Cited by 87Academic Writing and PublishingArtificial Intelligence in EducationTopic Modeling

Techniques for supercharging academic writing with generative AI

Open access
Lin, Zhicheng·2024·Nature Biomedical Engineering

Abstract

Academic writing is an indispensable yet laborious part of the research enterprise. This article maps out principles and methods for using generative artificial intelligence (AI), specifically large language models (LLMs), to elevate the quality and efficiency of academic writing. It introduces a human–AI collaborative framework that delineates the rationale (“why”), process (“how”), and nature (“what”) of AI engagement in writing. The framework pinpoints both short-term and long-term reasons for engagement, their underlying mechanisms (e.g., cognitive offloading and imaginative stimulation), and the need for a learning mindset to avoid overreliance on AI. It reveals the role of AI throughout the writing process, conceptualized through a two-stage model for human–AI collaborative writing, and the nature of AI assistance in writing, represented through a model of writing-assistance types and levels. Building on this framework, it then describes effective prompting techniques for incorporating AI into the writing routine—outlining, drafting, and editing—as well as strategies for maintaining rigor and adhering to ethics and policies. Ultimately, the prudent integration of AI into academic writing can ease the communication burden, empower authors, accelerate discovery, and promote diversity in science.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1038/s41551-024-01185-8

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Amano, T. et al. The manifold costs of being a non-native English speaker in science. PLoS Biol. 21, e3002184, doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.3002184 (2023). · DOI
  2. Lin, Z. & Li, N. Global diversity of authors, editors, and journal ownership across subdisciplines of psychology: Current state and policy implications. Perspect Psychol Sci 18, 358-377, doi:10.1177/17456916221091831 (2023). · DOI
  3. Thirunavukarasu, A. J. et al. Large language models in medicine. Nat. Med. 29, 1930- 1940, doi:10.1038/s41591-023-02448-8 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  4. Milano, S., McGrane, J. A. & Leonelli, S. Large language models challenge the future of higher education. Nat Mach Intell 5, 333-334, doi:10.1038/s42256-023-00644-2 (2023). · DOI
  5. White, A. D. The future of chemistry is language. Nat Rev Chem 7, 457-458, doi:10.1038/s41570-023-00502-0 (2023). · DOI
  6. Dergaa, I., Chamari, K., Zmijewski, P. & Ben Saad, H. From human writing to artificial intelligence generated text: examining the prospects and potential threats of ChatGPT in academic writing. Biol Sport 40, 615-622, doi:10.5114/biolsport.2023.125623 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  7. Hwang, S. I. et al. Is ChatGPT a "Fire of Prometheus" for Non-Native English-Speaking Researchers in Academic Writing? Korean J. Radiol. 24, 952-959, doi:10.3348/kjr.2023.0773 (2023). · DOI · Paper page
  8. Bell, S. The write algorithm: promoting responsible artificial intelligence usage and accountability in academic writing. BMC Med. 21, 334, doi:10.1186/s12916-023-03039-7 (2023). · DOI
  9. Chamba, N., Knapen, J. H. & Black, D. How to plan your astronomy research paper in ten steps. Nat Astron 6, 1015-1020, doi:10.1038/s41550-022-01757-1 (2022). · DOI
  10. Croxson, P. L., Neeley, L. & Schiller, D. You have to read this. Nat Hum Behav 5, 1466- 1468, doi:10.1038/s41562-021-01221-6 (2021). · DOI
  11. Luna, R. E. The art of scientific storytelling: framing stories to get where you want to go. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio 21, 653-654, doi:10.1038/s41580-020-00293-y (2020). · DOI
  12. Merow, C., Serra-Diaz, J. M., Enquist, B. J. & Wilson, A. M. AI chatbots can boost scientific coding. Nat Ecol Evol 7, 960-962, doi:10.1038/s41559-023-02063-3 (2023). · DOI
  13. Lin, Z. Ten simple rules for crafting effective prompts for large language models. PsyArXiv, doi:10.31234/osf.io/r78fc (2023). · DOI
  14. Yurkewicz, K. Three steps to better science communication. Nat Rev Mater 7, 673-674, doi:10.1038/s41578-022-00472-7 (2022). · DOI
  15. King, A. A. Writing a useful empirical journal article. Journal of Management Scientific Reports, doi:10.1177/27550311231187068 (2023). · DOI
  16. Patriotta, G. Crafting Papers for Publication: Novelty and Convention in Academic Writing. J Manage Stud 54, 747-759, doi:10.1111/joms.12280 (2017). · DOI
  17. Gernsbacher, M. A. Writing Empirical Articles: Transparency, Reproducibility, Clarity, and Memorability. Advances in Methods and Practices in Psychological Science 1, 403- 414, doi:10.1177/2515245918754485 (2018). · DOI
  18. Semrl, N. et al. AI language models in human reproduction research: exploring ChatGPT's potential to assist academic writing. Hum. Reprod., doi:10.1093/humrep/dead207 (2023). · DOI
  19. Lin, Z. Standing on the shoulders of AI: Toward a policy framework for AI use in scholarly publishing. PsyArXiv, doi:10.31234/osf.io/jgck4 (2023). · DOI
  20. Lin, Z. Responsible integration of AI in academic research: detection, attribution, and documentation. PsyArXiv, doi:10.31234/osf.io/w75gs (2023). · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lin, Z.
Affiliations
University of Science and Technology of China (CN)
Corresponding author
Lin, Zhicheng
Venue
Nature Biomedical Engineering
Published
2024-03-18
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
426-431
ISSN
2157-846X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4392897370
Cited by
87
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 30 · 2025: 32 · 2024: 21 · 2023: 4
FWCI
122.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Nature Biomedical Engineering (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (cc-by)
Funders
  • National Natural Science Foundation of China (STI2030, 32071045)
  • Shenzhen Fundamental Research Program (JCYJ20210324134603010)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › History and Philosophy of Science › Academic Writing and Publishing
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Information Systems › Artificial Intelligence in Education
  • Physical Sciences › Computer Science › Artificial Intelligence › Topic Modeling
Keywords
generative AI, academic writing, large language models, AI-assisted writing, scientific writing quality

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review