Quantum computational chemistry
Open accessAbstract
With small quantum computers becoming a reality, first applications are eagerly sought. Quantum chemistry presents a spectrum of computational problems, from relatively easy to classically intractable. Algorithms for the easiest of these have been run on the first quantum computers. But an urgent question is, how well will these algorithms scale to go beyond what is possible classically? This review presents strategies employed to construct quantum algorithms for quantum chemistry, with the goal that quantum computers will eventually answer presently inaccessible questions, for example, in transition metal catalysis or important biochemical reactions.
AI snapshot
Written from the paper’s full text.
TL;DR
This review provides a comprehensive introduction to quantum computational chemistry, bridging classical electronic structure methods and quantum algorithms for chemistry. It focuses on near-term variational algorithms with error mitigation and longer-term quantum phase estimation with error correction, and concludes that fault-tolerant chemistry simulations still require far more resources than current hardware.
Key findings
- Quantum computers can store the full configuration interaction wavefunction of M spin-orbitals using only M qubits in second quantisation, whereas classical FCI scales exponentially; the review identifies strongly correlated systems around 100–200 spin-orbitals as a target “sweet spot” for quantum advantage.
- For fault-tolerant phase estimation, resource estimates cited include FeMo-co (54 electrons, 108 spin-orbitals) requiring ~10^14 T gates and ~200 million physical qubits, running weeks/months; a later qubitization/low-rank approach for 113 electrons in 152 spin-orbitals reduced this to ~10^11 Toffoli gates and ~1 million physical qubits for 2 months.
- Condensed-phase/Fermi-Hubbard estimates are lower: ~2×10^8 T gates for a 128 spin-orbital 3D homogeneous electron gas and ~7.1×10^8 T gates for a 100-site 2D Fermi-Hubbard model, corresponding to ~2–3 million qubits for tens of hours; another Trotter estimate gives ~10^6 Toffoli and 10^7–10^8 T gates and ~400,000–600,000 physical qubits for a couple of hours.
- VQE measurement cost scales as O(M^6/ε^2) in a Gaussian orbital basis and O(M^4/ε^2) in a plane wave dual basis; UCCSD gate counts are O(M^3 N^2) with Jordan-Wigner, improved to O(M^3 N) with swap networks or O(M^3)–O(M^4) with low-rank decomposition.
Methods
- Design: narrative review, not a primary experimental or numerical study; it synthesizes classical computational chemistry (HF, MCSCF, CI, CC, basis sets, active-space reduction) and quantum computing (qubit encodings, Hamiltonian simulation, phase estimation, VQE, error mitigation).
- Data/sample: illustrative worked examples map H2 in STO-3G, 6-31G, and cc-PVDZ bases and LiH in STO-3G onto qubits, using Jordan-Wigner, Bravyi-Kitaev, and BK-tree mappings, natural molecular orbital active-space reduction, symmetry qubit removal, and UCCSD.
- Main analysis: qualitative and asymptotic resource comparisons between classical and quantum methods, with cited gate/qubit estimates for fault-tolerant and near-term algorithms.
Limitations
- The paper states that the field has grown beyond a single review and that it excludes complementary directions such as quantum machine learning for electronic structure, problem-decomposition approaches, hybrid DFT, relativistic quantum chemistry, molecular vibrations, analog simulators, quantum annealers, and non-Hermitian eigenvalue algorithms.
- The paper states that resource estimates depend on assumptions about hardware, error rates, error-correcting code, and fault-tolerance protocols; Trotter error bounds are believed loose by several orders of magnitude, and it is not yet possible to conclusively state which Hamiltonian simulation method will perform best.
- Evident from the text: as a review, it reports no new primary data or experimental results; its numerical resource figures are cited from prior works and are conditional on the stated error-correction and surface-code assumptions.
Model-written summary. Check it against the paper before relying on it.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
0 of 313 cited sources checked · 0 supported · 0 flagged
- Findingreasoning§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11
The cost of storing the wavefunction scales exponentially with the number of electrons, N.
“However, the cost of storing the wavefunction scales exponentially with the number of electrons, N .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. cc-PVDZ basis · p. 44
The diagonalised 1-RDM for H2 in the cc-PVDZ basis is Diag(1.96588, 0.00611, 0.02104, 0.0002, 0.00001, 0.00314, 0.00314, 0.00016, 0.00016, 0.00016).
“The diagonalised 1-RDM is given by Diag (1.96588, 0.00611, 0.02104, 0.0002, 0.00001, 0.00314, 0.00314, 0.00016, 0.00016, 0.00016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ 3. cc-PVDZ basis · p. 44
The 5th orbital in the cc-PVDZ H2 1-RDM has a NOON that is 20 times smaller than the next smallest NOON.
“We can see that the 5 th orbital has a NOON that is 20 times smaller than the next smallest NOON.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingown data§ A. Hydrogen · p. 42
The differences in energy between the three minima of the H2 ground state dissociation curves in STO-3G, 6-31G and cc-PVDZ bases are considerably larger than chemical accuracy (1.6 mHartree).
“We can see that the differences in energy between the three minima are considerably larger than chemical accuracy (1 . 6 mHartree).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Findingnone given§ 1. STO-3G basis · p. 43
Applying the simplified UCCSD operator to the HF state can reproduce the ground state given by Eq. (98).
“which can reproduce the ground state given by Eq. (98).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
The exact application of quantum mechanics to chemistry leads to equations too complicated to be soluble.
“The exact application of these laws leads to equations much too complicated to be soluble.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dirac, 1929
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 5
With only single qubit operations and CNOT gates, it is possible to approximate an arbitrary multi-qubit gate to any desired accuracy.
“With only single qubit operations and CNOT gates, it is possible to approximate an arbitrary multi-qubit gate to any desired accuracy (DiVincenzo, 1995).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites DiVincenzo, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
Classical computers are unable to exactly simulate quantum systems in an efficient way.
“This leaves classical computers unable to exactly simulate quantum systems in an efficient way.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
Quantum computers are able to efficiently simulate quantum systems.
“As quantum computers are able to efficiently simulate quantum systems”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Feynman, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
The complexity of the wavefunction of a quantum system grows exponentially with the number of particles.
“The problem described by Dirac is that the complexity of the wavefunction of a quantum system grows exponentially with the number of particles.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dirac, 1929
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2
Classical computational methods' ability to guide design is often precluded by the computational complexity of realistic models.
“However, their ability to guide design is often precluded by the computational complexity of realistic models.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6
Physical error rates below the surface code threshold of around 1% have been achieved for trapped ion and superconducting qubits.
“Physical error rates below the surface code threshold of around 1 % (Fowler et al. , 2012b; Stephens, 2014; Wang et al. , 2011) have been achieved for trapped ion (Ballance et al. , 2016; Gaebler et al. , 2016) and superconducting (Arute et al. , 2019; Barends et al. , 2014) qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fowler et al., 2012b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ballance et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Arute et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8
Solving the ground state problem for a completely general local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete.
“Moreover, it is important to note that solving the ground state problem for a completely general local Hamiltonian is QMA-complete (quantum Merlin-Arthur complete, the quantum analogue of NP-complete) (Cubitt and Montanaro, 2016; Kempe et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Cubitt and Montanaro, 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kempe et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11
This makes it classically intractable to simulate more than a few particles on a grid using a classical computer.
“This makes it classically intractable to simulate more than a few particles on a grid using a classical computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. The electronic structure problem · p. 9
If the energy is known to chemical accuracy, then the chemical reaction rate at room temperature can be predicted to within an order of magnitude using the Eyring equation.
“If the energy is known to chemical accuracy, then the chemical reaction rate at room temperature can be predicted to within an order of magnitude using the Eyring equation (Evans and Polanyi, 1935; Eyring, 1935)”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Evans and Polanyi, 1935
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Eyring, 1935
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
The reaction mechanism of the nitrogenase enzyme is not yet fully understood.
“While there has been significant experimental progress in understanding the structure of the nitrogenase enzyme over the last 100 years, the reaction mechanism is not yet fully understood (Burgess and Lowe, 1996).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Burgess and Lowe, 1996
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8
The ground state problem can also be tackled using variational algorithms.
“The ground state problem can also be tackled using variational algorithms (Peruzzo et al. , 2014), which we will discuss in detail in Sec. V.B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7
Time evolution of open and closed quantum systems can be simulated using variational approaches.
“It has also been shown that time evolution of open and closed quantum systems can be simulated using variational approaches (Chen et al. , 2019; Endo et al. , 2018b; Heya et al. , 2019; Li and Benjamin, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Chen et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Endo et al., 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li and Benjamin, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6
With physical error rates below the surface code threshold, around 10^3-10^4 physical qubits per logical qubit would be required to perform interesting tasks in a fault-tolerant manner.
“However, with these error rates, we would require around 10 3 -10 4 physical qubits per logical qubit to perform interesting tasks in a fault-tolerant manner (Campbell et al. , 2017; Fowler et al. , 2012a; O'Gorman and Campbell, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Campbell et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Fowler et al., 2012a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Gorman and Campbell, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. First and Second quantisation · p. 10
The property of convergence to the correct energy from above as the number of basis functions tends to infinity does not hold for grid based methods.
“This property does not hold for grid based methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6
The problems solved by quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are typically artificially constructed examples, rather than real-world problems.
“However, these problems are typically artificially constructed examples, rather than real-world problems (Boixo et al. , 2018; Harrow and Montanaro, 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Boixo et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Harrow and Montanaro, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
A complete understanding of even the Fermi-Hubbard model is still elusive.
“While more complex models are likely required to fully understand the mechanism of cuprate superconductivity, a complete understanding of even the Fermi-Hubbard model is still elusive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8
Problems in the QMA-complete complexity class are not believed to be efficiently solvable with either a classical or quantum computer.
“Problems in this complexity class are not believed to be efficiently solvable with either a classical or quantum computer.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
A complete analytic or computational understanding of the copper-oxygen layers in cuprate superconductors is beyond the capabilities of current classical techniques.
“A complete analytic or computational understanding of these layers is beyond the capabilities of current classical techniques.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7
The number of terms in the Hamiltonian scales polynomially with the number of particles for systems of interest in chemistry, due to the two-body nature of the Coulomb interactions between particles.
“The number of terms in the Hamiltonian scales polynomially with the number of particles for systems of interest in chemistry, due to the two-body nature of the Coulomb interactions between particles (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
Many transition metal catalysts show strong correlation, often due to their open-shell nature and spatially degenerate states.
“However, many of these systems show strong correlation, often due to their openshell nature, and spatially degenerate states (Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyakh et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8
Finding the low lying energy levels of a quantum Hamiltonian is in general an exponentially difficult problem for classical computers.
“Finding the low lying energy levels of a quantum Hamiltonian is in general an exponentially difficult problem for classical computers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
This strong correlation often precludes the study of transition metal catalysts in silico, forcing expensive, trial-and-error based discovery.
“This strong correlation often precludes their study in silico , forcing us to carry out expensive, trial-and-error based discovery -especially for transition metal based biological catalysts (Podewitz et al. , 2011).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Podewitz et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10
Models of fermions hopping on a 2D square lattice, such as the one-band Fermi-Hubbard model and the related t-J model, appear to reproduce many experimental observations.
“In particular, models of fermions hopping on a 2D square lattice, such as the one-band Fermi-Hubbard model (Hubbard, 1963), and the related t-J model, appear to reproduce many experimental observations (Anderson, 2002; Lee et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Anderson, 2002
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lee et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. The electronic structure problem · p. 9
Mapping out potential energy curves explicitly is exponentially costly in the degrees of freedom of the molecule.
“Mapping out these potential energy curves explicitly is exponentially costly in the degrees of freedom of the molecule, and that there are a variety of methods being developed to solve this difficult problem more efficiently (Christiansen, 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Christiansen, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7
To the best of the authors' knowledge, only the work by Berry et al. (2019a) considers a chemical reaction dynamics calculation on a quantum computer using basis set methods.
“To the best of our knowledge, only the work by Berry et al. (2019a) considers a chemical reaction dynamics calculation on a quantum computer using basis set methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11
Mapping out potential energy surfaces is exponentially costly.
“As mentioned in the previous section, mapping out these potential energy surfaces is exponentially costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ b. Basis set methods · p. 11
Basis set methods exploit knowledge of the general spatial form of the orbitals to reduce the resources needed to simulate chemical systems.
“In contrast, basis set methods exploit this knowledge to reduce the resources needed to simulate chemical systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13
If the electron-electron Coulomb interaction term is neglected, we obtain a new Hamiltonian which describes the behaviour of N independent electrons.
“If the electronelectron Coulomb interaction term in Eq. (17) is neglected, we obtain a new Hamiltonian which describes the behaviour of N independent electrons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13
A mean-field approximation (the Hartree-Fock procedure) can be used to obtain more suitable molecular orbitals.
“Instead, a mean-field approximation (the HartreeFock procedure, to be described in Sec. III.C.1) can be used to obtain more suitable molecular orbitals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15
MCSCF and CASSCF calculations are among the most effective classical methods at treating systems with strong static correlation.
“MCSCF and CASSCF calculations are among the most effective classical methods at treating systems with strong static correlation (Szalay et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Szalay et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13
The eigenstates of the true Hamiltonian can be expressed as linear combinations of Slater determinants, with complex coefficients called determinant amplitudes.
“Consequently, the eigenstates of the true Hamiltonian can be expressed as linear combinations of these Slater determinants, written as”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 12
As first quantised operators conserve the number of electrons, the second quantised operators must contain an equal number of creation and annihilation operators.
“As first quantised operators conserve the number of electrons, the second quantised operators must contain an equal number of creation and annihilation operators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15
Truncated CI calculations fail to satisfy size consistency.
“Truncated CI calculations also fail to satisfy a related property, known as 'size consistency'.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13
Slater determinants, as eigenstates of a Hermitian operator, form a complete basis of the problem Hilbert space.
“As they are eigenstates of a Hermitian operator, these Slater determinants form a complete basis of the problem Hilbert space.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15
MCSCF can be considered the best approximation to the exact wavefunction for a given number of determinants.
“MCSCF can be considered the best approximation to the exact wavefunction for a given number of determinants (Wang et al. , 2008).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wang et al. , 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14
Wavefunctions displaying dynamic correlation are often dominated by the Hartree-Fock determinant and have small additional contributions from a potentially large number of excited state determinants.
“Wavefunctions displaying dynamic correlation are often dominated by the Hartree-Fock determinant, and have small additional contributions from a (potentially large) number of excited state determinants.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14
Static correlation often dominates in many systems of scientific interest, such as excited states or transition metals.
“As a result, static correlation often dominates in many systems of scientific interest, such as excited states (Lischka et al. , 2018), or transition metals (Vogiatzis et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lischka et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vogiatzis et al. , 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15
It is not possible to perform a complete MCSCF calculation on all possible determinants for systems with more than a few electrons, as the number of determinants scales exponentially with the number of electrons.
“It is not possible to perform a complete MCSCF calculation on all possible determinants for systems with more than a few electrons, as the number of determinants scales exponentially with the number of electrons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15
Because low energy excitations dominate the ground state wavefunction in many physical systems, truncated CI can still produce good approximations to the ground state energy.
“However, as low energy excitations dominate the ground state wavefunction in many physical systems, these truncations can still produce good approximations to the ground state energy (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Szabo and Ostlund, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14
In the case of static correlation, the Hartree-Fock method provides a poor approximation to the ground state wavefunction.
“In this case, the Hartree-Fock method provides a poor approximation to the ground state wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14
It is in general not possible to avoid strong static correlation when considering the whole of the potential energy surface.
“Lyakh et al. (2012) note that, while it is sometimes possible to reduce the level of static correlation by manually enforcing correct spin symmetries, and using appropriately localised orbitals, it is in general not possible to avoid strong static correlation when considering the whole of the potential energy surface.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyakh et al. (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 12
The expectation values of second quantised operators must be equivalent to the expectation values of the corresponding first quantised operators.
“Therefore, the expectation values of second quantised operators must be equivalent to the expectation values of the corresponding first quantised operators.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13
The linear-combination-of-Slater-determinants solutions are exact provided that the molecular orbitals form a complete basis for the single-particle states and the N-electron wavefunction contains all determinants that these molecular orbitals can generate.
“These solutions are exact, provided that the molecular orbitals form a complete basis for the single particle states, and the N -electron wavefunction contains all of the determinants that these molecular orbitals can generate (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Szabo and Ostlund, 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szabo and Ostlund, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15
The CI method converges slowly to the full configuration interaction wavefunction as a result of its linear parametrization.
“The method converges slowly to the full configuration interaction wavefunction, as a result of its linear parametrization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15
The energy obtained from a truncated CI calculation is not size extensive.
“The energy obtained from a truncated CI calculation is not size extensive.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 12
As a result, the Hamiltonian contains up to M^4 terms, depending on the basis functions used.
“As a result, the Hamiltonian contains up to M 4 terms, depending on the basis functions used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14
The presence of strong static correlation can be evidenced by multiple near-degenerate solutions of the Hartree-Fock procedure.
“The presence of strong static correlation can be evidenced by multiple near-degenerate solutions of the Hartree-Fock procedure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ C. Classical computation methods · p. 13
The four classical methods reviewed for approximating the ground state wavefunction with a restricted number of Slater determinants create parametrized trial states that can be optimised to approach the ground state to an accuracy determined by the approximations made.
“These methods create parametrized trial states, which can then be optimised to approach the ground state (to an accuracy determined by the approximations made).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 12
The Hamiltonian only contains terms with up to four creation and annihilation operators because the Coulomb interaction between the electrons is a two-body interaction.
“The Hamiltonian only contains terms with up to four creation and annihilation operators (two creation, two annihilation) because the Coulomb interaction between the electrons is a two-body interaction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18
The plane wave and plane wave dual basis sets diagonalise the kinetic and potential operators, respectively.
“These basis sets diagonalise the kinetic and potential operators, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Jordan-Wigner encoding · p. 22
In the Jordan-Wigner encoding, a fermionic operator mapped to qubits generally has a weight of O(M) Pauli operators, each acting on a different qubit.
“The string of Z operators means that a fermionic operator mapped to qubits generally has a weight of O ( M ) Pauli operators, each acting on a different qubit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18
To describe molecular systems, approximately 10 to 100 times as many plane wave basis functions are required as GTOs.
“However, to describe molecular systems, approximately 10 to 100 times as many plane wave basis functions are required as GTOs (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19
Certain orbitals are sometimes very likely to be either occupied or virtual in all Slater determinants in the wavefunction.
“It is sometimes the case that certain orbitals are very likely to be either occupied or virtual in all Slater determinants in the wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisereasoning§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19
Spin-orbitals can be removed from the calculation if their expected occupation number is close to 0 or 1, reducing the calculation to only the most important (ambiguously occupied) orbitals, known as a reduced active space.
“Specifically, we are able to remove spin-orbitals from the calculation if their expected occupation number is close to 0 or 1. Our calculation is reduced to including only the most important (ambiguously occupied) orbitals. This is known as performing the calculation in a reduced active space.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16
The wavefunction generated by the canonical CC method does not obey the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle.
“Most notably, the wavefunction generated by the canonical CC method does not obey the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19
Takeshita et al. (2019) showed how to re-integrate some of the energy contribution of virtual orbitals into a quantum simulation without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals, using increased measurements and classical post-processing.
“Takeshita et al. (2019) showed how to re-integrate some of the energy contribution of the virtual orbitals into a quantum simulation, without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals. Their method utilises an increased number of measurements, and classical post-processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2. Correlation-consistent basis sets · p. 18
cc-PVnZ basis sets with higher n contain orbitals that better approximate the true atomic orbitals than those with lower n values.
“cc-PV n Z basis sets with higher values of n contain orbitals that better approximate the true atomic orbitals than those with lower n values.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18
Conventional orbital basis sets are not necessarily optimal for calculations performed on quantum computers.
“While the aforementioned basis sets have a long history of use in classical computational chemistry (and as a result, early work in quantum computational chemistry), they are not necessarily optimal basis sets for calculations performed on quantum computers.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisereasoning§ 2. Correlation-consistent basis sets · p. 18
The limitation of finite basis sets can be overcome by measuring the ground state energy in several different cc-PVnZ bases and extrapolating to the basis set limit.
“This limitation can be overcome by measuring the ground state energy in several different cc-PV n Z bases, and then extrapolating to the basis set limit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 1. Jordan-Wigner encoding · p. 22
Using a quantum computer, the full configuration interaction wavefunction can be stored using only M qubits.
“However, using a quantum computer, we can instead store the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction using only M qubits (Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aspuru-Guzik et al. , 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Bravyi-Kitaev encoding · p. 23
The BK-tree mapping produces qubit operators with a greater weight than the standard BK mapping.
“It has been noted that the BK-tree mapping produces qubit operators with a greater weight than the standard BK mapping (Sung, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sung, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18
This reduction in Hamiltonian terms leads to a reduction in the asymptotic scaling of quantum chemistry algorithms to find the ground state energy of molecules and solid state systems.
“This in turn leads to a reduction in the asymptotic scaling of quantum chemistry algorithms to find the ground state energy of molecules and solid state systems”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3. Locality preserving mappings · p. 24
Locality preserving mappings typically require more qubits than the JW encoding.
“These mappings typically require more qubits than the JW encoding.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Grid based methods · p. 21
Grid based approaches are typically considered unsuitable for near-term quantum computers, which will have relatively few qubits.
“Consequently, grid based approaches are typically considered unsuitable for near-term quantum computers, which will have relatively few qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. STOn G and split-valence basis sets · p. 17
When carrying out a HF calculation in an STOnG basis, the true HF energy will not be obtained, as the STOnG basis sets only approximate the true HF orbitals.
“It is important to note that when carrying out a HF calculation in an STOn G basis, the true HF energy (i.e. the energy obtained by performing a HF calculation using a grid based method, on an infinitely precise grid) will not be obtained, as the STOn G basis sets only approximate the true HF orbitals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 2. Bravyi-Kitaev encoding · p. 23
Applying the Bravyi-Kitaev mapping to a fermionic operator results in a qubit operator with a Pauli weight of O(log2 M).
“Applying the BK mapping to a fermionic operator results in a qubit operator with a Pauli weight of O (log 2 M ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Correlation-consistent basis sets · p. 18
Even large (n=5) basis sets struggle to exactly represent the true HF orbitals of simple molecules such as N2.
“However, even large ( n = 5) basis sets struggle to exactly represent the true HF orbitals of simple molecules such as N 2 (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18
The number of terms in the Hamiltonian plays a key role in the cost of some quantum chemistry algorithms.
“As we will see in Sec. V, the number of terms in the Hamiltonian plays a key role in the cost of some quantum chemistry algorithms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 25
Phase estimation can be used to find the lowest energy eigenstate and excited states of a physical Hamiltonian.
“Phase estimation (Kitaev, 1995) can be used to find the lowest energy eigenstate, | E 0 〉 , and excited states, | E i> 0 〉 , of a physical Hamiltonian (Abrams and Lloyd, 1999).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kitaev, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Abrams and Lloyd, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
Phase estimation can become exponentially costly due to imperfect preparation of eigenstates of non-interacting subsystems.
“Even more problematically, McClean et al. (2014) showed that phase estimation can become exponentially costly, by considering the imperfect preparation of eigenstates of non-interacting subsystems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 28
The accuracy of product formula simulations under a time-dependent Hamiltonian depends on the derivatives of the Hamiltonian.
“Wiebe et al. (2011) showed that the accuracy of such simulations depends on the derivatives of the Hamiltonian (although this dependence may be alleviated by incorporating randomisation procedures (Poulin et al. , 2011)).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wiebe et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poulin et al., 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25
The electronic structure Hamiltonian in the canonical molecular orbital basis contains O(M^4) terms, where M is the number of spin-orbitals.
“As discussed in Sec. III.A, the electronic structure Hamiltonian in the canonical molecular orbital basis contains O ( M 4 ) terms, where M is the number of spinorbitals in the molecule.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25
This has caused second quantised basis set methods to become the de facto option for experimental demonstrations of quantum computational chemistry algorithms, due to the limits of current quantum hardware.
“This has caused second quantised basis set methods to become the de facto option for experimental demonstrations of quantum computational chemistry algorithms, due to the limits of current quantum hardware.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ b. Advanced Hamiltonian simulation methods · p. 28
Qubitization naturally implements a quantum walk operator with eigenvalues e^{-i arcsin(E_k/α)} where E_k is the kth eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian H and α is a normalisation factor.
“Qubitization naturally implements a quantum walk operator with eigenvalues e -i arcsin( E k /α ) where E k is the k th eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian H and α is a normalisation factor.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
It is necessary to develop state preparation routines that result in at worst a polynomially decreasing overlap with the FCI ground state as system size increases.
“This highlights the necessity of developing state preparation routines which result in at worst a polynomially decreasing overlap with the FCI ground state, as the system size increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ 3. Locality preserving mappings · p. 24
In the Bravyi-Kitaev superfast transform, the number of gates required to implement a fermionic operator scales as O(d) where d is the degree of the graph.
“However, the number of gates required to implement a fermionic operator will scale as O ( d ) where d is the degree of the graph.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
For any Hamiltonian H_s, a state close to its ground state can be prepared via adiabatic state preparation.
“For any Hamiltonian H s , we can prepare a state | Ψ 〉 that is close to its ground state via adiabatic state preparation (Albash and Lidar, 2018).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Albash and Lidar, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
Gaussian orbitals result in a second quantised Hamiltonian with O(M^4) terms.
“They result in a second quantised Hamiltonian with O ( M 4 ) terms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25
Huggins et al. (2019b) used low rank decomposition to reduce the number of circuit repetitions required for variational algorithms to find the ground state energy of chemical systems.
“This low rank decomposition technique was also used by Huggins et al. (2019b), to reduce the number of circuit repetitions required for variational algorithms to find the ground state energy of chemical systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huggins et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
If an initial state with sufficiently large overlap with the ground state is available, adiabatic state preparation may be forgone and phase estimation carried out directly on that initial state.
“We note however that if an initial state with sufficiently large overlap with the ground state is available, we may be able to forgo adiabatic state preparation entirely, and instead carry out phase estimation directly on that initial state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
It is difficult to optimally allocate resources between the error budgets ε_PE, ε_U, and ε_CS in order to minimise the total error.
