbon dioxide utilization in catalysis

Carbon dioxide sequestration through silicate degradation and carbon mineralisation: promises and uncertainties

Open access
Daval, Damien·2018·npj Materials Degradation

Abstract

Turning carbon dioxide (CO 2) into rocks: controlling this process, which naturally operates at the Earth’s surface over geological timescales, is likely to represent a major technological challenge of this century. One of the recurring criticisms with the carbonation reactions is their sluggishness, as it is commonly admitted that converting silicates into carbonates within geologic reservoirs may take up to several thousands of years, i.e., a duration which is hardly compatible with the goal of achieving net zero emissions by mid-century. Last year, a study that generated substantial interest suggested that after 2 years, more than 95% of the CO 2 injected over the course of a pilot project of CO 2 injection in lava flows in Iceland might have been mineralised into carbonates. While such results could have been considered as a green light for industrial applications, a new high-profile study based on the same pilot experiment tempered this idea, as it revealed unexpected modifications of deep ecosystems in response to CO 2 injection, evidencing a bloom of chemolithoautotrophic bacteria, which have the ability to promote autotrophic C-fixation. Stated in other words, part of the CO 2 that was initially thought to be mineralised under the form of stable carbonates might instead have been converted into (much more labile) biomass. Assessing the respective contributions of carbonates and biomass to the C-sequestration should therefore represent a prerequisite prior to large-scale carbon capture and storage through mineral carbonation, to make sure that the cure is not worse than the disease.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41529-018-0035-4

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Daval, D.
Affiliations
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR)
Corresponding author
Daval, Damien
Venue
npj Materials Degradation
Published
2018-04-04
Volume
2
Issue
1
ISSN
2397-2106 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2807228745
Cited by
70
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3
FWCI
2.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • npj Materials Degradation (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Institut de Physique du Globe de Paris
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Engineering › CO2 Sequestration and Geologic Interactions
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Process Chemistry and Technology › Carbon dioxide utilization in catalysis
Keywords
CO2 sequestration, CO2 mineralization, CO2 injection, lava flows, chemolithoautotrophic bacteria, carbon capture and storage, net-zero emissions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review