CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 163Quantum Computing Algorithms and ArchitectureQuantum many-body systemsQuantum Information and Cryptography

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 40 of the 42 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Resource-efficient digital quantum simulation of d-level systems for photonic, vibrational, and spin-s Hamiltonians

Open access
Sawaya, Nicolas P. D., Menke, Tim, Kyaw, Thi Ha, Johri, Sonika, Aspuru-Guzik, Alán, Guerreschi, Gian Giacomo·2020·npj Quantum Information
DOI 10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free accountOpen PDF

Abstract

Simulation of quantum systems is expected to be one of the most important applications of quantum computing, with much of the theoretical work so far having focused on fermionic and spin- $$\frac{1}{2}$$ 1 2 systems. Here, we instead consider encodings of d -level (i.e., qudit) quantum operators into multi-qubit operators, studying resource requirements for approximating operator exponentials by Trotterization. We primarily focus on spin- s and truncated bosonic operators in second quantization, observing desirable properties for approaches based on the Gray code, which to our knowledge has not been used in this context previously. After outlining a methodology for implementing an arbitrary encoding, we investigate the interplay between Hamming distances, sparsity patterns, bosonic truncation, and other properties of local operators. Finally, we obtain resource counts for five common Hamiltonian classes used in physics and chemistry, while modeling the possibility of converting between encodings within a Trotter step. The most efficient encoding choice is heavily dependent on the application and highly sensitive to d , although clear trends are present. These operation count reductions are relevant for running algorithms on near-term quantum hardware because the savings effectively decrease the required circuit depth. Results and procedures outlined in this work may be useful for simulating a broad class of Hamiltonians on qubit-based digital quantum computers.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0

Cites

40 of 40 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 7

  1. Levitt, M. H. Spin Dynamics: Basics of Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, 2nd edn. (Wiley, 2008).
  2. Paolo, A. D., Barkoutsos, P. K., Tavernelli, I. & Blais, A. Variational quantum simulation of ultrastrong light-matter coupling. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1909.08640 (2019).
  3. Somma, R. D. Quantum computation, complexity, and many-body physics. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:quant-ph/0512209 (2005). · arXiv
  4. Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J. & Su, Y. Toward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 115, 9456–9461 (2018b). · DOI · Paper page
  5. Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Tran, M. C., Wiebe, N. & Zhu, S. A theory of trotter error. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1912.08854 (2019).
  6. Merzbacher, E. Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed. (John Wiley and Sons, 2004).
  7. Gosset, D., Kliuchnikov, V., Mosca, M. & Russo, V. An algorithm for the T-count. arXiv: http://arxiv.org/abs/arXiv:1308.4134 (2013).

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 163

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Sawaya, N. P. D., Menke, T., Kyaw, T. H., Johri, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Guerreschi, G. G.
Affiliations
  • Intel (United States) (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
  • Sawaya, Nicolas P. D.
  • Guerreschi, Gian Giacomo
ORCID
Venue
npj Quantum Information
Publisher
Springer Science and Business Media LLC
Published
2020-06-02
Volume
6
Issue
1
ISSN
2056-6387 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0
OpenAlex
W2976208308
Cited by
163
References
42
Citations by year
2026: 18 · 2025: 41 · 2024: 29 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 27 · 2021: 25 · 2020: 4
FWCI
7.37
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
Locations
  • npj Quantum Information (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Funders
  • Intel Research
  • Vannevar Bush Faculty Fellowship and the Canada 150 Research Chairs Program.
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum Information and Cryptography
Keywords
digital quantum simulation, qudits, d-level systems, Trotterization, Gray code, second quantization, Hamming distance, sparsity pattern, circuit depth, vibrational Hamiltonian, spin Hamiltonian

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review