“In general, it is difficult to optimally allocate resources between these error budgets in order to minimise the total error (Kivlichan et al. , 2019a; Reiher et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reiher et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
The ultimate limit for the number of calls required to e^{-iH} is π/ε_PE for a completely general Hamiltonian H, approximately obtained using Bayesian approaches or entanglement based approaches.
“The ultimate limit for the number of calls required to e -iH is π/ϵ PE (for a completely general Hamiltonian, H ), which is approximately obtained using Bayesian approaches (Berry et al. , 2009; Higgins et al. , 2007; Paesani et al. , 2017; Wiebe and Granade, 2016), or entanglement based approaches (Babbush et al. , 2018b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Berry et al. , 2009
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Higgins et al. , 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babbush et al. , 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 28
To achieve accuracy ε with first-order Trotterization, the number of Trotter steps S = O(t^2/ε) should be large.
“In practice, to achieve accuracy ε , the number of Trotter steps S = O ( t 2 /ε ) should be large in order to suppress the errors in the approximation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
The finite precision ε_PE obtained in E0 is not the only source of error in phase estimation.
“The finite precision, ϵ PE , obtained in E 0 is not the only source of error in the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
For a Trotter decomposition of e^{-iH}, the error in the energy eigenvalue obtained from phase estimation is upper bounded by ε_PE + ε_U + ε_CS.
“For the specific case of a Trotter decomposition of e -iH , Reiher et al. (2017) showed that the error in the energy eigenvalue obtained from phase estimation is upper bounded by ϵ PE + ϵ U + ϵ CS .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
In order to account for c0<1, the number of repetitions of phase estimation must be multiplied by 1/|c0|^2, on average, to obtain the ground state.
“In order to account for the fact that c 0 < 1, we must multiply the number of repetitions of phase estimation by 1 / | c 0 | 2 , on average, to obtain the ground state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 28
Randomisation procedures improve the accuracy obtained using product formulae.
“Randomisation procedures (such as randomly ordering the terms in the Trotter sequence, or stochastically choosing which terms to include in the Hamiltonian), have been shown to improve the accuracy obtained using product formulae (Campbell, 2018; Childs et al. , 2018; Ouyang et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Campbell, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Childs et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ouyang et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
A series of improvements reduced the scaling of phase estimation for molecules from O(M^11) to (empirically) O(M^5).
“A series of improvements throughout these papers reduced the scaling of phase estimation for molecules from O ( M 11 ) (Wecker et al. , 2014) to (empirically) O ( M 5 ) (Babbush et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Wecker et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babbush et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 28
Higher order product formulae scale better with respect to simulation error than the first order method.
“It is also possible to use higher order product formulae (Berry et al. , 2007; D¨ ur et al. , 2008; Suzuki, 1976), which scale better with respect to the simulation error than the first order method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Dür et al., 2008
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Suzuki, 1976
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
Initialising the qubit register in a state with sufficiently large overlap with the target eigenstate is a non-trivial problem.
“Initialising the qubit register in a state which has a sufficiently large overlap with the target eigenstate (typically the ground state), is a non-trivial problem.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Hamiltonian reduction · p. 24
The method by Bravyi et al. (2017) utilises conservation of electron number and spin to enable systematic reduction of two qubits when using the parity, BK (with the caveat that the number of orbitals is a power of two), or BK-tree encoding.
“Here, we will describe the method by Bravyi et al. (2017), which utilises two such symmetries: conservation of electron number and spin. This method enables the systematic reduction of two qubits when using the parity, BK (with the caveat that the number of orbitals is a power of two), or BK-tree encoding.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bravyi et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
Annealing times for methylene (CH2) could be reduced by up to four orders of magnitude by using an initial state with larger overlap with the true ground state.
“This view is supported by the numerical simulations of Veis and Pittner (2014), who found that annealing times for methylene (CH 2 ) could be reduced by up to four orders of magnitude by using an initial state with larger overlap with the true ground state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Veis and Pittner, 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
Introducing additional 'driving' Hamiltonians is a possible method for reducing the annealing time required.
“One possible method for reducing the annealing time required is to introduce additional 'driving' Hamiltonians, as was numerically investigated by Matsuura et al. (2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Matsuura et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
The efficiency of adiabatic state preparation depends on the gap between the ground state and the first excited state along the path between H_0 and H_s.
“The efficiency of adiabatic state preparation depends on the gap between the ground state and the first excited state along the path between H 0 and H s .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 1. Implementation · p. 26
Errors arise from imperfect implementation of the controlled unitary evolutions applied to the main register (ε_U).
“There are also errors arising from imperfect implementation of the controlled unitary evolutions applied to the main register, which we denote as ϵ U .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
Rigorous bounds on the Trotter error are believed to be loose by several orders of magnitude.
“A notable feature of these Trotter-based simulations is that rigorous bounds on the Trotter error are believed to be loose by several orders of magnitude, which may impact the scaling of these approaches.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poulin et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 2. State preparation · p. 27
A randomly chosen state would have an exponentially vanishing probability of collapsing to the desired ground state as system size increases.
“This is important, because a randomly chosen state would have an exponentially vanishing probability of collapsing to the desired ground state, as the system size increases.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
The Trotter error bounds appear to be loose by several orders of magnitude.
“While the advanced Hamiltonian simulation methods described above are asymptotically more efficient than Trotterization, the Trotter error bounds appear to be loose by several orders of magnitude (Babbush et al. , 2015; Poulin et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poulin et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 32
The VQE has been experimentally demonstrated on superconducting qubits, trapped ions, and photonic systems.
“The VQE has been experimentally demonstrated on most leading quantum architectures including: superconducting qubits (Colless et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017; O'Malley et al. , 2016), trapped ions (Hempel et al. , 2018; Kokail et al. , 2019; Nam et al. , 2019; Shen et al. , 2017), and photonic systems (Peruzzo et al. , 2014), and shows many desirable features.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Colless et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kandala et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Malley et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 30
Babbush et al. (2018a) obtained a scaling of O(N^{4/3} M^{2/3} + N^{8/3} M^{1/3}) for first quantized plane wave basis.
“Babbush et al. (2018a) obtained a scaling of O ( N 4 / 3 M 2 / 3 + N 8 / 3 M 1 / 3 ), similar to the scaling of their interaction picture algorithm discussed above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
Alternative methods are required for near-future chemistry simulation.
“Consequently, alternative methods are required for near-future chemistry simulation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
The scaling of the CI matrix based algorithm of Babbush et al. (2017) was reduced from O(N^2 M^3) in a Gaussian basis to O(M^{2.67}) in a plane wave basis.
“The scaling of the CI matrix based algorithm of Babbush et al. (2017) was reduced from O ( N 2 M 3 ) in a Gaussian basis to O ( M 2 . 67 ) in a plane wave basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babbush et al., 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33
The canonical UCCSD implementation requires O(M^3 N^2) gates when using the Jordan-Wigner mapping, where M is the number of spin-orbitals and N is the number of electrons.
“The canonical UCCSD implementation requires O ( M 3 N 2 ) gates when using the Jordan-Wigner mapping (where M is the number of spin-orbitals, and N is the number of electrons) (Romero et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romero et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
- Premisecitation§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
A study of spin Hamiltonians found that the asymptotic scaling of Trotter methods was much worse than qubitization + quantum signal processing and Taylor series methods.
“A study of spin Hamiltonians (Childs et al. , 2017) found that the asymptotic scaling of Trotter methods was much worse than the qubitization + quantum signal processing, and Taylor series methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Childs et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ d. Grid based methods · p. 30
Kivlichan et al. (2017) obtained a scaling of O((N/h^2 + N^2)t) for grid based methods.
“Those authors obtained a scaling of O (( N/h 2 + N 2 ) t ) (excluding logarithmic factors), where h is the grid spacing and t is the simulation time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
For certain functions f(H), qubitization can be used on its own to directly implement the unitary e^{-if(H)t} without approximation errors.
“However, it was later noted that for certain functions f ( H ), qubitization could be used on its own to directly implement the unitary e -if ( H ) t without approximation errors (Berry et al. , 2018; Poulin et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Poulin et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
For 3D materials, the scaling of Trotter based approaches to phase estimation in a plane wave dual basis was reduced to around O(M^2).
“For 3D materials, such as diamond, the scaling of Trotter based approaches to phase estimation in a plane wave dual basis was reduced to around O ( M 2 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
Babbush et al. (2018b) obtained a gate scaling of O(M) for the Fermi-Hubbard model using qubitization.
“Those authors obtained a gate scaling of O ( M ) for the Fermi-Hubbard model.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
Wecker et al. (2015b) found that their approach to finding the ground state of the Fermi-Hubbard model required O(M^3) gates.
“Their approach to finding the ground state required O ( M 3 ) gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wecker et al., 2015b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
When considering an intensive error in the energy, the qubitization approach outperforms the Trotter-based method of Kivlichan et al. (2019a).
“When considering an intensive error in the energy, this approach outperforms the Trotter-based method of Kivlichan et al. (2019a).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
The Hamiltonian has a sparsity of O(N^2 M^2) in the CI matrix basis.
“The Hamiltonian has a sparsity of O ( N 2 M 2 ) in this basis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisenone given§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
When numerical simulations were performed, Trotter methods required lower gate counts than the other methods.
“However, when numerical simulations were performed, Trotter methods required lower gate counts than the other methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
Kivlichan et al. (2019a) found that the cost of Fermi-Hubbard model simulations was effectively between O(1) and O(M^{1/2}) using Trotterisation when targeting extensive error.
“This was subsequently improved by Kivlichan et al. (2019a), who considered the case where an extensive error in the energy is targeted, and found that the cost of Fermi-Hubbard model simulations was effectively between O (1) and O ( M 1 / 2 ) using Trotterisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 31
The VQE is a promising algorithm for near-term quantum hardware.
“A promising algorithm for near-term quantum hardware is the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE), first proposed and experimentally realised by Peruzzo et al. (2014), and elaborated on by McClean et al. (2016).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McClean et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
The best product based formulae approaches scale as O(M^{1.67} N^{1.83}) in a plane wave basis.
“The best product based formulae approaches described above scale as O ( M 1 . 67 N 1 . 83 ) in a plane wave basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 31
The VQE exchanges the long coherence times needed for phase estimation for a polynomial overhead due to measurement repetitions and classical processing.
“This exchanges the long coherence times needed for phase estimation for a polynomial overhead due to measurement repetitions and classical processing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
Childs and Su (2019) proved that a kth order product formula can simulate time evolution of an M qubit lattice Hamiltonian using O((Mt)^{1+1/k}) elementary operations.
“Similar results were obtained by Childs and Su (2019), who proved that a k th order product formula can simulate time evolution of an M qubit lattice Hamiltonian using O (( Mt ) 1+ 1 k ) elementary operations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Childs and Su, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 32
The Hamiltonian averaging method requires O(1/ε^2) measurements to determine the energy to a precision ε.
“This is known as the Hamiltonian averaging method of calculating the energy (McClean et al. , 2014), and requires O (1 /ϵ 2 ) measurements to determine the energy to a precision ϵ .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ a. Hardware efficient ans¨ atze · p. 33
This effect becomes exponentially more prominent as the number of qubits and circuit depth increases.
“This effect becomes exponentially more prominent as the number of qubits and circuit depth increases.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29
Berry et al. (2019b) produced an algorithm with scaling O(M^{1.5} λ), where λ is the 1-norm of the Hamiltonian.
“This produced an algorithm with a scaling of O ( M 1 . 5 λ ), where λ is the 1-norm of the Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
These methods are typically assumed to require fault-tolerance.
“As a result, these methods are typically assumed to require fault-tolerance.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The methods discussed above require fault-tolerance.
- Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 30
A time dependent Taylor series approach in the interaction picture scales as O(M^2) in a plane wave dual basis.
“A time dependent form of the Taylor series approach was used for simulation in the 'interaction picture', which enables more efficient time evolution in a plane wave dual basis, scaling as O ( M 2 ) (Low and Wiebe, 2018) (although this algorithm uses O ( M log 2 ( M )) qubits).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Low and Wiebe, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
All of the methods discussed above require circuits with a large number of gates.
“Despite this progress, all of the methods discussed above require circuits with a large number of gates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ 5. Outstanding problems · p. 31
The long gate sequences required by these algorithms make them unsuitable for near-term hardware.
“As near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction, the long gate sequences required by these algorithms make them unsuitable for near-term hardware.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction.
- Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33
The coupled cluster (CC) method can be extended to produce the unitary coupled cluster (UCC) ansatz.
“Most notably, the coupled cluster (CC) method discussed in Sec. III.C.4 can be extended to produce the unitary coupled cluster (UCC) ansatz (Bartlett et al. , 1989; Hoffmann and Simons, 1988).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bartlett et al., 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Hoffmann and Simons, 1988
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30
Haah et al. (2018) obtained a simulation algorithm requiring O(Mt) gates to simulate time evolution for time t under lattice Hamiltonians.
“Haah et al. (2018) made use of arguments about the speed of information propagation in lattice systems to obtain a simulation algorithm requiring O ( Mt ) gates to simulate time evolution for time t under lattice Hamiltonians.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Haah et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ a. Hardware efficient ans¨ atze · p. 33
Randomly initialised hardware efficient ansätze are not a scalable solution for problems in quantum computational chemistry.
“This suggests that randomly initialised hardware efficient ans¨ atze are not a scalable solution for problems in quantum computational chemistry.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ b. Related methods of optimisation · p. 36
Quantum circuits can calculate the analytic gradient of the energy with respect to one of the parameters, avoiding finite difference formulae.
“Quantum circuits have been proposed to calculate the analytic gradient of the energy with respect to one of the parameters (Guerreschi and Smelyanskiy, 2017; Mitarai and Fujii, 2018; Schuld et al. , 2019). This avoids the use of finite difference formulae, which restrict the accuracy of gradient evaluation, as the finite difference considered is limited by the noise in the energy evaluation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Guerreschi and Smelyanskiy, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mitarai and Fujii, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Schuld et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 34
Around 10^13 samples would be required per energy evaluation for a 112 spin-orbital molecule such as Fe2S2.
“For example, Wecker et al. (2015a) found that around 10 13 samples would be required per energy evaluation for a 112 spin-orbital molecule such as Fe 2 S 2 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wecker et al. (2015a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 34
The number of measurements required to estimate the energy to a precision ε is bounded by a formula involving the coefficients of each Pauli string in the Hamiltonian.
“McClean et al. (2016) and Romero et al. (2019) showed that the number of measurements N m , required to estimate the energy to a precision ϵ , is bounded by”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McClean et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Romero et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33
For LiH in an STO-3G basis, taking into account symmetries and a reduced active space allows accurate results while considering only around 12 excitation operators, compared to around 200 naively.
“For example, the LiH molecule in an STO-3G basis naively has around 200 excitation operators to consider. However, taking into account symmetries and a reduced active space, one can achieve accurate results while considering only around 12 excitation operators (Hempel et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hempel et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
The Hamiltonian variational ansatz appears particularly suitable for the Fermi-Hubbard model, which only has O(M) terms in its Hamiltonian.
“The Hamiltonian variational ansatz appears particularly suitable for the Fermi-Hubbard model, which only has O ( M ) terms in its Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35
Canonical gradient descent based methods have struggled to find the ground state, due to the high levels of noise present in current quantum devices.
“In contrast, canonical gradient descent based methods have struggled to find the ground state, due to the high levels of noise present in current quantum devices (Peruzzo et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
It is possible to implement Trotter steps of the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian with O(√M) depth and O(M^1.5) gates on a linear array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity.
“Kivlichan et al. (2018) showed that it is possible to implement Trotter steps of the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian with O ( √ M ) depth and O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates on a linear array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35
In comparisons of out-of-the-box optimisers, the Nelder-Mead simplex algorithm utilised in experimental studies was outperformed by both other direct search approaches and gradient based approaches, such as LBFGS-B.
“In comparisons of 'out-of-the-box' optimisers (McClean et al. , 2016; Romero et al. , 2019), the NelderMead simplex algorithm utilised in experimental studies was outperformed by both other direct search approaches, and gradient based approaches, such as LBFGS-B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Romero et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33
The UCCSD gate count has been improved to O(M^3)-O(M^4) gates using a low-rank decomposition of the UCCSD tensor.
“or O ( M 3 ) - O ( M 4 ) gates using a low-rank decomposition of the UCCSD tensor (Motta et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Motta et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
- Premisenone given§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
The efficiency of the Hamiltonian variational ansatz is determined by the number of terms in the Hamiltonian.
“The efficiency of this ansatz is determined by the number of terms in the Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 35
If only the energy expectation value is of interest, it is possible to use low rank Hamiltonian decomposition and orbital basis rotations to divide the Hamiltonian into O(M) measurement groups.
“If we are only interested in measuring the energy expectation value, rather than the 1 and 2-RDMs, Huggins et al. (2019b) showed that it is possible to use the low rank Hamiltonian decomposition technique (discussed in Sec. IV.C.2) and orbital basis rotations to divide the Hamiltonian into O ( M ) measurement groups.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huggins et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
The Hamiltonian variational ansatz leads to a scaling of approximately O(M^4) when considering a Gaussian molecular orbital basis.
“This leads to a scaling of approximately O ( M 4 ) when considering a Gaussian molecular orbital basis (Wecker et al. , 2015a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wecker et al., 2015a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
The number of parameters in the Hamiltonian variational ansatz scales linearly with the number of Trotter steps, S.
“The number of parameters in this ansatz scales linearly with the number of Trotter steps, S .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34
The electronic structure Hamiltonian in a plane wave dual basis only contains O(M^2) terms.
“The electronic structure Hamiltonian in a plane wave dual basis only contains O ( M 2 ) terms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35
All methods were liable to becoming trapped in local minima, even for small systems.
“All methods were liable to becoming trapped in local minima, even for small systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Romero et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ 2. Measurement · p. 35
When taking into account covariances between commuting terms, the total number of measurements required for small molecules was reduced by several orders of magnitude.
“When taking into account covariances between commuting terms, the total number of measurements required for small molecules was reduced by several orders of magnitude.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33
In practice, the gate scaling of UCCSD is typically better than the bounds given above, as many excitations are forbidden by the symmetry point groups of molecular orbitals.
“In practice, the gate scaling is typically better than the bounds given above, as many excitations are forbidden by the symmetry point groups of molecular orbitals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 35
By grouping terms at a fermionic level, the fermionic 2-RDM can be measured using O(M^2) circuits, with an additional gate depth of O(M).
“By grouping terms at a fermionic level, rather than a qubit level, Bonet-Monroig et al. (2019) devised a method for measuring the fermionic 2-RDM using O ( M 2 ) circuits (an additional gate depth of O ( M ) is required).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bonet-Monroig et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 39
In general, error mitigation techniques only require a multiplicative overhead in the number of measurements required, if the error rate is sufficiently low.
“In general, these techniques only require a multiplicative overhead in the number of measurements required, if the error rate is sufficiently low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 41
QSE has been experimentally demonstrated using a two qubit superconducting system to measure the ground and excited state energies of H2.
“The QSE has been experimentally demonstrated, using a two qubit superconducting system to measure the ground and excited state energies of H 2 (Colless et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colless et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40
Using a combination of process and gate set tomography reduces the effect of errors due to state preparation and measurement.
“The latter approach reduces the effect of errors due to state preparation and measurement (Endo et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Endo et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 2. Overlap-based methods · p. 38
Overlap based methods exploit the orthogonality of energy eigenstates to find other eigenstates by ensuring they are orthogonal to the original state.
“Overlap based methods exploit the orthogonality of energy eigenstates. Once an eigenstate is found, we can find other eigenstates by ensuring that they are orthogonal to the original state (Endo et al. , 2018a; Higgott et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Endo et al., 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Higgott et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 39
Probabilistic error cancellation works by effectively realising the inverse of an error channel N^-1 such that N^-1(N(ρ0)) = ρ0.
“The probabilistic error cancellation method introduced by Temme et al. (2017) works by effectively realising the inverse of an error channel, N -1 , such that N -1 ( N ( ρ 0 )) = ρ 0 .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Temme et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40
In practice, it is not possible to exactly measure all possible terms resulting from errors if there are many gates in the circuit.
“In practice, it is not possible to exactly measure all of the possible terms resulting from errors if there are many gates in the circuit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37
The original QSE formulation used a polynomial number of additional measurements to find the excited states of a quantum system.
“The original formulation of the QSE used a polynomial number of additional measurements to find the excited states of a quantum system (McClean et al. , 2017a).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2017a
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40
Probabilistic error cancellation requires full knowledge of the noise model associated with each gate.
“Probabilistic error cancellation requires full knowledge of the noise model associated with each gate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 38
The VQE can be inherently robust to some coherent errors, such as qubit over-rotation.
“It has been shown both theoretically (McClean et al. , 2016) and experimentally (O'Malley et al. , 2016) that the VQE can be inherently robust to some coherent errors, such as qubit over-rotation.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Malley et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 2. Overlap-based methods · p. 38
After finding the ground state of a Hamiltonian H with VQE, replacing the Hamiltonian with H' = H + α|E0><E0| makes the ground state of H' the first excited state of H.
“The ground state of the updated Hamiltonian H ′ is no longer | E 0 〉 , but the first excited state | E 1 〉 of the original Hamiltonian H .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 38
Small experimental demonstrations of the VQE have shown that noise can still prevent reaching the desired levels of accuracy.
“However, small experimental demonstrations of the VQE have shown that noise can still prevent us from reaching the desired levels of accuracy (Hempel et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Hempel et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kandala et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37
The QSE single excitation linear response subspace is designed to target the low-lying excited states.
“This is designed to target the low-lying excited states, which are assumed to differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Low-lying excited states differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.
- Premisenone given§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40
The variance in the estimate of the noiseless measurement result O0 is increased by a factor γG, where γ is the overhead coefficient and G is the number of gates in the circuit.
“The variance in our estimate of ¯ O 0 is increased by a factor of γ G , where γ is the overhead coefficient, and G is the number of gates in the circuit.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41
It is possible to mitigate some errors by using symmetry checks on a suitably constructed ansatz state.
“It is also possible to mitigate some errors by using symmetry checks on a suitably constructed ansatz state (Bonet-Monroig et al. , 2018; McArdle et al. , 2018c).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bonet-Monroig et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McArdle et al. , 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37
The QSE can be used to recover the energy contribution of virtual orbitals without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals.
“Takeshita et al. (2019) showed how the QSE can be used to recover the energy contribution of virtual orbitals, without requiring additional qubits to represent the virtual orbitals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 38
If errors are not dealt with, they will corrupt the results of algorithms, rendering calculations meaningless.
“If these errors are not dealt with, they will corrupt the results of our algorithms, rendering the calculations meaningless.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40
Probabilistic error cancellation has been shown to work for general Markovian noise.
“The probabilistic error cancellation method described above has been shown to work for general Markovian noise (Endo et al. , 2017), and has also been extended to work with temporally correlated errors and low frequency noise (Huo and Li, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Endo et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37
The QSE was experimentally demonstrated in a two qubit superconducting system to find the ground and excited states of H2.
“The QSE was experimentally demonstrated in a two qubit superconducting system to find the ground and excited states of H 2 (Colless et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Colless et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ b. Related methods of optimisation · p. 36
Barkoutsos et al. introduced a transformation of the Hamiltonian such that it only measures the energy of excitations above the Hartree-Fock state (the correlation energy).
“Barkoutsos et al. (2018) introduced a transformation of the Hamiltonian, such that it only measures the energy of excitations above the Hartree-Fock state (the correlation energy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barkoutsos et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Extrapolation · p. 39
Exponential extrapolation is a more appropriate extrapolation technique for large quantum circuits.
“Exponential extrapolation was introduced by Endo et al. (2017) as a more appropriate extrapolation technique for large quantum circuits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Endo et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Extrapolation · p. 39
The extrapolation method has been demonstrated for VQE experiments in molecular chemistry and nuclear physics.
“The extrapolation method has been demonstrated for VQE experiments in both molecular chemistry (Kandala et al. , 2018; Ollitrault et al. , 2019), and nuclear physics (Shehab et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kandala et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ollitrault et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shehab et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 38
Numerical simulations showed the impact that noise has on phase estimation based chemistry calculations.
“This was confirmed for the case of chemistry calculations by Sawaya et al. (2016), who used numerical simulations to show the impact that noise has on phase estimation based chemistry calculations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sawaya et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41
States with electron number far from the true value appear to have a larger energy variance than those with smaller particle number errors.
“A key concern for the VQE is preserving particle number, as states with electron number far from the true value appear to have a larger energy variance than those with smaller particle number errors (Sawaya et al. , 2016).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Sawaya et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37
The QSE with single and double excitations can be understood as an approximation to the equation of motion (EoM) method for finding excited states.
“Ollitrault et al. (2019) showed that the QSE with single and double excitations can be understood as an approximation to the 'equation of motion' (EoM) method for finding excited states, which was originally introduced as a classical method in quantum chemistry by Rowe (1968).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ollitrault et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Quantum computers can store the FCI wavefunction of M spin-orbitals using only M qubits in second quantisation.
“As discussed in Sec. IV.B, quantum computers can store the FCI wavefunction of M spin-orbitals using only M qubits in second quantisation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47
Many problems of scientific interest fit the sweet spot description, including transition metal catalysts and the Fermi-Hubbard model.
“Interestingly, many problems of scientific interest fit this description, including: transition metal catalysts (Podewitz et al. , 2011; Vogiatzis et al. , 2019) and the Fermi-Hubbard model (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Podewitz et al. , 2011
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Vogiatzis et al. , 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47
Coupled cluster methods (often CCSD) are applicable to large systems (hundreds of spin-orbitals) which do not display strong static correlation.
“Coupled cluster methods (often CCSD) are some of the most widely used high-accuracy methods. They are applicable to large systems (hundreds of spinorbitals (Bartlett and Musiaglyph[suppress] l, 2007)) which do not display strong static correlation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Bartlett and Musiaglyph[suppress] l, 2007
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationown data§ A. Hydrogen · p. 42
Working in a suitably large basis set is crucial for obtaining accurate results.
“This highlights that working in a suitably large basis set is crucial for obtaining accurate results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41
McClean et al. (2019b) developed a related extension of QSE that effectively engineered additional symmetries using an error correcting code.
“A related extension of the quantum subspace expansion was developed by McClean et al. (2019b), who effectively engineered additional symmetries in the system using an error correcting code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ 1. STO-3G basis · p. 43
All Pauli terms arising from the same excitation operators commute.
