A transformer-based representation-learning model with unified processing of multimodal input for clinical diagnostics
Open accessAbstract
During the diagnostic process, clinicians leverage multimodal information, such as the chief complaint, medical images and laboratory test results. Deep-learning models for aiding diagnosis have yet to meet this requirement of leveraging multimodal information. Here we report a transformer-based representation-learning model as a clinical diagnostic aid that processes multimodal input in a unified manner. Rather than learning modality-specific features, the model leverages embedding layers to convert images and unstructured and structured text into visual tokens and text tokens, and uses bidirectional blocks with intramodal and intermodal attention to learn holistic representations of radiographs, the unstructured chief complaint and clinical history, and structured clinical information such as laboratory test results and patient demographic information. The unified model outperformed an image-only model and non-unified multimodal diagnosis models in the identification of pulmonary disease (by 12% and 9%, respectively) and in the prediction of adverse clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 (by 29% and 7%, respectively). Unified multimodal transformer-based models may help streamline the triaging of patients and facilitate the clinical decision-making process.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Transformer-based frameworks have been employed to combine EHRs with imaging data through attention mechanisms.
“Transformer-based frameworks have been employed to combine EHRs with imaging data through attention mechanisms [105].”
From Challenges in AI-driven Biomedical Multimodal Data Fusion and Analysis (2025) · cites this paper as [105]
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 44 · Cited by 343
- Authors
- Zhou, H.-Y., Yu, Y., Wang, C., Zhang, S., Gao, Y., Pan, J., Shao, J., Lu, G., Zhang, K., & Li, W.
- Affiliations
- University of Hong Kong (HK)
- Sichuan University (CN)
- Guangzhou Laboratory (CN)
- Nanjing General Hospital of Nanjing Military Command (CN)
- Macau University of Science and Technology (MO)
- Corresponding author
- Yu, Yizhou
- Wang, Chengdi
- Zhang, Kang
- Li, Weimin
- ORCID
- Venue
- Nature Biomedical Engineering
- Published
- 2023-06-12
- Volume
- 7
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 743-755
- ISSN
- 2157-846X (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4380319195
- Cited by
- 343
- References
- 44
- Citations by year
- 2026: 82 · 2025: 152 · 2024: 94 · 2023: 15
- FWCI
- 32.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
- Funders
- National Natural Science Foundation of China (91859203, 92159302, 82100119)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Machine Learning in Healthcare
- Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition › Multimodal Machine Learning Applications
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
- Keywords
- multimodal representation learning, transformer models, clinical decision support, radiographic evaluation, lung disease diagnosis, chief complaint, medical history, laboratory findings, cross-modal attention, triage
- MeSH terms
- COVID-19, COVID-19 Testing, Humans, Electric Power Supplies
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review