Amazonian tree species threatened by deforestation and climate change
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
These impacts would involve irreversible loss of biodiversity, socioeconomic and cultural values.
“These impacts would also involve irreversible loss of biodiversity, socioeconomic and cultural values1,7–9.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Considering that half of Amazonian tree species are estimated to become threatened by 2050 owing to climate change, deforestation and degradation, biodiversity losses could contribute to further reducing forest resilience.
“Considering that half of Amazonian tree species are estimated to become threatened (IUCN Red list) by 2050 owing to climate change, deforestation and degradation8, biodiversity losses could contribute to further reducing forest resilience.”
From Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system (2024) · cites this paper as [8]
Cites
High-Resolution Global Maps of 21st-Century Forest Cover Change
Hansen, M. C., Potapov, P. V., Moore, R., Hancher, M., Turubanova, S. A., Tyukavina, A., Thau, D., Stehman, S. V., Goetz, S. J., Loveland, T. R., et al. (2013) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1244693 · Cited by 11,704 · see citing works
The performance and potential of protected areas
Watson, J. E. M., Dudley, N., Segan, D. B., & Hockings, M. (2014) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature13947 · Cited by 2,397 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Critical transitions in the Amazon forest system
Flores, B. M., Montoya, E., Sakschewski, B., Nascimento, N., Staal, A., Betts, R. A., Levis, C., Lapola, D. M., Esquível-Muelbert, A., Jakovac, C., et al. (2024) · Nature · doi:10.1038/s41586-023-06970-0 · Cited by 607 · see citing works
- Authors
- Gomes, V. H. F., Vieira, I. C. G., Salomão, R. P., & ter Steege, H.
- Affiliations
- Museu Paraense Emílio Goeldi (BR)
- Universidade Federal Rural da Amazônia (BR)
- Corresponding author
- Gomes, Vitor H. F.
- Venue
- Nature Climate Change
- Published
- 2019-06-24
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 547-553
- ISSN
- 1758-678X (ISSN-L)
- 1758-6798
- OpenAlex
- W2951273725
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 2
- Citations by year
- 2026: 26 · 2025: 24 · 2024: 36 · 2023: 29 · 2022: 36 · 2021: 31 · 2020: 21 · 2019: 6
- FWCI
- 35.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nature Climate Change (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- VU Research Portal (submittedVersion)
- Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad
- Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação
- Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies
- Keywords
- Amazonian trees, deforestation, climate change, species richness decline, species distribution modeling, IUCN Red List, protected area network, forest fragmentation, lowland rainforest, biodiversity conservation, future climate scenarios
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