“It was shown by Romero et al. (2019) that all Pauli terms arising from the same excitation operators commute.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romero et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ E. Other methods of error mitigation · p. 41
Post-processing the results of individual error reduction produces a more accurate expectation value than would be obtained without the mitigation technique.
“Post-processing the results produces a more accurate expectation value than would be obtained without the mitigation technique.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otten and Gray, 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 47
These problems are among the best targets for quantum computers.
“This would imply that these problems are among the best targets for quantum computers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 47
There appears to be an untreated 'sweet spot' of systems with around 100 to 200 spin-orbitals that require high accuracy calculations.
“We can see from the above discussion that there appears to be an untreated 'sweet spot', of systems with around 100 to 200 spin-orbitals, that require high accuracy calculations.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ 1. STO-3G basis · p. 43
The ground state of the H2 molecule at its equilibrium bond distance is given by the wavefunction in Eq. (98) (Helgaker et al., 2014).
“and the ground state of the H 2 molecule at its equilibrium bond distance is given by (Helgaker et al. , 2014)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47
Over 95% of the approved drug molecules in DrugBank 5.0 are larger than the 100-200 spin-orbital systems that might be simulated with a small, error-corrected quantum computer.
“For example, Yamazaki et al. (2018) noted that over 95 % of the approved drug molecules in DrugBank 5.0 are larger than these 100-200 spin-orbital systems that we might aim to simulate with a small, error-corrected quantum computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Yamazaki et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Tubman et al. (2018) presented an algorithm which can prepare a suitable initial state by leveraging a classical adaptive configuration interaction method.
“Tubman et al. (2018) presented an algorithm which can prepare a suitable initial state by leveraging a classical adaptive configuration interaction method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tubman et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
This estimate was subsequently reduced through a series of algorithmic optimisations.
“This estimate was subsequently reduced through a series of algorithmic optimisations, as described in Sec V.A.4.a.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
The plane wave dual basis can reduce the costs of simulations.
“This enables the use of the plane wave dual basis (Sec. III.D.3), which as discussed in Sec. V.A.4.b can reduce the costs of simulations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Berry et al. (2019b) carried out a similar resource estimation using the more accurate FeMo-co active space of Li et al. (2018), with 113 electrons in 152 spin-orbitals, using an algorithm based on qubitization and low-rank decompositions of the Hamiltonian.
“Asimilar resource estimation (although using the more accurate FeMo-co active space of Li et al. (2018), with 113 electrons in 152 spin-orbitals) was carried out by Berry et al. (2019b), who used the algorithm based on qubitization and low-rank decompositions of the Hamiltonian, described in Sec. V.A.4.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Berry et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Li et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
These improvements, combined with the algorithmic advances described throughout this review, have contributed to a significant reduction in the resources required for chemistry calculations, compared to the initial estimates.
“These improvements, combined with the algorithmic advances described throughout this review, have contributed to a significant reduction in the resources required for chemistry calculations, compared to the initial estimates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Reiher et al. (2017) found that this would require around 10^14 T gates.
“They found that this would require around 10 14 T gates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Berry et al. (2019b) showed that the cost of Toffoli gate distillation is equivalent to around 1 million physical qubits, working for 2 months (assuming 10^-3 error rates and surface code cycle times of 1 μs).
“While a complete fault-tolerant resource analysis for this new approach has not yet been performed, those authors showed that the cost of Toffoli gate distillation is equivalent to around 1 million physical qubits, working for 2 months (assuming 10 -3 error rates and surface code cycle times of 1 µ s), at our time of writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Kivlichan et al. (2019a) found that simulations of a 100 site Fermi-Hubbard model, and a 128 spin-orbital homogeneous electron gas would both require on the order of 10^6 Toffoli gates and 10^7-10^8 T gates.
“They found that simulations of a 100 site Fermi-Hubbard model, and a 128 spin-orbital homogeneous electron gas would both require on the order of 10 6 Toffoli gates and 10 7 -10 8 T gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
This approach reduced the resources required to around 10^11 Toffoli gates.
“This approach reduced the resources required to around 10 11 Toffoli gates (which are currently the bottleneck for this approach).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
The length of circuit that we can implement without error correction is heavily limited by noise.
“However, the length of circuit that we can implement without error correction is heavily limited by noise.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Kivlichan et al. (2019a) performed resource estimations for condensed matter and solid state problems, using the Trotter based algorithm.
“Kivlichan et al. (2019a) also performed resource estimations for condensed matter and solid state problems, using the Trotter based algorithm discussed in Sec. V.A.4.b.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
The algorithm investigated in Jones et al. (2012) (the algorithm of Kassal et al. (2008)) has since been surpassed by the algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2017).
“The algorithm investigated in that work (the algorithm of Kassal et al. (2008)) has since been surpassed by the algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kassal et al. (2008)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Subsequent improvements in fault-tolerance protocols have further reduced these physical resources.
“Subsequent improvements in faulttolerance protocols have further reduced these physical resources (Fowler and Gidney, 2018; Gidney and Fowler, 2019; Litinski, 2019a,b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fowler and Gidney, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gidney and Fowler, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Litinski, 2019a,b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
This reduced the necessity of having a large overlap with the ground state.
“This reduced the necessity of having a large overlap with the ground state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
In particular, materials in the condensed phase and Fermi-Hubbard simulations so far require considerably fewer resources than simulations of individual molecules.
“In particular, materials in the condensed phase and Fermi-Hubbard simulations so far require considerably fewer resources than simulations of individual molecules.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Considerable work to reduce the cost of operations in the surface code (including magic state distillation) has reduced the overhead of error correction by several orders of magnitude.
“There has been considerable work to reduce the cost of operations in the surface code (including magic state distillation), which has reduced the overhead of error correction by several orders of magnitude (Fowler and Gidney, 2018; Gidney and Fowler, 2019; Litinski, 2019a,b; Trout and Brown, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Fowler and Gidney, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gidney and Fowler, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Litinski, 2019a,b
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
As such, the Jones et al. (2012) work is not directly comparable to the methods described above.
“As such, it is not directly comparable to the methods described above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Interpretationcitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
It may be many years before we possess a quantum computer with the resources required to implement these algorithms, given the challenges in scaling up hardware and performing quantum error correction.
“It may be many years before we possess a quantum computer with the resources required to implement these algorithms, given the challenges in scaling up hardware and performing quantum error correction (Gambetta et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gambetta et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Rests on an assumption: Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and a fully protected logical qubit has not yet been demonstrated.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Kivlichan et al. (2019a) found that if an intensive (e.g. absolute) error in the energy is targeted, then their algorithm was less efficient than the qubitization algorithm of Babbush et al. (2018b).
“Kivlichan et al. (2019a) found that if an intensive (e.g. absolute) error in the energy is targeted, then their algorithm was less efficient than the qubitization algorithm of Babbush et al. (2018b).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babbush et al. (2018b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationcitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
These results suggest that certain calculations with around 100 spin-orbitals may be better suited to early quantum computers than others.
“These results suggest that certain calculations with around 100 spin-orbitals may be better suited to early quantum computers than others.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Assuming error rates of 10^-3, 1 μs to implement a T gate (including surface code decoding), and 10 μs feedforward, the Babbush et al. (2018b) estimates led to resources of around 2-3 million qubits, running for tens of hours.
“Assuming error rates of 10 -3 , 1 µ s to implement a T gate (including surface code decoding), and 10 µ s feedforward, this led to resources of around 2-3 million qubits, running for tens of hours (using the best fault-tolerance protocols available when that work was completed).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al. (2018b)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisereasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Algorithm complexities are measured in terms of the number of T and/or Toffoli gates that they contain, as these are often the dominant contribution to the cost of the algorithm.
“As a result, algorithm complexities are measured in terms of the number of T and/or Toffoli gates that they contain, as these are often the dominant contribution to the cost of the algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Assuming error rates of 10^-3, surface code error detection times of 1 μs, and surface code error decoding times of 10 μs, the Kivlichan et al. (2019a) estimates require around 400,000-600,000 physical qubits, running for a couple of hours.
“Assuming error rates of 10 -3 , surface code error detection times of 1 µ s, and surface code error decoding times of 10 µ s, they require around 400,000 - 600,000 physical qubits, running for a couple of hours.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48
Reiher et al. (2017) calculated the resources required to perform an FCI calculation on an active space of 54 electrons in 108 spinorbitals for FeMo-co, using a Trotter-based approach to phase estimation.
“Reiher et al. (2017) carried out a fault-tolerant resource estimation for the problem of biological dinitrogen fixation, as described in Sec. III.A.1. Those authors calculated the resources required to perform an FCI calculation on an active space of 54 electrons in 108 spinorbitals for FeMo-co, using a Trotter-based approach to phase estimation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
The dominant Slater determinants in the wavefunction typically converge much more quickly than the correlation energy.
“This stems from the fact that the dominant Slater determinants in the wavefunction typically converge much more quickly than the correlation energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
This technique can also be combined with that of Berry et al. (2018), which used classically obtained knowledge of the energy eigenvalues to reduce the number of times that phase estimation must be repeated.
“This technique can also be combined with that of Berry et al. (2018), which used classically obtained knowledge of the energy eigenvalues to reduce the number of times that phase estimation must be repeated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
This algorithm was numerically shown to provide good estimates for the ground states of many systems of interest in chemistry, physics and materials science.
“This algorithm was numerically shown to provide good estimates for the ground states of many systems of interest in chemistry, physics and materials science.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tubman et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
Because these simulations consider a loose-but-rigorous bound on the energy error, these resource estimates may be overly pessimistic.
“As these simulations consider a loose-but-rigorous bound on the energy error (as discussed in Sec. V.A.5), these resource estimates may be overly pessimistic.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationnone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49
It still requires on the order of 100,000 physical qubits to surpass classical techniques.
“Despite these promising results, and recent, rapid improvements, we see that it still requires on the order of 100 , 000 physical qubits to surpass classical techniques.”
- Also stated in: § C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49 · hedged
“As discussed above, existing estimates for surpassing classical calculations require on the order of 100,000 physical qubits, in order to implement quantum error correction.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim - Also stated in: § C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49 · hedged
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
This calculation showed improved accuracy over an un-encoded calculation, due to the use of post-selection.
“This calculation showed improved accuracy over an un-encoded calculation, due to the use of post-selection.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Urbanek et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
This is comparable to the T gate counts required for phase estimation based approaches described in Sec. VIII.B.
“This is comparable to the T gate counts required for phase estimation based approaches described in Sec. VIII.B.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
The total algorithm scaling would be around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model.
“which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
An initial foray into error corrected VQE was conducted by Urbanek et al. (2019), who experimentally implemented a VQE calculation on the H2 molecule encoded in the [[4,2,2]] error detecting code.
“An initial foray into this area was conducted by Urbanek et al. (2019), who experimentally implemented a VQE calculation on the H 2 molecule encoded in the [[4,2,2]] error detecting code.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Urbanek et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
Our estimate of 40,000 two-qubit gates is approximately equal to the number of gates that we were limited to by noise in our back-of-the-envelope calculation above.
“Our estimate of 40,000 two-qubit gates is approximately equal to the number of gates that we were limited to by noise in our back-of-the-envelope calculation above.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
The phase estimation based algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2019a) is already only a constant factor less efficient (in terms of T/Toffoli gates) than just implementing time evolution under the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian directly.
“As an example, the phase estimation based algorithm of Kivlichan et al. (2019a) is already only a constant factor less efficient (in terms of T/Toffoli gates) than just implementing time evolution under the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian directly (as is required for a Hamiltonian variational ansatz).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2019a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
Previous work has shown that the Hamiltonian variational ansatz performs well for the Fermi-Hubbard model.
“Previous work has shown that the Hamiltonian variational ansatz performs well for the Fermi-Hubbard model, although it is not yet known how many Trotter steps may be required for accurate results.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Wecker et al. (2015a)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reiner et al. , 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reiner et al. , 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
Wecker et al. (2015a) achieved good convergence for a 12 site problem with 20 Trotter steps.
“Wecker et al. (2015a) achieved good convergence for a 12 site problem with 20 Trotter steps.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wecker et al. (2015a)
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
For the hypothetical O(M^2) scaling variational algorithm described above, we may still need around 4 × 10^5 to 4 × 10^6 T gates, neglecting constant factors.
“For the hypothetical O ( M 2 ) scaling variational algorithm described above, we may still need around 4 × 10 5 to 4 × 10 6 T gates, neglecting constant factors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.
- Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
A 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model requires 200 qubits.
“which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim - Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
The G1 set is a small set of molecules whose energy is known extremely accurately.
“This is a small set of molecules whose energy is known extremely accurately.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Pople et al. , 1989
Not checked in the free run.
- Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50
If the number of Trotter steps required to find the ground state scaled only linearly with the number of spin-orbitals, the total algorithm scaling would be O(M^2).
“Nevertheless, even if the number of Trotter steps required to find the ground state scaled only linearly with the number of spin-orbitals, the total algorithm scaling would be O ( M 2 ), which is around 40,000 two-qubit gates for a 10 × 10 site Fermi-Hubbard model (which requires 200 qubits).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
- May combine two claims. 130
- Classified as probably not a substantial claim. 148
- The quote only partly states this claim. 2
May combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11In total, there are P^3N × 2^N complex amplitudes, showing that the memory required scales exponentially with the size of the simulated system.
“In total, there are P 3 N × 2 N complex amplitudes, showing that the memory required scales exponentially with the size of the simulated system.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ B. Lithium Hydride STO-3G basis · p. 44For LiH in the STO-3G basis, considering {1s,2s,2px,2py,2pz} functions for lithium and a single {1s} orbital for hydrogen gives a total of 12 spin-orbitals, and the problem can be reduced to six qubits.
“For LiH in the STO-3G basis, we consider { 1 s, 2 s, 2 p x , 2 p y , 2 p z } functions for lithium, and a single { 1 s } orbital for hydrogen. This gives a total of 12 spin-orbitals. We can reduce this problem to one of six qubits, as illustrated in Fig. 12.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Findingnone given§ 3. cc-PVDZ basis · p. 44The lowest energy computational basis state of cc-PVDZ H2 in the Jordan-Wigner encoding (18 qubits) is |000000001000000001>, and the corresponding BK-tree mapped state (16 qubits) is |0001011100010111>.
“The lowest energy computational basis state of ccPVDZ H 2 in the Jordan-Wigner encoding (18 qubits) is | 000000001000000001 〉 . The corresponding BK-tree mapped state (16 qubits) is given by | 0001011100010111 〉 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ B. Lithium Hydride STO-3G basis · p. 45Our final Hamiltonian for LiH acts on 6 qubits but differs in energy from the full 12 qubit Hamiltonian by only 0.2 mHartree.
“Our final Hamiltonian acts on 6 qubits, but differs in energy from the full 12 qubit Hamiltonian by only 0 . 2 mHartree.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 3. cc-PVDZ basis · p. 44The 9th and 18th orbitals store the number of spin up electrons and total number of electrons, respectively, and can be removed, reducing the problem to 16 qubits.
“The reader will find that the 9 th and 18 th orbitals store the number of spin up electrons and total number of electrons, respectively. As a result, they can be removed. This reduces the problem to one of 16 qubits.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimThe quote only partly states this claim.
Findingnone given§ B. Lithium Hydride STO-3G basis · p. 44The 1-RDM in the canonical orbital basis from a CISD calculation on LiH at an internuclear separation of 1.45 Å is given by the matrix in the text.
“The 1-RDM in the canonical orbital basis from a CISD calculation on LiH (at an internuclear separation of 1.45 ˙ A) is given by”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Findingreasoning§ 2. 6-31G basis · p. 44The JW mapped HF state (8 qubits) is |00010001>, the BK mapped HF state (8 qubits) is |00111011>, and when the two conserved qubits are removed the BK mapped HF state (6 qubits) is |011011>.
“The JW mapped HF state (8 qubits) is given by | 00010001 〉 . Using the matrix given above, the BK mapped HF state (8 qubits) is | 00111011 〉 . When the two conserved qubits are removed, the BK mapped HF state (6 qubits) is | 011011 〉 .”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3Most of the prior work in quantum computational chemistry has focused on the electronic structure problem.
“Finally, most of the prior work in quantum computational chemistry has focused on this problem.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: The electronic structure problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2To achieve the ultimate goal of quantum simulation enabling design of new compounds, considerable further developments are needed in both technology and theory.
“However, we stress that to achieve this ultimate goal we would need considerable further developments - both in the technology required to build such as powerful quantum computer, and the theory behind an appropriate algorithm and model.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2No group has yet demonstrated a single fully error corrected qubit.
“Despite ongoing experimental efforts, no group has yet demonstrated a single fully error corrected qubit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6Any multi-qubit observable can be expanded into strings of Pauli operators, the expectation values of which we can measure efficiently with a quantum computer.
“Therefore any multi-qubit observable can be expanded into strings of Pauli operators, the expectation values of which we can measure efficiently with a quantum computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3Knowledge of the energy eigenstates enables the prediction of reaction rates, location of stable structures, and determination of optical properties.
“Knowledge of the energy eigenstates enables the prediction of reaction rates, location of stable structures, and determination of optical properties (Helgaker et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al., 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3Quantum computational chemistry has grown extremely rapidly and has already evolved beyond the stage that it can be fully described by a single review.
“Despite being a relatively young field, quantum computational chemistry has grown extremely rapidly, and has already evolved beyond the stage that it can be fully described by a single review.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 3The machinery developed to solve the electronic structure problem on quantum computers is easily applied to other types of problems, such as finding transition states, or understanding the vibrational structure of molecules.
“Secondly, the machinery developed to solve this problem on quantum computers is easily applied to other types of problems, such as finding transition states, or understanding the vibrational structure of molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2The gate counts currently estimated for transformative chemistry simulations likely signal the need for quantum error correction, which requires orders of magnitude more qubits, and lower error rates, than are currently available.
“Moreover, the gate counts currently estimated for transformative chemistry simulations likely signal the need for quantum error correction, which requires orders of magnitude more qubits, and lower error rates, than are currently available (Babbush et al. , 2018b; Kivlichan et al. , 2019a; Mueck, 2015).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kivlichan et al., 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Mueck, 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2Experimental developments have accompanied these theoretical milestones, with many groups demonstrating proof of principle chemistry calculations.
“Experimental developments have accompanied these theoretical milestones, with many groups demonstrating proof of principle chemistry calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2Limited by hardware capabilities, these experiments focus only on small chemical systems that we are already able to simulate classically.
“However, limited by hardware capabilities, these experiments focus only on small chemical systems that we are already able to simulate classically.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6The Pauli operators and identity matrix, multiplied by real coefficients, form a complete basis for any Hermitian single or multi-qubit operator.
“The Pauli operators and identity matrix, multiplied by real coefficients, form a complete basis for any Hermitian single or multi-qubit operator.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2The runtime and physical resources required by these algorithms are expected to scale polynomially with both the size of the system simulated and the accuracy required.
“The runtime and physical resources required by these algorithms are expected to scale polynomially with both the size of the system simulated and the accuracy required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisecitation§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2Using quantum hardware as the simulation platform is a solution to the problem of classically intractable quantum simulation.
“Feynman proposed a solution to this problem; using quantum hardware as the simulation platform”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Feynman, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Quantum computing · p. 5The circuit model of quantum computing typically decomposes all algorithms into single and two qubit gates.
“As a result, the circuit model of quantum computing typically decomposes all algorithms into single and two qubit gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ I. INTRODUCTION · p. 2Several efficient quantum algorithms have been proposed to solve problems in chemistry.
“To date, several efficient quantum algorithms have been proposed to solve problems in chemistry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ b. Basis set methods · p. 11First quantised basis set methods are rarely, if ever, used in classical computational chemistry calculations.
“As a consequence, first quantised basis set methods are rarely, if ever, used in classical computational chemistry calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8The electronic structure problem is widely considered to be one of the first applications of quantum computing.
“The electronic structure problem has received significant attention since it was first introduced in the context of quantum computational chemistry by Aspuru-Guzik et al. (2005), and is widely considered to be one of the first applications of quantum computing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Aspuru-Guzik et al., 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable). May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11It may be better to treat the nuclei and electrons on an equal footing, which is best achieved with grid based methods.
“As such, it may be better to treat the nuclei and electrons on an equal footing, which is best achieved with grid based methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 9Classical computational chemistry has made tremendous progress in describing and predicting the properties of a multitude of systems, but there are some systems that appear classically intractable to simulate with currently known techniques.
“While classical computational chemistry has made tremendous progress in describing and predicting the properties of a multitude of systems, there are some systems that appear classically intractable to simulate with currently known techniques.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ a. Grid based methods · p. 11Grid based methods are useful when considering chemical reaction dynamics, or when simulating systems for which the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not appropriate.
“Grid based methods are useful when considering chemical reaction dynamics, or when simulating systems for which the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not appropriate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ b. Basis set methods · p. 11The information encoded by a Slater determinant can be compressed by moving to the second quantised formalism.
“As we will see in Sec. III.B.2, the information encoded by a Slater determinant can be compressed by moving to the second quantised formalism.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationcitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6Quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits may be capable of solving problems which are intractable on even the largest classical supercomputers.
“Nevertheless, quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are considered too large to exactly simulate classically, and may thus be capable of solving problems which are intractable on even the largest classical supercomputers (Arute et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arute et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7A variational circuit with set parameters is tailored to the time evolution of one or more specific initial states, in contrast to a Trotter circuit, which can be used to time evolve any valid initial state.
“However, a variational circuit with set parameters is tailored to the time evolution of one or more specific initial states, in contrast to a Trotter circuit, which can be used to time evolve any valid initial state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ Quantum computational chemistry · p. 1Quantum computational chemistry is rapidly emerging as an interdisciplinary field requiring knowledge of both quantum computing and computational chemistry.
“Driven by this potential utility, quantum computational chemistry is rapidly emerging as an interdisciplinary field requiring knowledge of both quantum computing and computational chemistry.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- Rests on an assumption: Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
- Rests on an assumption: Quantum computers will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6Quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are considered too large to exactly simulate classically.
“Nevertheless, quantum computers with more than around 50 qubits are considered too large to exactly simulate classically, and may thus be capable of solving problems which are intractable on even the largest classical supercomputers (Arute et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Arute et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ B. First and Second quantisation · p. 10As a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle, the electronic wavefunction must be antisymmetric under the exchange of any two electrons.
“As a consequence of the Pauli exclusion principle, the electronic wavefunction must be antisymmetric under the exchange of any two electrons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S1 (asserted), S2 (checkable).
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8It is widely believed that the electronic structure problem should be efficiently solvable with a quantum computer, for physically relevant systems.
“It is widely believed that this problem should be efficiently solvable with a quantum computer, for physically relevant systems (Whitfield et al. , 2013).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Whitfield et al., 2013
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ b. Basis set methods · p. 11While the number of spin-orbitals considered, M, is typically larger than the number of electrons in the system, N, the electrons can only occupy N of the spin-orbitals in a given Slater determinant.
“While the number of spin-orbitals considered, M , is typically larger than the number of electrons in the system, N , the electrons can only occupy N of the spin-orbitals in a given Slater determinant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 8Abrams and Lloyd (1999) showed that the phase estimation algorithm can be used to find the energy of a quantum system, and collapse it into the desired energy eigenstate.
“In particular, Abrams and Lloyd (1999) showed that the phase estimation algorithm (Kitaev, 1995) can be used to find the energy of a quantum system, and collapse it into the desired energy eigenstate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Abrams and Lloyd, 1999
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kitaev, 1995
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ Quantum computational chemistry · p. 1Building a sufficiently large quantum computer will be a difficult scientific challenge.
“However, building a sufficiently large quantum computer will be a difficult scientific challenge.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7It has not yet been mathematically proven that BPP = BQP.
“It is important to note that, while it is widely believed to be true, it has not yet been mathematically proven that BPP = BQP (where BPP is the complexity class containing problems that are solvable in polynomial time on a probabilistic classical computer).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ A. The electronic structure problem · p. 9Even if individual energy values cannot be measured to within chemical accuracy, there is often a fortuitous cancellation of errors, which leads to the energy difference being found to chemical accuracy.
“Even if the individual energy values cannot be measured to within chemical accuracy, there is often a fortuitous cancellation of errors, which leads to the energy difference being found to chemical accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10Computational models of FeMo-co have been proposed which are beyond the reach of current classical methods for solving strongly correlated systems but would be accessible with a small error corrected quantum computer.
“Computational models of FeMo-co have been proposed which are beyond the reach of current classical methods for solving strongly correlated systems (see Sec. VIII.A) but would be accessible with a small error corrected quantum computer (Berry et al. , 2019b; Reiher et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Berry et al., 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reiher et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10The regime close to half filling at intermediate interaction strengths is believed to be most relevant to understanding cuprate superconductors.
“Interestingly, this is the same regime that is believed to be most relevant to understanding cuprate superconductors (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LeBlanc et al., 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. First and Second quantisation · p. 10Using a basis set is known as a Galerkin discretisation, which ensures that the energy converges to the correct value from above, as the number of basis functions tends to infinity.
“However, one key difference is that using a basis set is known as a 'Galerkin discretisation', which ensures that the energy converges to the correct value from above, as the number of basis functions tends to infinity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Chemical systems of interest · p. 10The Haber-Bosch process requires high temperatures and pressures, and is believed to consume up to 2% of the world's energy output.
“The Haber-Bosch process requires high temperatures and pressures, and is believed to consume up to 2 % of the world's energy output (Reiher et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ B. Quantum simulation · p. 7To perform accurate simulations of large chemical systems, digital quantum simulation will likely be required, because it is not yet clear how to protect large analog simulations from errors.
“Nevertheless, to perform accurate simulations of large chemical systems, we will likely require digital quantum simulation, as it is not yet clear how to protect large analog simulations from errors.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Quantum computing · p. 6Current estimates suggest that around 20 million physical qubits would be required to factor a number that is too large to tackle using known classical algorithms.
“For example, if we consider using a quantum computer to factor numbers in polynomial time (Shor, 1994), current estimates (at time of writing) suggest that we would require around 20 million physical qubits to factor a number that is too large to tackle using known classical algorithms (Gidney and Eker, 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Gidney and Eker, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15Size consistency is important for obtaining the correct behaviour from calculations to determine reaction rates, as reactants at the beginning of the process are considered non-interacting.
