The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Concerted nucleophilic aromatic substitutions
Open accessAbstract
AbstractNucleophilic aromatic substitution (SNAr) is one of the most widely applied reaction classes in pharmaceutical and chemical research, providing a broadly useful platform for the modification of aromatic ring scaffolds. The generally accepted mechanism for SNAr reactions involves a two-step addition–elimination sequence via a discrete, non-aromatic Meisenheimer complex. Here we use 12C/13C kinetic isotope effect (KIE) studies and computational analyses to provide evidence that prototypical SNAr reactions in fact proceed through concerted mechanisms. The KIE measurements were made possible by a new technique that leverages the high sensitivity of 19F as an NMR nucleus to quantitate the degree of isotopic fractionation. This sensitive technique permits the measurement of KIEs on 10 mg of natural abundance material in one overnight acquisition. As a result, it provides a practical tool for performing detailed mechanistic analyses of reactions that form or break C–F bonds.Nucleophilic aromatic substitution reactions have long been thought to occur primarily via stepwise mechanisms. New and sensitive methodology for measuring carbon kinetic isotope effects now shows that most such substitutions actually occur through concerted mechanisms.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Neese, F. (2012) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.81 · Cited by 13,466
Electron transfers in chemistry and biology
Marcus, R. A., & Sutin, N. (1985) · Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA) - Reviews on Bioenergetics · doi:10.1016/0304-4173(85)90014-x · Cited by 8,050
Nucleus-Independent Chemical Shifts (NICS) as an Aromaticity Criterion
Chen, Z., Wannere, C. S., Corminboeuf, C., Puchta, R., & Schleyer, P. V. R. (2005) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr030088+ · Cited by 3,847
Brown, D. G., & Boström, J. (2016) · Journal of Medicinal Chemistry · doi:10.1021/acs.jmedchem.5b01409 · Cited by 1,964
An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method
Riplinger, C., & Neese, F. (2013) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4773581 · Cited by 1,957
Aromatic Nucleophilic Substitution Reactions.
Bunnett, J. F., & Zahler, R. E. (1951) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr60153a002 · Cited by 1,032
Marenich, A. V., Jerome, S. V., Cramer, C. J., & Truhlar, D. G. (2012) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200866d · Cited by 1,030
Exchange Reactions with Activation Energy. I. Simple Barrier Potential for (H, H2)
Karplus, M., Porter, R. N., & Sharma, R. D. (1965) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.1697301 · Cited by 1,009
Perspectives on Basis Sets Beautiful: Seasonal Plantings of Diffuse Basis Functions
Papajak, E., Zheng, J., Xu, X., Leverentz, H. R., & Truhlar, D. G. (2011) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct200106a · Cited by 780
Singleton, D. A., & Thomas, A. A. (1995) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja00141a030 · Cited by 399
Metadata
- Authors
- Kwan, E. E., Zeng, Y., Besser, H. A., & Jacobsen, E. N.
- Venue
- Nature Chemistry
- Published
- 2018-07-16
- Volume
- 10
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 917-923
- ISSN
- 1755-4330 (ISSN-L)
- 1755-4349
- OpenAlex
- W2883027977
- Cited by
- 287
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 12.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Concerted nucleophilic aromatic substitutions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1038/s41557-018-0079-7
- The paper
- Kwan, E. E., Zeng, Y., Besser, H. A., & Jacobsen, E. N. (2018). Concerted nucleophilic aromatic substitutions. Nature Chemistry. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41557-018-0079-7
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.