The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method
Abstract
In previous publications, it was shown that an efficient local coupled cluster method with single- and double excitations can be based on the concept of pair natural orbitals (PNOs) [F. Neese, A. Hansen, and D. G. Liakos, J. Chem. Phys. 131, 064103 (2009)10.1063/1.3173827]. The resulting local pair natural orbital-coupled-cluster single double (LPNO-CCSD) method has since been proven to be highly reliable and efficient. For large molecules, the number of amplitudes to be determined is reduced by a factor of 105–106 relative to a canonical CCSD calculation on the same system with the same basis set. In the original method, the PNOs were expanded in the set of canonical virtual orbitals and single excitations were not truncated. This led to a number of fifth order scaling steps that eventually rendered the method computationally expensive for large molecules (e.g., >100 atoms). In the present work, these limitations are overcome by a complete redesign of the LPNO-CCSD method. The new method is based on the combination of the concepts of PNOs and projected atomic orbitals (PAOs). Thus, each PNO is expanded in a set of PAOs that in turn belong to a given electron pair specific domain. In this way, it is possible to fully exploit locality while maintaining the extremely high compactness of the original LPNO-CCSD wavefunction. No terms are dropped from the CCSD equations and domains are chosen conservatively. The correlation energy loss due to the domains remains below <0.05%, which implies typically 15–20 but occasionally up to 30 atoms per domain on average. The new method has been given the acronym DLPNO-CCSD (“domain based LPNO-CCSD”). The method is nearly linear scaling with respect to system size. The original LPNO-CCSD method had three adjustable truncation thresholds that were chosen conservatively and do not need to be changed for actual applications. In the present treatment, no additional truncation parameters have been introduced. Any additional truncation is performed on the basis of the three original thresholds. There are no real-space cutoffs. Single excitations are truncated using singles-specific natural orbitals. Pairs are prescreened according to a multipole expansion of a pair correlation energy estimate based on local orbital specific virtual orbitals (LOSVs). Like its LPNO-CCSD predecessor, the method is completely of black box character and does not require any user adjustments. It is shown here that DLPNO-CCSD is as accurate as LPNO-CCSD while leading to computational savings exceeding one order of magnitude for larger systems. The largest calculations reported here featured >8800 basis functions and >450 atoms. In all larger test calculations done so far, the LPNO-CCSD step took less time than the preceding Hartree-Fock calculation, provided no approximations have been introduced in the latter. Thus, based on the present development reliable CCSD calculations on large molecules with unprecedented efficiency and accuracy are realized.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Coupled-cluster theory in quantum chemistry
Bartlett, R. J., & Musiał, M. (2007) · Reviews of Modern Physics · doi:10.1103/revmodphys.79.291 · Cited by 3,343
Quantitative quantum chemistry
Helgaker, T., Klopper, W., & Tew, D. P. (2008) · Molecular Physics · doi:10.1080/00268970802258591 · Cited by 255
Cited by
Software update: The ORCA program system—Version 5.0
Neese, F. (2022) · WIREs Computational Molecular Science · doi:10.1002/wcms.1606 · Cited by 4,963
Self-citationCombining Machine Learning and Computational Chemistry for Predictive Insights Into Chemical Systems
Keith, J. A., Vassilev-Galindo, V., Cheng, B., Chmiela, S., Gastegger, M., Müller, K.-R., & Tkatchenko, A. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00107 · Cited by 849
Exploring the Accuracy Limits of Local Pair Natural Orbital Coupled-Cluster Theory
Liakos, D. G., Sparta, M., Kesharwani, M. K., Martin, J. M. L., & Neese, F. (2015) · Journal of Chemical Theory and Computation · doi:10.1021/ct501129s · Cited by 697
Self-citationSaitow, M., Becker, U., Riplinger, C., Valeev, E. F., & Neese, F. (2017) · The Journal of Chemical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.4981521 · Cited by 423
Self-citationNandy, A., Duan, C., Taylor, M. G., Liu, F., Steeves, A. H., & Kulik, H. J. (2021) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00347 · Cited by 358
Metadata
- Authors
- Riplinger, C., & Neese, F.
- Venue
- The Journal of Chemical Physics
- Publisher
- AIP Publishing
- Published
- 2013-01-17
- Volume
- 138
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 034106-034106
- ISSN
- 0021-9606 (ISSN-L)
- 1089-7690
- OpenAlex
- W2078511427
- Cited by
- 1,957
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 26.39
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1063/1.4773581
- The paper
- Riplinger, C., & Neese, F. (2013). An efficient and near linear scaling pair natural orbital based local coupled cluster method. The Journal of Chemical Physics. https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4773581
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.