“Size consistency is important for obtaining the correct behaviour from calculations to determine reaction rates, as reactants at the beginning of the process are considered non-interacting.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ b. Basis set methods · p. 11First quantised basis set approaches have found use in quantum computational chemistry.
“Secondly, first quantised basis set approaches have found use in quantum computational chemistry, as we will discuss in Sec. IV.A.2.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14Static correlation can arise because the wavefunction may require several determinants to be coupled in a proper spin configuration, or during bond breaking to account for the separation of electrons onto the products.
“Static correlation can arise because the wavefunction may require several determinants to be coupled in a proper spin configuration, or during bond breaking in order to account for the separation of the electrons onto the products (the latter case is often referred to as non-dynamic, or left-right correlation) (Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15The CI method is effective at recovering dynamic correlation but less effective at recovering static correlation.
“The CI method is effective at recovering dynamic correlation, but less effective at recovering static correlation (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13As these single-particle molecular orbitals are chosen such that they diagonalise the non-interacting (or mean-field) Hamiltonian, energy eigenstates can be formed by taking tensor products of each electron in a different molecular spin-orbital.
“As these single-particle molecular orbitals are chosen such that they diagonalise the non-interacting (or mean-field) Hamiltonian, energy eigenstates can be formed by taking tensor products of each electron in a different molecular spin-orbital.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14HF orbitals are not suitable for describing the virtual orbitals that electrons are excited into because the HF method only optimises the occupied orbitals in the single Slater determinant wavefunction.
“Although we will discuss orbital basis sets in more detail in Sec. III.D, we note here that the HF orbitals are not suitable for describing the virtual orbitals that electrons are excited into. This is because the HF method only optimises the occupied orbitals in the single Slater determinant wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14The Slater determinant generated from a HF calculation is typically taken as the reference state for post-HF methods, such as CI and CC, which seek to capture some dynamic correlation energy by including additional determinants describing excitations above the HF state.
“The Slater determinant generated from a HF calculation is typically taken as the reference state for post-HF methods, such as configuration interaction and coupled cluster, which seek to capture some of the dynamic correlation energy by including additional determinants, describing excitations above the HF state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15The MCSCF approach considers a wavefunction with several Slater determinants and variationally optimises both the molecular orbitals and the determinant amplitudes simultaneously.
“The MCSCF approach considers a wavefunction with several Slater determinants, and variationally optimises both the molecular orbitals, and the determinant amplitudes simultaneously (Roos et al. , 1980).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Roos et al. , 1980
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Premisenone given§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15Systems with strong static correlation are defined as those where multiple Slater determinants are equally dominant.
“Systems with strong static correlation are defined as those where multiple Slater determinants are equally dominant.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14In the HF method, each electron is assumed to move in the average charge distribution of all other electrons, introducing an effective potential.
“We then assume that each electron moves in the average charge distribution of all of the other electrons, which introduces an effective potential.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15Systems with strong static correlation include excited states, transition states, systems at the dissociation limit, and transition metals.
“These include excited states (Lischka et al. , 2018), transition states (Szalay et al. , 2012), systems at the dissociation limit (Lyakh et al. , 2012), and transition metals (Vogiatzis et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Lischka et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Szalay et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15As considering all determinants is classically intractable, the CI method is typically limited to including a small number of excitations above the reference state: single, double, and occasionally triple excitations.
“As considering all determinants is classically intractable, the CI method is typically limited to including a small number of excitations above the reference state: single excitations (CIS), double excitations (CISD), and occasionally triple excitations (CISDT).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16CCSD(T) treats triple excitations perturbatively and scales in time approximately as O(M^7).
“For more accurate results, the CCSD(T) method can be used, which treats the triple excitations pertubatively, and scales in time approximately as O ( M 7 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13The FCI wavefunction contains a number of determinants that scales exponentially with the number of electrons, making large calculations classically intractable.
“However, this wavefunction contains a number of determinants which scales exponentially with the number of electrons, making large calculations classically intractable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13To the best of the authors' knowledge, second quantised grid based methods have only been discussed by Babbush et al. (2018c) in their Appendix A.
“To the best of our knowledge, second quantised grid based methods have only been discussed by Babbush et al. (2018c) in their Appendix A.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al. (2018c)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13In order to obey the Pauli exclusion principle, these tensor products must be correctly antisymmetrised.
“In order to obey the Pauli exclusion principle, these tensor products must be correctly antisymmetrised.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Multiconfigurational self-consistent field · p. 15While MCSCF and CASSCF are often effective at recovering static correlation energy, they struggle to recover dynamic correlation energy.
“However, while the methods described above are often effective at recovering the static correlation energy, they struggle to recover the dynamic correlation energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15The Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle states that the energy expectation value of a parametrized wavefunction is greater than or equal to the lowest energy eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian being measured.
“The RayleighRitz variational principle states that the energy expectation value of a parametrized wavefunction is greater than or equal to the lowest energy eigenvalue of the Hamiltonian being measured.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13If all (M choose N) determinants are included, the wavefunction is the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction.
“If all ( M N ) determinants are included, the wavefunction is known as the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14The Hartree-Fock method is a mean-field technique that aims to find the dominant Slater determinant in the system wavefunction by optimising the spatial form of the spin-orbitals to minimise the energy.
“The Hartree-Fock (HF) method is a mean-field technique which aims to find the dominant Slater determinant in the system wavefunction. This is achieved by optimising the spatial form of the spin-orbitals to minimise the energy of the wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13This can be achieved by creating Slater determinants from the molecular orbitals.
“This can be achieved by creating Slater determinants from the molecular orbitals, as described by Eq. (21).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16The canonical implementation of CCSD does not store the wavefunction because this would be exponentially costly; instead coupled non-linear equations are solved, and their solution is the CCSD approximation to the ground state.
“The canonical implementation of CCSD does not store the wavefunction, as this would be exponentially costly (as the CCSD wavefunction has support on all possible Slater determinants). Instead, coupled non-linear equations can be derived. The solution to these equations is the CCSD approximation to the ground state (Helgaker et al. , 2014; Purvis and Bartlett, 1982).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Purvis and Bartlett, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13In practice, the molecular orbitals obtained by diagonalising the non-interacting part of the Hamiltonian will likely form a poor basis for the system.
“We note that in practice, the molecular orbitals obtained by diagonalising the non-interacting part of the Hamiltonian will likely form a poor basis for the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14In the HF method, the Coulomb repulsion term in the electronic structure Hamiltonian is neglected, reducing the problem to one of N independent electrons.
“In the HF method, we first neglect the Coulomb repulsion term in the electronic structure Hamiltonian (Eq. (17)), reducing the problem to one of N independent electrons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 13The Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian has only O(M) terms, where M is the number of spin-sites.
“This Hamiltonian has only O ( M ) terms, where M is the number of spin-sites.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14Dynamic correlation is a typically small correction arising from the Coulomb repulsion between electrons.
“Dynamic correlation is a typically small correction (Hattig et al. , 2012), arising from the Coulomb repulsion between electrons.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hattig et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14Correlation-consistent basis sets produce more compact basis sets than atomic natural orbitals and hence are used more frequently in practice.
“These two metrics are closely related, and while either can be used, the latter produces more compact basis sets, and hence is used more frequently in practice (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ a. Basis set methods · p. 12Observables must be independent of the representation used.
“Observables must be independent of the representation used.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14As a mean-field solution, the HF method neglects the effects of dynamic and static correlation in the wavefunction.
“However, as a mean-field solution, the HF method neglects the effects of dynamic and static correlation in the wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14The importance of each virtual atomic orbital is determined by its contribution to either the electron density (atomic natural orbitals) or the atomic correlation energy (correlation-consistent basis sets).
“The importance of each of the virtual atomic orbitals is determined by their contribution to either the electron density (atomic natural orbitals) or the atomic correlation energy (correlation-consistent basis sets).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Hartree-Fock · p. 14Static correlation occurs when more than one Slater determinant is equally dominant in the wavefunction.
“Static correlation occurs when more than one Slater determinant is equally dominant in the wavefunction (Hattig et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hattig et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16The coupled cluster method includes additional determinants to recover correlation energy but uses a product parametrization.
“The coupled cluster (CC) method also includes additional determinants to recover the correlation energy, but uses a product parametrization.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15If all determinants are included, the FCI wavefunction is recovered by considering all excitations above the Hartree-Fock wavefunction.
“If all determinants are included, we recover the full configuration interaction (FCI) wavefunction, generated by considering all excitations above the Hartree-Fock wavefunction”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16The time taken to solve CCSD equations scales as O((M-N)^4 N^2), while the memory needed to store the molecular integrals scales as O(M^4).
“The time taken to solve these equations scales as O (( M -N ) 4 N 2 ) (Purvis and Bartlett, 1982), while the memory needed to store the molecular integrals needed scales as O ( M 4 ).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Purvis and Bartlett, 1982
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ 3. Configuration interaction · p. 15The CI method generates a correlated wavefunction by considering excitations above a reference state, typically the Hartree-Fock state.
“The configuration interaction (CI) method generates a correlated wavefunction by considering excitations above a reference state, typically the Hartree-Fock state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16When all excitation operators are included, the CC method recovers the full configuration interaction wavefunction, but performing this calculation would be exponentially costly.
“When all of the excitation operators T i are included, the CC method recovers the full configuration interaction wavefunction - however, performing this calculation would be exponentially costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Grid based methods · p. 21Kivlichan et al. (2017) showed that there exist systems where the grid spacing must decrease exponentially with the number of particles to maintain constant accuracy, and consequently these systems are not efficient to simulate using grid based methods.
“Kivlichan et al. (2017) also showed that there exist systems where the grid spacing must decrease exponentially with the number of particles in the system to maintain constant accuracy. Consequently, these systems are not efficient to simulate using this method.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17Although the Schrödinger equation can be solved exactly for one electron atoms, the orbitals obtained become diffuse too rapidly to accurately describe many-electron atoms, especially close to the nuclei.
“Although the Schr¨ odinger equation can be solved exactly for one electron atoms, the orbitals obtained become diffuse too rapidly to accurately describe manyelectron atoms, especially close to the nuclei (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ 1. STOn G and split-valence basis sets · p. 17Basis sets can be further improved by adding additional orbitals with higher angular momenta (polarisation functions) that make the angular part of the wavefunction more flexible.
“These basis sets can be further improved by adding additional orbitals with higher angular momenta, which make the angular part of the wavefunction more flexible. These orbitals are called 'polarisation functions', as they describe the polarisation of atomic charge caused by bonding (for example, the 6-31G* basis).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Correlation-consistent basis sets · p. 18cc-PVnZ basis sets include additional unoccupied virtual orbitals to recover correlation energy; virtual orbitals are generated from correlated calculations on atoms.
“Additional accuracy can be obtained by using cc-PV n Z basis sets (correlation consistent polarised valence n zeta), introduced by Dunning Jr. (1989). These include additional unoccupied ('virtual') orbitals to recover the correlation energy. The virtual orbitals are generated from correlated calculations on atoms.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dunning Jr. (1989)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19As the single-particle reduced density matrix is Hermitian, it can be diagonalised with a unitary transform, which is a basis change from canonical orbitals to natural molecular orbitals; the diagonal elements are natural orbital occupation numbers (NOONs).
“As ρ 1 is a Hermitian operator, we can diagonalise it with a unitary transform. This is a basis change from the canonical orbitals to the 'natural molecular orbitals'. The diagonal elements of the basis transformed ρ 1 are called the natural orbital occupation numbers (NOONs).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19Spin-orbitals with a NOON close to 0 or 1 can be assumed to be empty or occupied, respectively.
“Spin-orbitals with a NOON close to 0 or 1 (compared to the other NOONs) can be assumed to be empty or occupied, respectively.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Grid based methods · p. 20Using a grid based method rather than basis sets means the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not required, allowing electrons and nuclei to be treated on an equal footing, which can be important for systems undergoing reactions.
“Using a grid based method, rather than basis sets, means that the Born-Oppenheimer approximation is not required. As a result, we are able to treat the electrons and nuclei on an equal footing using grid based methods, which can be important for systems undergoing reactions.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17The number of orbitals considered determines the runtime and memory requirements of classical chemistry algorithms; in quantum computational chemistry, the number of basis functions determines the number of qubits and gate operations required.
“The number of orbitals considered determines the runtime and memory requirements of classical chemistry algorithms. In the case of quantum computational chemistry, the number of basis functions determines the number of qubits and gate operations required to solve the problem”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Grid based methods · p. 21Simulating chemical systems using a grid based method can require considerably more qubits than basis set approaches; for example, storing the position of a single spinless particle to 32 bits of accuracy using a grid based approach requires 96 logical qubits, whereas interesting molecules or Fermi-Hubbard models could be simulated with around 100 logical qubits using basis set approaches.
“The simulation of chemical systems using a grid based method can require considerably more qubits than in basis set approaches. For example, it would require 96 logical qubits to store the position of a single spinless particle to 32 bits of accuracy using a grid based approach. This can be contrasted with basis set approaches, where interesting molecules or Fermi-Hubbard models could be simulated”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18The plane wave basis reduces the number of Hamiltonian terms from O(M^4) to O(M^3), and the plane wave dual basis reduces it to O(M^2).
“This reduces the number of Hamiltonian terms from O ( M 4 ) to O ( M 3 ) in the plane wave basis, and O ( M 2 ) in the plane wave dual basis.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Babbush et al. , 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17STO functions exhibit many desirable features but make evaluating the two-electron integrals computationally expensive.
“While the STO functions exhibit many desirable features, they make evaluating the two-electron integrals in Eq. (28) computationally expensive.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17The true orbitals of a system can be obtained by numerically solving the Schrödinger equation using grid based methods with a very fine grid spacing, which is only possible for small atoms or simple molecules.
“These can be obtained by numerically solving the Schr¨ odinger equation using grid based methods with a very fine grid spacing, which is only possible for small atoms or simple molecules.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16The conventional CC method is a single determinant reference state method and consequently does not tend to perform well when applied to multireference states required to treat systems with strong static correlation.
“Moreover, the conventional CC method described above is a single determinant reference state method. Consequently, it does not tend to perform well when applied to multireference states, which are required to treat systems with strong static correlation (Lischka et al. , 2018; Lyakh et al. , 2012).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Lischka et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lyakh et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18Plane wave basis sets are well suited to periodic systems and have a long history of use in classical density functional theory calculations.
“These plane wave basis sets are well suited to periodic systems, and have a long history of use in classical density functional theory calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17The limitation of GTOs in approximating charge distribution is compensated by the ease of integral evaluation, and the disadvantages of GTOs are less prominent in molecular calculations.
“However, this limitation is compensated by the ease of integral evaluation. Furthermore, the disadvantages of GTOs are less prominent in molecular calculations (Helgaker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Helgaker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 19A similar reduction in the number of Hamiltonian terms can be obtained using gausslet basis sets or discontinuous Galerkin sets, which can both require fewer functions to accurately describe individual molecules than plane wave basis sets.
“A similar reduction in the number of Hamiltonian terms can be obtained using gausslet basis sets (White, 2017), or 'discontinuous Galerkin' sets (McClean et al. , 2019a), which can both require fewer functions to accurately describe individual molecules than plane wave basis sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites White, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McClean et al. , 2019a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. STOn G and split-valence basis sets · p. 17Calculations using minimal basis sets are of limited accuracy, giving only a qualitative description of the system.
“Calculations using minimal basis sets are of limited accuracy, giving only a qualitative description of the system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19Takeshita et al. also provide a technique to improve the energy estimate from a calculation by optimising the active space using orbital rotations, as is done in MCSCF calculations.
“Those authors also provide a technique to improve the energy estimate from a calculation by optimising the active space using orbital rotations, as is done in MCSCF calculations (Sec. III.C.2).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Takeshita et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Bravyi-Kitaev encoding · p. 23The BK-tree mapping is uniquely defined even when the number of orbitals M is not a power of 2, so the qubit reduction by symmetry technique can always be used with it; with standard BK mapping, this technique is only possible when the number of orbitals is a power of two.
“The BK-tree mapping is uniquely defined even when the number of orbitals, M , is not a power of 2. As a result, when using the BK-tree mapping we are always able to use the qubit reduction by symmetry technique, which we will discuss in Sec. IV.C. We have observed that it is only possible to use this technique with the standard BK mapping when the number of orbitals is a power of two.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16Because of its product parametrization, the CC method generates a trial wavefunction that includes all possible determinants, albeit with an incorrect parametrization, and therefore provides faster convergence than the configuration interaction method.
“Because of its product parametrization, the CC method generates a trial wavefunction which includes all possible determinants, albeit with an incorrect parametrization. It therefore provides faster convergence than the configuration interaction method.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisereasoning§ E. Reduction of orbitals · p. 19The diagonal elements of the single-particle reduced density matrix are the expectation values of the number operator for the corresponding orbitals.
“From the definition above, we can see that the diagonal elements of ρ 1 are the expectation values of the number operator for the corresponding orbitals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. STOn G and split-valence basis sets · p. 17More accurate basis sets can be formed by adding increased radial flexibility to the valence orbitals via a double-zeta representation, achievable using split-valence basis sets such as 6-31G.
“More accurate basis sets can be formed by adding increased radial flexibility to the valence orbitals (the orbitals of the highest occupied energy level), by considering a double-zeta representation of the valence orbitals. This can be achieved using split-valence (Ditchfield et al. , 1971) basis sets, such as the 6-31G basis.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ditchfield et al. , 1971
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 1. Jordan-Wigner encoding · p. 22The full configuration interaction wavefunction contains a number of determinants scaling exponentially with the number of electrons, roughly O(M^N), and requires memory scaling exponentially with system size.
“As discussed in Sec. III.B.2, the full configuration interaction wavefunction contains a number of determinants which scales exponentially with the number of electrons, as roughly O ( M N ). As such, it requires an amount of memory that scales exponentially with the system size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. STOn G and split-valence basis sets · p. 17STOnG basis sets are often called minimal basis sets because they contain only the orbitals required to write the Hartree-Fock state and those orbitals of similar energy.
“STOn G basis sets are often called minimal basis sets, as they contain only the orbitals required to write the Hartree-Fock (HF) state (and those orbitals of similar energy).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hehre et al. , 1969
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Basis set methods · p. 21Berry et al. (2018) improved the antisymmetrisation circuit to use O(N log^c N log M) gates, with depth O(log^c N log log M), where c≥1 depends on the sorting network, and O(N log N) ancilla qubits.
“This was improved by Berry et al. (2018), who used a circuit with O ( N log c 2 ( N )log 2 ( M )) gates, with a depth of O (log c 2 ( N )log 2 log 2 ( M )), where c ⩾ 1 and depends on the choice of sorting network used, and O ( N log 2 ( N )) ancilla qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Berry et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4. Coupled cluster · p. 16The product parametrization of CC ensures size extensivity and size consistency.
“The product parametrization also ensures size extensivity and size consistency.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 2. Basis set methods · p. 22The Hamiltonian can contain up to O(N^2 M^6) Pauli terms, which are up to 2log2(M)-local.
“There are up to O ( N 2 M 4 ) possible 2-body terms, each leading to up to O (2 2log 2 ( M ) ) Pauli terms - meaning the Hamiltonian can contain up to O ( N 2 M 6 ) Pauli terms, which are up to 2log 2 ( M )-local.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims. The quote only partly states this claim.
Interpretationreasoning§ IV. QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY MAPPINGS · p. 20The number of qubits required to store the wavefunction is N⌈log2(M)⌉ for first quantised basis set simulations, (3m+1)N for first quantised grid based simulations, and M for second quantised basis set simulations, where M is the number of spin-orbitals, N is the number of simulated particles, and m=log2(P) with P the number of grid points per axis.
“The number of qubits required to store the wavefunction using the different encoding methods. M is the number of spin-orbitals used in a basis set simulation, N is the number of simulated particles in the problem, and m = log 2 ( P ), where P is the number of grid points per axis for a grid based simulation.”
- Also stated in: § IV. QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY MAPPINGS · p. 20 · plain
“| First quantised, basis sets | N ⌈ log 2 ( M ) ⌉ |”
- Also stated in: § 1. Grid based methods · p. 20 · plain
“As a result, it only requires (3 m + 1) N qubits to store the N electron wavefunction described by Eq. (40).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Also stated in: § IV. QUANTUM COMPUTATIONAL CHEMISTRY MAPPINGS · p. 20 · plain
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Bravyi-Kitaev encoding · p. 23Tranter et al. (2018) found that the BK transform was at least as efficient, in general, as the JW transform when finding the ground states of 86 molecular systems, and in many cases using the BK transform made calculations considerably more efficient.
“A thorough comparison of the BK and JW mappings was performed by Tranter et al. (2018) for 86 molecular systems. They found that the BK transform was at least as efficient, in general, as the JW transform when finding the ground states of the molecular systems. In many cases using the BK transform made the calculations considerably more efficient.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tranter et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 3. Plane wave basis sets · p. 18Conventional basis sets result in an accurate description of the system with relatively few basis functions but lead to Hamiltonians containing up to O(M^4) terms.
“While these basis sets result in an accurate description of the system with relatively few basis functions, they also lead to Hamiltonians containing up to O ( M 4 ) terms.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17The most common basis sets construct approximate STOs from linear combinations of GTOs, and these approximate STOs are used as basis functions for atomic orbitals.
“The most common basis sets construct approximate STOs from linear combinations of GTOs. These approximate STOs are used as the basis functions for our atomic orbitals.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2. Correlation-consistent basis sets · p. 18In cc-PVnZ basis sets, core orbitals have a single-zeta representation, valence orbitals have an n-zeta representation, and virtual orbitals are polarisation functions with higher angular momenta than valence orbitals, selected by their contribution to correlation energy.
“The core orbitals have a single-zeta representation, while the valence orbitals have an n -zeta representation. The virtual orbitals considered are polarisation functions, with higher angular momenta than the valence orbitals. The polarisation functions are selected by the size of their contribution to the correlation energy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Basis set methods · p. 21The original first quantised basis set algorithm by Abrams and Lloyd (1997) accomplished antisymmetrisation using O(N^2 log^2 M) gates and O(N log M) ancilla qubits.
“The original approach, by Abrams and Lloyd (1997), accomplished this using O ( N 2 log 2 2 ( M )) gates and O ( N log 2 ( M )) ancilla qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Abrams and Lloyd (1997)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ D. Chemical basis sets · p. 17GTOs are more localised than STOs; as a result, GTOs do not approximate the atomic charge distribution as well as STOs, so more are required to describe a given orbital.
“Because of the dependence on r 2 in the exponent, GTOs are more localised than STOs. As a result, GTOs do not approximate the atomic charge distribution as well as STOs, so more are required to describe a given orbital.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Grid based methods · p. 21Such pathological cases can also exist for basis set methods, but are typically dealt with efficiently using a clever choice of basis function.
“However, those authors noted that such pathological cases can also exist for basis set methods, but are typically dealt with efficiently using a clever choice of basis function.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. State preparation · p. 27It is difficult to know the size of the gap along the entire adiabatic path a priori, restricting the ability to perform ASP in the minimum amount of time.
“It is difficult to know the size of the gap along the entire adiabatic path a priori , restricts our ability to perform ASP in the minimum amount of time.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Locality preserving mappings · p. 24Verstraete and Cirac (2005) developed a scheme to eliminate the strings of Z operators introduced by the JW transform, resulting in qubit operators with the same locality as the fermionic operators, achieved by doubling the number of qubits.
“Verstraete and Cirac (2005) developed a scheme to eliminate the strings of Z operators introduced by the JW transform, resulting in qubit operators with the same locality as the fermionic operators. This is achieved by doubling the number of qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Verstraete and Cirac (2005)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 1. Implementation · p. 27Phase estimation requires the register to initially be in a state with a non-zero overlap with the target eigenstate.
“Firstly, it is necessary for the register to initially be in a state with a non-zero overlap with the target eigenstate.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26Errors arise from constructing arbitrary gates from a discrete set of gates (circuit synthesis errors, ε_CS), and can be quantified using techniques such as the Solovay-Kitaev theorem.
“There are also errors arising from constructing arbitrary gates from a discrete set of gates - such as approximating single qubit rotations from multiple T and Hadamard gates. These are typically referred to as circuit synthesis errors, ϵ CS , and can be quantified using techniques such as the Solovay-Kitaev theorem (Dawson and Nielsen, 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Dawson and Nielsen, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25Most work to date in quantum computational chemistry has focused on second quantised basis set methods.
“We note that most of the work to date in quantum computational chemistry has focused on second quantised basis set methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25Motta et al. (2018) utilised a low rank decomposition of the Hamiltonian in a Gaussian orbital basis to reduce the cost of time evolution, using a doubly factorised Cholesky decomposition with efficient quantum circuit implementation; by truncating terms they reduced cost with controllable error.
“Motta et al. (2018) utilised a low rank decomposition of the Hamiltonian in a Gaussian orbital basis to reduce the cost of time evolution. This decomposition is made possible by the structure present in the molecular Hamiltonian, which arises from the pairwise nature of the electron-electron interactions. Those authors leveraged a doubly factorised Cholesky decomposition of the Hamiltonian, with”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Motta et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Implementation · p. 26To realise standard phase estimation, one sequentially time evolves the main register under H for times t0=2π, t1=4π, ..., t_{ω-1}=2^ω π; total coherent time evolution T is approximately T=2^{ω+1}π.
“To realise the standard phase estimation algorithm given above, we sequentially need to time evolve the main register under the Hamiltonian H for times t 0 = 2 π, t 1 = 4 π, ..., t ω -1 = 2 ω π . The total coherent time evolution, T , is then given by approximately T = 2 ω +1 π .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 1. Hamiltonian reduction · p. 24While the qubit reduction transformation leaves the ground state of the system unchanged, it does alter the excited states that can be found; one is restricted to finding states with an electron number and total s_z value equal to the values determined.
“We remark that while this transformation leaves the ground state of the system unchanged, it does alter the excited states that can be found. In particular, we are restricted to finding those states with an electron number and total s z value equal to the values determined as described above.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- Rests on an assumption: For non-relativistic molecules, the total number of electrons and the total s_z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 2. Low rank decomposition techniques · p. 25While first quantised basis set simulations require asymptotically fewer qubits than second quantised basis set simulations, for the smallest simulable systems (such as small molecules in minimal basis sets), second quantised basis set methods require either fewer qubits and/or shorter gate sequences.
“While first quantised basis set simulations require asymptotically fewer qubits than second quantised basis set simulations, for the smallest simulable systems (such as small molecules in minimal basis sets), second quantised basis set methods require either fewer qubits and/or shorter gate sequences.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Hamiltonian reduction · p. 24In the JW, parity and BK encoding methods, the number of qubits is equal to the number of spin-orbitals considered, M.
“In the JW, parity and BK encoding methods, the number of qubits is equal to the number of spin-orbitals considered, M .”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Locality preserving mappings · p. 24Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices, so the BKSF transform may require fewer gates than the JW mapping.
“Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices. As a result, the BKSF transform may require fewer gates than the JW mapping.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26Using Eq. (61), for a success probability p=0.5, ω=n+2 ancilla qubits are required; total evolution time relates to binary precision ε=1/2^n as T=8π/ε; with p=0.5, one expects to repeat twice, equivalent to 16π/ε calls to e^{-iH}.
“Using Eq. (61), for a success probability of p = 0 . 5, we require ω = n + 2 ancilla qubits. The total evolution time can be related to the binary precision ϵ PE = 1 / 2 n , to show that T = 8 π/ϵ PE . Given that our success probability for this estimate is p = 0 . 5, we expect to have to repeat the procedure twice to obtain a good estimate of the ground state. This is equivalent to a total of 16”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 27Both canonical phase estimation and adiabatic state preparation require implementation of the time evolution operator e^{-iHt}.
“As discussed above, both the canonical phase estimation algorithm and adiabatic state preparation require implementation of the time evolution operator, e -iHt , where H may or may not be time dependent.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. State preparation · p. 27The true scaling of the maximum annealing time may be closer to O(M^2 / min_t ∆(t)).
“Reiher et al. (2017) noted that the true scaling may be closer to O ( M 2 / min t ∆( t )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ 3. Hamiltonian simulation · p. 28The gate counts of all product formula based methods scale as O(poly(1/ε)).
“It is important to note that the gate counts of all product formula based methods scale as O (poly(1 /ϵ )).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ 1. Implementation · p. 27Phase estimation requires a way to coherently implement a unitary operator defined by an efficiently invertible function of the Hamiltonian.
“Secondly, we must have a way to coherently implement a unitary operator defined by an efficiently invertible function of the Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ b. Advanced Hamiltonian simulation methods · p. 28The Taylor series and quantum signal processing + qubitization algorithms scale exponentially better with regards to the accuracy of the simulation than product formula based methods.
“The Taylor series and quantum signal processing + qubitization algorithms scale exponentially better with regards to the accuracy of the simulation than product formula based methods.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 1. Implementation · p. 26For a molecular Hamiltonian, Reiher et al. (2017) showed that a number of calls scaling as π/(2ε_PE) will suffice.
“For the case of a molecular Hamiltonian Reiher et al. (2017) showed that a number of calls scaling as π/ 2 ϵ PE will suffice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. (2017)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33The UCC ansatz is typically truncated at a given excitation level, usually single and double excitations (UCCSD).
“The UCC ansatz is typically truncated at a given excitation level - usually single and double excitations (known as UCCSD).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 32The VQE is a heuristic method; it is currently unclear whether the quantum circuits proposed will yield better approximations of the ground state than the classical methods already available.
“Firstly, the VQE is a heuristic method; it is currently unclear whether the quantum circuits proposed will yield better approximations of the ground state than the classical methods already available.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 32The number of measurements required to obtain the energy to the desired accuracy can be large.
“Secondly, the number of measurements required to obtain the energy to the desired accuracy can be large.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33The UCC method retains all of the advantages of the CC method, with the added benefits of being fully variational, and able to converge when used with multireference initial states.
“The UCC method retains all of the advantages of the CC method, with the added benefits of being fully variational, and able to converge when used with multireference initial states.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ a. Hardware efficient ans¨ atze · p. 33Using hardware efficient ansätze with random initial parameters makes the energy gradient essentially zero among most directions of Hilbert space, making classical optimisation extremely difficult.
“McClean et al. (2018) showed that using hardware efficient ans¨ atze with random initial parameters makes the energy gradient essentially zero among most directions of Hilbert space, making classical optimisation extremely difficult.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29Plane wave and plane wave dual basis sets reduce the number of terms in the Hamiltonian to O(M^3) and O(M^2), respectively.
“The plane wave and plane wave dual basis sets reduce the number of terms in the Hamiltonian to O ( M 3 ) and O ( M 2 ), respectively.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 31The VQE aims to find the lowest eigenvalue of a given Hamiltonian.
“The VQE aims to find the lowest eigenvalue of a given Hamiltonian, such as that of a chemical system.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ c. Fermi-Hubbard model · p. 30The Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian contains O(M) terms, many of which commute with each other.
“As described in Sec. III.B.2, the Fermi-Hubbard Hamiltonian contains O ( M ) terms, many of which commute with each other.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 31The VQE is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm.
“The VQE is a hybrid quantum-classical algorithm.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 31The VQE relies upon the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle.
“The VQE relies upon the Rayleigh-Ritz variational principle.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33The UCCSD gate count has been improved to O(M^3 N) gates, with a depth of O(M^2 N), using swap networks.
“This has been improved to O ( M 3 N ) gates, with a depth of O ( M 2 N ) using swap networks (O'Gorman et al. , 2019)”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites O'Gorman et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- The authors state this as an assumption: A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33The UCC method is intractable on classical computers but can be efficiently implemented on a quantum computer.
“The UCC method is intractable on classical computers, but can be efficiently implemented on a quantum computer.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Yung et al. (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peruzzo et al. (2014)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Variational algorithms · p. 32The VQE appears to be robust against some errors and capable of finding the ground state energies of small chemical systems using low depth circuits.
“It appears to be robust against some errors (McClean et al. , 2016; O'Malley et al. , 2016), and capable of finding the ground state energies of small chemical systems using low depth circuits (Kandala et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites O'Malley et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kandala et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 4. Phase estimation for chemistry simulation · p. 29Using the Taylor series method, algorithms scale as O(M^5) and O(N^2 M^3) for molecules in Gaussian basis sets.
“Using the Taylor series method, algorithms were developed which scale as O ( M 5 ) (Babbush et al. , 2016) and O ( N 2 M 3 ) (Babbush et al. , 2017) for molecules in Gaussian basis sets.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Babbush et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35Direct search methods were found to exhibit good convergence to the ground state energy of small systems, despite relatively high noise rates.
“Direct search methods (such as Nelder-Mead simplex (Hempel et al. , 2018; Peruzzo et al. , 2014; Shen et al. , 2017), simulated annealing (Hempel et al. , 2018), particle swarm (Colless et al. , 2018; Santagati et al. , 2018) covariance matrix adaptation (Sagastizabal et al. , 2019), and the dividing rectangles algorithm (Kokail et al. , 2019)) were found to exhibit good convergence to the ground”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Hempel et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Peruzzo et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Shen et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 35It is important to consider the covariances between Hamiltonian terms within groups, as if these covariances are positive, it may be better to measure the terms separately.
“McClean et al. (2016) showed that it is important to consider the covariances between Hamiltonian terms within groups, as if these covariances are positive, then it may be better to measure the terms separately.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al. (2016)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34The low rank decomposition method reduces the number of gates required to implement a Trotter step of the Hamiltonian to O(M^2 log^2(M)) with increasing molecular size, and O(M^3) for fixed molecular size and increasing basis size.
“They reduced the number of gates required to implement a Trotter step of the Hamiltonian to O ( M 2 log 2 ( M )) with increasing molecular size, and O ( M 3 ) for fixed molecular size and increasing basis size.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Motta et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 36Classical neural networks can be trained to optimise VQE circuits for small instances of the Fermi-Hubbard model, and showed indications that they may generalise to larger systems than those on which they were trained.
“Recent numerical work has explored the possibility of using classical neural networks to optimise VQE circuits for small instances of the Fermi-Hubbard model (Verdon et al. , 2019; Wilson et al. , 2019). This approach (known as 'meta-learning') works by training the neural networks on many random instances of the system being studied. The networks were able to successfully 'learn' to optimise the”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Verdon et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Wilson et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 34The measurement scaling is O(M^6/ε^2) in a Gaussian orbital basis, and O(M^4/ε^2) for a plane wave dual basis.
“This leads to a scaling of O ( M 6 /ϵ 2 ) in a Gaussian orbital basis, and O ( M 4 /ϵ 2 ) for a plane wave dual basis (Babbush et al. , 2018c; Cao et al. , 2019; McClean et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Babbush et al., 2018c
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Cao et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites McClean et al., 2014
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33Classically tractable methods can be used to get initial approximations for the remaining non-zero parameters, which makes the classical optimisation step of the VQE easier.
“Moreover, we can use classically tractable methods to get initial approximations for the remaining non-zero parameters (O'Malley et al. , 2016; Romero et al. , 2019), which makes the classical optimisation step of the VQE easier.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites O'Malley et al., 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Romero et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35The SPSA algorithm has been used to successfully find the ground state energy of small molecules, despite relatively large uncertainties due to shot noise and physical error rates.
“The simultaneous perturbation stochastic approximation (SPSA) algorithm, has also been used to successfully find the ground state energy of small molecules, despite relatively large uncertainties due to shot noise, and physical error rates (Ganzhorn et al. , 2018; Kandala et al. , 2017, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Ganzhorn et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kandala et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Kandala et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34It is possible to use locality preserving mappings to perform Trotter steps in constant depth, at the cost of requiring additional qubits and potentially a large constant factor gate overhead.
“It has also been noted (Kivlichan et al. , 2018) that it is possible to use locality preserving mappings (Jiang et al. , 2018a; Verstraete and Cirac, 2005) to perform Trotter steps in constant depth. However, this comes at a cost of requiring additional qubits, and may have a large constant factor gate overhead.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jiang et al., 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Verstraete and Cirac, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 35This local minima problem was partly mitigated by using a good initialisation strategy, such as using a chemically motivated (Møller-Plesset) guess for UCC excitation amplitudes.
“This problem was partly mitigated by using a good initialisation strategy, such as using a chemically motivated (M¨ ollerPlesset) guess for UCC excitation amplitudes (Romero et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Romero et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 36The meta-learning approach demonstrated some resilience to noise included in the simulations.
“The approach also demonstrated some resilience to noise included in the simulations (Wilson et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wilson et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 3. Classical optimisation · p. 35Direct search algorithms are considered more robust to noise than gradient based methods, but may require more function evaluations.
“Direct search algorithms are considered more robust to noise than gradient based methods, but may require more function evaluations (Kolda et al. , 2006).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kolda et al., 2006
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34For Hamiltonians of the plane wave dual form, Trotter steps can be implemented in depth O(M), using O(M^2) two qubit gates.
“Kivlichan et al. (2018) showed that for Hamiltonians of this form, we can implement Trotter steps in depth O ( M ), using O ( M 2 ) two qubit gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Kivlichan et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ c. Hamiltonian variational ansatz · p. 34For a 2D array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity, it is possible to prepare initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model using O(M^1.5) gates, and perform Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian using O(M) gates for each Trotter step.
“Jiang et al. (2018b) improved this result for the case of a 2D array of qubits with nearest-neighbour connectivity. They showed that it is possible to prepare initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model using O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates, and perform Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian using O ( M ) gates for each Trotter step.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al. (2018b)
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ a. Previous optimisation studies · p. 36A limitation of the majority of these optimisation studies is that realistic noise has rarely been considered, so it is still unclear exactly how effective each method may be in practice.
“A limitation of the majority of these studies is that realistic noise has rarely been considered, so it is still unclear exactly how effective each method may be in practice.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ b. Chemically inspired ans¨ atze · p. 33Depending on how the operators in the Trotterized UCCSD ansatz are ordered, the optimised energies of systems displaying significant electron correlation can vary by amounts larger than chemical accuracy.
“However, this approach has been questioned by Grimsley et al. (2019) who found that depending on how the operators in the Trotterized UCCSD ansatz are ordered, the optimised energies of systems displaying significant electron correlation can vary by amounts larger than chemical accuracy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Grimsley et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ 2. Measurement · p. 35Using additional unitary transforms to enable more terms to be grouped reduces the number of groups of terms from O(M^4) to O(M^3).
“Some authors have also considered using additional unitary transforms to enable more terms to be grouped, reducing the number of groups of terms from O ( M 4 ) to O ( M 3 ) (Crawford et al. , 2019; Gokhale et al. , 2019; Gokhale and Chong, 2019; Jena et al. , 2019; Yen et al. , 2019b; Zhao et al. , 2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Crawford et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gokhale et al., 2019
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Gokhale and Chong, 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ b. Related methods of optimisation · p. 36The annealed variational method can be generalised to any ansatz with a repeating, layered structure.
“This technique can be generalised to any ansatz with a repeating, layered structure.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The ansatz is composed of S layers.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Extrapolation · p. 39The extrapolation method works by intentionally increasing the dominant error rate by a factor λ, and inferring the error free result by extrapolation.
“The extrapolation method (Li and Benjamin, 2017; Temme et al. , 2017) works by intentionally increasing the dominant error rate, ϵ 0 , by a factor λ , and inferring the error free result by extrapolation.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Li and Benjamin, 2017
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Temme et al., 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 39Error mitigation schemes are not a scalable solution to the problem of noise in quantum hardware; scaling to arbitrarily large sizes requires fault-tolerant, error corrected quantum computers.
“It is important to note that error mitigation schemes are not a scalable solution to the problem of noise in quantum hardware. In order to scale up computations to arbitrarily large sizes, fault-tolerant, error corrected quantum computers are required.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ b. Related methods of optimisation · p. 36Simulated VQE calculations on small molecules were sped up by a factor of 2 to 4 using the correlation-energy transformation.
“Overall, simulated VQE calculations on small molecules were sped up by a factor of 2 to 4 (Barkoutsos et al. , 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Barkoutsos et al., 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ 3. Contraction VQE methods · p. 38The contraction VQE methods (SSVQE and MCVQE) obtain all eigenstates at the same time, rather than sequentially, so all eigenstates should be obtained to a similar accuracy.
“These contraction VQE methods differ from the overlap based methods, in that they obtain all of the eigenstates at the same time, rather than sequentially. Consequently, all eigenstates should be obtained to a similar accuracy.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ 2. Overlap-based methods · p. 38The SWAP test approach for overlap requires a circuit that has twice as many gates as the ansatz used (but is of the same depth), and has twice as many qubits.
“The SWAP test approach requires a circuit that has twice as many gates as the ansatz used (but is of the same depth), and has twice as many qubits.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40Probabilistic error cancellation has been extended to work with temporally correlated errors and low frequency noise.
“The probabilistic error cancellation method described above has been shown to work for general Markovian noise (Endo et al. , 2017), and has also been extended to work with temporally correlated errors and low frequency noise (Huo and Li, 2018).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huo and Li, 2018
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ b. Related methods of optimisation · p. 36Because only the correlation energy is calculated, fewer measurements are required and classical optimisation becomes easier.
“Because only the correlation energy is calculated, fewer measurements are required and classical optimisation becomes easier.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 39Error mitigation techniques are only effective when used with low depth circuits, such that the total error rate in the circuit is low.
“These techniques are only effective when used with low depth circuits, such that the total error rate in the circuit is low.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37The QSE method was originally introduced to find excited states and has proven useful for near-term quantum computational chemistry, with benefits including better ground state estimation and mitigation of hardware errors.
“The quantum subspace expansion (QSE) method was originally introduced to find excited states (McClean et al. , 2017a), but has proven to be one of the most useful techniques introduced to near-term quantum computational chemistry, with benefits including better ground state estimation (discussed below) and mitigation of hardware errors (discussed in Sec. VI.C).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al., 2017a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 40Quantum subspace expansion can mitigate errors in VQE in addition to calculating excited energy eigenstates.
“The quantum subspace expansion (QSE) (McClean et al. , 2017a) described in Sec. V.C.1 can mitigate errors in the VQE, in addition to calculating the excited energy eigenstates.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al. , 2017a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ C. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 40QSE is most effective at correcting systematic errors, but can also suppress some stochastic errors.
“This method is most effective at correcting systematic errors, but can also suppress some stochastic errors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40Probabilistic error cancellation has been experimentally demonstrated on both superconducting and trapped ion systems.
“The probabilistic error cancellation method has been experimentally demonstrated on both superconducting (Song et al. , 2018) and trapped ion (Zhang et al. , 2019) systems.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Song et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Zhang et al. , 2019
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 40The overhead γ determines the number of additional measurements required to keep the variance of the error mitigated result equal to the variance of the noisy result.
“The overhead γ determines the number of additional measurements required to keep the variance of the error mitigated result equal to the variance of the noisy result.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37The EoM method was found to be robust to noise when demonstrated experimentally, and more accurate for finding excitation energies than the QSE, in numerical tests.
“They found the EoM method to be robust to noise when demonstrated experimentally, and more accurate for finding excitation energies than the QSE, in numerical tests.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Ollitrault et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ B. Probabilistic error cancellation · p. 39Realising the inverse of an error channel is in general an unphysical process.
“Because realising the inverse channel is in general an unphysical process, we use the scheme depicted in Fig. 9 to effectively realise the inverse channel by focusing only on measurement results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 3. Contraction VQE methods · p. 38It may be difficult to find a unitary circuit that simultaneously prepares many eigenstates on an equal footing, which may make contraction methods difficult to realise in practice.
“However, it may be difficult to find a unitary circuit that simultaneously prepares many eigenstates on an equal footing, which may make these contraction methods difficult to realise in practice.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41The low-rank + orbital rotations measurement technique appears to be the most powerful of the symmetry-based error mitigation methods, requiring modest additional circuit depth, limited connectivity, and enabling effective post-selection on electron number and sz value rather than just parities.
“The latter method appears to be the most powerful of these, requiring a modest additional circuit depth, limited connectivity, and enabling effective post-selection on the electron number and s z value, rather than just the parities of these quantities.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Huggins et al. , 2019b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Extrapolation · p. 39Otten and Gray extended the extrapolation method to the scenario where the error rates of different gates are increased by different factors.
“Otten and Gray (2018b) have also extended the extrapolation method to the scenario where the error rates of different gates are increased by different factors.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otten and Gray (2018b)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ A. Extrapolation · p. 39The extrapolation method can improve the accuracy of calculations, but requires additional measurements to keep the variance of the measured observable the same as the non-extrapolated case.
“While this method can improve the accuracy of calculations, it requires additional measurements in order to keep the variance of the measured observable the same as the non-extrapolated case.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ 1. Quantum subspace expansion · p. 37The main drawback of the QSE is the large number of measurements that may be required to obtain the 4-RDM of the system; in general there are O(M^8) elements to measure in the 4-RDM, compared to O(M^4) elements for the Hamiltonian.
“The main drawback of the QSE is the large number of measurements that may be required to obtain the 4-RDM of the system. In general there are O ( M 8 ) elements to measure in the 4-RDM, compared to O ( M 4 ) elements for the Hamiltonian.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Premisenone given§ VI. ERROR MITIGATION FOR CHEMISTRY · p. 38Physical qubits accumulate errors during computation, due to their interaction with the environment and imperfect control.
“As discussed in Sec. II.A, physical qubits accumulate errors during computation, due to their interaction with the environment, and our imperfect control.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Tensor network methods such as DMRG have proven effective for systems displaying strong static correlation and allow treatment of larger active spaces, including metalloenzyme complexes with active spaces of over 70 spin-orbitals, which is larger than the roughly 30 to 40 spin-orbitals treatable with CASSCF.
“Tensor network methods, such as density matrix renormalisation group (DMRG), have proven effective for dealing with systems displaying strong static correlation. They provide an alternative approach to CASSCF (see Sec. III.C.2) approaches (Knecht et al. , 2016), allowing the treatment of larger active spaces, including those of metalloenzyme complexes with active spaces of over 70 spin-orbitals (K”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Kurashige et al. , 2013
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Sharma et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Lischka et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ VIII. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS · p. 46The resources required for quantum calculations are considerably greater than what we currently have available, at time of writing.
“We will see that the resources required are considerably greater than what we currently have available, at time of writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41The generalised Bravyi-Kitaev superfast transform and the majorana loop stabiliser code introduce additional qubits whose values are constrained by the mappings.
“For example, both the generalised Bravyi-Kitaev superfast transform (Setia et al. , 2018), and the majorana loop stabiliser code (Jiang et al. , 2018a) (discussed in Sec. IV.B.3) introduce additional qubits, whose values are constrained by the mappings.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Setia et al. , 2018
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Jiang et al. , 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Exact diagonalisation is possible up to system sizes of around 20 to 30 lattice sites for Fermi-Hubbard models.
“In the context of condensed matter physics, these calculations are referred to as 'exact diagonalisation' and are possible up to system sizes of around 20 to 30 lattice sites, in the case of Fermi-Hubbard models (Jiang et al. , 2018b; Yamada et al. , 2005).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Jiang et al. , 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Yamada et al. , 2005
Not checked in the free run.
Classified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A. Classical limits · p. 46DFT and HF techniques can struggle to achieve highly accurate results for strongly correlated systems and are not systematically improvable.
“However, these techniques can struggle to achieve highly accurate results for strongly correlated systems, and are not systematically improvable.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ E. Other methods of error mitigation · p. 41Other methods of error mitigation have been proposed but require further research to assess how they can be best incorporated into chemistry calculations.
“Other methods of error mitigation have been proposed, but require further research in order to assess how they can be best incorporated into chemistry calculations.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ 3. cc-PVDZ basis · p. 44We consider the 5th spatial orbital in cc-PVDZ H2 to always be empty and remove all terms involving it from the Hamiltonian, leaving a Hamiltonian acting on M = 18 spin-orbitals.
“As a result, we consider this spatial orbital to always be empty, and so remove all terms involving it from the Hamiltonian. This leaves a Hamiltonian acting on M = 18 spin-orbitals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 47In practice, it is not always necessary to perform highly accurate calculations on the entirety of a large molecule or enzyme; problem decomposition approaches can be utilised.
“However, in practice it is not always necessary to perform highly accurate calculations on the entirety of a large molecule or enzyme. Instead, problem decomposition approaches can be utilised”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Monte Carlo methods have a sign problem that affects fermionic simulations.
“However, Monte Carlo methods are not without their own shortcomings, including the infamous 'sign problem', that affects fermionic simulations (Austin et al. , 2012; Ortiz et al. , 2001).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Austin et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Ortiz et al. , 2001
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ 1. STO-3G basis · p. 43Hempel et al. (2018) simplified the UCCSD operator for H2 by implementing the single excitation terms as basis rotations and combining terms in the double excitation operator.
“Hempel et al. (2018) simplified the UCCSD operator for H 2 by implementing the single excitation terms as basis rotations, and combining terms in the double excitation operator”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Hempel et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Full configuration interaction (FCI) calculations are less computationally expensive than grid-based approaches, but their cost scales exponentially with system size, so they are only applicable to small systems like the dinitrogen molecule.
“Exact results (albeit with a less accurate model of the system) can also be obtained by carrying out basis set, full configuration interaction (FCI) calculations (Sec. III.B.2), which are less computationally expensive than grid based approaches. However, the cost of these calculations still scales exponentially with the system size, so they are only applicable to small systems, like the dinitrog”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Rossi et al. , 1999
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 47These systems in the sweet spot are too strongly correlated to be tackled with HF, DFT or even CCSD, and too large to be reliably dealt with using DMRG or quantum Monte Carlo, and much too large for classical FCI methods.
“These systems are too strongly correlated to be tackled with methods like HF, DFT or even CCSD. They are also too large to be reliably dealt with using DMRG or quantum Monte Carlo, and much too large for classical FCI methods.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Grid-based simulations provide the most accurate results but can only be carried out for a very small number of particles because of the large number of grid points required.
“Grid-based simulations (as described in Sec. III.B.1) provide the most accurate results - but can only be carried out for a very small number of particles, because of the large number of grid points required.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationcitation§ 1. STO-3G basis · p. 43The first determinant in the H2 ground state wavefunction is the HF state, showing that a mean-field solution is a good approximation for H2 at this interatomic distance.
“The first determinant in the ground state wavefunction is the HF state for H 2 , showing that a mean-field solution is a good approximation for this molecule at this interatomic distance.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim. May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ A. Classical limits · p. 46DFT and HF calculations are often very efficient to run and can treat large systems.
“These calculations are often very efficient to run, and can treat large systems.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ A. Classical limits · p. 46We do not expect DFT and HF calculations to be replaced by quantum computers, given the large system sizes that are simulated.
“We do not expect these calculations to be replaced by those on quantum computers, given the large system sizes that are simulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ E. Other methods of error mitigation · p. 41The quantum variational error corrector uses a variational algorithm to construct noise-tailored quantum memories.
“One such method is the quantum variational error corrector (Johnson et al. , 2017), which uses a variational algorithm to construct noise-tailored quantum memories.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Johnson et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Tensor network methods are useful for treating Fermi-Hubbard models accurate to around 100 sites.
“Tensor network methods are also useful for treating systems in condensed matter physics, including Fermi-Hubbard models that are accurate to around 100 sites (LeBlanc et al. , 2015).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ A. Classical limits · p. 46In general, the cost of applying classical computational chemistry methods grows with the accuracy of the results they produce and the size of the system simulated.
“In general, the cost of applying these methods grows with the accuracy of the results that they produce, and the size of the system simulated.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47Quantum Monte Carlo has been used to obtain results comparable to FCI in relatively small systems, state of the art results in Fermi-Hubbard systems accurate to around 100 sites, and less accurate results in other larger systems.
“Quantum Monte Carlo has many variants, and has been used to obtain results comparable to FCI in relatively small systems (the Cr 2 molecule with 24 active electrons in 30 spin-orbitals (Tubman et al. , 2016), or the fluorine atom in a cc-PV5Z basis with additional basis functions (Booth and Alavi, 2010)), as well as state of the art results in Fermi-Hubbard systems that are accurate to around 100”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 3 sources checked- cites Tubman et al. , 2016
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Booth and Alavi, 2010
Not checked in the free run.
- cites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ B. Lithium Hydride STO-3G basis · p. 45The first orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM has a NOON close to two, so we consider it to always be doubly occupied and remove terms containing a†0, a0, a†1, a1.
“The first orbital has a NOON close to two, and so we consider it to always be doubly occupied. We can then remove any terms containing a † 0 , a 0 , a † 1 , a 1”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ D. Symmetry based methods · p. 41By post-processing measurements from multiple iterations, McClean et al. could detect some errors or effectively realise a limited form of error correction.
“By post-processing measurements from multiple iterations, they could detect some errors, or effectively realise a limited form of error correction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites McClean et al. (2019b)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Interpretationown data§ B. Lithium Hydride STO-3G basis · p. 45The fourth orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM has a very small NOON, so we assume it is never occupied and remove the two corresponding fermion operators, leaving a Hamiltonian acting on 8 spin-orbitals.
“In contrast, the fourth orbital has a very small NOON. As a result, we assume that this orbital is never occupied, and so remove the two corresponding fermion operators from the Hamiltonian. This leaves a Hamiltonian acting on 8 spin-orbitals.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim- The authors state this as an assumption: The fourth orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM is never occupied.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ A. Classical limits · p. 47A small quantum computer with around 100 perfect qubits would be able to calculate the FCI energy of a system with around 100 spin-orbitals in polynomial time.
“As we have discussed throughout this review, a small quantum computer, with around 100 perfect qubits, would be able to calculate the FCI energy of a system with around 100 spin-orbitals in polynomial time.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Initial work suggested that around 10^18 gates would be necessary to perform phase estimation on a system of around 100 spin-orbitals, excluding the overhead of error correction.
“Initial work suggested that around 10 18 gates would be necessary to perform phase estimation on a system of around 100 spin-orbitals (excluding the overhead of error correction) (Wecker et al. , 2014).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Wecker et al. , 2014
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ E. Other methods of error mitigation · p. 41Individual error reduction uses error correction to protect a single qubit while leaving the rest of the physical qubits subject to noise, repeating the process with each physical qubit protected in turn.
“Another example is individual error reduction (Otten and Gray, 2018a). This method uses error correction to protect a single qubit, while leaving the rest of the physical qubits subject to noise. The process is repeated several times, with each physical qubit being protected in turn.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Otten and Gray, 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ A. Classical limits · p. 47CC methods can also be applied to strongly correlated systems, but higher excitation degrees are often required, making the method more costly to implement.
“While CC methods can also be applied to strongly correlated systems (LeBlanc et al. , 2015; Watson and Chan, 2012), higher excitation degrees are often required, making the method more costly to implement.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites LeBlanc et al. , 2015
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Watson and Chan, 2012
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Non-Clifford gates cannot be natively implemented in a fault-tolerant way in the surface code, but instead are typically implemented using magic state distillation and teleportation, which is often expensive.
“This is because these non-Clifford gates cannot be natively implemented in a fault-tolerant way in the surface code, but instead are typically implemented using magic state distillation and teleportation (Bravyi and Kitaev, 2005), which is often expensive (Campbell et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Bravyi and Kitaev, 2005
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Campbell et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Fault-tolerant resource estimations have been carried out for two main systems: small transition metal molecules, and condensed phase materials (including 2D Fermi-Hubbard models, 2D and 3D electron gases, and solid materials, such as lithium or diamond).
“Fault-tolerant resource estimations have since been carried out for two main systems: small transition metal molecules, and condensed phase materials (including 2D Fermi-Hubbard models, 2D and 3D electron gases, and solid materials, such as lithium or diamond).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49The figure of merit for fault-tolerant calculations is often the circuit depth - in particular the number of T or Toffoli gates.
“However, as described above, the figure of merit for fault-tolerant calculations is often the circuit depth - in particular the number of T or Toffoli gates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable), S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49It is difficult to prove that a given circuit will be able to obtain a good estimate for the ground state, especially when the difficulty of classical optimisation is considered.
“It is difficult to prove that a given circuit will be able to obtain a good estimate for the ground state, especially when the difficulty of classical optimisation is considered.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing). May combine two claims.
Premisereasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49The VQE is a heuristic approach, which attempts to generate an approximation to the ground state wavefunction that is better than classical methods, using a short circuit.
“The VQE is a heuristic approach, which attempts to generate an approximation to the ground state wavefunction that is better than classical methods, using a short circuit.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Other works have conducted similar resource estimations for equivalently sized problems (100-200 spinorbitals), but have focused on matter in the condensed phase.
“Other works have conducted similar resource estimations for equivalently sized problems (100-200 spinorbitals), but have focused on matter in the condensed phase.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49The first generations of quantum computers will be significantly smaller than the 100,000 physical qubits required to surpass classical calculations.
“The first generations of quantum computers will be significantly smaller than this.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Reiher et al. (2017) were considering a targeted majorana fermion-based quantum computer, with physical error rates 10^3 times lower than has been demonstrated in trapped ion or superconducting qubits, at the time of writing.
“Wenote that those authors were considering a targeted majorana fermion-based quantum computer, with physical error rates 10 3 times lower than has been demonstrated in trapped ion or superconducting qubits, at our time of writing.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49The initial investigation into fault-tolerant grid based simulation (Jones et al., 2012) did not calculate the total number of T gates required, or the number of qubits, for systems of interest.
“While an initial investigation into faulttolerant grid based simulation was performed (Jones et al. , 2012), it did not calculate the total number of T gates required, or the number of qubits, for systems of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al. , 2012
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisereasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48All resource estimates to date have focused on the 2D surface code, due to its high threshold, and suitability for architectures with a 2D nearest-neighbour connectivity.
“All resource estimates to date have focused on the 2D surface code, due to its high threshold, and suitability for architectures with a 2D nearest-neighbour connectivity.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50In general, the longer the circuit is, the better it can approximate the ground state wavefunction.
“In general, the longer the circuit is, the better it can approximate the ground state wavefunction.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49Tubman et al. (2018) showed that the cost of this state preparation algorithm is considerably lower than the cost for phase estimation detailed above, and hence, may be neglected for many systems of interest.
“Tubman et al. (2018) showed that the cost of this state preparation algorithm is considerably lower than the cost for phase estimation detailed above, and hence, may be neglected for many systems of interest.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Tubman et al. (2018)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisenone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 49The VQE has received significant attention in recent years, due to its short required circuit depth (compared to phase estimation).
“As discussed in Sec. V.B, the variational quantum eigensolver (VQE) has received significant attention in recent years, due to its short required circuit depth (compared to phase estimation).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisereasoning§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48In the standard model of surface code resource estimation, Clifford gates are considered to be of negligible cost, while non-Clifford gates are more costly.
“In the standard model of surface code resource estimation, Clifford gates (such as Pauli gates and the CNOT gate) are considered to be of negligible cost, while non-Clifford gates (such as the T gate, or Toffoli gate) are more costly.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50While error mitigation techniques may enable us to recover accurate results from a circuit deeper than 10,000 gates, it seems unlikely that these methods alone would enable more than a small multiplicative increase in the circuit depth.
“While the error mitigation techniques discussed in Sec. VI may enable us to recover accurate results from a circuit deeper than 10,000 gates, it seems unlikely that these methods alone would enable more than a small multiplicative increase in the circuit depth.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 48Assuming the best physical error rates (10^-3) at the time of writing, the Reiher et al. (2017) estimate would require around 200 million physical qubits, and take on the order of weeks (10 ns to implement a T gate, including surface code decoding) or months (100 ns per T gate).
“Assuming the best physical error rates (10 -3 ) at our time of writing, this would require around 200 million physical qubits, and take on the order of weeks (10 ns to implement a T gate, including surface code decoding) or months (100 ns per T gate) (Reiher et al. , 2017).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Reiher et al. , 2017
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49All of the resource estimation papers above focus on the cost of phase estimation, and assume that the system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.
“All of the resource estimation papers above focus on the cost of phase estimation, and assume that the system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ B. Quantum resources: medium to long-term · p. 49There have been many improvements in fault-tolerant circuit design and magic state distillation since the work of Jones et al. (2012).
“Moreover, there have been many improvements in fault-tolerant circuit design and magic state distillation since the work of Jones et al. (2012).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jones et al. (2012)
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S4 (based). May combine two claims.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Summary and outlook · p. 51The vast majority of these proposals were tested on small system sizes, performed a limited number of comparisons to other techniques, and were not optimised for maximum efficacy.
“However, the vast majority of these proposals: were tested on small system sizes, performed a limited number of comparisons to other techniques, and were not optimised for maximum efficacy.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimMay combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50Initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model can be prepared using O(M^1.5) gates, and Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian can be performed using O(M) gates for each Trotter step.
“We can prepare initial states of the Fermi-Hubbard model using O ( M 1 . 5 ) gates, and perform Trotter steps of the Hamiltonian using O ( M ) gates for each Trotter step (Jiang et al. , 2018b).”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claim0 of 1 sources checked- cites Jiang et al. , 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing), S4 (based).
Premisenone given§ D. Summary and outlook · p. 51A wide range of ansätze, chemistry mappings, classical optimisation routines, and error mitigation techniques have been proposed in recent years.
“In the realm of variational algorithms, a wide range of ans¨ atze, chemistry mappings, classical optimisation routines, and error mitigation techniques have been proposed in recent years.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimClassified as probably not a substantial claim.
Interpretationnone given§ D. Summary and outlook · p. 51Quantum methods still face many challenges, not least the high error rates and low qubit counts of existing hardware.
“However, we have also shown that quantum methods still face many challenges, not least the high error rates and low qubit counts of existing hardware.”
Quote in the paperSubstantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationreasoning§ D. Summary and outlook · p. 51The success of quantum computational chemistry will depend on our ability to construct larger and better controlled quantum computers.
“Ultimately, the success of quantum computational chemistry will depend on our ability to construct larger and better controlled quantum computers.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Interpretationreasoning§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50The number of gates required would likely be higher than the rough estimate because it neglects constant factors.
“This rough estimate neglects constant factors, and so the number of gates required would likely be higher.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claimProbably not a substantial claim: may not pass S3 (load-bearing).
Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50This proposal has recently been formalised by McCaskey et al. (2019) and Nam et al. (2019).
“This proposal has recently been formalised by McCaskey et al. (2019) and Nam et al. (2019).”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites McCaskey et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Nam et al. (2019)
Not checked in the free run.
May combine two claims.
Premisecitation§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50Further work has shown promising results for both the ground state problem and dynamics simulation, both in the presence of realistic noise rates.
“Further work has shown promising results for both the ground state problem (Reiner et al. , 2018a), and dynamics simulation (Reiner et al. , 2018b), both in the presence of realistic noise rates.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim0 of 2 sources checked- cites Reiner et al. , 2018a
Not checked in the free run.
- cites Reiner et al. , 2018b
Not checked in the free run.
Probably not a substantial claim: may not pass S2 (checkable).
Interpretationnone given§ C. Quantum resources: near to medium-term · p. 50We cannot expect to surpass classical methods without first reproducing classically known results.
“We cannot expect to surpass classical methods without first reproducing classically known results.”
Quote in the paperNot a substantial claim
The paper relies on this without support.
Using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.
“It is believed that using quantum systems as our simulation platform will enable us to tackle classically intractable problems in chemistry, physics, and materials science.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Quantum computers will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.
“As quantum computers are able to efficiently simulate quantum systems, it is believed that they will enable a more accurate understanding of the models in use today, as well as the ability to simulate more complex (and therefore, more realistic) models.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The electronic structure problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.
“Primarily, this problem is a fundamental one in classical computational chemistry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Digital quantum simulation is more vulnerable to noise and device imperfections than analog simulation.
“Digital quantum simulation is more vulnerable to noise and device imperfections than analog simulation.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Many systems of commercial and scientific interest, such as catalysts and high temperature superconductors, are strongly correlated.
“Many systems of commercial and scientific interest, such as catalysts and high temperature superconductors, are believed to be strongly correlated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
High temperature superconductors are strongly correlated systems.
“High temperature superconductors are also believed to be strongly correlated systems.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current quantum computers possess only tens of error-prone physical qubits.
“In contrast to the large error corrected machines described above, current quantum computers possess only tens of error-prone physical qubits.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In order to isolate errors arising from the method used, the authors assume they are working in the full molecular orbital basis for the molecule.
“In order to isolate the errors arising from the method used, we assume that we are working in the full molecular orbital basis for our molecule, although in practice this would be classically intractable for large system sizes”
The authors state this as an assumption.
In the following section, the authors assume they include all possible determinants that a limited number of molecular orbitals can generate, unless explicitly stated.
“we consider only a limited number of molecular orbitals, but assume that we include all possible determinants that they can generate, unless explicitly stated.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Second quantised basis set methods are the most widely used approach in classical computational chemistry and have formed the basis of most work so far in quantum computational chemistry.
“Second quantised basis set methods are the most widely used approach in classical computational chemistry, and have formed the basis of most of the work done so far in quantum computational chemistry.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The second quantised grid based method has not yet been used in any classical or quantum computational chemistry algorithms.
“As discussed above, this second quantised grid based method has not yet (to the best of our knowledge) been used in any classical or quantum computational chemistry algorithms.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.
“Assuming fairly local interactions for a molecule, the degree of the graph will be less than the number of vertices.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For non-relativistic molecules, the total number of electrons and the total s_z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian.
“For non-relativistic molecules, the total number electrons and the total s z value are conserved.”
“As the electron number and total s z value are conserved by the Hamiltonian, these qubits are only acted on by the identity or Pauli Z operators.”
The paper relies on this without support.
It is classically intractable to store the required P^{3N} × 2^N = 2^{(3m+1)N} complex amplitudes for large quantum systems.
“While it is classically intractable to store the required P 3 N × 2 N = 2 (3 m +1) N complex amplitudes for large quantum systems, it is possible using a quantum computer.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction.
“As near-term quantum computers will not have enough physical qubits for error correction”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The methods discussed above require fault-tolerance.
“As a result, these methods are typically assumed to require fault-tolerance.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
A single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator.
“These gate counts assume that a single Trotter step can be used to implement the UCC operator, which has previously been shown to yield accurate results (Barkoutsos et al. , 2018; Romero et al. , 2019).”
The authors state this as an assumption.
Low-lying excited states differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.
“This is designed to target the low-lying excited states, which are assumed to differ from the ground state by a small number of excitations.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The ansatz is composed of S layers.
“We assume that the ansatz is composed of S layers.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The fourth orbital in the LiH NMO 1-RDM is never occupied.
“we assume that this orbital is never occupied”
The paper relies on this without support.
When the error rate is low, terms resulting from many errors are negligibly small.
“If the error rate is low, then the other terms can be considered negligibly small.”
The authors state this as an assumption.
The system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.
“All of the resource estimation papers above focus on the cost of phase estimation, and assume that the system is prepared in an initial state that has a sufficiently large overlap with the true ground state.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and a fully protected logical qubit has not yet been demonstrated.
“Current quantum computers possess only around 100 physical qubits, and we have yet to demonstrate a fully protected logical qubit.”
The paper relies on this without support.
The use of error correcting codes is complicated by the difficulty of producing error protected T gates.
“Nevertheless, the use of error correcting codes is complicated by the difficulty of producing error protected T gates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
Synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.
“Moreover, synthesizing an arbitrary angle rotation gate can require at least 10 to 100 T gates.”
The paper relies on this without support.
For many of the molecules in the G1 set, an FCI calculation on a sufficiently accurate basis set would be classically intractable.
“For many of the molecules in the G1 set, an FCI calculation on a sufficiently accurate basis set would be classically intractable (although they are typically not necessary due to highly accurate approximate methods and experimental results).”
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Quantum computers can play a crucial role in performing precise simulations for chemical processes and procedures in biological sciences.
“Therefore, quantum computers can play a crucial role in performing precise simulations for chemical processes and procedures in biological sciences [9, 69-71].”
From Quantum Computing in the Next-Generation Computational Biology Landscape: From Protein Folding to Molecular Dynamics (2024) · cites this paper as [70]
The electronic structure problem is one of the most prominent tasks within VQAs and was the pioneering task for VQE.
“The electronic structure problem is one of the most prominent tasks within VQAs (see for example the reviews (Cao et al. , 2019; McArdle et al. , 2020)) and was the pioneering task for VQE (McClean et al. , 2016; Peruzzo et al. , 2014).”
From Noisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms (2022) · cites this paper as McArdle et al. , 2020
Classical algorithms are currently able to treat up to 50-70 single-particle states depending on the approach and on the features of the system.
“which are currently able to treat up to 50–70 single-particle states depending on the approach and on the features of the system [89]”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
There is a certain consensus that quantum advantage will be realized only on a subset of electronic structure problems.
“There is a certain consensus that quantum advantage will be realized only on a subset of electronic structure problems [86, 89, 90].”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
These are strongly correlated/multireference systems that are not-and are not projected to be-at reach for classical algorithms.
“These are strongly correlated/multireference systems that are not—and are not projected to be—at reach for classical algorithms”
From Quantum computing algorithms: getting closer to critical problems in computational biology (2022) · cites this paper as [89]
Cites
Dunning, T. H. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456153 · Cited by 31,693 · see citing works
<i>Quantum Computation and Quantum Information</i>
Nielsen, M. A., Chuang, I., & Grover, L. K. (2002) · American Journal of Physics · doi:10.1119/1.1463744 · Cited by 21,895 · see citing works
Quantum computation and quantum information
Law, J. (2001) · ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes · doi:10.1145/505482.505499 · Cited by 20,449 · see citing works
Ditchfield, R., Hehre, W. J., & Pople, J. A. (1971) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1674902 · Cited by 10,612 · see citing works
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond
Preskill, J. (2018) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2018-08-06-79 · Cited by 8,830 · see citing works
Quantum supremacy using a programmable superconducting processor
Arute, F., Arya, K., Babbush, R., Bacon, D., Bardin, J. C., Barends, R., Biswas, R., Boixo, S., Brandao, F. G. S. L., Buell, D. A., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1666-5 · Cited by 7,720 · see citing works
Simulating physics with computers
Feynman, R. P. (1982) · International Journal of Theoretical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf02650179 · Cited by 7,691 · see citing works
Quantum computation with quantum dots
Loss, D., & DiVincenzo, D. P. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.120 · Cited by 6,840 · see citing works
Electron correlations in narrow energy bands
Hubbard, J. (1963) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London A Mathematical and Physical Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1963.0204 · Cited by 6,687 · see citing works
A full coupled-cluster singles and doubles model: The inclusion of disconnected triples
Purvis, G. D., & Bartlett, R. J. (1982) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.443164 · Cited by 6,538 · see citing works
Szabó, A., & Ostlund, N. S. (1982) · Cited by 6,239 · see citing works
A scheme for efficient quantum computation with linear optics
Knill, E., Laflamme, R., & Milburn, G. J. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35051009 · Cited by 5,880 · see citing works
The Activated Complex in Chemical Reactions
Eyring, H. (1935) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1749604 · Cited by 5,236 · see citing works
A variational eigenvalue solver on a photonic quantum processor
Peruzzo, A., McClean, J., Shadbolt, P., Yung, M.-H., Zhou, X.-Q., Love, P. J., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & O’Brien, J. L. (2014) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/ncomms5213 · Cited by 4,552 · see citing works
Self-citationDoping a Mott insulator: Physics of high-temperature superconductivity
Lee, P. A., Nagaosa, N., & Wen, X.-G. (2006) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.78.17 · Cited by 4,510 · see citing works
Raussendorf, R., & Briegel, H. J. (2001) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.86.5188 · Cited by 4,477 · see citing works
Hehre, W. J., Stewart, R. F., & Pople, J. A. (1969) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1672392 · Cited by 4,227 · see citing works
A complete active space SCF method (CASSCF) using a density matrix formulated super-CI approach
Roos, B. O., Taylor, P. R., & Sigbahn, P. E. M. (1980) · Chemical Physics · doi:10.1016/0301-0104(80)80045-0 · Cited by 3,982 · see citing works
Quantum information with continuous variables
Braunstein, S. L., & van Loock, P. (2005) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.77.513 · Cited by 3,858 · see citing works
A silicon-based nuclear spin quantum computer
Kane, B. E. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30156 · Cited by 3,779 · see citing works
Quantum Computations with Cold Trapped Ions
Cirac, J. I., & Zoller, P. (1995) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.74.4091 · Cited by 3,733 · see citing works
Sakurai, J. J., & Napolitano, J. (2020) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108587280 · Cited by 3,672 · see citing works
Ladd, T. D., Jelezko, F., Laflamme, R., Nakamura, Y., Monroe, C., & O’Brien, J. L. (2010) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08812 · Cited by 3,592 · see citing works
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343 · see citing works
Correlated electrons in high-temperature superconductors
Dagotto, E. R. (1994) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.66.763 · Cited by 3,096 · see citing works
Lloyd, S. (1996) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.273.5278.1073 · Cited by 3,088 · see citing works
Surface codes: Towards practical large-scale quantum computation
Fowler, A. G., Mariantoni, M., Martinis, J. M., & Cleland, A. N. (2012) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.86.032324 · Cited by 3,059 · see citing works
Hardware-efficient variational quantum eigensolver for small molecules and quantum magnets
Kandala, A., Mezzacapo, A., Temme, K., Takita, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23879 · Cited by 2,982 · see citing works
Georgescu, I. M., Ashhab, S., & Nori, F. (2014) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.86.153 · Cited by 2,932 · see citing works
Quantum dynamics of single trapped ions
Leibfried, D., Blatt, R., Monroe, C., & Wineland, D. (2003) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.75.281 · Cited by 2,739 · see citing works
Spins in few-electron quantum dots
Hanson, R., Kouwenhoven, L. P., Petta, J. R., Tarucha, S., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.1217 · Cited by 2,672 · see citing works
�ber das Paulische �quivalenzverbot
Jordan, P., & Wigner, E. (1928) · Zeitschrift f�r Physik · doi:10.1007/bf01331938 · Cited by 2,597 · see citing works
Molecular Electronic‐Structure Theory
Helgaker, T., Jørgensen, P., & Olsen, J. (2000) · doi:10.1002/9781119019572 · Cited by 2,594 · see citing works
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · Nature · doi:10.1038/19718 · Cited by 2,386 · see citing works
Barren plateaus in quantum neural network training landscapes
McClean, J. R., Boixo, S., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-07090-4 · Cited by 2,329 · see citing works
On the product of semi-groups of operators
Trotter, H. F. (1959) · Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society · doi:10.1090/s0002-9939-1959-0108732-6 · Cited by 2,282 · see citing works
Introduction to Quantum Mechanics
Grimes, R. A. (2019) · doi:10.1002/9781119618232.ch1 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms
McClean, J. R., Romero, J., Babbush, R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2016) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/18/2/023023 · Cited by 2,227 · see citing works
Self-citationEvans, M. G., & Polanyi, M. F. D. (1935) · Transactions of the Faraday Society · doi:10.1039/tf9353100875 · Cited by 1,857 · see citing works
Mechanism of Molybdenum Nitrogenase
Burgess, B. K., & Lowe, D. J. (1996) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr950055x · Cited by 1,854 · see citing works
P y SCF: the Python‐based simulations of chemistry framework
Sun, Q., Berkelbach, T. C., Blunt, N. S., Booth, G. H., Guo, S., Li, Z., Liu, J., McClain, J. D., Sayfutyarova, E. R., Sharma, S., et al. (2017) · Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1340 · Cited by 1,795 · see citing works
A Quantum Approximate Optimization Algorithm
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., & Gutmann, S. (2014) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1411.4028 · Cited by 1,789 · see citing works
Quantum mechanics of many-electron systems
Dirac, P. A. M. (1929) · Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical and Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rspa.1929.0094 · Cited by 1,786 · see citing works
Mechanism of Nitrogen Fixation by Nitrogenase: The Next Stage
Hoffman, B. M., Lukoyanov, D. A., Yang, Z., Dean, D. R., & Seefeldt, L. C. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr400641x · Cited by 1,776 · see citing works
Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance
Barends, R., Kelly, J., Megrant, A., Veitia, A., Sank, D., Jeffrey, E., White, T. C., Mutus, J., Fowler, A. G., Campbell, B., et al. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13171 · Cited by 1,733 · see citing works
Optimization by Direct Search: New Perspectives on Some Classical and Modern Methods
Kolda, T. G., Lewis, R. M., & Torczon, V. J. (2003) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/s003614450242889 · Cited by 1,659 · see citing works
Measurement-based quantum computation on cluster states
Raussendorf, R., Browne, D. E., & Briegel, H. J. (2003) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.68.022312 · Cited by 1,655 · see citing works
Quantum simulations with trapped ions
Blatt, R., & Roos, C. F. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2252 · Cited by 1,629 · see citing works
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J. P., Degroote, M., Johnson, P. D., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I. D., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N. P. D., et al. (2019) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00803 · Cited by 1,560 · see citing works
Self-citationAlbash, T., & Lidar, D. A. (2018) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.90.015002 · Cited by 1,546 · see citing works
Universal quantum computation with ideal Clifford gates and noisy ancillas
Bravyi, S., & Kitaev, A. (2005) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.71.022316 · Cited by 1,525 · see citing works
Coherent control of macroscopic quantum states in a single-Cooper-pair box
Nakamura, Y., Pashkin, Y. A., & Tsai, J. S. (1999) · RePEc: Research Papers in Economics · Cited by 1,509 · see citing works
Gaussian-1 theory: A general procedure for prediction of molecular energies
Pople, J. A., Head‐Gordon, M., Fox, D. J., Raghavachari, K., & Curtiss, L. A. (1989) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.456415 · Cited by 1,507 · see citing works
Molecular electronic-structure theory
Ratner, M. A. (2000) · Cited by 1,506 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1997) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539796300921 · Cited by 1,503 · see citing works
Quantum computations: algorithms and error correction
Kitaev, A. Y. (1997) · Russian Mathematical Surveys · doi:10.1070/rm1997v052n06abeh002155 · Cited by 1,424 · see citing works
Simulated Quantum Computation of Molecular Energies
Aspuru-Guzik, A., Dutoi, A. D., Love, P. J., & Head-Gordon, M. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1113479 · Cited by 1,418 · see citing works
Self-citationError Mitigation for Short-Depth Quantum Circuits
Temme, K., Bravyi, S., & Gambetta, J. M. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180509 · Cited by 1,379 · see citing works
Quantum error correction for quantum memories
Terhal, B. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.307 · Cited by 1,354 · see citing works
Bernstein, E., & Vazirani, U. (1993) · Proceedings of the twenty-fifth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing - STOC '93 · doi:10.1145/167088.167097 · Cited by 1,284 · see citing works
Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J., Degroote, M., Johnson, P., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N., et al. (n.d.) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Self-citationParrish, R. M., Burns, L. A., Smith, D. G. A., Simmonett, A. C., DePrince, A. E., Hohenstein, E. G., Bozkaya, U., Sokolov, A. Y., Remigio, R. D., Richard, R. M., et al. (2017) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.7b00174 · Cited by 1,253 · see citing works
Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices
Boixo, S., Isakov, S. V., Smelyanskiy, V. N., Babbush, R., Ding, N., Jiang, Z., Bremner, M. J., Martinis, J. M., & Neven, H. (2018) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x · Cited by 1,175 · see citing works
Quantum Computation Over Continuous Variables
Lloyd, S., & Braunstein, S. L. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.82.1784 · Cited by 1,145 · see citing works
Equations-of-Motion Method and the Extended Shell Model
ROWE, D. J. (1968) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.40.153 · Cited by 1,139 · see citing works
14-Qubit Entanglement: Creation and Coherence
Monz, T., Schindler, P., Barreiro, J. T., Chwalla, M., Nigg, D., Coish, W. A., Harlander, M., Hänsel, W., Hennrich, M., & Blatt, R. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.130506 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
Evaluating analytic gradients on quantum hardware
Schuld, M., Bergholm, V., Gogolin, C., Izaac, J., & Killoran, N. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.032331 · Cited by 1,072 · see citing works
<i>Colloquium</i> : Theory of intertwined orders in high temperature superconductors
Fradkin, E., Kivelson, S. A., & Tranquada, J. M. (2015) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.87.457 · Cited by 1,070 · see citing works
On-chip quantum simulation with superconducting circuits
Houck, A. A., Türeci, H. E., & Koch, J. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2251 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Two-bit gates are universal for quantum computation
DiVincenzo, D. P. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.1015 · Cited by 1,069 · see citing works
Scalable Quantum Simulation of Molecular Energies
O’Malley, P. J. J., Babbush, R., Kivlichan, I. D., Romero, J., McClean, J. R., Barends, R., Kelly, J., Roushan, P., Tranter, A., Ding, N., et al. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031007 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
Self-citationBravyi, S. B., & Kitaev, A. Y. (2002) · Annals of Physics · doi:10.1006/aphy.2002.6254 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer
Grimsley, H. R., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
Quantum information processing with superconducting circuits: a review
Wendin, G. P. (2017) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/1361-6633/aa7e1a · Cited by 970 · see citing works
Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Walther, P. (2012) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/nphys2253 · Cited by 952 · see citing works
Self-citationAbout the Pauli exclusion principle
Jordán, P., & Wigner, E. P. (1928) · Cited by 951 · see citing works
Theory of fault-tolerant quantum computation
Gottesman, D. (1998) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.57.127 · Cited by 945 · see citing works
Suzuki, M. (1976) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/bf01609348 · Cited by 895 · see citing works
Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor
Kandala, A., Temme, K., Corcoles, A. D., Mezzacapo, A., Chow, J. M., & Gambetta, J. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1040-7 · Cited by 870 · see citing works
Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization
Low, G. H., & Chuang, I. L. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-07-12-163 · Cited by 854 · see citing works
VIII. The deferred approach to the limit
Richardson, L. F., & Gaunt, J. A. (1927) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A Containing Papers of a Mathematical or Physical Character · doi:10.1098/rsta.1927.0008 · Cited by 838 · see citing works
How to factor 2048 bit RSA integers in 8 hours using 20 million noisy qubits
Gidney, C., & Ekerå, M. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-04-15-433 · Cited by 830 · see citing works
Quantum computational supremacy
Harrow, A. W., & Montanaro, A. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23458 · Cited by 823 · see citing works
Quantum Algorithm Providing Exponential Speed Increase for Finding Eigenvalues and Eigenvectors
Abrams, D. S., & Lloyd, S. (1999) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.83.5162 · Cited by 817 · see citing works
Towards quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
Lanyon, B. P., Whitfield, J. D., Gillett, G. G., Goggin, M. E., Almeida, M. P., Kassal, I., Biamonte, J. D., Mohseni, M., Powell, B. J., Barbieri, M., et al. (2010) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.483 · Cited by 796 · see citing works
Self-citationScaling the Ion Trap Quantum Processor
Monroe, C., & Kim, J. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1231298 · Cited by 786 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Quantum Logic Gates Using Trapped-Ion Hyperfine Qubits
Ballance, C. J., Harty, T. P., Linke, N. M., Sepiol, M. A., & Lucas, D. M. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.060504 · Cited by 777 · see citing works
Quantum error correction for beginners
Devitt, S. J., Munro, W. J., & Nemoto, K. (2013) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/76/7/076001 · Cited by 775 · see citing works
Optimal Hamiltonian Simulation by Quantum Signal Processing
Low, G. H., & Chuang, I. L. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.118.010501 · Cited by 770 · see citing works
Simulation of Many-Body Fermi Systems on a Universal Quantum Computer
Abrams, D. S., & Lloyd, S. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2586 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers
Reiher, M., Wiebe, N., Svore, K. M., Wecker, D., & Troyer, M. (2017) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1619152114 · Cited by 745 · see citing works
Simulating Hamiltonian Dynamics with a Truncated Taylor Series
Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., Cleve, R., Kothari, R., & Somma, R. D. (2015) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.114.090502 · Cited by 742 · see citing works
Strategies for quantum computing molecular energies using the unitary coupled cluster ansatz
Romero, J., Babbush, R., McClean, J. R., Hempel, C., Love, P. J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2019) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/aad3e4 · Cited by 726 · see citing works
Self-citationProgress towards practical quantum variational algorithms
Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.042303 · Cited by 716 · see citing works
Hamiltonian Simulation by Qubitization
Low, G. H., & Chuang, I. L. (2019) · DSpace@MIT (Massachusetts Institute of Technology) · Cited by 714 · see citing works
Szalay, P. G., Müller, T., Gidofalvi, G., Lischka, H., & Shepard, R. L. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200137a · Cited by 713 · see citing works
Motta, M., Sun, C., Tan, A. T. K., O’Rourke, M. J., Ye, E., Minnich, A. J., Brandão, F. G. S. L., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2020) · Nature Physics · doi:10.1038/s41567-019-0704-4 · Cited by 709 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Wave Function-Based Methods of Molecular-Property Calculations
Helgaker, T. U., Coriani, S., Jørgensen, P., Kristensen, K., Olsen, J., & Ruud, K. (2012) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2002239 · Cited by 694 · see citing works
Efficient Quantum Algorithms for Simulating Sparse Hamiltonians
Berry, D. W., Ahokas, G., Cleve, R., & Sanders, B. C. (2007) · Communications in Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1007/s00220-006-0150-x · Cited by 692 · see citing works
Efficient Variational Quantum Simulator Incorporating Active Error Minimization
Li, Y., & Benjamin, S. C. (2017) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.7.021050 · Cited by 686 · see citing works
Self-citationRyan-Anderson, C. (2013) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9781139034807 · Cited by 656 · see citing works
The Complexity of the Local Hamiltonian Problem
Kempe, J., Kitaev, A., & Regev, O. (2006) · SIAM Journal on Computing · doi:10.1137/s0097539704445226 · Cited by 648 · see citing works
LeBlanc, J. P. F., Antipov, A. E., Becca, F., Bulik, I. W., Chan, G. K., Chung, C.-M., Deng, Y., Ferrero, M., Henderson, T. M., Jiménez-Hoyos, C. A., et al. (2015) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.5.041041 · Cited by 644 · see citing works
High-Fidelity Preparation, Gates, Memory, and Readout of a Trapped-Ion Quantum Bit
Harty, T. P., Allcock, D. T. C., Ballance, C. J., Guidoni, L., Janacek, H. A., Linke, N. M., Stacey, D. N., & Lucas, D. M. (2014) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.113.220501 · Cited by 632 · see citing works
Entanglement-free Heisenberg-limited phase estimation
Higgins, B. L., Berry, D. W., Bartlett, S. D., Wiseman, H. M., & Pryde, G. J. (2007) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06257 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Building logical qubits in a superconducting quantum computing system
Gambetta, J., Chow, J. M., & Steffen, M. (2017) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-016-0004-0 · Cited by 628 · see citing works
Quantum Chemistry Calculations on a Trapped-Ion Quantum Simulator
Hempel, C., Maier, C., Romero, J., McClean, J., Monz, T., Shen, H., Jurcevic, P., Lanyon, B. P., Love, P., Babbush, R., et al. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031022 · Cited by 597 · see citing works
Self-citationRoads towards fault-tolerant universal quantum computation
Campbell, E. T., Terhal, B. M., & Vuillot, C. (2017) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature23460 · Cited by 596 · see citing works
Maintaining coherence in quantum computers
Unruh, W. G. (1995) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.51.992 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
Self-verifying variational quantum simulation of lattice models
Kokail, C., Maier, C., van Bijnen, R., Brydges, T., Joshi, M. K., Jurcevic, P., Muschik, C. A., Silvi, P., Blatt, R., Roos, C. F., et al. (2019) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-019-1177-4 · Cited by 594 · see citing works
The Bravyi-Kitaev transformation for quantum computation of electronic structure
Seeley, J. T., Richard, M. J., & Love, P. J. (2012) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4768229 · Cited by 585 · see citing works
Practical Quantum Error Mitigation for Near-Future Applications
Endo, S., Benjamin, S. C., & Li, Y. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.031027 · Cited by 562 · see citing works
Self-citationMultireference Nature of Chemistry: The Coupled-Cluster View
Lyakh, D. I., Musiał, M., Lotrich, V. F., & Bartlett, R. J. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2001417 · Cited by 558 · see citing works
Variational ansatz-based quantum simulation of imaginary time evolution
McArdle, S., Jones, T., Endo, S., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0187-2 · Cited by 557 · see citing works
Self-citationToward the first quantum simulation with quantum speedup
Childs, A. M., Maslov, D., Nam, Y., Ross, N. J., & Su, Y. (2018) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.1801723115 · Cited by 551 · see citing works
Experimental Ten-Photon Entanglement
Wang, X., Chen, L.-K., Li, W.-Y., Huang, H.-L., Liu, C., Chen, C., Luo, Y.-H., Su, Z.-E., Wu, D., Li, Z.-D., et al. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.210502 · Cited by 548 · see citing works
(2016) · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.060505 · Cited by 540 · see citing works
Quantum Computation by Adiabatic Evolution
Farhi, E., Goldstone, J., Gutmann, S., & Sipser, M. (2000) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.quant-ph/0001106 · Cited by 536 · see citing works
Explicitly Correlated Electrons in Molecules
Hättig, C., Klopper, W., Köhn, A., & Tew, D. P. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr200168z · Cited by 534 · see citing works
OpenFermion: the electronic structure package for quantum computers
McClean, J. R., Rubin, N. C., Sung, K. J., Kivlichan, I., Bonet-Monroig, X., Cao, Y., Dai, C., Fried, E., Gidney, C., Gimby, B., et al. (2020) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ab8ebc · Cited by 525 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid quantum-classical hierarchy for mitigation of decoherence and determination of excited states
McClean, J. R., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., Carter, J., & de Jong, W. A. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.042308 · Cited by 516 · see citing works
Quantum Manipulations of Small Josephson Junctions
Shnirman, A., Schön, G., & Hermon, Z. (1997) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.79.2371 · Cited by 482 · see citing works
Simulation of electronic structure Hamiltonians using quantum computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268976.2011.552441 · Cited by 472 · see citing works
Self-citationMultireference Approaches for Excited States of Molecules
Lischka, H., Nachtigallová, D., Aquino, A. J. A., Szalay, P. G., Plasser, F., Machado, F. B. C., & Barbatti, M. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00244 · Cited by 467 · see citing works
Variational Quantum Computation of Excited States
Higgott, O., Wang, D., & Brierley, S. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-07-01-156 · Cited by 463 · see citing works
Computation of Molecular Spectra on a Quantum Processor with an Error-Resilient Algorithm
Colless, J. I., Ramasesh, V. V., Dahlen, D., Blok, M. S., Kimchi-Schwartz, M. E., McClean, J. R., Carter, J., de Jong, W. A., & Siddiqi, I. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011021 · Cited by 460 · see citing works
10-Qubit Entanglement and Parallel Logic Operations with a Superconducting Circuit
Song, C., Xu, K., Liu, W., Yang, C., Zheng, S., Deng, H., Xie, Q., Huang, K., Guo, Q., Zhang, L., et al. (2017) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.119.180511 · Cited by 449 · see citing works
Generalized Unitary Coupled Cluster Wave functions for Quantum Computation
Lee, J., Huggins, W. J., Head-Gordon, M., & Whaley, K. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01004 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation of Electronic Structure with Linear Depth and Connectivity
Kivlichan, I. D., McClean, J., Wiebe, N., Gidney, C., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Chan, G. K.-L., & Babbush, R. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.120.110501 · Cited by 431 · see citing works
Self-citationComputational Approach to Molecular Catalysis by 3d Transition Metals: Challenges and Opportunities
Vogiatzis, K. D., Polynski, M. V., Kirkland, J. K., Townsend, J., Hashemi, A., Liu, C., & Pidko, E. A. (2018) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.8b00361 · Cited by 428 · see citing works
Zhong, H.-S., Li, Y., Li, W., Peng, L.-C., Su, Z.-E., Hu, Y., He, Y., Ding, X., Zhang, W., Li, H., et al. (2018) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.121.250505 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
A Game of Surface Codes: Large-Scale Quantum Computing with Lattice Surgery
Litinski, D. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-03-05-128 · Cited by 408 · see citing works
Tang, H. L., Shkolnikov, V. O., Barron, G. S., Grimsley, H. R., Mayhall, N. J., Barnes, E., & Economou, S. E. (2019) · arXiv · doi:10.48550/arxiv.1911.10205 · Cited by 408
Generation of multicomponent atomic Schrödinger cat states of up to 20 qubits
Song, C., Xu, K., Li, H., Zhang, Y.-R., Zhang, X., Liu, W., Guo, Q., Wang, Z., Ren, W., Hao, J., et al. (2019) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.aay0600 · Cited by 402 · see citing works
Toward True DNA Base-Stacking Energies: MP2, CCSD(T), and Complete Basis Set Calculations
Hobza, P., & Šponer, J. (2002) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja026759n · Cited by 399 · see citing works
Adiabatic Quantum Computation Is Equivalent to Standard Quantum Computation
Aharonov, D., van Dam, W., Kempe, J., Landau, Z., Lloyd, S., & Regev, O. (2008) · SIAM Review · doi:10.1137/080734479 · Cited by 395 · see citing works
Simulating quantum systems on a quantum computer
Zalka, C. (1998) · Proceedings of the Royal Society A Mathematical Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0162 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Polynomial-time quantum algorithm for the simulation of chemical dynamics
Kassal, I., Jordan, S. P., Love, P. J., Mohseni, M., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0808245105 · Cited by 385 · see citing works
Self-citationEncoding Electronic Spectra in Quantum Circuits with Linear T Complexity
Babbush, R., Gidney, C., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., McClean, J., Paler, A., Fowler, A., & Neven, H. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.041015 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Hamiltonian Simulation with Nearly Optimal Dependence on all Parameters
Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., & Kothari, R. (2015) · 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science · doi:10.1109/focs.2015.54 · Cited by 372 · see citing works
Finding low-energy conformations of lattice protein models by quantum annealing
Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Dickson, N., Drew-Brook, M., Rose, G., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2012) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep00571 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Self-citationThe ab-initio density matrix renormalization group in practice
Olivares‐Amaya, R., Hu, W., Nakatani, N., Sharma, S., Yang, J., & Chan, G. K. (2015) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4905329 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Simulating physical phenomena by quantum networks
Somma, R. D., Ortíz, G., Gubernatis, J. E., Knill, E. H., & Laflamme, R. (2002) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.65.042323 · Cited by 364 · see citing works
Barkoutsos, P. K., Gonthier, J. F., Sokolov, I., Moll, N., Salis, G., Fuhrer, A., Ganzhorn, M., Egger, D. J., Troyer, M., Mezzacapo, A., et al. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.022322 · Cited by 363 · see citing works
Potential of quantum computing for drug discovery
Cao, Y., Romero, J., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2018) · IBM Journal of Research and Development · doi:10.1147/jrd.2018.2888987 · Cited by 357 · see citing works
Self-citationSchütz, M. (2000) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1323265 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Experimental quantum simulations of many-body physics with trapped ions
Schneider, C., Porras, D., & Schaetz, T. (2012) · Reports on Progress in Physics · doi:10.1088/0034-4885/75/2/024401 · Cited by 354 · see citing works
Simulating Chemistry Using Quantum Computers
Kassal, I., Whitfield, J. D., Perdomo-Ortiz, A., Yung, M.-H., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2011) · Annual Review of Physical Chemistry · doi:10.1146/annurev-physchem-032210-103512 · Cited by 352 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum algorithms for fermionic simulations
Ortiz, G., Gubernatis, J. E., Knill, E., & Laflamme, R. (2001) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.64.022319 · Cited by 347 · see citing works
Random Compiler for Fast Hamiltonian Simulation
Campbell, E. T. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.123.070503 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Ground-state energy estimation of the water molecule on a trapped-ion quantum computer
Nam, Y., Chen, J.-S., Pisenti, N. C., Wright, K., Delaney, C. P., Maslov, D., Brown, K. R., Allen, S., Amini, J., Apisdorf, J., et al. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0259-3 · Cited by 346 · see citing works
Surface code quantum computing with error rates over 1%
Wang, D. S., Fowler, A. G., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2011) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.83.020302 · Cited by 345 · see citing works
Boson sampling for molecular vibronic spectra
Huh, J., Guerreschi, G. G., Peropadre, B., McClean, J. R., & Aspuru-Guzik, A. (2015) · Nature Photonics · doi:10.1038/nphoton.2015.153 · Cited by 341 · see citing works
Self-citationAn initialization strategy for addressing barren plateaus in parametrized quantum circuits
Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Ostaszewski, M., & Benedetti, M. (2019) · UCL Discovery (University College London) · Cited by 338 · see citing works
Subspace-search variational quantum eigensolver for excited states
Nakanishi, K. M., Mitarai, K., & Fujii, K. (2019) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.1.033062 · Cited by 337 · see citing works
Local perturbative triples correction (T) with linear cost scaling
Schütz, M., & Werner, H. (2000) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(00)00066-x · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Low-Depth Quantum Simulation of Materials
Babbush, R., Wiebe, N., McClean, J., McClain, J., Neven, H., & Chan, G. K.-L. (2018) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.8.011044 · Cited by 335 · see citing works
Exponential improvement in precision for simulating sparse Hamiltonians
Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., Cleve, R., Kothari, R., & Somma, R. D. (2014) · Proceedings of the forty-sixth annual ACM symposium on Theory of computing · doi:10.1145/2591796.2591854 · Cited by 324 · see citing works
A deterministic alternative to the full configuration interaction quantum Monte Carlo method
Tubman, N. M., Lee, J., Takeshita, T. Y., Head-Gordon, M., & Whaley, K. B. (2016) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4955109 · Cited by 323 · see citing works
Alternative coupled-cluster ansätze II. The unitary coupled-cluster method
Bartlett, R. J., Kucharski, S. A., & Noga, J. (1989) · Chemical Physics Letters · doi:10.1016/s0009-2614(89)87372-5 · Cited by 316 · see citing works
Quantum Monte Carlo and Related Approaches
Austin, B. M., Zubarev, D. Y., & Lester, W. A. (2011) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr2001564 · Cited by 315 · see citing works
Tensor product methods and entanglement optimization for<i>ab initio</i>quantum chemistry
Szalay, S., Pfeffer, M., Murg, V., Barcza, G., Verstraete, F., Schneider, R., & Legeza, Ö. (2015) · International Journal of Quantum Chemistry · doi:10.1002/qua.24898 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Low-energy spectrum of iron–sulfur clusters directly from many-particle quantum mechanics
Sharma, S., Sivalingam, K., Neese, F., & Chan, G. K. (2014) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.2041 · Cited by 314 · see citing works
Universal quantum gate set approaching fault-tolerant thresholds with superconducting qubits.
Chow, J., Gambetta, J., Córcoles, A., Merkel, S., Smolin, J., Rigetti, C. T., Poletto, S., Keefe, G., Rothwell, M., Rozen, J., et al. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.109.060501 · Cited by 299 · see citing works
Gate-count estimates for performing quantum chemistry on small quantum computers
Wecker, D., Bauer, B., Clark, B. K., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2014) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.90.022305 · Cited by 296 · see citing works
Quantum implementation of the unitary coupled cluster for simulating molecular electronic structure
Shen, Y., Zhang, X., Zhang, S., Zhang, J.-N., Yung, M., & Kim, K. (2017) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.95.020501 · Cited by 288 · see citing works
Qubit Coupled Cluster Method: A Systematic Approach to Quantum Chemistry on a Quantum Computer
Ryabinkin, I. G., Yen, T.-C., Genin, S. N., & Izmaylov, A. F. (2018) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b00932 · Cited by 287 · see citing works
Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer
Wecker, D., Hastings, M. B., Wiebe, N., Clark, B. K., Nayak, C., & Troyer, M. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.92.062318 · Cited by 285 · see citing works
Quantum Computation of Electronic Transitions Using a Variational Quantum Eigensolver
Parrish, R. M., Hohenstein, E. G., McMahon, P. L., & Martínez, T. J. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.230401 · Cited by 282 · see citing works
Learning the quantum algorithm for state overlap
Cincio, L., Subaşı, Y., Sornborger, A. T., & Coles, P. J. (2018) · New Journal of Physics · doi:10.1088/1367-2630/aae94a · Cited by 282 · see citing works
An efficient local coupled cluster method for accurate thermochemistry of large systems
Werner, H., & Schütz, M. (2011) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3641642 · Cited by 280 · see citing works
NMR Implementation of a Molecular Hydrogen Quantum Simulation with Adiabatic State Preparation
Du, J., Xu, N., Peng, X., Wang, P., Wu, S., & Lu, D. (2010) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.104.030502 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Measurement optimization in the variational quantum eigensolver using a minimum clique cover
Verteletskyi, V., Yen, T.-C., & Izmaylov, A. F. (2020) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.5141458 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation of Time-Dependent Hamiltonians and the Convenient Illusion of Hilbert Space
Poulin, D., Qarry, A., Somma, R., & Verstraete, F. (2011) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.106.170501 · Cited by 265 · see citing works
Entangled quantum electronic wavefunctions of the Mn4CaO5 cluster in photosystem II
Kurashige, Y., Chan, G. K., & Yanai, T. (2013) · Nature Chemistry · doi:10.1038/nchem.1677 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Variational quantum algorithms for discovering Hamiltonian spectra
Jones, T., Endo, S., McArdle, S., Yuan, X., & Benjamin, S. C. (2019) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.99.062304 · Cited by 256 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Quantum-Classical Approach to Correlated Materials
Bauer, B., Wecker, D., Millis, A. J., Hastings, M. B., & Troyer, M. (2016) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.6.031045 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
A game of surface codes: Large-scale quantum computing with lattice surgery
Litinski, D. (2019) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-4067 · Cited by 254 · see citing works
Low-cost error mitigation by symmetry verification
Bonet-Monroig, X., Sagastizabal, R., Singh, M., & O'Brien, T. E. (2018) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.98.062339 · Cited by 250 · see citing works
Brun, T. A. (2020) · doi:10.1093/acrefore/9780190871994.013.35 · Cited by 246 · see citing works
Accelerated Variational Quantum Eigensolver
Wang, D., Higgott, O., & Brierley, S. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.140504 · Cited by 241 · see citing works
Error-Mitigated Digital Quantum Simulation
McArdle, S., Yuan, X., & Benjamin, S. C. (2019) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.122.180501 · Cited by 238 · see citing works
Self-citationVariational Quantum Simulation of General Processes
Endo, S., Sun, J., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.010501 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationSimulating the vibrational quantum dynamics of molecules using photonics
Sparrow, C., Martín-López, E., Maraviglia, N., Neville, A., Harrold, C., Carolan, J., Joglekar, Y. N., Hashimoto, T., Matsuda, N., O’Brien, J. L., et al. (2018) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-018-0152-9 · Cited by 230 · see citing works
Qubitization of Arbitrary Basis Quantum Chemistry Leveraging Sparsity and Low Rank Factorization
Berry, D. W., Gidney, C., Motta, M., McClean, J. R., & Babbush, R. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-12-02-208 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
From transistor to trapped-ion computers for quantum chemistry
Yung, M.-H., Casanova, J., Mezzacapo, A., McClean, J., Lamata, L., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Solano, E. (2014) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/srep03589 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Self-citationSequential minimal optimization for quantum-classical hybrid algorithms
Nakanishi, K. M., Fujii, K., & Todo, S. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.043158 · Cited by 221 · see citing works
Magic State Distillation: Not as Costly as You Think
Litinski, D. (2019) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2019-12-02-205 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Structure optimization for parameterized quantum circuits
Ostaszewski, M., Grant, E., & Benedetti, M. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-01-28-391 · Cited by 220 · see citing works
Simulation of Electronic Structure Hamiltonians Using Quantum Computers
Whitfield, J. D., Biamonte, J., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2011) · Digital Access to Scholarship at Harvard (DASH) (Harvard University) · Cited by 218 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum chemistry as a benchmark for near-term quantum computers
McCaskey, A., Parks, Z. P., Jakowski, J., Moore, S., Morris, T., Humble, T. S., & Pooser, R. C. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0209-0 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Witnessing eigenstates for quantum simulation of Hamiltonian spectra
Santagati, R., Wang, J., Gentile, A. A., Paesani, S., Wiebe, N., McClean, J. R., Morley-Short, S., Shadbolt, P. J., Bonneau, D., Silverstone, J. W., et al. (2018) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aap9646 · Cited by 211 · see citing works
Towards Practical Classical Processing for the Surface Code
Fowler, A. G., Whiteside, A. C., & Hollenberg, L. C. L. (2012) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.108.180501 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Stochastic gradient descent for hybrid quantum-classical optimization
Sweke, R., Sweke, R., Meyer, J. J., Meyer, J. J., Faehrmann, P. K., Meynard-Piganeau, B., & Eisert, J. (2020) · Refubium (Universitätsbibliothek der Freien Universität Berlin) · doi:10.17169/refubium-28427 · Cited by 203 · see citing works
Resource-efficient quantum algorithm for protein folding
Robert, A., Barkoutsos, P. K., Woerner, S., & Tavernelli, I. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00368-4 · Cited by 201 · see citing works
Chemical basis of Trotter-Suzuki errors in quantum chemistry simulation
Babbush, R., McClean, J., Wecker, D., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Wiebe, N. (2015) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.91.022311 · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Self-citationMapping local Hamiltonians of fermions to local Hamiltonians of spins
Verstraete, F., & Cirac, J. I. (2005) · Journal of Statistical Mechanics: Theory and Experiment · doi:10.1088/1742-5468/2005/09/p09012 · Cited by 196 · see citing works
A unitary multiconfigurational coupled-cluster method: Theory and applications
Hoffmann, M. R., & Simons, J. (1988) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.454125 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Efficient Bayesian Phase Estimation
Wiebe, N., & Granade, C. (2016) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.117.010503 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
Optimal quantum measurements of expectation values of observables
Knill, E. H., Ortíz, G., & Somma, R. D. (2007) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.75.012328 · Cited by 192 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Research works printed but not linked: 12
- Berry, D. W., 2014, Proceedings of the Forty-Sixth Annual ACM Symposium on Theory of Computing (STOC ’14)
- Berry, D. W., 2015, Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE 56th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), Berkeley, CA
- 10.5555/2481569.2481570 · DOI
- Coppersmith, D., 1994, IBM
- 10.5555/2685188.2685189 · DOI
- Malik, M. R., 2012, NASA
- 10.1103/physrevresearch.1.013129 · DOI
- 10.5555/2871401.2871402 · DOI
- Shor, P. W., 1994, Proceedings of the 35th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Sante Fe
- Shor, P. W., 1996, Proceedings of the 37th Annual Symposium on Foundations of Computer Science, Burlington, VT
- 10.5555/2600508.2600515 · DOI
- Yamada, S., 2005, Proceedings of the 2005 ACM/IEEE Conference on Supercomputing (SC ’05), Seattle
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Variational quantum algorithms
Cerezo, M., Arrasmith, A., Babbush, R., Benjamin, S. C., Endo, S., Fujii, K., McClean, J. R., Mitarai, K., Yuan, X., Cincio, L., et al. (2021) · Nature Reviews Physics · doi:10.1038/s42254-021-00348-9 · Cited by 3,385 · see citing works
Self-citationNoisy intermediate-scale quantum algorithms
Bharti, K., Cervera-Lierta, A., Kyaw, T. H., Haug, T., Alperin-Lea, S., Anand, A., Degroote, M., Heimonen, H., Kottmann, J. S., Menke, T., et al. (2022) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.94.015004 · Cited by 1,726 · see citing works
Self-citationQuantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing
Cao, Y., Romero, J., Olson, J., Degroote, M., Johnson, P., Kieferová, M., Kivlichan, I., Menke, T., Peropadre, B., Sawaya, N., et al. (n.d.) · OPUS - Open Publications of UTS Scholars (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 1,265 · see citing works
Self-citationStrong Quantum Computational Advantage Using a Superconducting Quantum Processor
Wu, Y., Bao, W.-S., Cao, S., Chen, F., Chen, M.-C., Chen, X., Chung, T.-H., Deng, H., Du, Y., Fan, D., et al. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.127.180501 · Cited by 1,059 · see citing works
An adaptive variational algorithm for exact molecular simulations on a quantum computer
Grimsley, H. R., Economou, S. E., Barnes, E., & Mayhall, N. J. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10988-2 · Cited by 1,033 · see citing works
The Variational Quantum Eigensolver: A review of methods and best practices
Tilly, J., Chen, H., Cao, S., Picozzi, D., Setia, K., Li, Y., Grant, E., Wossnig, L., Rungger, I., Booth, G. H., et al. (2022) · Physics Reports · doi:10.1016/j.physrep.2022.08.003 · Cited by 1,031 · see citing works
Noise-induced barren plateaus in variational quantum algorithms
Wang, S., Fontana, E., Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Sone, A., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2021) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-021-27045-6 · Cited by 773 · see citing works
Feng, Q., Zhong, S., Pei, J., Zhao, Y. H., Zhang, D.-L., Liu, D., Zhang, Y., & Dang, Z. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00793 · Cited by 753 · see citing works
Materials challenges and opportunities for quantum computing hardware
de Leon, N. P., Itoh, K. M., Kim, D., Mehta, K. K., Northup, T. E., Paik, H., Palmer, B. S., Samarth, N., Sangtawesin, S., & Steuerman, D. W. (2021) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.abb2823 · Cited by 710 · see citing works
Quantum Simulators: Architectures and Opportunities
Altman, E., Brown, K. R., Carleo, G., Carr, L. D., Demler, E., Chin, C., DeMarco, B., Economou, S. E., Eriksson, M. A., Fu, K. C., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.017003 · Cited by 588 · see citing works
Hybrid Quantum-Classical Algorithms and Quantum Error Mitigation
Endo, S., Cai, Z., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021) · Journal of the Physical Society of Japan · doi:10.7566/jpsj.90.032001 · Cited by 566 · see citing works
Self-citationTheory of Trotter Error with Commutator Scaling
Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Tran, M. C., Wiebe, N., & Zhu, S. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.011020 · Cited by 545 · see citing works
Quantum logic with spin qubits crossing the surface code threshold
Xue, X., Russ, M., Samkharadze, N., Undseth, B., Sammak, A., Scappucci, G., & Vandersypen, L. M. K. (2022) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-021-04273-w · Cited by 524 · see citing works
Generalized Unitary Coupled Cluster Wave functions for Quantum Computation
Lee, J., Huggins, W. J., Head-Gordon, M., & Whaley, K. B. (2019) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01004 · Cited by 432 · see citing works
Computational molecular spectroscopy
Barone, V., Alessandrini, S., Biczysko, M., Cheeseman, J. R., Clary, D. C., McCoy, A. B., DiRisio, R. J., Neese, F., Melosso, M., & Puzzarini, C. (2021) · Nature Reviews Methods Primers · doi:10.1038/s43586-021-00034-1 · Cited by 437 · see citing works
Compact Ion-Trap Quantum Computing Demonstrator
Pogorelov, I., Feldker, T., Marciniak, C. D., Postler, L., Jacob, G., Krieglsteiner, O., Podlesnic, V., Meth, M., Negnevitsky, V., Stadler, M., et al. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.020343 · Cited by 387 · see citing works
Quantum Simulation for High-Energy Physics
Bauer, C., Davoudi, Z., Balantekin, A. B., Tanmoy Bhattacharya, A., Carena, M. S., de Jong, W. A., Draper, P., El-Khadra, A. X., Gemelke, N., Hanada, M., et al. (2023) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.4.027001 · Cited by 356 · see citing works
Even More Efficient Quantum Computations of Chemistry Through Tensor Hypercontraction
Lee, J., Berry, D. W., Gidney, C., Huggins, W. J., McClean, J. R., Wiebe, N., & Babbush, R. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030305 · Cited by 304 · see citing works
Quantum computational advantage via 60-qubit 24-cycle random circuit sampling
Zhu, Q., Cao, S., Chen, F., Chen, M.-C., Chen, X., Chung, T.-H., Deng, H., Du, Y., Fan, D., Gong, M., et al. (2022) · Science Bulletin · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.10.017 · Cited by 263 · see citing works
Quantum computing enhanced computational catalysis
von Burg, V., Low, G. H., Häner, T., Steiger, D. S., Reiher, M., Roetteler, M., & Troyer, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033055 · Cited by 259 · see citing works
Systematic literature review: Quantum machine learning and its applications
García, D. P., Cruz-Benito, J., & García‐Peñalvo, F. J. (2024) · Computer Science Review · doi:10.1016/j.cosrev.2024.100619 · Cited by 328 · see citing works
Polymer dielectrics for high-temperature energy storage: Constructing carrier traps
Zha, J., Xiao, M., Wan, B., Wang, X., Dang, Z., & Chen, G. (2023) · Progress in Materials Science · doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2023.101208 · Cited by 247 · see citing works
Learning-Based Quantum Error Mitigation
Strikis, A., Qin, D., Chen, Y., Benjamin, S. C., & Li, Y. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040330 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationVariational Quantum Simulation of General Processes
Endo, S., Sun, J., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2020) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.125.010501 · Cited by 237 · see citing works
Self-citationBosonic quantum error correction codes in superconducting quantum circuits
Cai, W., Ma, Y., Wang, W., Zou, C.-L., & Sun, L. (2021) · Fundamental Research · doi:10.1016/j.fmre.2020.12.006 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
VQE method: a short survey and recent developments
Fedorov, D. A., Peng, B., Govind, N., & Alexeev, Y. (2022) · Materials Theory · doi:10.1186/s41313-021-00032-6 · Cited by 224 · see citing works
A quantum computing view on unitary coupled cluster theory
Anand, A., Schleich, P., Alperin-Lea, S., Jensen, P. W. K., Sim, S., Díaz‐Tinoco, M., Kottmann, J. S., Degroote, M., Izmaylov, A. F., & Aspuru‐Guzik, A. (2022) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/d1cs00932j · Cited by 224 · see citing works
Self-citationThe prospects of quantum computing in computational molecular biology
Outeiral, C., Strahm, M., Shi, J., Morris, G. M., Benjamin, S. C., & Deane, C. M. (2021) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1481 · Cited by 232 · see citing works
Self-citationLaser-annealing Josephson junctions for yielding scaled-up superconducting quantum processors
Hertzberg, J. B., Zhang, E. J., Rosenblatt, S., Magesan, E., Smolin, J. A., Yau, J.-B., Adiga, V. P., Sandberg, M., Brink, M., Chow, J. M., et al. (2021) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-021-00464-5 · Cited by 216 · see citing works
Solving nonlinear differential equations with differentiable quantum circuits
Kyriienko, O., Paine, A. E., & Elfving, V. E. (2021) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.103.052416 · Cited by 185 · see citing works
Quantum circuit architecture search for variational quantum algorithms
Du, Y., Huang, T., You, S., Hsieh, M.-H., & Tao, D. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00570-y · Cited by 199 · see citing works
Scaling and networking a modular photonic quantum computer
Rad, H. A., Ainsworth, T., Alexander, R. N., Altieri, B., Askarani, M. F., Baby, R., Banchi, L., Baragiola, B. Q., Bourassa, J. E., Chadwick, R. S., et al. (2025) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-024-08406-9 · Cited by 193 · see citing works
A Multireference Quantum Krylov Algorithm for Strongly Correlated Electrons
Stair, N. H., Huang, R., & Evangelista, F. A. (2020) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/acs.jctc.9b01125 · Cited by 183 · see citing works
Artificial Intelligence for Materials Discovery, Development, and Optimization
Madika, B., Saha, A., Kang, C., Buyantogtokh, B., Agar, J., Wolverton, C. M., Voorhees, P. W., Littlewood, P. B., Kalinin, S. V., & Hong, S. (2025) · ACS Nano · doi:10.1021/acsnano.5c04200 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Efficient quantum measurement of Pauli operators in the presence of finite sampling error
Crawford, O., Straaten, B. V., Wang, D., Parks, T., Campbell, E., & Brierley, S. (2021) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2021-01-20-385 · Cited by 188 · see citing works
Hardware-efficient variational quantum algorithms for time evolution
Benedetti, M., Fiorentini, M., & Lubasch, M. (2021) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.3.033083 · Cited by 174 · see citing works
Heisenberg-Limited Ground-State Energy Estimation for Early Fault-Tolerant Quantum Computers
Lin, L., & Tong, Y. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010318 · Cited by 176 · see citing works
Variational algorithms for linear algebra
Xu, X., Sun, J., Endo, S., Li, Y., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X. (2021) · 中国科学通报:英文版 · doi:10.1016/j.scib.2021.06.023 · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Self-citationSawaya, N. P. D., Menke, T., Kyaw, T. H., Johri, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., & Guerreschi, G. G. (2020) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-020-0278-0 · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationDifferentiable quantum architecture search
Zhang, S., Hsieh, C., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2022) · Quantum Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2058-9565/ac87cd · Cited by 170 · see citing works
Fundamental limits of quantum error mitigation
Takagi, R., Endo, S., Minagawa, S., & Gu, M. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00618-z · Cited by 163 · see citing works
Self-citationDoubling the Size of Quantum Simulators by Entanglement Forging
Eddins, A., Motta, M., Gujarati, T. P., Bravyi, S. B., Mezzacapo, A., Hadfield, C. F., & Sheldon, S. (2022) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.3.010309 · Cited by 160 · see citing works
Application-Oriented Performance Benchmarks for Quantum Computing
Lubinski, T., Johri, S., Varosy, P., Coleman, J., Zhao, L., Necaise, J., Baldwin, C. H., Mayer, K., & Proctor, T. J. (2023) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2023.3253761 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Machine learning in the quantum realm: The state-of-the-art, challenges, and future vision
Houssein, E. H., Abohashima, Z., Elhoseny, M., & Mohamed, W. M. (2022) · Expert Systems with Applications · doi:10.1016/j.eswa.2022.116512 · Cited by 157 · see citing works
Exponential Error Suppression for Near-Term Quantum Devices
Koczor, B. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.031057 · Cited by 147 · see citing works
Ajagekar, A., & You, F. (2022) · Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.rser.2022.112493 · Cited by 155 · see citing works
An Adaptive Optimizer for Measurement-Frugal Variational Algorithms
Kübler, J. M., Arrasmith, A., Cincio, L., & Coles, P. J. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-05-11-263 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Hybrid quantum-classical algorithms in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum era and beyond
Callison, A., & Chancellor, N. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.106.010101 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
Variational quantum state eigensolver
Cerezo, M., Sharma, K., Arrasmith, A., & Coles, P. J. (2022) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-022-00611-6 · Cited by 154 · see citing works
Chen, S., Yu, W., Zeng, P., & Flammia, S. T. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030348 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Biomolecular QM/MM Simulations: What Are Some of the “Burning Issues”?
Cui, Q., Pal, T., & Xie, L. (2021) · The Journal of Physical Chemistry B · doi:10.1021/acs.jpcb.0c09898 · Cited by 134 · see citing works
Drug design on quantum computers
(2024) · doi:10.1038/s41567-024-02411-5 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Self-citationBenchmarking Quantum Computers and the Impact of Quantum Noise
Resch, S., & Karpuzcu, U. R. (2021) · ACM Computing Surveys · doi:10.1145/3464420 · Cited by 137 · see citing works
Hardware Efficient Quantum Simulation of Non-Abelian Gauge Theories with Qudits on Rydberg Platforms
González-Cuadra, D., Zache, T. V., Carrasco, J. A., Kraus, B., & Zoller, P. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.129.160501 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations
Yao, Y.-X., Gomes, N., Zhang, F., Wang, C.-Z., Ho, K.-M., Iadecola, T., & Orth, P. P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030307 · Cited by 139 · see citing works
Quantum Information and Algorithms for Correlated Quantum Matter
Head-Marsden, K., Flick, J., Ciccarino, C. J., & Narang, P. (2020) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.0c00620 · Cited by 128 · see citing works
TensorCircuit: a Quantum Software Framework for the NISQ Era
Zhang, S., Allcock, J., Wan, Z., Liu, S., Sun, J., Yu, H., Yang, X.-H., Qiu, J., Ye, Z., Chen, Y., et al. (2023) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2023-02-02-912 · Cited by 129 · see citing works
Quantum Computing and Simulations for Energy Applications: Review and Perspective
Paudel, H. P., Syamlal, M., Crawford, S. E., Lee, Y., Shugayev, R., Lu, P., Ohodnicki, P. R., Mollot, D., & Duan, Y. (2022) · ACS Engineering Au · doi:10.1021/acsengineeringau.1c00033 · Cited by 132 · see citing works
Fault-tolerant quantum simulations of chemistry in first quantization
Su, Y., Berry, D. W., Wiebe, N., Rubin, N., & Babbush, R. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040332 · Cited by 123 · see citing works
Quantum Computing 40 Years Later
Preskill, J. P. (2023) · CRC Press eBooks · doi:10.1201/9781003358817-7 · Cited by 130 · see citing works
Quantum Generative Models for Small Molecule Drug Discovery
Li, J., Topaloglu, R. O., & Ghosh, S. (2021) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2021.3104804 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Chemistry beyond the scale of exact diagonalization on a quantum-centric supercomputer
Moreno, J. R., Motta, M., Haas, H., Javadi-Abhari, A., Jurcevic, P., Kirby, W., Martiel, S., Sharma, K., Sharma, S., Shirakawa, T., et al. (2025) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.adu9991 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Measurements as a roadblock to near-term practical quantum advantage in chemistry: resource analysis
Gonthier, J. F., Radin, M. D., Buda, C., Doskocil, E. J., Abuan, C. M., & Romero, J. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.033154 · Cited by 120 · see citing works
Smart, S. E., & Mazziotti, D. A. (2021) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.126.070504 · Cited by 117 · see citing works
Quantum Software Engineering: Landscapes and HorizonsPreprint
Zhao, J. (2020) · arXiv (Cornell University) · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2007.07047 · Cited by 200 · see citing works
Time-dependent Hamiltonian simulation with L 1 -norm scaling
Berry, D. W., Childs, A. M., Su, Y., Wang, X., & Wiebe, N. (2020) · Quantum · doi:10.22331/q-2020-04-20-254 · Cited by 109 · see citing works
Efficient Measure for the Expressivity of Variational Quantum Algorithms
Du, Y., Tu, Z., Yuan, X., & Tao, D. (2022) · Physical Review Letters · doi:10.1103/physrevlett.128.080506 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Self-citationHybrid Quantum Neural Network for Drug Response Prediction
Sagingalieva, A., Kordzanganeh, M., Kenbaev, N. R., Kosichkina, D., Tomashuk, T., & Melnikov, A. A. (2023) · Cancers · doi:10.3390/cancers15102705 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Error-mitigated quantum gates exceeding physical fidelities in a trapped-ion system
Zhang, S., Lu, Y., Zhang, K., Chen, W., Li, Y., Zhang, J.-N., & Kim, K. (2020) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-020-14376-z · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Quantum Krylov subspace algorithms for ground- and excited-state energy estimation
Cortes, C. L., & Gray, S. K. (2022) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.105.022417 · Cited by 110 · see citing works
Efficient quantum circuits for quantum computational chemistry
Yordanov, Y. S., Arvidsson-Shukur, D. R. M., & Barnes, C. H. W. (2020) · Physical Review A · doi:10.1103/physreva.102.062612 · Cited by 105 · see citing works
Quantum Power Method by a Superposition of Time-Evolved States
Seki, K., & Yunoki, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010333 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Classical Optimizers for Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum Devices
Lavrijsen, W., Tudor, A., Müller, J., Iancu, C., & de Jong, W. A. (2020) · IEEE International Conference on Quantum Computing and Engineering (QCE) · doi:10.1109/qce49297.2020.00041 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
$O(N^3)$ Measurement Cost for Variational Quantum Eigensolver on Molecular Hamiltonians
Gokhale, P., Angiuli, O., Ding, Y., Gui, K., Tomesh, T., Suchara, M., Martonosi, M., & Chong, F. T. (2020) · IEEE Transactions on Quantum Engineering · doi:10.1109/tqe.2020.3035814 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Adaptive Variational Quantum Dynamics Simulations
Yao, Y., Gomes, N., Zhang, F., Wang, C., Ho, K., Iadecola, T., & Orth, P. P. (2021) · Iowa State University Digital Repository (Iowa State University) · Cited by 104 · see citing works
Calculating energy derivatives for quantum chemistry on a quantum computer
O’Brien, T. E., Senjean, B., Sagastizabal, R., Bonet-Monroig, X., Dutkiewicz, A., Buda, F., DiCarlo, L., & Visscher, L. (2019) · npj Quantum Information · doi:10.1038/s41534-019-0213-4 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Many-Body Physics in the NISQ Era: Quantum Programming a Discrete Time Crystal
Ippoliti, M., Kechedzhi, K., Moessner, R., Sondhi, S. L., & Khemani, V. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.030346 · Cited by 101 · see citing works
Quantum self-attention neural networks for text classification
Li, G., Zhao, X., & Wang, X. (2024) · Science China Information Sciences · doi:10.1007/s11432-023-3879-7 · Cited by 112 · see citing works
Kim, I. H., Liu, Y.-H., Pallister, S., Pol, W., Roberts, S., & Lee, E. (2022) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.4.023019 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Faster Digital Quantum Simulation by Symmetry Protection
Tran, M. C., Su, Y., Carney, D., & Taylor, J. M. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010323 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Qubit-excitation-based adaptive variational quantum eigensolver
Yordanov, Y. S., Armaos, V., Barnes, C. H., & Arvidsson-Shukur, D. R. M. (2021) · Apollo (University of Cambridge) · doi:10.17863/cam.75907 · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Calculation of the Green's function on near-term quantum computers
Endo, S., Kurata, I., & Nakagawa, Y. O. (2020) · Physical Review Research · doi:10.1103/physrevresearch.2.033281 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Self-citationGarcía-Pérez, G., Rossi, M. A. C., Sokolov, B., Tacchino, F., Barkoutsos, P. K., Mazzola, G., Tavernelli, I., & Maniscalco, S. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.040342 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Quantum Computing for Molecular Biology**
Baiardi, A., Christandl, M., & Reiher, M. (2023) · ChemBioChem · doi:10.1002/cbic.202300120 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Software architecture for quantum computing systems — A systematic review
Khan, A. A., Ahmad, A., Waseem, M., Liang, P., Fahmideh, M., Mikkonen, T., & Abrahamsson, P. (2023) · Journal of Systems and Software · doi:10.1016/j.jss.2023.111682 · Cited by 102 · see citing works
Business Renaissance: Opportunities and Challenges at the Dawn of the Quantum Computing Era
How, M.-L., & Cheah, S.-M. (2023) · Businesses · doi:10.3390/businesses3040036 · Cited by 103 · see citing works
Autoregressive neural-network wavefunctions for ab initio quantum chemistry
Barrett, T. D., Malyshev, A., & Lvovsky, A. I. (2022) · Nature Machine Intelligence · doi:10.1038/s42256-022-00461-z · Cited by 95 · see citing works
Towards provably efficient quantum algorithms for large-scale machine-learning models
Liu, J., Liu, M., Liu, J.-P., Ye, Z., Wang, Y., Alexeev, Y., Eisert, J., & Jiang, L. (2024) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-023-43957-x · Cited by 98 · see citing works
Theoretical and Experimental Perspectives of Quantum Verification
Carrasco, J. A., Elben, A., Kokail, C., Kraus, B., & Zoller, P. (2021) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.2.010102 · Cited by 91 · see citing works
Optimized Quantum Compilation for Near-Term Algorithms with OpenPulse
Gokhale, P., Javadi-Abhari, A., Earnest, N., Shi, Y., & Chong, F. T. (2020) · IEEE/ACM International Symposium on Microarchitecture (MICRO) · doi:10.1109/micro50266.2020.00027 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Lunghi, A., & Sanvito, S. (2022) · Nature Reviews Chemistry · doi:10.1038/s41570-022-00424-3 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
Quantum Master Equations: Tips and Tricks for Quantum Optics, Quantum Computing, and Beyond
Campaioli, F., Cole, J. H., & Hapuarachchi, H. (2024) · PRX Quantum · doi:10.1103/prxquantum.5.020202 · Cited by 89 · see citing works
Neural predictor based quantum architecture search
Zhang, S.-X., Hsieh, C.-Y., Zhang, S., & Yao, H. (2021) · Machine Learning: Science and Technology · doi:10.1088/2632-2153/ac28dd · Cited by 88 · see citing works
Hardware efficient quantum algorithms for vibrational structure calculations
Ollitrault, P. J., Baiardi, A., Reiher, M., & Tavernelli, I. (2020) · Chemical Science · doi:10.1039/d0sc01908a · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Quantum Variational Optimization of Ramsey Interferometry and Atomic Clocks
Kaubruegger, R., Vasilyev, D. V., Schulte, M., Hammerer, K., & Zoller, P. (2021) · Physical Review X · doi:10.1103/physrevx.11.041045 · Cited by 92 · see citing works
Recent Advances in Quantum Computing for Drug Discovery and Development
Kumar, G., Yadav, S., Mukherjee, A., Hassija, V., & Guizani, M. (2024) · IEEE Access · doi:10.1109/access.2024.3376408 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
Advances in Silicon Quantum Photonics
Adcock, J. C., Bao, J., Chi, Y., Chen, X., Bacco, D., Gong, Q., Oxenløwe, L. K., Wang, J., & Ding, Y. (2020) · IEEE Journal of Selected Topics in Quantum Electronics · doi:10.1109/jstqe.2020.3025737 · Cited by 87 · see citing works
Jiang, D., Xu, R., Bai, L., Wu, W., Luo, D., Li, Z., Asahi, T., Mai, Y., Liu, Z., Yamauchi, Y., et al. (2024) · Coordination Chemistry Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ccr.2024.215923 · Cited by 85 · see citing works
Pal, S., Bhattacharya, M., Lee, S.-S., & Chakraborty, C. (2024) · Molecular Biotechnology · doi:10.1007/s12033-023-00765-4 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
- Authors
- McArdle, S., Endo, S., Aspuru-Guzik, A., Benjamin, S. C., & Yuan, X.
- Affiliations
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Venue
- Reviews of Modern Physics
- Publisher
- American Physical Society (APS)
- Published
- 2020-03-30
- Volume
- 92
- Issue
- 1
- ISSN
- 0034-6861 (ISSN-L)
- 1539-0756
- OpenAlex
- W2889126882
- Semantic Scholar
- b49ca782a7c16ca66345ccc8c73beabb6bf2ce92
- Cited by
- 1,621
- References
- 415
- Citations by year
- 2026: 197 · 2025: 316 · 2024: 305 · 2023: 273 · 2022: 216 · 2021: 212 · 2020: 84 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 77.29
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- arxiv.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Reviews of Modern Physics (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University)
- Funders
- Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EP/M013243/1)
- U.S. Department of Defense
- Japan Student Services Organization
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Quantum Computing Algorithms and Architecture
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Quantum many-body systems
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics › Advanced Chemical Physics Studies
- Keywords
- quantum algorithms, quantum chemistry, quantum computing, algorithm design, scalability, transition metal catalysis, biochemical reactions, quantum simulation
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Claims read by deepseek-v4.1-flash under definition version 3 (extract-v3) on 2026-10-10.
Classified by jev-1.13-20260917 (gold-guideline-v0.2) on 2026-10-10.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review